-
Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii Jun 2022Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCDLBCL) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rare.
INTRODUCTION
Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCDLBCL) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rare.
AIM
The literature that analyses the cutaneous manifestations of PCDLBCL and assesses the effect and the outcome of treatment is scarce.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We described a case of PCDLBCL after TKA, whose cutaneous mass develops around surgical sites, mimicking a prosthetic joint infection. In addition, we conducted a systematic review of 29 reported cases with PCDLBCL. Primary endpoint for the review was main cutaneous manifestations of PCDLBCL. Secondary endpoint included treatment options of PCDLBCL and optimal therapeutic method.
RESULTS
We found that the main cutaneous manifestations include infiltrative cutaneous lesions such as macules, papules or nodules, some of them presented as ulcerations or formation of vesicles, subcutaneous nodules or both. The treatment options include excision, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and even "watchful waiting" as spontaneous regression was noted in some cases. Systemic chemotherapy is the most frequent initial treatment approach chosen, of which rituximab is often combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy and patients who received systemic rituximab tend to have a better overall survival (OS) time than those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS
PCDLBCL is a rare disease after TKA, however, an early recognition and distinguishing from infection is still needed. Patients with PCDLBCL may profit from rituximab-based chemotherapy, increasing the survival rate, despite the high relapse rate and limited OS time in some cases.
PubMed: 35950110
DOI: 10.5114/ada.2021.108444 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHI) is a rare placental lesion with a high recurrence rate and poor perinatal outcomes. There are currently limited guidelines... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHI) is a rare placental lesion with a high recurrence rate and poor perinatal outcomes. There are currently limited guidelines regarding the diagnosis of this condition in the index pregnancy and treatment where recurrence is suspected.
OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the perinatal outcomes of pregnancies affected by chronic histiocytic intervillositis and to what extent they can be improved with treatment. The secondary objective was to assess the relationship between CHI lesion severity and pregnancy loss.
METHODS
A systematic search of Ovid Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar and CINAHL was carried out. Case reports, cohort, case-control and randomised controlled trials (RCT) detailing the perinatal outcomes of CHI pregnancies, both treated and untreated, were included.
RESULTS
No RCTs were identified. However, in a review population of 659 pregnancies, with additional 7 in case reports, CHI treatments included aspirin, prednisone, prednisolone, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), hydroxychloroquine and adalimumab. A descriptive synthesis of data found mixed results for treatments in relation to live birth, miscarriage and fetal growth restriction outcomes. Furthermore, quantitative synthesis of 38 pregnancies revealed a non-significant improvement in live birth rate with CHI targeted treatment (OR 1.79 [95% CI 0.33-9.61] (p=0.50), while meta-analysis of CHI severity in line with pregnancy loss, in a sample of 231 pregnancies, revealed lower odds of pregnancy loss with less severe lesions (OR: 0.17 [0.03-0.80], p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis reinforce notions surrounding the insufficient evidence for CHI treatment. It also strengthens previous hypotheses detailing the positive association between CHI lesion severity and odds of pregnancy loss. Aspirin, LMWH, prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine and adalimumab are candidates with varying levels of weak to moderate evidence supporting their use. Further prospective research is required to obtain robust evidence pertaining to treatment safety and efficacy and optimal drug regimes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
[website], identifier CRD42021237604.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Adalimumab; Aspirin; Female; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Prednisolone; Pregnancy
PubMed: 35937841
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.945543 -
Cureus Jun 2022Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease involving multiple systems with a range of clinical presentations caused by the production of... (Review)
Review
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease involving multiple systems with a range of clinical presentations caused by the production of antibodies, activation of complements, and deposition of immune complexes. The exact cause of SLE is still unknown. The effectiveness of traditional treatment methods for SLE is very little. Nowadays, resistance to conventional therapy, steroids, and immunosuppressants is common among SLE patients. Patients with refractory disease and nephritis generally have severe drug-induced toxicity which contributes to organ dysfunction, despite available therapies. Different biologic agents and therapeutic antibodies have become an alternative and have been under experiment in clinical trials, enrolling patients whose disease is inadequately controlled by conventional treatment. Belimumab is the only targeted therapy approved for SLE treatment. This systematic review discusses one such biological agent for treating systemic lupus erythematosus, namely, belimumab. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from 2005 to 2021 on adult SLE. patients treated with monoclonal antibodies to assess the efficacy and safety. Methodological quality was assessed using PubMed, PMC, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the QUality In Prognosis Studies Tool (QUIPS) for RCTs. Two independent reviewers performed an electronic search on MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, SCIELO, Scopus, and ResearchGate. Based on a systematic review of articles we found that belimumab appears to be efficacious and generally well-tolerated in the treatment of SLE as compared to other drugs. The long-term use of belimumab combined with standard therapy showed a low incidence of organ damage. A lower incidence of organ damage was seen after initiating treatment in patients with a high risk for organ dysfunction. Patients who test for antinuclear antibody or anti-dsDNA-positive SLE, with moderate symptoms in the skin and musculoskeletal systems despite immunosuppressants, are treated with belimumab as an adjunct therapy. Patients with severe lupus nephritis or active CNS lupus cannot be treated with belimumab. Belimumab is effective in most races, as a clinical trial done in North-East Asia showed improvement in SLE symptoms and decreased dependence on prednisone. Belimumab also decreased disease activity and severe flares. Belimumab had greater efficacy in children.
PubMed: 35844357
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25887 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022Interstitial pneumonitis (IP), a potentially fatal complication of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) patients received CHOP (cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin and vincristine...
OBJECTIVES
Interstitial pneumonitis (IP), a potentially fatal complication of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) patients received CHOP (cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin and vincristine and prednisone)-like chemotherapy, negatively affected patients' clinical outcome and quality of life. We aimed to explore patient-related, disease-related and drug-related risk factors associated with IP and gain a better understanding of the incidence in NHL patients.
METHODS
Databases, including PubMed, Ovid, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), and Wanfang Database from inception to January 20, 2022, were searched to identify studies evaluating the risk factors and incidence of IP. The included studies were assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale and above 7 points was considered high quality. The statistical analysis of risk factors was assessed by RevMan software (version 5.3) and incidence of IP was calculated by R software (version 4.1.2). Fixed-or random-effects models were applied to estimated the relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (Cl).
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies comprised of 3423 NHL patients were included in the analysis. Among the 3 available patient-related risk factors, 6 disease-related risk factors and 3 drug-related risk factors, it was found that only drug-related risk factors were significantly associated with IP development: pegylated liposomes doxorubicin (PLD) replacement (RR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.69-6.27, 64%), rituximab (RTX) addition (RR = 4.24, 95% CI = 2.58-6.96, 0) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration (RR = 5.80, 95% CI = 3.05-11.05, 0). The pooled incidence of CHOP, R-CHOP, and R-CDOP regimen was 1.0% (95% CI 0.00-0.01, = 8%), 7.0% (95% CI 0.05-0.09, = 64%) and 22.0% (95% CI 0.13-0.32, = 87%) respectively.
CONCLUSION
PLD replacement, RTX addition and G-CSF administration were significant risk factors of IP for NHL patients received the CHOP-like chemotherapy. Clinicians should focus on these patients to detect and treat the IP development timely, which might bring benefit in patients' survival.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022309884.
PubMed: 35720002
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.880144 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous neoplasm and is characterized as the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite 60-70% of all...
BACKGROUND
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous neoplasm and is characterized as the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite 60-70% of all patients being cured with R-CHOP therapeutic regimen (Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, combined with rituximab), remaining patients display aggressive disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. Recently, exosomal miRNAs have been approved as novel biomarkers in DLBCL due to their potential involvement in lymphomagenesis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We conducted an investigation on the potential role of exosomal miRNAs as diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in DLBCL in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science search engines. We searched by using a combination of keywords, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL, miRNA, microRNA, miR, exosome, exosomes, exosomal, extracellular vesicles, EVs, and secretome. Then, search results were narrowed based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Twelve articles were eligible for our systematic reviews. Among them, nine discussed diagnostic biomarkers, three considered prognostic significance, four evaluated therapeutic efficacy, two studies were conducted , and three assessed molecular pathways associated with these exosomal miRNAs in DLBCL.
DISCUSSION
According to our systematic review, exosomal miRNAs are not only useful for diagnosis and prognosis in DLBCL but are also promising therapeutic tools and predictors of response to therapy. Although promising results so far, more research is required to develop innovative biomarkers.
PubMed: 35719983
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.904637 -
Pathology International Jul 2022Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-positive marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is rare and undefined. It is unclear whether IgG4-positive MZLs have as favorable an outcome as MZLs in...
Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-positive marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is rare and undefined. It is unclear whether IgG4-positive MZLs have as favorable an outcome as MZLs in general. Also, correlation with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) and IgG4-positive MZLs is unknown. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for all peer-reviewed articles using keywords including"IgG4" and "marginal zone lymphoma" from their inception to February 20, 2022. Twenty-two articles, including six observational studies and 24 cases from 16 case reports and case series, were included. Only one study had a comparative group, and the other five were exploratory observational studies. IgG4-positive MZLs commonly occurred in males (83.3%). It primarily involved ocular adnexa (41.7%) and skin (29.2%). Only 29.2% had concurrent IgG4-RD, and no expiration was noted. While most cases were treated with excision, resection, or clinical observation, 21.7% received rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone as a first-line treatment. This systematic review summarizes the current understanding of the characteristics of IgG4-positive MZLs. While there seems to be IgG4-RD-related and de novo IgG4-positive MZLs, future research needs to clearly define MZL with polyclonal IgG4-positive cells and IgG4-producing lymphoma. Further studies are critical to clarifying long-term prognosis and optimal surveillance planning.
Topics: Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease; Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone; Male; Prognosis; Rituximab
PubMed: 35678201
DOI: 10.1111/pin.13251 -
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Dec 2022The management of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has been significantly modified by the availability of innovative but expensive... (Review)
Review
The management of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has been significantly modified by the availability of innovative but expensive treatments, increasing the economic burden of prostate cancer. Here, we aimed to systematically identify and review published economic evaluations (EEs) related to the treatment of mHSPC and assess their quality. A systematic search was performed of the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Three reviewers independently selected EEs by defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. They extracted all data from each EE (general information, study population, data about the EE, interventions and comparators, and outcomes). They also assessed the quality of the selected EEs according to Drummond's checklist. Fourteen EEs published between 2016 and 2021 were eligible for the systematic review. The EEs found ADT + docetaxel to be the most cost-effective of all available treatments as a first-line strategy for mHSPC (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide). Five EEs showed that a simple price reduction of abiraterone acetate of 50% to 75% could change the results to render this treatment also cost-effective relative to that with docetaxel. Twelve EEs were of high quality, with a Drummond score ≥ 7. Analysis of the 14 EEs identified by our systematic review, amongst which 78.6% met high quality standards, showed that ADT + docetaxel tends to be the most cost-effective alternative for mHSPC. These results were assessed by sensitivity analysis. The data provided by this systematic review help to provide a better understanding of these treatments and the better use of healthcare resources.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Abiraterone Acetate; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Prostatic Neoplasms; Hormones
PubMed: 35610112
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.014 -
Rheumatology and Therapy Aug 2022Belimumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody that binds to soluble B-lymphocyte stimulator and inhibits its biological activity. Since receiving approvals for... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Belimumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody that binds to soluble B-lymphocyte stimulator and inhibits its biological activity. Since receiving approvals for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), several observational studies have investigated the effectiveness of belimumab in the real-world setting. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of belimumab for the treatment of SLE.
METHODS
A literature search following PRISMA Guidelines and limited to studies in English was performed (2014-2020) to identify relevant studies reporting effectiveness outcomes of belimumab in patients with SLE. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Outcomes, including SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score, prednisone-equivalent use, and SLE flare were pooled and analyzed using statistical aggregation methods.
RESULTS
The literature search identified 514 articles for initial review. Of these, 17 articles were suitable for data extraction and summary. Baseline characteristics of patients in real-world studies were generally similar to those of relevant clinical trials, including age, sex, disease duration, SLEDAI score, and prednisone-equivalent use. Real-world use of belimumab was associated with reductions in SLEDAI score (mean baseline score to month 6: 10.1-4.4; 57% reduction), prednisone-equivalent dosing (mean baseline dose to month 6: 12.1 mg/day to 6.9 mg/day; 43% reduction), and flare frequency (12 months prior to belimumab to 12 months after belimumab: 1.15-0.39 mean flares per patient per year; 66% reduction). Long-term data (up to 2 years post-treatment initiation) for SLEDAI score and prednisone-equivalent dose indicated that improvements in both outcomes continue over time among patients remaining on therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
In the real-world setting, observed outcomes with belimumab for the treatment of SLE are consistent with those reported from randomized clinical trials. Improvements persist long-term for SLEDAI activity and prednisone-equivalent use with belimumab.
PubMed: 35596922
DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00454-9 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022Facial seborrheic dermatitis (FSD), also called facial seborrheic eczema, is a common disease affecting both male and female patients worldwide. Tanshinone is the main...
BACKGROUND
Facial seborrheic dermatitis (FSD), also called facial seborrheic eczema, is a common disease affecting both male and female patients worldwide. Tanshinone is the main bioactive component extracted from the Traditional Chinese Medicine , which is widely used in treating skin inflammatory diseases. It is necessary to evaluate the clinical evidence for tanshinone capsule treatment of FSD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tanshinone capsules combined with prednisone in the treatment of facial seborrheic dermatitis and to provide evidence for clinical practice.
METHODS
Studies were searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and WanFang Database before October 2021. We also searched for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) of tanshinone capsules combined with prednisone on facial seborrheic dermatitis. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook. Two reviewers regulated the research selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, respectively, and a third reviewer was used for consulting when necessary. Review Manager Software 5.3 was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 10 RCTs with 916 participants were included. Nine studies reported total effectiveness, five studies reported symptom score, seven studies reported adverse events, and four studies reported recurrence rate. The duration of treatment was 4 to 8 weeks. Combination therapy showed better clinical effects compared to the prednisone (OR: 5.82; 95% CI: 3.53, 9.59; < 0.00001). Combination therapy could repair skin lesions (MD: -0.40; 95% CI: -0.51, -0.30; < 0.00001), reduce skin erythema (MD: -0.58, 95% CI: -0.67, -0.49; < 0.00001), relieve skin itch (MD: -0.70; 95% CI -0.77, -0.63; < 0.00001), and desquamation score (MD: -0.64; 95% CI: -0.71, -0.56; < 0.00001). Furthermore, combination therapy could reduce adverse events (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.84; = 0.01) and control recurrence rate (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.36; < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with prednisone, tanshinone capsules combined with prednisone may be effective in the treatment of facial seborrheic dermatitis. However, due to the high risk and ambiguity of bias in the included trials, the conclusion of this study must be interpreted carefully.
PubMed: 35572959
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.816419 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2022Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in people older than 50 years of age. It causes granulomatous inflammation of medium- to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in people older than 50 years of age. It causes granulomatous inflammation of medium- to large-sized vessels. Tocilizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R).
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab, given alone or with corticosteroids, compared with therapy without tocilizumab for treatment of GCA.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 3 January 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared tocilizumab of any dosage regimen (alone or with corticosteroids) with therapy without tocilizumab that had a minimum follow-up of six months. Participants were at least 50 years of age, with biopsy-proven GCA or by large-vessel vasculitis by angiography, and met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 guidelines for GCA.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
Main results We included two RCTs in the review. The studies were conducted in the USA, Canada, and Europe and enrolled a total of 281 participants with GCA, of whom 74% were women. The mean age of participants was 70 years, with new-onset or relapsing GCA, and fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria with no uncontrolled comorbidities. Both studies were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, the manufacturer of tocilizumab. Findings One RCT (30 participants) compared tocilizumab administered every four weeks versus placebo. Point estimates at 12 months and beyond favored tocilizumab over placebo in terms of sustained remission (risk ratio (RR) 4.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 14.88; moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates suggest no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality at 12 months or more (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.94; moderate-certainty evidence). At 12 months, mean time to first relapse after induction of remission was 25 weeks in favor of participants receiving tocilizumab compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) 25, 95% CI 11.4 to 38.6; moderate-certainty evidence). The second RCT (250 participants) randomized participants into two intervention and two comparator groups to receive tocilizumab weekly (100 participants), bi-weekly (49 participants), weekly placebo + 26-week taper (50 participants), or weekly placebo + 52-week taper (51 participants). At 12 months, point estimates from this study on proportion of participants with sustained remission favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.17, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.89; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.97 to 8.12; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.75; 100 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 3.79, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.91; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates on proportion of participants who did not need escape therapy (defined by the study as the inability to keep to the protocol-defined prednisone taper) favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.35; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.83 to 4.78; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14; 100 participants) but not tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.54; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). This study did not report mean time to first relapse after induction of remission or all-cause mortality. Across comparison groups, the same study found no evidence of a difference in vision changes and inconsistent evidence with regard to quality of life. Evidence on quality of life as assessed by the physical (MD 8.17, 95% CI 4.44 to 11.90) and mental (MD 5.61, 95% CI 0.06 to 11.16) component score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) favored weekly tocilizumab versus placebo + 52-week taper but not bi-weekly tocillizumab versus placebo + 26-week taper (moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events One RCT reported a lower percentage of participants who experienced serious adverse events when receiving tocilizumab every four weeks versus placebo. The second RCT reported no evidence of a difference among groups with regard to adverse events; however, fewer participants reported serious adverse events in the tocilizumab weekly and tocilizumab biweekly interventions compared with the placebo + 26-week taper and placebo + 52-week taper comparators. Investigators in both studies reported that infection was the most frequently reported adverse event.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review indicates that tocilizumab therapy may be beneficial in terms of proportion of participants with sustained remission, relapse-free survival, and the need for escape therapy. While the evidence was of moderate certainty, only two studies were included in the review, suggesting that further research is required to corroborate these findings. Future trials should address issues related to the required duration of therapy, patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and economic outcomes, as well as the clinical outcomes evaluated in this review.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Female; Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Male; Recurrence
PubMed: 35560150
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013484.pub3