-
Frontiers in Neurology 2024This study aimed to investigate the impact of early vestibular rehabilitation training combined with corticosteroids initiated within 2 weeks, compared with...
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the impact of early vestibular rehabilitation training combined with corticosteroids initiated within 2 weeks, compared with corticosteroid treatment, after the peripheral acute vestibular syndrome (pAVS) onset.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. From inception to January 24, 2024. The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews approved this study (CRD42023422308).
RESULTS
Five studies involving 235 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The subjective outcome measure Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) was pooled for a meta-analysis and was statistically significantly in favor of early vestibular rehabilitation training (early VRT) plus corticosteroids compared with corticosteroids alone: at one-month follow-up ( = 0.00) and 12 months follow-up ( = 0.01). DHI was a critical outcome for measuring the differences in effect of early VRT. The objective outcome measures of caloric lateralization, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography were gathered for a narrative synthesis.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis showed that early VRT in combination with corticosteroids was more effective for treating pAVS than corticosteroid treatment alone. No adverse effects were reported for early VRT.
PubMed: 38872828
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1396891 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2024We performed a comprehensive systematic review to identify medication-associated orbital inflammation and to characterize its clinico-radiological features. We reviewed...
We performed a comprehensive systematic review to identify medication-associated orbital inflammation and to characterize its clinico-radiological features. We reviewed English-language articles describing medication-associated orbital inflammation (i.e., orbital myositis, dacryoadenitis and orbital fat) published to June, 2023. Isolated inflammation of the intraocular structures or globe alone (i.e. uveitis, scleritis, optic neuritis and perineuritis) were excluded. In medication-associated orbital inflammation, the extraocular muscles are preferentially affected, occurring in isolation or in combination with other orbital and/or intraocular structures. Clinico-radiological manifestations may be non-specific; however, certain medications may be distinguished according to the presence of systemic prodrome, laterality, associated intraocular inflammation, and predisposition to involve certain orbital structures. Rapid identification, discontinuation of the provoking medication, and systemic corticosteroid therapy (if appropriate) typically achieves a favorable visual prognosis. As new medications become adopted by clinicians, rare adverse effects will be further delineated.Medication-associated orbital inflammation is an important diagnostic consideration in orbital inflammatory disease. A careful medication history and clinical assessment may be revealing, permitting timely discontinuation of the offending agent and initiation of appropriate management.
Topics: Humans; Dacryocystitis; Glucocorticoids; Orbital Diseases; Orbital Myositis
PubMed: 38490453
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.03.003 -
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders May 2024To compare the efficacy of treatment of optic neuritis (ON) with corticosteroids (CTC) alone, CTC+plasmapheresis (PLP), and CTC+intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study Review
Efficacy and comparison of corticosteroids only and corticosteroids with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of optic neuritis in demyelinating disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
To compare the efficacy of treatment of optic neuritis (ON) with corticosteroids (CTC) alone, CTC+plasmapheresis (PLP), and CTC+intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).
DESIGN
After an episode of ON, although visual recovery is usually good, some patients may have significant visual sequelae. While the efficacy of first-line CTC is now indisputable, there is no consensus on the nature of second-line treatment. To date, no systematic review has compared the efficacy of treatment of ON with CTC alone, CTC+plasmapheresis (PLP), and CTC+intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). A meta-analysis is needed to compare the efficacy of PLP and IVIG in steroid-resistant ON.
METHODS
This systematic review included all studies comparing at least two of the three treatments for steroid-resistant ON (CTC alone, CTC+PLP, and CTC+IVIG). From all articles published on PubMed between January 2000 and June 2022, two independent ophthalmologists selected studies of interest using the PRISMA method. Methodology, patient characteristics, and outcomes were identified. A network metaanalysis was then performed to compare the efficacy of the three treatments.
RESULTS
Six comparative studies were included, representing 209 patients. The percentage of significant visual recovery after CTC alone, CTC+PLP, and CTC+IVIG in the acute treatment of steroid-resistant ON was 30 %, 45 %, and 77 %, respectively. Comparison of CTC+IVIG vs CTC alone, CTC+PLP vs CTC only, and CTC+PLP vs CTC+IVIG yielded odds ratios of 12.81, 2.47, and 0.19 respectively.
