-
Journal of Endodontics Mar 2024Enterococcus faecalis is the most common enterococcal species associated with infective endocarditis and 1 of the most commonly detected bacteria in cases of... (Review)
Review
Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Clinical Strains of Enterococci from Secondary/Persistent Endodontic Infections: What do We Know? A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
INTRODUCTION
Enterococcus faecalis is the most common enterococcal species associated with infective endocarditis and 1 of the most commonly detected bacteria in cases of secondary/persistent endodontic infection (SPEI). Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health concern. This review aimed to answer the following research question: "Is there a change in the antibiotic resistance profile in clinical strains of E. faecalis over the years?". P (population) - patients with SPEI, I (intervention) -endodontic retreatment, C (comparison) -not included, O (outcome) - profile of Enterococci resistance and susceptibility to systemic antibiotics used.
METHODS
Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The literature search was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline. Clinical studies in which Enterococci strains were isolated to assess their antimicrobial resistance were included.
RESULTS
Eleven clinical trials were included. Overall, E. faecalis isolated from teeth with SPEI presented an intermediate resistance to 16 antibiotics. In recent years, E. faecalis showed a little resistance to amoxicillin (without clavulanate) and benzylpenicillin. Erythromycin and rifampicin presented an increase in the intermediate-resistance status between the first and the last studies. E. faecium presented intermediate-resistance results.
CONCLUSION
The most effective drugs remain the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate, followed by amoxicillin and benzylpenicillin. In patients allergic to penicillin derivatives, moxifloxacin and azithromycin may be indicated with caution. The antibiotics with the highest pattern of resistance against E. faecalis are clindamycin, gentamicin, metronidazole, and rifampicin and are therefore, contraindicated in cases of SPEI. Very few clinical studies using a microbiological approach in teeth with endodontic failure have been carried out to improve the efficacy of prophylactic regimens. However, as bacteria periodically develop resistance to the main drugs used, regular studies should be carried out on the action of these drugs in infection control.
Topics: Humans; Enterococcus; Rifampin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Amoxicillin; Enterococcus faecalis; Penicillin G; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Clavulanic Acid; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Enterococcus faecium
PubMed: 38171449
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.12.007 -
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Jan 2024With Helicobacter pylori's increasing antibiotic resistance, evidence of more effective treatments is lacking in China, where H. pylori prevalence is nearly 50%. Thus,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
With Helicobacter pylori's increasing antibiotic resistance, evidence of more effective treatments is lacking in China, where H. pylori prevalence is nearly 50%. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare therapeutic regimens.
METHODS
Data extracted from eligible randomized controlled trials from January 2000 to September 2021 were entered into a Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model to evaluate the efficacy and safety of H. pylori eradication regimens.
RESULTS
This study included 101 trials involving 21,745 patients. Vonoprazan-bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (VBQT) ranked the highest [surfaces under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 83.64%], followed by high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy (HDDT) [SUCRA, 79.70%, odds ratio (OR)=1.31, 95% credible interval (CrI) (0.36, 4.72)] and proton pump inhibitor-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) [SUCRA, 63.59%, OR=1.59, 95% CrI (0.48, 5.24)]. HDDT [OR=2.47, 95% CrI (1.51, 4.06)], BQT [OR=2.04, 95% CrI (1.69, 2.47)], concomitant quadruple nonbismuth therapy (CT) [OR=1.93, 95% CrI (1.19, 3.15)], and sequential therapy (ST) [OR=1.86, 95% CrI (1.50, 2.32)] had higher eradication rates than standard triple therapy (TT). ST (SUCRA, 82.52%) and VBQT (SUCRA, 83.89%) had the highest eradication rate before and after 2010 in the effectiveness ranking, respectively. Furthermore, the H. pylori eradication rate of patients receiving 14-day BQT treatment was higher than that of 10-day BQT regimen [OR=2.55, 95% CI (1.84, 3.53)] and 7-day BQT regimen [OR=3.64, 95% CI (2.64, 5.01)].
