-
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jan 2024Conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the main treatment plan for patients with first-line treatment failure of acetabulum fracture. This meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the main treatment plan for patients with first-line treatment failure of acetabulum fracture. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of the type of initial treatment and timing of surgery on the outcomes of conversion THA.
METHODS
Using PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL Cochrane were searched for articles published before October 14, 2022. Comparative studies investigating the outcome of THA following treatment failure of acetabular fracture were included. These articles were categorized into three groups, and the outcomes of treatment plans in each group were compared: (A) primary THA vs. conversion THA, (B) THA following conservative treatment vs. THA following ORIF, and (C) acute THA vs. delayed THA following prior treatment failure. Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3) software was utilized to perform the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty-four comparative studies met the inclusion criteria (reported the data of 13,373 patients). Concerning group (A), the following complications were significantly higher in conversion THA: Infection (OR [95% CI] 3.19 [2.12, 4.79]; p value < 0.00001), dislocation (OR [95% CI] 4.58 [1.56, 13.45]; p value = 0.006), heterotopic ossification (OR [95% CI] 5.68 [3.46, 9.32]; p value < 0.00001), and Revision (OR [95% CI] 2.57 [1.65, 4.01]; p value < 0.00001). Postoperative HHS (SMD [95% CI] - 0.66 [- 1.24, - 0.08]; p value = 0.03) was significantly lower and operation time (SMD [95% CI] 0.88 [0.61, 1.15]; p value < 0.00001), blood loss (SMD [95% CI] 0.83 [0.56, 1.11]; p value < 0.00001), and bone graft need (OR [95% CI] 27.84 [11.80, 65.65]; p value < 0.00001) were significantly higher in conversion THA. Regarding group (B), bone graft need (OR [95% CI] 0.48 [0.27, 0.86]; p value = 0.01) was considerably higher in patients with prior acetabular fracture conservative treatment, while other outcomes were comparable. Respecting group (C), there were no significant differences in analyzed outcomes. However, systematically reviewing existing literature suggested a higher incidence rate of DVT following acute THA.
CONCLUSION
There were significantly higher postoperative complications and lower functional outcomes in conversion THA compared to primary THA. While complications and functional outcomes were comparable between ORIF and the conservative groups, the bone graft need was significantly higher in the conservative group. There were no significant differences between aTHA and dTHA. These results can assist surgeons in designing treatment plans based on each patient's clinical situation. Prospero registration code: CRD42022385508.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III/IV.
Topics: Humans; Acetabulum; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38245744
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04561-x -
Acta Neurochirurgica Jan 2024Eagle jugular syndrome (EJS), recently identified as a cause of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) due to venous obstruction by an elongated styloid process (SP), is reported...
BACKGROUND
Eagle jugular syndrome (EJS), recently identified as a cause of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) due to venous obstruction by an elongated styloid process (SP), is reported here alongside a case of concurrent de novo cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM). This study aims to explore the potential causal relationship between EJS and de novo CCM through a comprehensive literature review.
METHOD
Systematic literature reviews, spanning from 1995 to 2023, focused on EJS cases with definitive signs and symptoms and de novo CCM cases with detailed clinical characteristics. Data on the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of EJS, as well as potential risk factors preceding de novo CCM, were collected to assess the relationship between the two conditions.
RESULT
Among 14 patients from 11 articles on EJS, the most common presentation was increased intracranial hypertension (IIH), observed in 10 patients (71.4%), followed by dural sinus thrombosis in four patients (28.6%). In contrast, 30 patients from 28 articles were identified with de novo CCM, involving 37 lesions. In these cases, 13 patients developed CCM subsequent to developmental venous anomalies (43%), seven following dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) (23%), and two after sinus thrombosis (6%). In a specific case of de novo brainstem CCM, the development of an enlarged condylar emissary vein, indicative of venous congestion due to IJV compression by the elongated SP, was noted before the emergence of CCM.
CONCLUSION
This study underscores that venous congestion, a primary result of symptomatic EJS, might lead to the development of de novo CCM. Thus, EJS could potentially be an indicator of CCM development. Further epidemiological and pathophysiological investigations focusing on venous circulation are necessary to clarify the causal relationship between EJS and CCM.
