-
BMC Gastroenterology Mar 2021There is increased interest in the therapeutic use of statins in cirrhosis, but preferred statin and safety outcomes are still not well known. In this systematic review...
BACKGROUND/AIMS
There is increased interest in the therapeutic use of statins in cirrhosis, but preferred statin and safety outcomes are still not well known. In this systematic review we aimed to address pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and effects on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes of statins in cirrhosis.
METHODS
Our systematic search in several electronic databases and repositories of two regulatory bodies up to 2020-06-11 yielded 22 articles and 2 drug monographs with relevant data.
RESULTS
Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin showed minimal PK changes in Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. Only rosuvastatin was assessed in a repeated dosing PK study. Atorvastatin showed pronounced PK changes in cirrhosis. No PK data was found for simvastatin, the most commonly used statin in cirrhosis trials. There was insufficient data to assess CV effects of statins in cirrhosis. Clinical trials in cirrhosis were limited to simvastatin, atorvastatin, and pravastatin. In patients taking simvastatin 40 mg, pooled frequency of rhabdomyolysis was 2%, an incidence 40-fold higher than that reported in non-cirrhosis patients, while this was no rhabdomyolysis observed in patients on simvastatin 20 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 40 mg. Drug-induced liver injury was of difficult interpretation due to co-existence of muscle damage. No overt liver failure was reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Simvastatin 40 mg should be avoided in decompensated cirrhosis. Safety data on simvastatin 20 mg or other statins are based on small study sample size. This rarity of evidence combined with lack of data in dose adjustment methods in cirrhosis is a barrier for using statins for CV indications or for investigational use for liver indications.
Topics: Atorvastatin; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Liver Cirrhosis; Pravastatin; Simvastatin
PubMed: 33726685
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01704-w -
Pharmacological Research Mar 2021Recent studies have suggested that statins may be associated with a lower risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recent studies have suggested that statins may be associated with a lower risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception until May 2020 to identify any eligible studies that reported the association between statin use and the risk of recurrent VTE, and conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020190169) on this matter.
RESULTS
A total of 14 observational studies were included for qualitative review and 12 of them qualified for meta-analyses. The main meta-analysis found that statin use was associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence among patients with VTE (pooled adjusted HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.69-0.83), which was robust in sensitivity analyses and free of significant publication bias. Additionally, such association was present when restricting to periods after anticoagulation withdrawal (pooled adjusted HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.88) and when separately analyzing recurrent deep vein thrombosis (pooled adjusted HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81) and recurrent pulmonary embolism (pooled adjusted HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.97; P = 0.027). Furthermore, statin use in patients with VTE was also found to be associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.77), and possibly an even lower risk of bleeding (adjusted HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.73-1.07), albeit not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
Statins have the potential to reduce recurrent events among patient with VTE. Randomized clinical trials to better explore the effect of statins in secondary prevention of VTE are warranted.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 33412275
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105413 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Feb 2021The most efficacious strategy to manage pregnant patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) refractory to conventional heparin/low-dose aspirin treatment or at high... (Review)
Review
The efficacy and safety of second-line treatments of refractory and/or high risk pregnant antiphospholipid syndrome patients. A systematic literature review analyzing 313 pregnancies.
OBJECTIVE
The most efficacious strategy to manage pregnant patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) refractory to conventional heparin/low-dose aspirin treatment or at high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes has not been determined with any degree of certainty. The study set out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the second-line treatments most frequently used in addition to conventional therapy, and the data were analyzed to identify which is/are associated to the best pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature on studies concerning second-line treatments for refractory and/or high risk pregnant APS women published between February 2006 and February 2020 was conducted. The records were retrieved by searching Medline via Pubmed, the Web of Science platform, the Cochrane library database and clinicaltrials.gov.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria of the review: six retrospective cohort studies, one case-control, one case-series and six case reports. The results of single treatment protocols based upon hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), low-dose steroids (LDS), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange (PE) or pravastatin and of combination protocols based upon HCQ+LDS, IVIG+LDS, PE+LDS and PE+IVIG used during 313 pregnancies in 303 APS women were analyzed and compared. The second-line treatments produced 261/313 (83.4%) live births; severe pregnancy complications were registered in 75/313 (24%) pregnancies. Drug side-effects were observed in 3/313 (0.9%) pregnancies. Statistical analysis identified a significantly higher live birth rate and/or a significantly lower number of severe complications in the pregnancies treated with IVIG, HCQ, pravastatin, PE+IVIG and PE+LDS.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest using low-dose IVIG (< 2 g/Kg/month) or HCQ 400 mg/day starting before pregnancy in women with APS refractory to conventional therapy, while high-dose IVIG (2 g/Kg/month) associated with PE or alone in those with high risk±refractory APS.