CONCLUSIONS
The TT regimen was not an optimal choice in China for H. pylori eradication; VBQT, HDDT, and BQT showed better efficacy. After 2010, there is a trend toward significance that VBQT provided a higher H. pylori eradication rate in China, but with only 1 randomized controlled trial. Thus, more supportive real-world data are needed to confirm its effectiveness.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bismuth; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Amoxicillin; China; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38084866
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001902 -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Jan 2024Patients with haematological malignancies (HM patients) are at high risk of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). MDR-GNB intestinal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Prevalence of and risk factors for intestinal colonisation by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in patients with haematological malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Patients with haematological malignancies (HM patients) are at high risk of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). MDR-GNB intestinal colonisation is associated with MDR-GNB infections. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis on HM patients was to pool the prevalence of and risk factors for intestinal colonisation by MDR-GNB, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales, reported in previous studies.
METHODS
This study was conducted according to the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022374425). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 25 October 2022. Observational studies reporting CRE and/or ESBL intestinal colonisation in HM patients were included. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study region.
RESULTS
A total of 21 402 HM patients from 32 studies were analysed. The pooled CRE and ESBL colonisation rates were 21.7% [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 18.7-24.8] and 19.2% (95%CI 13.9-24.5), respectively. Prior exposure to tigecycline [odds ratio (OR) 3.99, 95%CI 2.08-7.68], carbapenem (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.13-2.97) or penicillin (OR 1.72, 95%CI 1.05-2.83), as well as chemotherapy (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.05-5.73), neutropenia (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.08-3.26) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.33-2.61), were risk factors for CRE colonisation in HM patients. Prior antibiotic exposure was a risk factor for ESBL colonisation in HM patients (OR 4.90, 95%CI 2.76-8.70).
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows the high prevalence of MDR-GNB (CRE and ESBL) colonisation in HM patients and explains associated factors for the colonisation. The results provide evidence for MDR-GNB infection control in HM management.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Hematologic Neoplasms; Prevalence; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38040318
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.107043 -
The Journal of Arthroplasty Jun 2024Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) who report penicillin allergy (PA) are frequently administered second-line antibiotics, although recent evidence...
BACKGROUND
Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) who report penicillin allergy (PA) are frequently administered second-line antibiotics, although recent evidence suggests that this may be unnecessary and could increase infection risk. Many institutions have aimed to improve antibiotic deployment via allergy testing and screening; however, there is little standardization to this process. This review aimed to evaluate (1) antibiotic selection in patients who report PA and assess the impact of screening and testing interventions, (2) rates of allergic reactions in patients who report PA, and (3) the association between reported PA and screening or testing programs and odds of surgical site infection or periprosthetic joint infection.
METHODS
PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched on February 4, 2023 to identify all studies published since January 1, 2000 that evaluated the impact of PA on patients undergoing TJA (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023394031). Articles were included if full-text manuscripts in English were available, and the study analyzed the impact of PA and related interventions on TJA patients. There were 11 studies evaluating 1,276,663 patients included. Interventions were compared via presentation of key findings regarding rates of clinically relevant or high-risk PA reported upon screenings or testings, cephalosporin utilizations, allergic reactions, and postoperative infections (surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection).
RESULTS
All 6 studies found that PA screening and testing markedly increase the use of first-line antibiotics. Testing showed low rates of true allergy (0.7 to 3%) and allergic reaction frequency for patients who have reported PA receiving cephalosporins was between 0% and 2%. Although there were mixed findings across studies, there was a trend toward second-line antibiotic prophylaxis being associated with a slightly higher rate of infection in PA patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Using PA screening and testing can promote antibiotic stewardship by safely increasing the use of first-line antibiotics in patients who have a reported PA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, Therapeutic Study.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Antimicrobial Stewardship; Arthroplasty, Replacement; Drug Hypersensitivity; Patient Safety; Penicillins; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 38040064
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.034 -
Helicobacter 2024Recent clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recent clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in different regions with inconsistent results reported. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of VA dual therapy compared to the currently recommended therapy for eradicating H. pylori.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed using the following search terms: ("Helicobacter" OR "H. pylori" OR "Hp") AND ("vonoprazan" OR "potassium-competitive acid blocker" OR "P-CAB") AND ("amoxicillin" OR "penicillin") AND ("dual"). The primary outcome was to evaluate the eradication rate according to intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. The secondary outcomes were adverse events and compliance.