CONCLUSION
Treatment of steroid-resistant ON with CTC+PLP or CTC+IVIG is more effective than treatment with CTC alone. Although no study has directly compared the two treatments, IVIG may be more effective than PLP.
Topics: Optic Neuritis; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Plasmapheresis; Network Meta-Analysis; Combined Modality Therapy; Immunologic Factors; Demyelinating Diseases
PubMed: 38457882
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105521 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jan 2024: The COVID-19 pandemic affects various populations worldwide. The discovery of vaccinations was necessary for the prevention and elimination of the disease. Despite the... (Review)
Review
: The COVID-19 pandemic affects various populations worldwide. The discovery of vaccinations was necessary for the prevention and elimination of the disease. Despite the high importance of these vaccinations, they may cause some complications, such as ocular complications. This study aims to draw attention to the possible complications of the vaccination and highlight its importance. : Systematic review of the literature from January 2021 to January 2023. A total of 20 published articles were included and reported cases of ocular complications in patients who received COVID-19 vaccines. : A total of 243 patients with verified ocular complications following the COVID-19 vaccination were included, ranging in age from 18 to 84 years. The most common ocular complications reported in the current study were ocular inflammatory complications, which represented 47.3%, followed by optic neuritis (24.3%). Retinal artery occlusion, retinal vein occlusion, acute macular neuroretinopathy, and paracentral acute middle maculopathy represented 10.7%. Herpetic ocular infections and herpetic eye disease (14%). Nearly half (42%) of the patients with ocular problems received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination. : Despite the high importance of the COVID-19 vaccination, it was found that it is associated with the occurrence of some ocular complications. Future projects should come with more extensive prospective studies to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms and risk factors associated with ocular complications following COVID-19 vaccination, thereby enhancing our understanding and guiding appropriate management strategies.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; COVID-19 Vaccines; Pandemics; Prospective Studies; COVID-19; Vaccination
PubMed: 38399537
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020249 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024To date, no systematic review or meta-analysis has critically evaluated the relevance of using optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN) in diagnosis of vestibular disorders....
INTRODUCTION
To date, no systematic review or meta-analysis has critically evaluated the relevance of using optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN) in diagnosis of vestibular disorders. To assess the role of OKAN in diagnosis of vestibular disorders, the OKAN time constant (TC) between patients with vestibular disorders and healthy participants will be compared.
METHODS
Automated search strategies were carried out in the Embase, Medline PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to December 2023. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) evaluation of OKAN in individuals with vestibular disorders, (2) clinical trials, and (3) inclusion of healthy individuals as the control group. Exclusion criteria were: (1) animal studies, (2) non-clinical trial study designs, (3) assessment of non-vestibular disorders, (4) no examination of OKAN TC, (5) only examination of healthy participants, (6) studies published in a language other than English, (7) no healthy participants as control group, (8) case reports, and (9) only abstract available. The random-effects model was used to pool the data. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools was used to assess the risk of bias. The quality assessment was performed with the aid of the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, provided by NHLBI. The PRISMA guidelines were used as reporting guidelines. The main outcome of this study was the between-group mean difference (MDbetween) in OKAN TC and its 95% confidence interval between patients with vestibular disorders and healthy participants.
RESULTS
Seven out of 244 screened articles were included that studied 289 participants. The overall mean difference (MD = -7.08) with a 95% CI of [-10.18; -3.97] was significant ( = 0.014). The heterogeneity was significant ( = 0.02). Quality assessment was generally good (76%). The risk of bias was low in five studies and moderate in two studies.
CONCLUSION
The results demonstrate that OKAN TC is significantly shorter in patients with vestibular disorders compared to healthy controls. This finding is important for future research, particularly with the emergence of novel clinical tools and diagnostic syndromes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=442695.
PubMed: 38385042
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1367735 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disease that affects almost 0.8-1.9 cases per 100,000 people worldwide every year. This is the most prevalent cause of subacute... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disease that affects almost 0.8-1.9 cases per 100,000 people worldwide every year. This is the most prevalent cause of subacute flaccid paralyzing illness today. It is a subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; the typical scenario involves ascending symmetrical flaccid paralysis, but in some circumstances, sensory, autonomic, and cranial neuropathy may also be involved. Several vaccines have been found to have complications since the previous century. Numerous case reports of GBS in the literature have been reported following COVID-19 vaccines in recent times.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive examination of GBS cases that have been reported after COVID-19 vaccines; to analyze the descriptive statistical analysis of data gathered regarding clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological, and radiological characteristics; to discuss, based on the available evidence, whether the disease has a preference for a particular vaccine type; and to speculate on the potential pathogenesis.