Topics: Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Aspirin; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33360227
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.10.001 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Feb 2022There has been increasing research momentum to identify new therapeutic agents for the prevention or treatment of preeclampsia, drugs that can affect the underlying...
There has been increasing research momentum to identify new therapeutic agents for the prevention or treatment of preeclampsia, drugs that can affect the underlying disease pathophysiology. Molecular targets of candidate treatments include oxidative stress, antiangiogenic factors, and the angiotensin, nitric oxide, and proinflammatory pathways. The proposed treatments undergoing preclinical and clinical trial evaluation are thought to act on placental or endothelial disease or both. Most have adopted the pragmatic strategy of repurposing drugs. Of all the therapeutic agents proposed, pravastatin has received the most interest. There are preclinical studies showing that it has pleiotropic actions that favorably impact on multiple molecular targets and can resolve a preeclampsia phenotype in many animal models. An early phase clinical trial suggests that it may have therapeutic activity. Several large prevention trials are planned or ongoing and, when completed, could definitively address whether pravastatin can prevent preeclampsia. Proton-pump inhibitors, metformin, and sulfasalazine are other drugs with preclinical evidence of multiple molecular actions that could resolve the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. These agents are also currently being evaluated in clinical trials. There have been many recent preclinical studies identifying the potential of numerous natural compounds to treat preeclampsia, such as plant extracts and micronutrients that have potent anti-inflammatory or antioxidant activity. Recent preclinical studies have also proposed novel molecular-targeted strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha, placental growth factor, and short interfering RNA technology, to silence the gene expression of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 or angiotensinogen. Other treatment approaches that have transitioned to human trials (ranging from single-arm to phase III trials that have been completed or are ongoing) include folic acid, nitric oxide donors (such as L-arginine), recombinant antithrombin III, digoxin immune antigen-binding fragment, and melatonin. There have been case series showing the removal of circulating soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 may help stabilize the disease and prolong pregnancy. Interestingly, there are case reports suggesting that monoclonal antibody eculizumab (complement inhibitor) may have therapeutic potential. If new agents are discovered that are proven to be effective in preventing or treating preeclampsia, the potential to improve global maternal and perinatal health will be significant.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antioxidants; Antithrombin III; Biological Products; Blood Component Removal; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Micronutrients; Placenta Growth Factor; Plant Extracts; Pravastatin; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Proton Pump Inhibitors; RNA, Small Interfering; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfasalazine; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1
PubMed: 32946849
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.014 -
Nutrients Jul 2020Statins and omega-3 supplementation have been recommended for cardiovascular disease prevention, but comparative effects have not been investigated. This study aimed to... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparative Effect of Statins and Omega-3 Supplementation on Cardiovascular Events: Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis of 63 Randomized Controlled Trials Including 264,516 Participants.
Statins and omega-3 supplementation have been recommended for cardiovascular disease prevention, but comparative effects have not been investigated. This study aimed to summarize current evidence of the effect of statins and omega-3 supplementation on cardiovascular events. A meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis of 63 randomized controlled trials were used to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effects of specific statins and omega-3 supplementation compared with controls. Overall, the statin group showed significant risk reductions in total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke; however, omega-3 supplementation significantly decreased the risks of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction only, in the comparison with the control group. In comparison with omega-3 supplementation, pravastatin significantly reduced the risks of total cardiovascular disease (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72-0.91), coronary heart disease (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.94), and myocardial infarction (RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94). Risks of total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke in the atorvastatin group were statistically lower than those in the omega-3 group, with RRs (95% CIs) of 0.80 (0.73-0.88), 0.64 (0.50-0.82), 0.75 (0.60-0.93), and 0.81 (0.66-0.99), respectively. The findings of this study suggest that pravastatin and atorvastatin may be more beneficial than omega-3 supplementation in reducing the risk of total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and myocardial infarction.
