-
Annals of Palliative Medicine Sep 2021Surgery is the clinically preferred treatment for high perianal abscesses. Incision and seton drainage improve the cure rate and reduce recurrence. We aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Surgery is the clinically preferred treatment for high perianal abscesses. Incision and seton drainage improve the cure rate and reduce recurrence. We aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical effect and safety of incision and seton drainage in the treatment of high perianal abscess.
METHODS
China Knowledge Network (CNKI), WanFang database, VIP database, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched and all relevant Chinese and English language documents until July 2021were retrieved. All records that described randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of incision and seton drainage for the treatment of high perianal abscess were eligible. Documents that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk Evaluation Standard, and Revman5.4 software was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS
Fourteen RCTs were included. The results of nine studies showed that the clinical cure rate of the incision-seton group was higher than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Seven studies showed that the wound healing time of the incision-seton group was shorter than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Four studies showed that the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the incision-seton group was lower than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Five studies showed that the Wexner score of the incision-seton group was lower than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Six studies showed that the formation rate of anal fistula in the incision-seton group was lower than that in the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Six studies demonstrated that the recurrence rate of abscess in the incision-seton group was lower than that in the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Seven studies showed that the incidence of adverse events in the incision-seton group was lower than that in the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Five studies demonstrated that the length of stay in the incision-seton group was shorter than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05).
DISCUSSION
The choice of surgical methods in clinical research has always been controversial. The incision-seton method can effectively and safely treat high perianal abscess. However, the results of this meta-analysis still leave some gaps in the evidence. More large-sample, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are needed.
Topics: Abscess; Anus Diseases; Drainage; Humans; Rectal Fistula; Recurrence
PubMed: 34628909
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2229 -
Pediatric Surgery International Nov 2020Perianal abscesses are a common surgical presentation in infants. Historically, general anaesthesia (GA) has been used to facilitate incision and drainage, with or...
Perianal abscesses are a common surgical presentation in infants. Historically, general anaesthesia (GA) has been used to facilitate incision and drainage, with or without exploration for a fistula-in-ano (FIA). This review aims to assess outcomes following management of perianal abscesses without GA in infants less than 24 months old. We aim to identify the success of management without GA. Using PRISMA guidelines, studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed. Studies including infants less than 24 months with perianal abscesses managed without GA were reviewed. The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring GA following initial management without GA. Secondary outcomes included rates of recurrent perianal abscesses, rates of progression to FIA and time to cure. Nine studies, involving 1049 infants less than 24 months old met inclusion criteria. A total of 1039 (99.0%) were males. Study design consisted of one prospective case series of 18 patients, and eight retrospective cohort studies. There were no randomized control trials. A total of 1037 (98.9%) patients were initially managed without GA. Of these, 59 (5.6%) were documented to subsequently require a general anaesthetic. Treatment modalities included antibiotics, regular baths, needle aspiration, incision and drainage under local anaesthesia, hainosankyuto and fibroblast growth factor. A total of 790 (75.3%) healed primarily without further intervention. A total of 243 (23.2%) were documented to have a recurrence or progression to FIA. All patients who required a subsequent general anaesthetic had progressed to FIA. Despite the lack of well-designed prospective studies, existing evidence supports management of perianal abscesses without initial GA in infants, with more than 75% healing completely. Further research aimed at standardizing care and confirming the safety and efficacy of initial non-operative management are warranted, and may potentially reduce the number of unnecessary initial and subsequent clinical interventions.
Topics: Abscess; Anesthesia, General; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anus Diseases; Disease Management; Drainage; Humans; Infant; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32785778
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04728-7 -
Khirurgiia 2020To analyze efficacy and safety of submucosal laser ablation of internal hemorrhoids (SLT).
OBJECTIVE
To analyze efficacy and safety of submucosal laser ablation of internal hemorrhoids (SLT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Systematic review included 10 articles published in electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Elibrary until January 2019. There were only full-text publications from prospective clinical trials devoted to submucosal laser ablation in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Isolated SLT was used in 4 trials, combination with other minimally invasive procedures was reported in 6 reports.
RESULTS
SLT was predominantly used in the treatment of hemorrhoids grade 2-3. Efficacy of procedure was 91.1-100% after 6 months and 87.5-100% after 12 months. Intra- and postoperative complications included intraoperative bleeding (8.4%), perianal and external piles edema (8.2%), postoperative bleeding (2.7%), urinary retention (1.2%), anal fistula (0.6%), perianal abscess (0.14%).
CONCLUSION
Submucosal laser ablation is quite effective and safe option for treatment of hemorrhoids grade 2-3. However, further researches are required considering the absence of clear recommendations on laser beam parameters, indications for procedure and data on long-term outcomes.
Topics: Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoids; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Laser Therapy
PubMed: 32271744
DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202003189