METHODOLOGY
This review has been carried out by recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULT
Reviewing 60 case reports illustrated that most of them are from the USA (18.1%) and the majority of affected individuals were males (60%). The results favored the association between vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, particularly AstraZeneca vaccine, and the GBS. The mean of symptoms onset is 11.4 days. The results of diagnostic tests such as LP are consistent mostly with albumin-cytological dissociation (81.81%), where brain and spine MRI was unremarkable in 59.52%. Regarding electrodiagnostic tests, AIDP is the most common variant (61.81%). The management was not consistent among the case reports. However, IVIG is the most frequent way of treating these patients (68.33%). The functional outcome was documented in 47 patients; 65% improved with medical management.
CONCLUSION
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of reported cases of GBS following COVID-19 vaccines and descriptive statistical analysis of collected data on clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological, and radiological features, to discuss, based on available results, whether the disease has a predilection to a specific vaccine type and to speculate the potential pathogenesis.
PubMed: 38352138
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1332364 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery May 2024Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injuries have become increasingly common, leading to a higher number of mUCL reconstructions (UCLR). Various techniques and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injuries have become increasingly common, leading to a higher number of mUCL reconstructions (UCLR). Various techniques and graft choices have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of each available graft choice, the surgical techniques most utilized, and the reported complications associated with each surgical method.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysesguidelines. We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify all articles that included UCLR between January 2002 and October 2022. We included all studies that referenced UCLR graft choice, surgical technique, and/or ulnar nerve transposition. Studies were evaluated in a narrative fashion to assess demographics and report current trends in utilization and complications of UCLR as they pertain to graft choice and surgical techniques over the past 20 years. Where possible, we stratified based on graft and technique.
RESULTS
Forty-seven articles were included, reporting on 6671 elbows. The cohort was 98% male, had a weighted mean age of 21 years and follow-up of 53 months. There were 6146 UCLRs (92%) performed with an autograft and 152 (2.3%) that utilized an allograft, while 373 (5.6%) were from mixed cohorts of autograft and allograft. Palmaris longus autograft was the most utilized mUCL graft choice (64%). The most utilized surgical configuration was the figure-of-8 (68%). Specifically, the most common techniques were the modified Jobe technique (37%), followed by American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) (22%), and the docking (22%) technique. A concomitant ulnar nerve transposition was performed in 44% of all patients, with 1.9% of these patients experiencing persistent ulnar nerve symptoms after ulnar nerve transposition. Of the total cohort, 14% experienced postoperative ulnar neuritis with no prior preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. Further, meta-analysis revealed a significantly greater revision rate with the use of allografts compared to autograft and mixed cohorts (2.6% vs. 1.8% and 1.9%, P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS
Most surgeons performed UCLR with palmaris autograft utilizing a figure-of-8 graft configuration, specifically with the modified Jobe technique. The overall rate of allograft use was 2.3%, much lower than expected. The revision rate for UCLR with allograft appears to be greater compared to UCLR with autograft, although this may be secondary to limited allograft literature.
Topics: Humans; Male; Young Adult; Adult; Female; Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction; Elbow; Collateral Ligament, Ulnar; Ulnar Nerve; Ulnar Neuropathies; Elbow Joint; Collateral Ligaments; Baseball
PubMed: 38072032
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.023 -
Seminars in Ophthalmology Jan 2024Optic neuritis may occur in a variety of conditions, including as a manifestation of multiple sclerosis. Despite significant research into the efficacy of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Optic neuritis may occur in a variety of conditions, including as a manifestation of multiple sclerosis. Despite significant research into the efficacy of corticosteroids as a first-line treatment, the optimal route of administration has not been well defined. This review aims to explore the efficacy, adverse effects and economic implications of using oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone to treat acute optic neuritis.