Topics: Aged; Atorvastatin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Disease; Dietary Supplements; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Pravastatin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32722395
DOI: 10.3390/nu12082218 -
European Journal of Clinical... Dec 2020A growing body of preclinical and observational research suggests that statins have potential as a therapeutic strategy in patients with cancer. This systematic review...
PURPOSE
A growing body of preclinical and observational research suggests that statins have potential as a therapeutic strategy in patients with cancer. This systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with solid tumours aimed to determine the efficacy of statin therapy on mortality outcomes, their safety profile and the risk of bias of included studies.
METHODS
Full-text articles comparing statin therapy versus control in solid tumours and reporting mortality outcomes were identified from Medline and Embase from conception to February 2020. A systematic review with qualitative (primarily) and quantitative synthesis was conducted. This systematic review was prospectively registered (Prospero registration CRD42018116364).
RESULTS
Eleven trials of 2165 patients were included. Primary tumour sites investigated included lung, colorectal, gastro-oesophageal, pancreatic and liver. Most trials recruited patients with advanced malignancy and used sub-maximal statin doses for relatively short durations. Aside from one trial which demonstrated benefit with allocation to pravastatin 40 mg in hepatocellular carcinoma, the remaining ten trials did not demonstrate efficacy with statins. The pooled hazard ratio for all-cause mortality with allocation to pravastatin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in two trials was 0.69 (95% confidence interval CI 0.30-1.61). Study estimates were imprecise. There were no clinically important differences in statin-related adverse events between groups. Overall, included trials were deemed low risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
The trial evidence is not sufficiently robust to confirm or refute the efficacy and safety of statins in patients with solid malignant tumours. Study and patient characteristics may explain this uncertainty. The potential role of high-dose statins in adjuvant settings deserves further research.
Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Neoplasms; Pravastatin; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors
PubMed: 32719919
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02967-0 -
Cancer Causes & Control : CCC Oct 2020The link between lipid-stabilizing medications and epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis is incompletely understood. Statins may reduce ovarian cancer risk, but results are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The link between lipid-stabilizing medications and epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis is incompletely understood. Statins may reduce ovarian cancer risk, but results are inconclusive.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting associations between statin use and ovarian cancer risk in PubMed. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses by cancer histotype, statin class (lipo- or hydrophilic) and duration of statin use were conducted. Use of individual statins in populations was assessed to determine population-specific differences in statin types.
RESULTS
Nine studies with 435,237 total women were included (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT); 4 prospective; 4 case-control). Statin use was associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.03) and risk was significantly reduced in populations with low pravastatin use (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99). Risk estimates varied by statin class (3 studies; lipophilic: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.12; hydrophilic: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.72-1.57) and cancer histotype (3 studies; serous: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.69-1.30; clear cell: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.74-1.86). Long-term use was associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.54-1.10) that further reduced when pravastatin use was low (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-1.01). Between-study heterogeneity was high overall and in subgroups (I > 60%).
CONCLUSION
Statins may be associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer, but the effect likely differs by individual statin, duration of use and cancer histotype. Additional well-powered studies are needed to elucidate important subgroup effects.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Ovarian Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk
PubMed: 32685996
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01327-8 -
Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2020The drug efficacy may differ among different statins, and evidence from head-to-head comparisons is sparse and inconsistent. The study is aimed at comparing the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative Lipid-Lowering/Increasing Efficacy of 7 Statins in Patients with Dyslipidemia, Cardiovascular Diseases, or Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analyses of 50 Randomized Controlled Trials.
OBJECTIVE
The drug efficacy may differ among different statins, and evidence from head-to-head comparisons is sparse and inconsistent. The study is aimed at comparing the lipid-lowering/increasing effects of 7 different statins in patients with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, or diabetes mellitus by conducting systematic review and network meta-analyses (NMA) of the lipid changes after certain statins' use.
METHODS
In this study, we searched four electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through February 25, 2020, comparing the lipid-lowering efficacy of no less than two of the included statins (or statin vs. placebo). Three reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. Firstly, mixed treatment overall comparison analyses, in the form of frequentist NMAs, were conducted using STATA 15.0 software. Then, subgroup analyses were conducted according to different baseline diseases. At last, sensitivity analyses were conducted according to age and follow-up duration. The trial was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42018108799).
