-
Head and Neck Pathology Jun 2024Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome (BHDS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome with different skin, lung, and renal manifestations. It is diagnosed commonly in the third decade of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome (BHDS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome with different skin, lung, and renal manifestations. It is diagnosed commonly in the third decade of life, and patients have an increased risk for pneumothorax and renal carcinomas.
METHODS
Articles published in PubMed, and Medline from 1977 to September 2023, were included in the systematic review. Inclusion criteria were applied to case reports, case series, and a retrospective cohort study, describing clinical, histopathological, and genetic findings in patients with BHDS with oral and/or parotid lesions.
RESULTS
Sixteen families/individuals with BHDS were identified for analysis. Patients ranged in age from 20 to 74 years, with an average of 49.4 years. Males were affected 52.2% of the time and females, 39.1%. Skin fibrofolliculomas were reported in 87% of cases, and oral lesions were documented in 47.8%. Parotid tumors were documented in 43.5% of patients, 30.4% of which were oncocytomas, 4.3% bilateral oncocytomas, and 4.3% "oncocytic carcinoma".
CONCLUSIONS
Because BHDS is uncommon, its spectrum of clinical manifestations may be underrecognized, especially as the disease is mostly reported at advanced stage. And some of the patients with BHDS may have oncocytic parotid tumors and oral lesions. In this regard, patients presenting these lesions and other indications of BHDS should be considered for renal screening.
Topics: Humans; Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Adult; Male; Female; Aged; Young Adult
PubMed: 38896302
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-024-01657-y -
Cancer Cytopathology May 2024The incidence of renal tumors has steadily increased over the past decade. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review and analysis of the literature on...
BACKGROUND
The incidence of renal tumors has steadily increased over the past decade. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review and analysis of the literature on renal fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to determine its performance and explore whether a standardized classification system can be used for reporting renal FNA cytology.
METHODS
A systematic search of published articles on renal FNA was conducted. The data on FNA and histologic diagnosis were extracted and categorized, and the risk of malignancy was calculated. Different scenarios were used to estimate FNA performance statistics.
RESULTS
Of the 3766 potentially relevant studies, 23 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The 2231 FNA cases included were re-categorized according to the classification system, rendering 142 (6.36%) nondiagnostic, 270 (12.1%) nonneoplastic, 271 (12.14%) benign neoplasm, 65 (2.91%) renal neoplasm with unknown malignant potential, oncocytic type, 25 (1.12%) atypia of undetermined significance, 60 (2.68%) suspicious for malignancy, and 1398 (62.66%) malignant FNA diagnoses. The risk of malignancy in these cases was 65.4%, 18.1%, 16.6%, 16.9%, 60%, 73.3%, and 96.9%, respectively. According to the classification system, the study indicated that the accuracy of renal FNA was between 91% and 95%, the sensitivity was 90.9%-96.7%, and the specificity was 82%-92% in different scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a need for a standardized reporting in renal cytology that will improve the sensitivity and accuracy of renal cytology, reduce the rate of indeterminate diagnoses, and alter the management strategies of renal lesions. Based on the available literature, a new reporting system is proposed, including categories with an associated risk of malignancy.
PubMed: 38713617
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22826 -
European Urology Jan 2024The diagnostic accuracy of current imaging techniques in differentiating benign from malignant neoplasms in the case of indeterminate renal masses is still suboptimal. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
The diagnostic accuracy of current imaging techniques in differentiating benign from malignant neoplasms in the case of indeterminate renal masses is still suboptimal.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Tc-sestamibi (SestaMIBI) single-photon emission tomography computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in characterizing indeterminate renal masses by differentiating renal oncocytoma and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor (HOCT) from (1) all other renal lesions and (2) all malignant renal lesions. Secondary outcomes were: (1) benign versus malignant; (2) renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus clear cell (ccRCC) and papillary (pRCC) renal cell carcinoma; and (3) renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A literature search was conducted up to November 2022 using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Studies included were prospective and retrospective cross-sectional studies in which SestaMIBI SPECT/CT findings were compared to histology after renal mass biopsy or surgery.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Overall, eight studies involving 489 patients with 501 renal masses met our inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of SestaMIBI SPECT/CT for renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus all other renal lesions were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-97%) and 89% (95% CI 86-92%), respectively. Notably, for renal oncocytoma and HOCT versus ccRCC and pRCC, SestaMIBI SPECT/CT showed specificity of 98% (95% CI 91-100%) and similar sensitivity. Owing to the relatively high risk of bias and the presence of heterogeneity among the studies included, the level of evidence is still low.
CONCLUSIONS
SestaMIBI SPECT/CT has good sensitivity and specificity in differentiating renal oncocytoma and HOCT from all other renal lesions, and in particular from those with more aggressive oncological behavior. Although these results are promising, further studies are needed to support the use of SestaMIBI SPECT/CT outside research trials.
PATIENT SUMMARY
A scan method called SestaMIBI SPECT/CT has promise for diagnosing whether kidney tumors are malignant or not. However, it should still be limited to research trials because the level of evidence from our review is low.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Kidney Neoplasms; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography; Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Radiopharmaceuticals
PubMed: 37673752
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.07.013 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Nov 2023Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a cystic precursor to pancreatic cancer. IPMNs deemed clinically to be at high-risk for malignant progression are...
BACKGROUND
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a cystic precursor to pancreatic cancer. IPMNs deemed clinically to be at high-risk for malignant progression are frequently treated with surgical resection, and pathological examination of the pancreatectomy specimen is a key component of the clinical care of IPMN patients.
METHODS
Systematic literature reviews were conducted around eight topics of clinical relevance in the examination of pathological specimens in patients undergoing resection of IPMN.
RESULTS
This review provides updated perspectives on morphological subtyping of IPMNs, classification of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms, nomenclature for high-grade dysplasia, assessment of T stage, distinction of carcinoma associated or concomitant with IPMN, role of molecular assessment of IPMN tissue, role of intraoperative assessment by frozen section, and preoperative evaluation of cyst fluid cytology.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis provides the foundation for data-driven approaches to several challenging issues in the pathology of IPMNs.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Retrospective Studies; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37604731
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.08.002 -
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons... Apr 2020Parietal cell/oncocytic gastric carcinomas are very rare and various aspects of this group remain unclear. The human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of...
INTRODUCTION
Parietal cell/oncocytic gastric carcinomas are very rare and various aspects of this group remain unclear. The human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of these tumours is largely unknown.
METHODS
We performed a systematic electronic search of the literature and clinicopathological presentation of two cases including first-time complete assessment of HER2 status. Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 64.3 years, 87.5% of whom were male, were included in this review.
FINDINGS
Half of the cases were recorded in Asia. Median follow-up was 24 months. There was no predominant site of development, while underlying histological abnormalities were present in 25%. At initial presentation, lymph node involvement was evident in 46.6% while distant metastatic disease was present in 9.3%. Presentation at stage I occurred in 55.6%. Potentially curative surgical/interventional treatment was intended in 90.6%. Recurrence occurred in 6.6%, while death was recorded in 19.2%, with cancer-related deaths reaching 11.5%. The one- and three-year survival rates were 84.2% and 79%, respectively. Our two cases displayed negative HER2 expression.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review demonstrates that this group of malignancies is very rare but possibly underdiagnosed. The disease commonly presents at early stage, mainly affecting middle-aged men. The prognosis is generally favourable even in cases of advanced disease. The HER2 expression and its correlation with the outcomes need to be further explored.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Gastrectomy; Greece; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Parietal Cells, Gastric; Receptor, ErbB-2; Sex Factors; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate
PubMed: 31928359
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0183 -
APMIS : Acta Pathologica,... Mar 2020Intraductal carcinomas (IDCs) are rare, not well-characterized salivary gland tumors. A systematic literature review of pure IDCs (without stromal invasion) of low-grade...
Intraductal carcinomas (IDCs) are rare, not well-characterized salivary gland tumors. A systematic literature review of pure IDCs (without stromal invasion) of low-grade (LG-IDCs) or high-grade (HG-IDCs) was performed: IDCs were classified using the apocrine (AR+/S100-) vs intercalated (S100+/AR-) classification. Eighty-two LG-IDCs and 11 HG-IDCs were identified (84% parotid; 11% oral; 3% submandibular; 1% lacrimal; and 1% unknown). Out of 11 HG-IDCs, 2 HG-IDCs (18%) recurred as HG-IDC or invasive carcinoma. IDCs were classified as follows: intercalated (30%); mixed apocrine and intercalated (27%); apocrine (11%); oncocytic (6%); intercalated with focal oncocytic features (1%); and unclassifiable (25%). Double AR/S100 expressors (4%) or discrepancies between morphology and immunophenotype (9%) were found. Apocrine features and necrosis were more frequent in HG-IDCs (55%; 45%). Pleomorphism favored HG-IDCs (especially when combined with >10 mitoses/10 HPFs and/or Ki67 index >10%), being associated with apocrine areas at least in 3 HG-IDCs (27%). IDCs were typically mammaglobin+/ER-/PR-/DOG1-. No immunomarker clearly distinguished HG-IDCs from LG-IDCs. About 57% IDCs (16 LG-IDCs, 1 HG-IDC) showed RET rearrangements, including NCOA4-RET (eight intercalated and two unclassifiable IDCs) and TRIM27-RET fusions (two mixed IDCs). No ETV6, ALK-1, ROS, NTRK3, MAML2, MAML3, or PLAG1 rearrangements were identified. Complete excision and total sampling should exclude invasive areas.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Salivary Glands
PubMed: 31697865
DOI: 10.1111/apm.13009 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Sep 2019Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas (IOPN-P) is a rare subtype of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study was performed to...
BACKGROUND
Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas (IOPN-P) is a rare subtype of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study was performed to summarize the clinicopathological features and management of IOPN-P.
METHODS
English-language articles were searched from MEDLINE and EMBASE from the first report of IOPN-P in 1996 until 1 May 2019 following the methodology in the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
In total, 66 patients from 24 full articles were included in the final data analysis. The patients' average age was 61 years, and the male/female ratio was 1. Most lesions were large (average size, 5.50 cm), located in the pancreatic head, and found either incidentally or by uncharacteristic abdominal symptoms. IOPN-P was usually a cystic and solid lesion with or without mural nodules on radiological examination. A definitive diagnosis was often acquired from fine needle aspiration biopsy or postoperative pathology. All tumors were diagnosed as carcinoma in situ or minimally invasive carcinoma, necessitating surgical resection. The prognosis of IOPN-P was better than that of other IPMN subtypes, even when metastasis occurred. Recurrence after surgical resection of IOPN-P was rare.
CONCLUSIONS
IOPN-P is rare among IPMN subtypes with unique pathological characteristics. Because of the nontypical symptoms and radiological findings, a definitive preoperative diagnosis usually depends on multimodal examinations. Management and surveillance of IOPN-P after surgical resection should be differentiated from those of other pancreatic benign cystic lesions because of its relative malignancy, but IOPN-P should also be differentiated from other IPMN subtypes and malignant cystic tumors because of its favorable prognosis.
Topics: Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Papilloma, Intraductal; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31375434
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.07.040