-
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Jun 2021Diagnosis of childhood polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) has become challenging after the definition of deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2). We aimed to define the...
BACKGROUND
Diagnosis of childhood polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) has become challenging after the definition of deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2). We aimed to define the differential features of pediatric PAN and DADA2 patients in our center and in the literature.
METHODS
The charts of pediatric PAN and DADA2 patients followed at the Pediatric Rheumatology Unit of Hacettepe University between 2010-2020 were analyzed. A systematic literature review was conducted for articles regarding pediatric PAN or DADA2.
RESULTS
Thirty-four pediatric PAN and 18 pediatric DADA2 patients were included. The age at onset was younger, parental consanguinity, livedo reticularis, neurologic involvement (especially strokes), lymphopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia were more frequent, while thrombocytosis and panniculitis were less frequent in DADA2 patients. The primary treatment was anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) in DADA2. For induction treatment, all systemic PAN patients received corticosteroids, and cyclophosphamide (n=11) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 3). Cyclophosphamide was replaced with MMF in nine once remission was confirmed with PVAS. In the literature, 28 articles describing 613 pediatric PAN patients and 26 articles describing 207 pediatric DADA2 patients were identified. Neurologic, gastrointestinal, and cardiac involvements were more frequent in DADA2, while constitutional symptoms and testis involvement were more common in PAN.
CONCLUSION
In a child with PAN-like phenotype, DADA2 should be considered in the presence of young age at disease onset, parental consanguinity, strokes, lymphopenia, and lack of thrombocytosis during active disease. Anti-TNF treatment is indicated for vasculitic DADA2. Cyclophosphamide could be switched to MMF when remission is confirmed with PVAS in severe PAN.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Agammaglobulinemia; Child; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Male; Polyarteritis Nodosa; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
PubMed: 33901990
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.04.009 -
Cancers Oct 2020Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogenous group of rare diseases. Many studies have reported on local epidemiology or geographic clustering, however we lack...
Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogenous group of rare diseases. Many studies have reported on local epidemiology or geographic clustering, however we lack information from a global perspective. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library based on a previously registered protocol and according to the preferred reporting of items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). We selected publications that enrolled at least 100 patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas according to the current classifications. The relative frequencies (proportions) of subtypes were compared between studies and geographic regions in a meta-analysis. In total, 26 studies met our inclusion criteria, reporting on altogether 16,953 patients. Within primary cutaneous lymphomas, CTCL appeared to be 15% more frequent in Asian populations. Mycosis fungoides (MF) accounted for 62% of CTCL, with an important heterogeneity in frequencies between studies and continents. The proportion of Sézary syndrome (SS) was 3%, stable worldwide. Rare CTCL, such as NK/T-cell lymphoma or subcutaneous panniculitis-like lymphoma, were more frequent in Asian studies. This global meta-analysis of CTCL confirmed the predominance of CTCL among primary cutaneous lymphomas (83% on average) in the three analyzed continents, most of which were MF cases. It revealed the same proportions of SS across continents, and the heterogeneity of MF frequencies, suggesting the possible role of environmental factors in the pathophysiology of the latter. Registration number: CRD42020148295 (PROSPERO).
PubMed: 33050643
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102921