METHODS
A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL was performed to July 2022, prior to data collection and risk of bias analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
Six articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The results showed that in the treatment of acute optic neuritis, oral methylprednisolone has a non-inferior efficacy and adverse effect profile in comparison to intravenous methylprednisolone. In a cost analysis, oral methylprednisolone to be more cost-effective than intravenous methylprednisolone.
CONCLUSIONS
Oral methylprednisolone has comparable efficacy and adverse effect profiles to intravenous methylprednisolone for the treatment of optic neuritis. The analysis suggests oral administration is more cost-effective than intravenous administration; however, further analyses of the formal cost-benefit ratio are required.
Topics: Humans; Methylprednisolone; Prednisone; Glucocorticoids; Administration, Intravenous; Optic Neuritis; Administration, Oral
PubMed: 38013424
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2287100 -
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Nov 2023Studies have demonstrated that people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) experience visual impairments and neurodegenerative retinal processes. The disability progression in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Studies have demonstrated that people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) experience visual impairments and neurodegenerative retinal processes. The disability progression in pwMS may be associated with retinal changes assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT). This meta-analysis aims at synthesizing the correlations between OCT measurements of disability in pwMS.
METHODS
We systematically searched four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to November 2022, then conducted a meta-analysis using a random effects model to determine the pooled correlation coefficient(r) between OCT measurements and disability scales by R version 4.2.3 with the meta version 6.2-1 package.
RESULTS
From 3129 studies, 100 studies were included. Among 9051 pwMS, the female-to-male ratio was 3.15:1, with a mean age of 39.57 ± 6.07 years. The mean disease duration and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were 8.5 ± 3.7 and 2.7 ± 1.1, respectively. Among the pooled subgroup analyses, macular ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) in patients with relapsing-remitting (pwRRMS) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) in patients with progressive MS (pwPMS) had strong correlations with EDSS, r = -0.33 (95% CI: -0.45 to -0.20, I = 45%, z-score = -4.86, p < 0.001) and r = -0.20 (95% CI:-0.58 to 0.26, I = 76%, z-score = -0.85, p = 0.395), respectively. According to subgroup analysis on pwMS without optic neuritis (ON) history, the largest correlation was seen between EDSS and macular ganglion cell complex (mGCC): r = -0.39 (95% CI: -0.70 to 0.04, I = 79%, z-score = -1.79, p = 0.073).
CONCLUSION
OCT measurements are correlated with disability in pwMS, and they can complement the comprehensive neurological visit as an additional paraclinical test.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis; Retinal Ganglion Cells; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Retina; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive; Optic Neuritis
PubMed: 37924591
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120847 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2023New neurological complications of COVID-19 infection have been reported in recent research. Among them, the spectrum of anti-MOG positive diseases, defined as anti-MOG...
BACKGROUND
New neurological complications of COVID-19 infection have been reported in recent research. Among them, the spectrum of anti-MOG positive diseases, defined as anti-MOG antibody associated disease (MOGAD), is distinguished, which can manifest as optic neuritis, myelitis, or various forms of encephalitis (MOGAE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study reports a new case of MOGAE following SARS-CoV-2 infection. A literature review of other MOGAE cases associated with COVID-19 infection was conducted and summarized.
RESULTS
A 60-year-old male patient, who had previously been infected with COVID-19, was admitted to the Neurology Department with a rapidly progressive deterioration of his cognitive functions that lasted for about 3 months. On neurological examination, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was 17, which further deteriorated to 13. In addition, central paresis of the right VIIth nerve and pyramidal hemiparesis on the right side were noted. The MRI of the brain showed multiple hyperintense lesions. The CSF examination revealed an elevated total protein level with a normal cell count, and serum showed a positive finding of anti-MOG antibodies. Taking into account all the information, the diagnosis of MOGAE, following COVID-19 infection, was made. A total of 9 similar cases of MOGAE associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified in the available literature. Among them 2 cases presented progressive cognitive dysfunction and another 5 altered mental status. The most frequently described MRI changes were hyperintense lesions located cortically and/or subcortically. Anti-MOG antibodies were positive in all patients. In 5 cases they were detected only in serum, in 2 cases in serum and CSF, and in 2 cases the origin was not reported.
CONCLUSION
The reported cases of MOGAE following COVID-19 infection suggest an increasing new clinical problem, and show an association between COVID-19 and MOGADs.
PubMed: 37638199
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1239657