RESULTS
A total of 15 studies involving 4, 568 patients were included. The pooled eradication rate of VA dual therapy was 85.0% and 90.0% by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis, respectively. The adverse events rate and compliance of VA dual therapy were 17.5% and 96%, respectively. The efficacy of VA dual therapy was superior to proton pump inhibitors-based triple therapy (82.0% vs. 71.4%, p < 0.01) but lower than vonoprazan-containing quadruple therapy (83.1% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.02). 7-day VA dual therapy showed lower eradication rates than 10-day (χ = 24.09, p < 0.01) and 14-day VA dual therapy (χ = 11.87, p < 0.01). The adverse events rate of VA dual therapy was lower than vonoprazan triple therapy (24.6% vs. 30.9%, p = 0.01) and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (20.5% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.01). No significant difference of compliance was observed between VA dual therapy and each subgroup.
CONCLUSION
VA dual therapy, a novel regimen, showed high efficacy as the first-line treatment for H. pylori eradication, which should be optimized before application in different regions.
Topics: Humans; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38036941
DOI: 10.1111/hel.13039 -
Helicobacter 2024Recently, vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported as a promising approach for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. However, the effects of VA... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Recently, vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported as a promising approach for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. However, the effects of VA therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) on H. pylori eradication remains unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of VA dual therapy with BQT for H. pylori eradication.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted from the beginning to September 2023, utilizing PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science database. A random-effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis to determine the pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Moreover, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to evaluate the conclusiveness of the H. pylori eradication rate.
RESULTS
Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1233 patients were included. The VA therapy has similar eradication rate (ITT analysis: 87% vs. 85.7%, RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.93-1.09, p = 0.84; PP analysis: 92.5% vs. 93.2%, RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.06, p = 0.97) and compliance (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03, p = 0.32) compared to BQT. The VA therapy group had a significantly lower incidence of total adverse events than the BQT group (16.3% vs. 40.0%, RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37-0.55, p < 0.00001). The TSA result showed that the effect was conclusive.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence indicated that VA therapy is just as successful as BQT in eliminating H. pylori, yet it has fewer adverse events and similar compliance.
Topics: Humans; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bismuth; Drug Therapy, Combination; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 37983865
DOI: 10.1111/hel.13040 -
The Journal of Hospital Infection Jan 2024Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) poses a significant threat to critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Although an association between antibiotic exposure... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) poses a significant threat to critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Although an association between antibiotic exposure and resistant AB is reported in the literature, a synthesis of evidence in ICU patients is still lacking.
AIM
To summarize the evidence on the association between prior antibiotic exposure and the occurrence of resistant AB in ICU patients.
METHODS
Online databases were searched for cohort and case-control studies providing data on the association of interest. Carbapenem/multidrug-resistant AB isolation was compared with non-isolation; carbapenem/multidrug-resistant AB was compared with carbapenem/antibiotic-susceptible AB; and extensively drug-resistant AB isolation was compared with non-isolation. Each comparison was subjected to a restricted maximum likelihood random-effects meta-analysis per antibiotic class, estimating pooled ORs. Stratified meta-analyses were performed by study design, outcome type and association-measure adjustment.
FINDINGS
Overall, 25 high-quality studies were retrieved. Meta-analyses showed that carbapenem/multidrug-resistant AB isolation was associated with previous exposure to aminoglycosides, carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporines, glycylcyclines, and nitroimidazoles. Increased risk of isolation of carbapenem/multidrug-resistant AB isolation vs carbapenem/antibiotic-susceptible AB was shown for prior exposure to aminoglycosides, antipseudomonal penicillins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides, and penicillins. Third-generation cephalosporin exposure increased the risk of extensively drug-resistant AB isolation vs non-isolation.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review clarifies the role of antibiotic use in antibiotic-resistant AB spread in ICUs, although for some antibiotic classes the evidence is still uncertain due to the small number of adjusted analyses, methodological and reporting issues, and limited number of studies. Future studies need to be carried out with standardized methods and appropriate reporting of multivariable models.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acinetobacter Infections; Carbapenems; Aminoglycosides; Intensive Care Units; Penicillins; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37972711
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.11.002 -
The Lancet. Gastroenterology &... Jan 2024We previously showed rising primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori during 1990-2015 in the Asia-Pacific region. However, whether primary antibiotic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
We previously showed rising primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori during 1990-2015 in the Asia-Pacific region. However, whether primary antibiotic resistance continues to rise is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to assess the latest prevalence of H pylori antibiotic resistance in this region.