Topics: Humans; Brain Stem; Hyperemia; Ossification, Heterotopic; Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial; Temporal Bone
PubMed: 38231302
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-05900-x -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Apr 2024Prosthetic substitution of the talus presents a significant challenge to the foot and ankle surgeon. The shear and compressive forces on the talus and its tenuous blood...
BACKGROUND
Prosthetic substitution of the talus presents a significant challenge to the foot and ankle surgeon. The shear and compressive forces on the talus and its tenuous blood supply lead to high rates of avascular necrosis and eventual talar collapse. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate whether total ankle total talus replacement (TATTR) leads to improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with appropriate safety metrics in patients with a history of avascular necrosis or significant trauma.
METHODS
We searched the concepts of talus, prosthesis, and arthroplasty in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and Scopus (Elsevier) from the database's inception through March 9, 2023. Inclusion Criteria were 1) previous trauma to the talus, 2) post-traumatic arthritis to the tibiotalar joint, 3) avascular necrosis of talus, 4) multiple failed prior interventions, 5) degenerative osteoarthritis to the tibiotalar joint, and 6) inflammatory arthropathy to tibiotalar joint. Patients less than 18 years of age and manuscripts in non-English languages were excluded.
RESULTS
Of the 7625 references, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding data from 136 patients (139 ankles). The studies varied in design, with case reports and retrospective case series being predominant. The overall weighted average modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) was 70.4 out of 100, indicating moderate flaws in study design that may be subject to various forms of bias and possible confounders. Demographics showed a diverse range of etiologies, with alumina ceramic being the primary prosthesis material. Functional scores demonstrated improvements in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, although patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were inconsistently reported. Complications included fractures, heterotopic ossification, prolonged wound healing, and infections. Revision details were sparsely reported.
CONCLUSION
TATTR is a promising treatment modality for improving short-term functional outcomes for patients with avascular necrosis or trauma-related issues. However, this systematic review underscores the need for standardized reporting, longer-term follow-ups, and further research to establish the procedure's efficacy and safety, particularly in comparison to other treatment modalities.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III, Systematic Review of Level IV Studies.
Topics: Humans; Ankle; Retrospective Studies; Talus; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Ankle Joint; Osteonecrosis; Arthritis
PubMed: 38228466
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.12.006 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery Nov 2023This systematic review aimed to determine the incidence of complications following surgical fixation of an acute capitellum fracture. We secondarily aimed to compare the...
PURPOSE
This systematic review aimed to determine the incidence of complications following surgical fixation of an acute capitellum fracture. We secondarily aimed to compare the complication rate between anterior-to-posterior (A-P) versus posterior-to-anterior (P-A) screw insertion.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched to identify studies on surgical fixation of capitellum fractures in skeletally mature patients. The main outcome was the rate of complication after fracture fixation. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact of the fixation technique on the outcomes after surgery. An inverse variance method using random or fixed effects models was used to perform a meta-analysis based on the degree of heterogeneity between studies. Study heterogeneity was evaluated using Q statistics to calculate the I index.
RESULTS
We included 42 studies in the final analysis. The most reported complications after surgical fixation of capitellum fractures included elbow pain (21%), radiocapitellar arthritis (19%), hardware removal (17%), and heterotopic ossification (13%). When groups were stratified based on the direction of screw insertion, the mean rate of avascular necrosis was higher in the P-A direction (29% vs 11%). In comparison, the rate of revision fixation (2.9% vs 6.7%) and heterotopic ossification (7.3% vs 22%) were higher in the A-P direction. Transient posterior interosseous nerve palsy was reported in four patients in four studies, of whom three patients had A-P screw fixation.
CONCLUSION
Fixation of a displaced capitellum fracture is recommended when possible. However, patients should be counseled about the potential risk of complications and chances of undergoing an unplanned surgery.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic IV.