RESULTS
As a result, seven statin monotherapy treatments in 50 studies (51956 participants) were used for the analyses. The statins included simvastatin (SIM), fluvastatin (FLU), atorvastatin (ATO), rosuvastatin (ROS), lovastatin (LOV), pravastatin (PRA), and pitavastatin (PIT). In terms of LDL-C lowering, rosuvastatin ranked 1 with a surface under cumulated ranking (SUCRA) value of 93.1%. The comparative treatment efficacy for LDL-C lowering was ROS>ATO>PIT>SIM>PRA>FLU>LOV>PLA. All of the other ranking and NMA results were reported in SUCRA plots and league tables.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the NMAs, it can be concluded that rosuvastatin ranked 1 in LDL-C, ApoB-lowering efficacy and ApoA1-increasing efficacy. Lovastatin ranked 1 in TC- and TG-lowering efficacy, and fluvastatin ranked 1 in HDL-C-increasing efficacy. The results should be interpreted with caution due to some limitations in our review. However, they can provide references and evidence-based foundation for drug selection in both statin monotherapies and statin combination therapies.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Down-Regulation; Dyslipidemias; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 32411300
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3987065 -
Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi : Turk... Mar 2020The aim of this study was to examine and present the effect of statin treatment on the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of patients in Turkey by...
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to examine and present the effect of statin treatment on the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of patients in Turkey by evaluating the data of studies conducted in the country.
METHODS
Manuscripts published between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017 with terms 'LDL' and 'TURK' in the title or abstract and reporting LDL cholesterol data of patients treated with statins were evaluated for inclusion in the study. From the initial search result a total of 1795 papers, 39 manuscripts with 63 study arms were selected for analysis and the data of 3486 patients were included. Descriptive analysis was used to assess the data. Weighted averages of the data were also calculated.
RESULTS
The female/male ratio was 42/58. The mean age was 52.9±10.1 years. The proportion of patients with the recommended LDL cholesterol level of <70 mg/dL after treatment with statins was 15.3%;. In all, 10.2% of the patients who were prescribed a low-dose statin and 28.0% of those who were prescribed a high-dose statin had an LDL cholesterol of <70 mg/dL after treatment. Among patients who were being treated with statins for ≤2 months, 25.7% achieved an LDL cholesterol level of <70 mg/dL. Among those who were being treated with statins for 2-4 months and >4 months the proportion was 11.4% and 9.7%, respectively. The percentage of patients at the target level was 21.8%, 21.7%, 17.9%;, 8.6%, and 0.8% among those using atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, and pravastatin, respectively.
CONCLUSION
In Turkey, only 15% of the patients who had received statin therapy had a LDL cholesterol level of <70 mg/dL. Revision of the current treatment should be considered to reach the target levels recommended in the guidelines, especially for patients with high cardiovascular risk.
Topics: Cholesterol, LDL; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypercholesterolemia; Turkey
PubMed: 32147651
DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2019.45156 -
European Journal of Neurology Jun 2020Prevention of ischaemic stroke and cardiovascular events is an established benefit of statin therapy, but the effects of statin treatment on the accrual of magnetic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Prevention of ischaemic stroke and cardiovascular events is an established benefit of statin therapy, but the effects of statin treatment on the accrual of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of ischaemic cerebral injury remain unknown. A systematic review was performed to identify all studies that randomized patients with cardiovascular risk factors to statin treatment and assessed the effect of statin treatment on covert infarcts (asymptomatic, evident only on neuroimaging) and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) accrual on MRI.
METHODS
A systematic review in MEDLINE and Scopus from inception to 23 October 2019 was performed. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates of the crude risk ratios and standardized mean differences.
RESULTS
Data from three randomized controlled trials (1430 participants) were included evaluating the effect of rosuvastatin (10 mg/day) in 668 hypertensive patients older than 60 years of age over 5 years, pravastatin (40 mg/day) in 554 elderly people more than 70 years of age over 3 years and simvastatin (20 mg/day) in 208 patients with asymptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis over 2 years. Patients randomized to statin treatment had decreased accrual of new covert infarcts (risk ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.88) during a mean follow-up of 2-6 years. Only one study reported WMH decreased volume change in patients randomized to statin treatment compared to patients randomized to non-statin treatment (standardized mean difference -1.17; 95% confidence interval -1.33, -1.00).
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that, in addition to stroke prevention, statin treatment can reduce the accrual of covert MRI markers of ischaemic cerebral injury.
Topics: Aged; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Infarction; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke
PubMed: 32133735
DOI: 10.1111/ene.14196