METHODS
We did an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library between Jan 1, 1990, and July 12, 2023. Studies investigating primary H pylori resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, or tetracycline in individuals naive to eradication therapy in the Asia-Pacific region (as defined by the UN geoscheme) were eligible for inclusion. There were no language restrictions. Studies that focused on specific subpopulations (eg, children) were excluded. Using a standardised extraction form, two authors independently reviewed and extracted summary data from all eligible articles. The updated prevalence of antibiotic resistance was generated by meta-analysis under a random-effects model and subgroup analyses were done by countries and periods of study. Between-study variability was assessed by use of I. The study is registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022339956.
FINDINGS
A total of 351 studies, including 175 new studies and 176 studies from our previous analysis, were included in this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of primary antibiotic resistance of H pylori between 1990 and 2022 was 22% (95% CI 20-23; I=96%) for clarithromycin, 52% (49-55; I=99%) for metronidazole, 26% (24-29; I=96%) for levofloxacin, 4% (3-5; I=95%) for tetracycline, and 4% (3-5; I=95%) for amoxicillin. Prevalence varied considerably between countries and across study periods. From 1990 to 2022, the prevalence of primary resistance increased for clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin but remained stable for amoxicillin and tetracycline. The latest primary resistance prevalences were 30% (95% CI 28-33; I=93%) for clarithromycin, 61% (55-66; I=99%) for metronidazole, 35% (31-39; I=95%) for levofloxacin, 4% (2-6; I=96%) for tetracycline, and 6% (4-8; I=96%) for amoxicillin in the Asia-Pacific region.
INTERPRETATION
Treatment guidelines should be adapted in response to the rising primary resistance of key antibiotics for H pylori eradication. A global policy to control and monitor the antibiotic resistance of H pylori is urgently needed.
FUNDING
Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan, National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan, and National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATION
For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Topics: Child; Humans; Clarithromycin; Metronidazole; Levofloxacin; Helicobacter pylori; Helicobacter Infections; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Amoxicillin; Tetracycline; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Asia
PubMed: 37972625
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00281-9 -
APMIS : Acta Pathologica,... Feb 2024The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review of publications between 2010 and 2021 on the antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and...
The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review of publications between 2010 and 2021 on the antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii from urinary tract infections and to analyze changes over time in hospital urine cultures from 2016 through 2021. The literature was searched, and a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study was performed in the hospital. Out of 21 838 positive urine cultures, 3.86% were due to P. aeruginosa and 0.44% were due to A. baumannii. For P. aeruginosa, lower resistance rates were observed to virtually all tested antibiotics than were obtained in the systematic review, and the present series of hospital samples showed an in vitro resistance rate <10% to ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, tobramycin, and colistin. For A. baumannii, the resistance rates to almost all antibiotics were higher in the present series than in the systematic review, being lowest to colistin (10%). Both microorganisms show reduced in vitro susceptibility to some antibiotics during the years of the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to previous years. In our setting, both piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem can be recommended for the empirical treatment of UTIs by P. aeruginosa, whereas only colistin can be recommended for UTIs by A. baumannii.
