-
Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Jan 2023The use of robotic assistance in minimally invasive pancreatic resection is quickly growing. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The use of robotic assistance in minimally invasive pancreatic resection is quickly growing.
METHODS
We present a systematic review of the literature regarding all types of robotic pancreatic resection (RPR). Our aim is to show for which procedures there is enough experience to permit safe training and provide an estimation of how many centers could serve as teaching institutions.
RESULTS
Sixty-four studies reporting on 4587 RPRs were analyzed. A total of 2598 pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) were reported by 28 centers from Europe (6/28; 21.4%), the Americas (11/28; 39.3%), and Asia (11/28; 39.3%). Six studies reported >100 robot PD (1694/2598; 65.2%). A total of 1618 distal pancreatectomies (DP) were reported by 29 centers from Europe (10/29; 34.5%), the Americas (10/29; 34.5%), and Asia (9/29; 31%). Five studies reported >100 robotic DP (748/1618; 46.2%). A total of 154 central pancreatectomies were reported by six centers from Europe (1/6; 16.7%), the Americas (2/6; 33.3%), and Asia (3/6; 50%). Only 49 total pancreatectomies were reported. Finally, 168 enucleations were reported in seven studies (with a mean of 15.4 cases per study). A single center reported on 60 enucleations (35.7%). Results of each type of robotic procedure are also presented.
CONCLUSIONS
Experience with RPR is still quite limited. Despite high case volume not being sufficient to warrant optimal training opportunities, it is certainly a key component of every successful training program and is a major criterion for fellowship accreditation. From this review, it appears that only PD and DP can currently be taught at few institutions worldwide.
Topics: Humans; Europe; Laparoscopy; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Robotics
PubMed: 35751504
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1209 -
BJS Open May 2022
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Review Literature as Topic
PubMed: 35598157
DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac051 -
Transplantation Oct 2022Pancreas transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains relatively uncommon compared with pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes...
Pancreas transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains relatively uncommon compared with pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, several studies have suggested similar outcomes between T2D and T1D, and the practice has become increasingly common. Despite this growing interest in pancreas transplantation in T2D, no study has systematically summarized the data to date. We systematically reviewed the literature on pancreas transplantation in T2D patients including patient and graft survival, glycemic control outcomes, and comparisons with outcomes in T2D kidney transplant alone and T1D pancreas transplant recipients. We searched biomedical databases from January 1, 2000, to January 14, 2021, and screened 3314 records, of which 22 full texts and 17 published abstracts met inclusion criteria. Full-text studies were predominantly single center (73%), whereas the remaining most often studied the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. Methodological quality was mixed with frequent concern for selection bias and concern for inconsistent definitions of both T2D and pancreas graft survival across studies. Overall, studies generally reported favorable patient survival, graft survival, and glycemic control outcomes for pancreas transplantation in T2D and expressed a need to better characterize the T2D patients who would benefit most from pancreas transplantation. We suggest guidance for future studies, with the aim of supporting the safe and evidence-based treatment of end-stage T2D and judicious use of scarce resources.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Graft Survival; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Pancreas Transplantation
PubMed: 35576270
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004113 -
Transplant Immunology Aug 2022Passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) is an immune-mediated hemolysis that occurs after ABO-mismatched kidney transplantation. PLS is caused by donor lymphocytes producing... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) is an immune-mediated hemolysis that occurs after ABO-mismatched kidney transplantation. PLS is caused by donor lymphocytes producing antibodies to recipient red blood cells, resulting in hemolysis. The incidence of PLS has been reported to be approximately 20% in patients with ABO-mismatched groups. Nevertheless, there is no comprehensive review of PLS following renal transplantation. In this review, we systematically summarized the data of patients with PLS after renal transplantation to help clinicians diagnose and treat more effectively.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. All relevant data were collected, including age, sex, and clinical and immune parameters.
RESULTS
A total of 91 published cases were identified. The age ranged from 9 to 70 years old and 58.2% were male. Eighty-six cases were only kidney transplantations, one was liver-kidney transplantation, three were pancreas-kidney transplantations, and one was intestinal-kidney transplantation. Of these cases, 27 received kidneys from deceased donors, whereas 40 received kidneys from living donors. Most patients showed immune hemolysis dominated by anaemia, which was significantly improved after symptomatic support treatment, such as blood transfusion and erythropoietin injection.
CONCLUSION
PLS is an immune-mediated disease that can occur in patients with ABO-mismatched renal transplantation, which commonly causes hemolysis, although death or deformities of the graft can also occur in patients with the disorder. Symptomatic supportive treatment is an effective treatment scheme at present, but more effective treatment and prevention schemes still need to be explored.