PubMed: 38032550
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.11.005 -
Cureus Oct 2023This systematic review aims to assess the contemporary literature on the incidence rate, functional scores, and clinical outcomes of heterotopic ossification (HO)... (Review)
Review
This systematic review aims to assess the contemporary literature on the incidence rate, functional scores, and clinical outcomes of heterotopic ossification (HO) following shoulder arthroplasty. We conducted a thorough literature search on EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ortho Search to identify studies that directly compared patients with and without HO following hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). We included studies with a minimum follow-up period of one year published from January 2000 to March 2023. We excluded case reports, editorials, and reviews. We performed the systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of the 297 studies initially identified, seven met our inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated a total of 1,134 arthroplasties (212 hemiarthroplasties, 376 aTSAs, and 546 rTSAs). The mean follow-up period was 30.52 (12-120) months and the mean age was 68.69 (20-92). The overall incidence rate of HO was 26.8% (304/1,134). Male gender was associated with a higher incidence rate of HO in three studies. No statistically significant difference was noted in symptoms at follow-up or in Constant-Murley score at two years of follow-up (HO vs. non-HO: 70 vs. 75, p = 0.081). Only one study reported a significant difference in the post-arthroplasty range of motion, specifically in forward elevation (121° vs. 133°, p = 0.0087) and external rotation (19° vs. 25°, p-value = 0.0266). We conclude that HO after shoulder arthroplasty does not display a significant impact on postoperative symptoms or functional outcomes in the majority of patients. To fully comprehend its effect, further research and consensus among experts is necessary.
PubMed: 38021631
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47374 -
Neurosurgical Review Nov 2023Revision surgery for OPLL is undesirable for both patients and physicians. However, the risk factors for reoperation are not clear. Thus, we sought to review the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Revision surgery for OPLL is undesirable for both patients and physicians. However, the risk factors for reoperation are not clear. Thus, we sought to review the existing literature and determine the factors associated with higher reoperation rates in patients with OPLL. A search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Ovid to include studies regarding the risk factors of reoperation for OPLL. RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies) was used for risk of bias analysis. Heterogeneity of studies and publication bias was assessed, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a p-value < 0.05 using SPSS software (version 23). Twenty studies with 129 reoperated and 2,793 non-reoperated patients were included. The pooled reoperation rate was 5% (95% CI: 4% to 7). The most common cause of reoperation was residual OPLL or OPLL progression (n = 51, 39.53%). An increased risk of additional surgery was found with pre-operative cervical or thoracic angle (Standardized mean difference = -0.44; 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.19; p = 0.0061), post-operative CSF leak (Odds ratio, OR = 4.97; 95% CI: 2.48 to 9.96; p = 0.0005), and graft and/or hardware failure (OR = 192.09; 95% CI: 6.68 to 5521.69; p = 0.0101). Apart from the factors identified in our study, the association of other variables with the risk of second surgery could not be ruled out, owing to the complexity of the relationship and significant bias in the current literature.
Topics: Humans; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome; Osteogenesis; Longitudinal Ligaments; Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; Risk Factors; Cervical Vertebrae; Decompression, Surgical; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37996772
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02215-w -
Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica... 2024To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on... (Review)
Review
[Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE
To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study.
RESULTS
Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91° was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION
In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.
PubMed: 37995814
DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.11.013 -
Spine Feb 2024A systematic review and meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
This study systematically reviewed and evaluated the safety and efficacy of spinal endoscopic techniques as a treatment for thoracic ligamentum flavum ossification (TOLF).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
The use of spinal endoscopic techniques for the treatment of TOLF has increased in recent years. The present study is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis focused on the use of spinal endoscopic techniques for TOLF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The Cochrane Central, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies focused on patients undergoing spinal endoscopic techniques to treat symptomatic TOLF.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 23 studies. We included 323 patients (177 males, 146 females) with a mean age of 58.40±10.06 years, with 304 total recorded lesion locations of which 245 were located in the lower thoracic spine. Complications affected 35/323 patients, and the mean operative duration for 305 patients was 108.15±47.34 minutes. For 187 patients, the mean operative bleeding was 25.13±12.54 mL, while for 87 patients the mean duration of hospitalization was 4.59±1.93 days. At last follow-up, functional assessment was performed for 260 patients, of whom 200 were in excellent condition, visual analog scale (VAS) scores were assessed for 160 patients, with a mean improvement of 4.40 (3.95, 4.86) Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were recorded for 115 patients, with a mean improvement of 3.49 (2.79,4.18), and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores were recorded for 208 patients, with a mean improvement of 3.62 (2.89,4.35).