Topics: Humans; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Meropenem; Acinetobacter baumannii; Spain; Colistin; Cross-Sectional Studies; Retrospective Studies; Pandemics; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Pseudomonas Infections; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Urinary Tract Infections; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Hospitals; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37971152
DOI: 10.1111/apm.13360 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2023Antibiotics provide only modest benefit in treating sore throat, although their effectiveness increases in people with positive throat swabs for group A beta-haemolytic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Antibiotics provide only modest benefit in treating sore throat, although their effectiveness increases in people with positive throat swabs for group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS). It is unclear which antibiotic is the best choice if antibiotics are indicated. This is an update of a review first published in 2010, and updated in 2013, 2016, and 2021.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the comparative efficacy of different antibiotics in: (a) alleviating symptoms (pain, fever); (b) shortening the duration of the illness; (c) preventing clinical relapse (i.e. recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution); and (d) preventing complications (suppurative complications, acute rheumatic fever, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis). To assess the evidence on the comparative incidence of adverse effects and the risk-benefit of antibiotic treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2023, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Elsevier, and Web of Science (Clarivate) up to 19 March 2023.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised, double-blind trials comparing different antibiotics, and reporting at least one of the following: clinical cure, clinical relapse, or complications and/or adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened trials for inclusion and extracted data using standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies according to the methods outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and used the GRADE approach to assess the overall certainty of the evidence for the outcomes. We reported the intention-to-treat analysis, and also performed an analysis of evaluable participants to explore the robustness of the intention-to-treat results.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 19 trials reported in 18 publications (5839 randomised participants): six trials compared penicillin with cephalosporins; six compared penicillin with macrolides; three compared penicillin with carbacephem; one compared penicillin with sulphonamides; one compared clindamycin with ampicillin; and one compared azithromycin with amoxicillin in children. All participants had confirmed acute GABHS tonsillopharyngitis, and ages ranged from one month to 80 years. Nine trials included only, or predominantly, children. Most trials were conducted in an outpatient setting. Reporting of randomisation, allocation concealment, and blinding was poor in all trials. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence mainly due to lack of (or poor reporting of) randomisation or blinding, or both, heterogeneity, and wide confidence intervals. Cephalosporins versus penicillin We are uncertain if there is a difference in symptom resolution (at 2 to 15 days) for cephalosporins versus penicillin (odds ratio (OR) for absence of symptom resolution 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 1.12; 5 trials, 2018 participants; low-certainty evidence). Results of the sensitivity analysis of evaluable participants differed (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; 5 trials, 1660 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Based on an analysis of evaluable participants, we are uncertain if clinical relapse may be lower for cephalosporins compared with penicillin (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.99; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 50; 4 trials, 1386 participants; low-certainty evidence). Very low-certainty evidence showed no difference in reported adverse events. Macrolides versus penicillin We are uncertain if there is a difference between macrolides and penicillin for resolution of symptoms (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.35; 6 trials, 1728 participants; low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis of evaluable participants resulted in an OR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.09; 6 trials, 1159 participants). We are uncertain if clinical relapse may be different (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.03; 6 trials, 802 participants; low-certainty evidence). Children treated with macrolides seemed to experience more adverse events than those treated with penicillin (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.15; 1 trial, 489 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, the test for subgroup differences between children and adults was not significant. Azithromycin versus amoxicillin Based on one unpublished trial in children, we are uncertain if resolution of symptoms is better with azithromycin in a single dose versus amoxicillin for 10 days (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.05; 1 trial, 673 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis for per-protocol analysis resulted in an OR of 0.29 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.73; 1 trial, 482 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are also uncertain if there was a difference in relapse between groups (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.82; 1 trial, 422 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Adverse events were more common with azithromycin compared to amoxicillin (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.78 to 3.99; 1 trial, 673 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Carbacephem versus penicillin There is low-certainty evidence that compared with penicillin, carbacephem may provide better symptom resolution post-treatment in adults and children (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99; NNTB 14.3; 3 trials, 795 participants). Studies did not report on long-term complications, so it was unclear if any class of antibiotics was better at preventing serious but rare complications.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We are uncertain if there are clinically relevant differences in symptom resolution when comparing cephalosporins and macrolides with penicillin in the treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis. Low-certainty evidence in children suggests that carbacephem may be more effective than penicillin for symptom resolution. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions regarding the other comparisons in this review. Data on complications were too scarce to draw conclusions. Antibiotics have a limited effect in the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis and the results do not demonstrate that other antibiotics are more effective than penicillin. In the context of antimicrobial stewardship, penicillin can be used if treatment with an antibiotic is indicated. All studies were conducted in high-income countries with a low risk of streptococcal complications, so there is a need for trials in low-income countries and disadvantaged populations, where the risk of complications remains high.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Infant; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Chronic Disease; Macrolides; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Streptococcus pyogenes; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 37965935
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub6