-
International Ophthalmology Mar 2024It is commonly accepted that phacoemulsification surgery is a risk factor for the development of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and may accelerate the process. This...
PURPOSE
It is commonly accepted that phacoemulsification surgery is a risk factor for the development of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and may accelerate the process. This is an important consideration particularly in cases involving young patients who pre-operatively have no PVD, given the increased risk of retinal tears and detachments.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting incidence of PVD post-uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used for search strategy. Of 3071 titles, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria; The outcomes measured were PVD occurrence by (1) time, (2) type, (3) age, (4) gender and (5) axial length, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager.
RESULTS
A total of 2034 eyes were included for analysis with a mean follow-up time of 28.3 months. 33.3% of patients developed a PVD, either partial or complete, with rates increasing in a time dependent manner. No significant difference was noted in sub-group analysis by age, gender or axial length.
CONCLUSIONS
The results from our systematic review show that uncomplicated phacoemulsification accelerates the physiological process of PVD development. Pre-operative evaluation of the vitreoretinal interface should be performed with careful post-operative follow-up advised in those without a pre-existing PVD.
Topics: Humans; Vitreous Detachment; Phacoemulsification; Prospective Studies; Vitreous Body; Retinal Perforations; Retinal Detachment
PubMed: 38512501
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03091-z -
Eye (London, England) Jun 2024To investigate the effect of perioperative intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medications on controlling postoperative IOP following uncomplicated phacoemulsification. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To investigate the effect of perioperative intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medications on controlling postoperative IOP following uncomplicated phacoemulsification.
METHODS
Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up until November 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed IOP change via applanation tonometry in medicated and control arms following uncomplicated cataract surgery in healthy eyes were included. The primary outcome was the weighted mean difference (WMD) of IOP at 2-8 h, 12-24 h, and 1-7 days postoperatively within each medication class or common fixed-combination formulations. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised risk of bias in randomised trials (RoB-2). Level of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) RESULTS: From 702 screened articles, 30 RCTs involving 2986 eyes were included. There was a statistically significant reduction in IOP favouring treatment arms at 2-8 h (WMD = -3.87 mmHg; 95% CI [-4.75, -3.00]; p < 0.001) and 12-24 h (WMD = -2.69 mmHg; 95% CI [-3.36, -2.02]; p < 0.001), with the effect wearing off beyond 1 day (p = 0.18). Between medication classes, the largest effect at both 2-8 h and 12-24 h was observed with intracameral cholinergics or fixed-combination carbonic anhydrase inhibitor-beta-blocker (FCCB) formulations. Conversely, the smallest effect was observed with prostaglandin analogues, alpha-agonists, and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs).
CONCLUSION
Prophylaxis against acute IOP elevations following uncomplicated cataract surgery is effective. FCCB and intracameral cholinergics are the most effective ocular antihypertensive agents, while alpha-agonists, prostaglandin analogues, and topical CAIs were found to be the least effective. These findings may inform future surgical guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Phacoemulsification; Antihypertensive Agents; Postoperative Complications; Tonometry, Ocular; Ocular Hypertension
PubMed: 38326483
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-02940-6 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2024In phakic patients Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are frequently combined with... (Review)
Review
In phakic patients Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are frequently combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (triple procedure). This surgery might cause a refractive shift difficult to predict. Early DMEK and DSAEK results have shown a tendency toward a hyperopic shift. Myopic postoperative refraction is typically intended to correct this postoperative refractive defect and to bring all eyes as close to emmetropia as possible. We sought to understand the mechanism underlying the hyperopization and to identify predictive factors for poorer refractive outcomes, the most suitable target refraction and IOL calculation methods in patients undergoing combined cataract extraction and lamellar endothelial corneal transplantation (DSAEK or DMEK) for endothelial dysfunctions. Of the 407 articles analyzed, only 18 were included in the analysis. A myopic target between -0.50 D and -0.75 was the most common (up to -1.50 for DSAEK triple procedures), even though no optimum target was found. Hyperopic surprises appeared more frequently in corneas that were flatter in the center than in the periphery (oblate posterior profile). Among the numerous IOL calculation formulas, there was no apparent preference.
Topics: Humans; Refraction, Ocular; Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty; Lens Implantation, Intraocular; Phacoemulsification; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 38309315
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.01.003 -
Ophthalmologica. Journal International... 2024The safety and effectiveness of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains poorly understood for the treatment of epiretinal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The safety and effectiveness of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains poorly understood for the treatment of epiretinal membrane (ERM).
OBJECTIVES
Our study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PPV with and without ILM peeling for ERM.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2023 for comparative studies reporting visual and anatomical outcomes for patients with ERM that received PPV with or without ILM peeling. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at last study observation and change in BCVA from baseline. Secondary outcomes included retinal thickness (RT) at last study observation, change in RT from baseline, risk of ERM recurrence, and adverse events. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool of observational studies using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions-I tool. The certainty of evidence of outcomes was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies reporting on 1,291 eyes at baseline were included. PPV with and without ILM peel achieved a similar BCVA at last study observation (p = 0.68) and change in BCVA from baseline (p = 0.79). These findings remained consistent irrespective of whether simultaneous phacoemulsification was performed. PPV with ILM peel achieved a significantly lower incidence of ERM recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.26, 95% CI = [0.13, 0.51], p < 0.0001) and additional surgery (RR = 0.17, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.74], p = 0.02) compared to PPV without ILM peel.
CONCLUSION
PPV with and without ILM peel achieved a similar BCVA at last study observation in ERM patients. Patients treated with PPV and ILM peel also had a reduced risk of ERM recurrence and lower reoperation risk. These conclusions are associated with a moderate certainty of evidence and potential for bias from multiple non-randomized studies.
Topics: Humans; Epiretinal Membrane; Vitrectomy; Basement Membrane; Retina; Cataract Extraction; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, Optical Coherence
PubMed: 37899043
DOI: 10.1159/000534851 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... May 2024To compare anterior capsule contraction (ACC) after cataract surgery with implantation of intraocular lens (IOLs) of different materials and designs. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To compare anterior capsule contraction (ACC) after cataract surgery with implantation of intraocular lens (IOLs) of different materials and designs.
METHODS
We searched three electronic databases for relevant studies published up to January 1, 2023. Five randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and three cohort studies involving 1,221 eyes were included in quantitative synthesis. We extracted data, assessed their quality independently, and calculated standard mean difference (SMD) using a random-effects model. Six RCTs and one retrospective cohort were included in information summary.
RESULTS
The contraction of the anterior capsule opening area in the hydrophilic group was larger than that of the hydrophobic group from one month to one year postoperatively (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Specifically, the hydrophilic group showed greater contraction of the anterior capsule opening area at one month postoperatively (Standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.93 to -0.52), three months (SMD = -1.04, 95% CI = -1.32 to -0.75), six months (SMD = -0.99, 95% CI = -1.24 to -0.74) and one year (SMD = -1.33, 95% CI = -2.50 to -0.16). As of one year postoperatively, the anterior capsular opening area showed a trend of decreasing over time in both groups (P = 0.046 and P = 0.050, respectively). In information summary, three studies indicated no relationship between haptic design and ACC, while the other four studies reported that the number and shape of haptic would affect ACC.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis suggested that the postoperative ACC after the implantation of hydrophobic IOLs was less than that induced by hydrophilic IOLs. Haptic design may also affect the degree of ACC.
Topics: Humans; Lens Implantation, Intraocular; Haptic Technology; Lenses, Intraocular; Eye, Artificial; Cataract; Phacoemulsification; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design
PubMed: 37831171
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06230-x -
Lasers in Medical Science Sep 2023To compare the efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) combined with non-toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus Toric IOL (TIOL)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy versus toric intraocular lens implantation on correction of astigmatism in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
To compare the efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) combined with non-toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus Toric IOL (TIOL) implantation in correcting corneal astigmatism in cataract patients.
METHODS
Relevant literature was searched in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and SinoMed. Data from the included studies were extracted. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the correction performance of FSAK combined with non-toric IOL implantation and TIOL implantation using postoperative refractive astigmatism, correction index, and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) outcomes. Publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis were also performed.
RESULTS
Five comparative studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The TIOL group had smaller postoperative refractive astigmatism and a greater correction index compared to the FSAK group. The mean differences in postoperative refractive astigmatism and correction index between the two groups were - 0.19D (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.26, P < 0.01, I = 7%) and - 0.09 (95% CI = - 0.18 to 0.00, P = 0.04, I = 0%), respectively. We found no statistically significant difference in UDVA between the two groups (95% CI = - 0.01 to 0.11, P = 0.09, I = 70%).
CONCLUSIONS
FSAK combined with non-toric IOL implantation was found to be less effective than TIOL implantation in correcting preoperative corneal astigmatism in cataract patients. The difference in the effectiveness of astigmatism correction between the two surgical methods seems to diminish, as the degree of preoperative corneal astigmatism decreases.
Topics: Humans; Lens Implantation, Intraocular; Astigmatism; Phacoemulsification; Cataract; Lasers
PubMed: 37773468
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03893-0 -
American Journal of Ophthalmology Jan 2024To systematically review the literature and quantitatively synthesize the currently available evidence to compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens calculation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To systematically review the literature and quantitatively synthesize the currently available evidence to compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens calculation formulas in eyes with long axial length (AL).
DESIGN
Network meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published between January 2000 and June 2022. Included were prospective or retrospective clinical studies reporting the following outcomes in cataract patients with long AL (ie, ≥26 mm): percentage of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D). Network meta-analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.2.1).
RESULTS
Ten prospective or retrospective clinical studies, including 1016 eyes and 11 calculation formulas, were identified. A traditional meta-analysis showed that for the percentage of eyes with PE within ±0.25 and ±0.50 D, the Olsen, Kane, and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) all had insignificantly higher percentages compared with others. Considering the percentage of eyes with PE within ±1.00 D, the original and modified Wang-Koch adjustment formulas for Holladay 1 (H1-WK and H1-MWK) and EVO formulas showed superiority, but the difference was insignificant. This network meta-analysis revealed that compared with the widely used Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, the Olsen, Kane, and EVO formulas had higher percentages of eyes with PE within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 D (all odds ratios >1 but P >.05). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) values for the percentage of eyes with PE within ±0.25 D, the Olsen (96.4%), Kane (77.5%), and EVO (75.9%) formulas had the highest probability of being in the top 3 of the 11 formulas.
CONCLUSIONS
The Olsen, Kane, and EVO formulas may perform better than others in calculating IOL power in eyes with long AL. Nevertheless, there is still considerable uncertainty in this regard and the accuracy of these formulas in highly myopic eyes should be confirmed in studies based on large multicenter registries.
Topics: Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Eye; Lenses, Intraocular; Biometry; Optics and Photonics; Refraction, Ocular; Axial Length, Eye; Phacoemulsification; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37726043
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.009 -
Ophthalmology and Therapy Dec 2023The proper choice of an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula is an important aspect of phacoemulsification. In this study, the formulas most commonly used... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The proper choice of an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula is an important aspect of phacoemulsification. In this study, the formulas most commonly used today are described and their accuracy is evaluated.
METHODS
This review includes papers evaluating the accuracy of IOL power calculation formulas published during the period from January 2015 to December 2022. The articles were identified by a literature search of medical and other databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Crossref, Web of Science, SciELO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library) using the terms "IOL formulas," "Barrett Universal II," "Kane," "Hill-RBF," "Olsen," "PEARL-DGS," "EVO," "Haigis," "SRK/T," and "Hoffer Q." Twenty-nine of the most recent peer-reviewed papers in English with the largest samples and largest number of formulas compared were considered.
RESULTS
Outcomes of mean absolute error and percentage of predictions within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were used to evaluate the accuracy of the formulas. In most studies, Barrett achieved the smallest mean absolute error and PEARL-DGS the highest percentage of patients with ±0.5 D in short eyes, while Kane obtained the highest percentage of patients with ±0.5 D in long eyes.
CONCLUSIONS
The third- and fourth-generation formulas are gradually being replaced by more accurate ones. The Barrett Universal II among vergence formulas and Kane and PEARL-DGS among artificial intelligence-based formulas are currently most often reported as the most precise.
PubMed: 37698825
DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00799-6 -
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology 2023Despite many recent developments, preference in the choice of surgical treatment of uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) remains a challenge. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Despite many recent developments, preference in the choice of surgical treatment of uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) remains a challenge.
OBJECTIVE
This study compares the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) to alternative surgical procedures, for all types of glaucoma.
METHODOLOGY
The methodology adheres to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for systematic review reporting. Studies reporting ECP and alternative surgeries in treating refractory glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma, aphakic glaucoma, filtering surgical failure-induced glaucoma, congenital or juvenile glaucoma, and secondary glaucoma such as uveitis glaucoma, traumatic glaucoma, secondary glaucoma postcorneal transplantation, etc. were included. The efficacy was evaluated from the number of IOP-lowering drugs, and mean change in pre- and post-IOP were the outcomes assessed in ECP and non-ECP groups in this review. Evaluations of the postoperative complications revealed the safety assessment of the procedure.
RESULTS
In total, 11 relevant studies were selected in this study with a total of 5418 eyes, including 763 eyes in the ECP group and 4655 in the non-ECP group. This review observed that both ECP and non-ECP procedures had been successful in reducing postoperative IOP.
CONCLUSION
It can be deduced from this review, that all types of glaucoma can be treated efficiently with significantly higher success rates with ECP and ECP demonstrates lowest postoperative complications when compared to non ECP procedures. This review provides updated scientific evidence which caters to support clinical decisions for surgical treatment of glaucoma.
PubMed: 37602189
DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_106_22 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2023Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the... (Review)
Review
Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the time of vitrectomy is associated with both advantages and disadvantages. The combination of cataract extraction (i.e., phacoemulsification) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPVc) enhances visualization of the peripheral retina and the surgical management of the vitreous base. However, PPVc prolongs the surgical time and is associated with iatrogenic loss of the accommodation function in younger patients, possible postoperative anisometropia, and unexpected refractive results. Performance of pars plana vitrectomy alone (PPVa) requires good technical skills to minimize the risk of lens damage, and quickens cataract development. We retrieved all recent papers that directly compared PPVc and PPVa using parameters that we consider essential when choosing between the two procedures (the success rate of anatomical RRD repair, postoperative refractive error, intra- and postoperative complications, and costs). PPVa and PPVc were generally comparable in terms of RRD anatomical repair. PPVc was associated with fewer intraoperative, but more postoperative, complications. Macula-off RRD PPVc treatment was often associated with undesirable myopic refractive error. PPVa followed by phacoemulsification was the most expensive procedure.
PubMed: 37568424
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155021