CONCLUSIONS
These results support several advantages of spinal endoscopic techniques for the treatment of symptomatic TOLF. These include low complication rates, rapid postoperative recovery, and good functional recovery when used for single-segment, non-nodular ossification and no combined dural ossification.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Osteogenesis; Thoracic Vertebrae; Ossification, Heterotopic; Laminectomy; Decompression, Surgical; Ligamentum Flavum; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37937419
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004866 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Jan 2024The complex anatomy of acetabular fracture needs a surgical approach that can achieve anatomical reduction with fewer complications for the fixation of these fractures.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The complex anatomy of acetabular fracture needs a surgical approach that can achieve anatomical reduction with fewer complications for the fixation of these fractures. Current literature suggests that both Pararectus (PR) approach and Ilioinguinal (IL) approach can be used for the fixation of these fractures safely. However, superiority of the PR approach over the IL approach is not established. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the PR versus IL approach.
METHODOLOGY
A literature search was performed on five databases Medline/PubMed, Scopus Embase, Cinhal, and Cochrane Library, from the inception to January 14, 2023. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was done for the five eligible studies from the literature search. Individual study characteristics data and outcomes were extracted, and Software version 5.4.1 of Review Manager was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Five articles, one Randomized trial (RCT), and four retrospective articles were included and analyzed in this meta-analysis. PR approach has a shorter surgical time [mean difference (MD) -48.4 with 95% CI -74.49, -22.30; p = 0.0003], less intraoperative blood loss (MD -123.22 with 95% CI -212.28, -34.15; p = 0.007), and smaller surgical incision (MD -9.87 with 95% CI -15.21, -4.52; p = 0.0003) than the IL approach. However, the meta-analysis failed to show a difference between the two surgical approaches concerning the quality of reduction, overall complications, nerve injury, vascular injury, heterotopic ossification, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.
CONCLUSION
The PR approach has a shorter surgical duration, less blood loss, and a smaller surgical incision than the IL approach. However, both surgical approaches have equivocal results regarding fracture reduction quality, complication rates, and functional outcomes for acetabular fracture fixation. Hence, for acetabular fractures fixation, PR approach can be considered a safe and feasible alternative to the IL approach.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Wound; Acetabulum; Hip Fractures; Fractures, Bone; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37646876
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03700-0 -
Finite element modeling of the human cervical spinal cord and its applications: A systematic review.North American Spine Society Journal Sep 2023Finite element modeling (FEM) is an established tool to analyze the biomechanics of complex systems. Advances in computational techniques have led to the increasing use... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Finite element modeling (FEM) is an established tool to analyze the biomechanics of complex systems. Advances in computational techniques have led to the increasing use of spinal cord FEMs to study cervical spinal cord pathology. There is considerable variability in the creation of cervical spinal cord FEMs and to date there has been no systematic review of the technique. The aim of this study was to review the uses, techniques, limitations, and applications of FEMs of the human cervical spinal cord.
METHODS
A literature search was performed through PubMed and Scopus using the words finite element analysis, spinal cord, and biomechanics. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) use of human spinal cord modeling at the cervical level; (2) model the cervical spinal cord with or without the osteoligamentous spine; and (3) the study should describe an application of the spinal cord FEM.
RESULTS
Our search resulted in 369 total publications, 49 underwent reviews of the abstract and full text, and 23 were included in the study. Spinal cord FEMs are used to study spinal cord injury and trauma, pathologic processes, and spine surgery. Considerable variation exists in the derivation of spinal cord geometries, mathematical models, and material properties. Less than 50% of the FEMs incorporate the dura mater, cerebrospinal fluid, nerve roots, and denticulate ligaments. Von Mises stress, and strain of the spinal cord are the most common outputs studied. FEM offers the opportunity for dynamic simulation, but this has been used in only four studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Spinal cord FEM provides unique insight into the stress and strain of the cervical spinal cord in various pathological conditions and allows for the simulation of surgical procedures. Standardization of modeling parameters, anatomical structures and inclusion of patient-specific data are necessary to improve the clinical translation.
PubMed: 37636342
DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100246