Topics: ABO Blood-Group System; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Group Incompatibility; Child; Female; Hemolysis; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Lymphocytes; Male; Middle Aged; Syndrome; Young Adult
PubMed: 35487476
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101605 -
Journal of Nephrology Sep 2022Transplant nephropathology is a highly specialized field of pathology comprising both the evaluation of organ donor biopsy for organ allocation and post-transplant graft... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Transplant nephropathology is a highly specialized field of pathology comprising both the evaluation of organ donor biopsy for organ allocation and post-transplant graft biopsy for assessment of rejection or graft damage. The introduction of digital pathology with whole-slide imaging (WSI) in clinical research, trials and practice has catalyzed the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for histopathology, with development of novel machine-learning models for tissue interrogation and discovery. We aimed to review the literature for studies specifically applying AI algorithms to WSI-digitized pre-implantation kidney biopsy.
METHODS
A systematic search was carried out in the electronic databases PubMed-MEDLINE and Embase until 25th September, 2021 with a combination of the key terms "kidney", "biopsy", "transplantation" and "artificial intelligence" and their aliases. Studies dealing with the application of AI algorithms coupled with WSI in pre-implantation kidney biopsies were included. The main theme addressed was detection and quantification of tissue components. Extracted data were: author, year and country of the study, type of biopsy features investigated, number of cases, type of algorithm deployed, main results of the study in terms of diagnostic outcome, and the main limitations of the study.
RESULTS
Of 5761 retrieved articles, 7 met our inclusion criteria. All studies focused largely on AI-based detection and classification of glomerular structures and to a lesser extent on tubular and vascular structures. Performance of AI algorithms was excellent and promising.
CONCLUSION
All studies highlighted the importance of expert pathologist annotation to reliably train models and the need to acknowledge clinical nuances of the pre-implantation setting. Close cooperation between computer scientists and practicing as well as expert renal pathologists is needed, helping to refine the performance of AI-based models for routine pre-implantation kidney biopsy clinical practice.
Topics: Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Biopsy; Humans; Intelligence; Kidney
PubMed: 35441256
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01327-8 -
Pancreas Feb 2022Incidental premalignant pancreatic cystic lesions (pPCLs) are increasingly being detected in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The impact of...
Incidental premalignant pancreatic cystic lesions (pPCLs) are increasingly being detected in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The impact of chronic immunosuppression upon pPCLs may elevate risk of progression to pancreatic cancer. This systematic review assesses prevalence, outcome, and management of pPCLs in patients undergoing OLT. Systematic literature searches were performed in accordance with Cochrane review guidelines. Data on 658 patients were identified from 13 articles. Median age was 59 years with a prevalence of 6.2%. Most studies focused on branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Average cyst size at diagnosis was 10.3 mm. Six patients (0.9%) underwent pancreatic resection, post-OLT, for suspected "worrisome features" on imaging. One death was due to pancreatic-related cancer, post-OLT. Based on the review, the authors suggest the following: (1) patients with pPCLs undergoing OLT, without "worrisome features," should be followed conservatively; (2) presence of pPCLs alone should not preclude eligibility for OLT, nor should chronic immunosuppression be altered; (3) follow-up should parallel standard approach applied in immunocompetent patients, as development of "worrisome features" of cancer is rare and does not appear to be hastened by immunosuppression; (4) resection is recommended for surgically fit patients without portal hypertension that develop "worrisome features."
Topics: Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Middle Aged; Pancreas; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Precancerous Conditions; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35404885
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001974 -
Clinical Transplantation Oct 2022Portal inflow modulation (PIM) aimed at reducing portal hyperperfusion is commonly used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to reduce the risk of small-for-size... (Review)
Review
Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations.
BACKGROUND
Portal inflow modulation (PIM) aimed at reducing portal hyperperfusion is commonly used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to reduce the risk of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Many different techniques, both pharmacological and surgical have been used for this purpose. There is, however, little consensus on the best method of PIM, its exact role in preventing SFSS and on early post-LDLT recovery.
OBJECTIVES
To identify whether modifications of portal pressures and flows enhance recovery after LDLT and to provide international expert panel recommendations.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.
METHODS
Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42021260997.
RESULTS
Five hundred and ninety four articles were identified through databases' search. Of the 24 included for a final review by the working group (WG), there were five randomized control trials, four prospective studies and 15 retrospective series. Six outcome measures which were likely to influence early recovery after LDLT, especially in small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were shortlisted. These included acute kidney injury, SFSS, morbidity including sepsis, length of ICU and hospital stay, morbidity of the PIM technique and overall mortality. The WG noted that PIM in this subset of LDLT recipients had a beneficial effect on all the outcomes measures.
CONCLUSIONS
Considering all decision domains, the panel recommends pre- and intraoperative actual graft weight validation, portal pressure/flow measurements, and a comprehensive donor evaluation for the determination of potentially small-for-size/ small-for-flow grafts as mandatory. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) Pharmacological PIM helps improve early renal function in LDLT recipients. (Quality of Evidence: High | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In selected patients with SFSG, PIM helps reduce SFSS/EAD and sepsis. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) PIM in the form of splenectomy has increased morbidity compared to splenic artery ligation (SAL). (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, PIM may help reduce morbidity/mortality. (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, modification of portal pressures and flows enhances recovery after LDLT. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).
Topics: Humans; Living Donors; Liver Transplantation; Portal Pressure; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Graft Survival; Organ Size; Liver
PubMed: 35344628
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14657 -
BJS Open Mar 2022The prognostic impact of margin status is reported with conflicting results after pancreatic cancer resection. While some studies validated an uninvolved resection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The prognostic impact of margin status is reported with conflicting results after pancreatic cancer resection. While some studies validated an uninvolved resection margin (R0) 1 mm or more of tumour clearance, others have failed to show benefit. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of margin definitions on median overall survival (OS).
METHODS
MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting associations between resection margins and OS between 2010 and 2021. Data regarding margin status (R0 circumferential resection margin (CRM) negative (CRM-), R0 CRM positive (CRM+), R0 direct, and R1 and OS were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled with a random-effects model. The risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.
RESULTS
The full texts of 774 studies were screened. In total, 21 studies compromising 6056 patients were included in the final synthesis. In total, 188 (24 per cent) studies were excluded due to missing margin definitions. The R0 (CRM+) rate was 50 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.40 to 0.61) and the R0 (CRM-) rate was 38 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 0.29 to 0.47). R0 (CRM-) resection was independently associated with improved OS compared to combined R1 and R0 (CRM+; HR 1.36, 95 per cent c.i. 1.23 to 1.56).
CONCLUSION
The revised R status was confirmed as an independent prognosticator compared to combined R0 (CRM+) and R1. The limited number of studies, non-standardized pathology protocols, and the varying number of margins assessed hamper comparability.
Topics: Humans; Margins of Excision; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 35301513
DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac010 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Sep 2022The learning curve of new surgical procedures has implications for the education, evaluation and subsequent adoption. There is currently no standardised surgical...
BACKGROUND
The learning curve of new surgical procedures has implications for the education, evaluation and subsequent adoption. There is currently no standardised surgical training for those willing to make their first attempts at minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. This study aims to ascertain the learning curve in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science was performed up to March 2021. Studies investigating the number of cases needed to achieve author-declared competency in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery were included.
RESULTS
In total, 31 original studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria with 2682 patient outcomes being analysed. From these studies, the median learning curve for distal pancreatectomy was reported to have been achieved in 17 cases (10-30) and 23.5 cases (7-40) for laparoscopic and robotic approach respectively. The median learning curve for pancreaticoduodenectomy was reported to have been achieved at 30 cases (4-60) and 36.5 cases (20-80) for a laparoscopic and robotic approach respectively. Mean operative times and estimated blood loss improved in all four surgical procedural groups. Heterogeneity was demonstrated when factoring in the level of surgeon's experience and patient's demographic.
CONCLUSIONS
There is currently no gold standard in the evaluation of a learning curve. As a result, derivations are difficult to utilise clinically. Existing literature can serve as a guide for current trainees. More work needs to be done to standardise learning curve assessment in a patient-centred manner.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Learning Curve; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 35278112
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02470-3 -
Surgical Endoscopy Jun 2022The outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage (EUSD) in treatment of pancreas fluid collection (PFC) after pancreas surgeries have not been evaluated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage (EUSD) in treatment of pancreas fluid collection (PFC) after pancreas surgeries have not been evaluated systematically. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the outcomes of EUSD in patients with PFC after pancreas surgery and compare it with percutaneous drainage (PCD).
METHODS
PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes EUSD in treatment of PFC after pancreas surgeries, from their inception until January 2022. Two meta-analyses were performed: (A) a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of EUSD (meta-analysis A) and (B) two-arm meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of EUSD and PCD (meta-analysis B). Pooled proportion of the outcomes in meta-analysis A as well as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) in meta-analysis B was calculated to determine the technical and clinical success rates, complications rate, hospital stay, and recurrence rate. ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias.
RESULTS
The literature search retrieved 610 articles, 25 of which were eligible for inclusion. Included clinical studies comprised reports on 695 patients. Twenty-five studies (477 patients) were included in meta-analysis A and eight studies (356 patients) were included in meta-analysis B. In meta-analysis A, the technical and clinical success rates of EUSD were 94% and 87%, respectively, with post-procedural complications of 14% and recurrence rates of 9%. Meta-analysis B showed comparable technical and clinical success rates as well as complications rates between EUSD and PCD. EUSD showed significantly shorter duration of hospital stay compared to that of patients treated with PCD.
CONCLUSION
EUSD seems to be associated with high technical and clinical success rates, with low rates of procedure-related complications. Although EUSD leads to shorter hospital stay compared to PCD, the certainty of evidence was low in this regard.
Topics: Drainage; Endosonography; Humans; Length of Stay; Pancreas; Pancreatic Diseases
PubMed: 35246738
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09137-6