-
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Jun 2024The primary aim was to analyze the current practices on the use of operative hysteroscopy for preserving fertility in patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The primary aim was to analyze the current practices on the use of operative hysteroscopy for preserving fertility in patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and premalignancies. Our secondary objectives included investigating medical therapy and analyzing reported pregnancy-related outcomes subsequent to fertility preservation procedures.
METHODS
We performed a semi-systematic literature review on PubMed, employing pertinent terms related to hysteroscopy, fertility preservation, and endometrial cancer and premalignancies. Patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy with or without following medical treatment were included. We adhered to the PRISMA 2020 statement and utilized Covidence software to manage our systematic review. We performed a pooled analysis on various outcomes.
RESULTS
Our final analysis included 15 studies evaluating 458 patients, where 238 (52.0%) were diagnosed with endometrial cancer, and 220 (48.0%) had endometrial premalignancies. With 146 pregnancies in our study, the overall pregnancy rate was 31.9%. Among these, 97 resulted in live births, accounting for 66.4% of the reported pregnancies. In terms of medical treatment, various forms of progestins were reported. Complications or adverse effects related to operative hysteroscopy were not reported in more than half of the studies. Among those studies that did report them, no complications nor adverse effects were documented. After hysteroscopic resection, complete response to medical treatment has been reported in 65.5% of the overall cases.
CONCLUSION
Our review sheds light on the contemporary landscape of operative hysteroscopy for fertility preservation in endometrial cancer and premalignancies. Future studies should include the integration of molecular classification into fertility-preserving management of endometrial malignancies to offer a more personalized and precise strategy.
Topics: Humans; Female; Hysteroscopy; Fertility Preservation; Endometrial Neoplasms; Pregnancy; Precancerous Conditions; Pregnancy Rate
PubMed: 38493419
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07463-9 -
The European Journal of Contraception &... Apr 2024The long-acting reversible contraception progestin subdermal implant (ENG implant) may be effective to improve endometriosis-related symptoms. Since adenomyosis is a... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The long-acting reversible contraception progestin subdermal implant (ENG implant) may be effective to improve endometriosis-related symptoms. Since adenomyosis is a histopathological form of endometriosis, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ENG implant in adenomyosis management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electronic search in Medline, Scopus, Embase databases and Google Scholar using combinations of the following keywords: Progestin; subdermal implant; Implanon; Nexplanon; Adenomyosis; Endometriosis.
RESULTS
Out of 889 articles in the initial database, 5 prospective observational studies were eligible for inclusion in our literature review. Our review involving 152 participants found a significant reduction in pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea (baseline median VAS score ranged from 10 to 7.62 before implantation vs VAS score ranged from 1.81 to 0.1 after implantation) as well as an increase in the levels of haemoglobin after implantation of the device (from 86 g/L to 129 g/L after implantation). Moreover, the improvement may be sustained throughout the long-term follow-up visits (until 36 months). The most common adverse events were changes in bleeding patterns which were tolerable in most cases.
CONCLUSION
ENG implant may be a relevant and promising medical option in the management of adenomyosis. Nevertheless, randomised controlled trials and prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm the potential role of ENG implant in the management of adenomyosis.
PubMed: 38426337
DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2024.2314298 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Feb 2024Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with endometrial atypical... (Review)
Review
Oncological and reproductive outcomes of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer patients undergoing conservative therapy with hysteroscopic resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) undergoing conservative therapy with hysteroscopic resection (HR).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The study strictly followed the methodological framework proposed by the Cochrane Handbook and was retrospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469986). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to October 10, 2023. A checklist based on items of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies was used for quality assessment. The primary end points for this meta-analysis were complete response (CR), pregnancy, and live birth rates following HR-based therapy in patients with EEC or AH. The secondary end point was the recurrence rate (RR).
RESULTS
Twenty-one articles involving 407 patients with clinical stage IA, low or intermediate grade, EEC, and 444 patients with AH managed with HR-based conservative treatment were included for this systematic review. CR to HR-based conservative therapy was achieved in 88.6% of patients with EEC and 97.0% of patients with AH. Of these, 30.6% and 24.2%, respectively, had live births. The overall pooled disease RR was 18.3% and 10.8% in patients with EEC and AH, respectively. Further subset analyses revealed that EEC patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤28 kg/m had higher CR rates as well as higher chances of pregnancy and live birth (91.6% CR, 32.9% pregnancy, 31.1% live birth) compared with patients with BMI >28 kg/m (86.4% CR, 28.4% pregnancy, 23.0% live birth). The HR followed by oral progestogen subgroup had higher CR rates and higher chances of pregnancy and live birth (91.8% CR, 36.3% pregnancy, 28.2% live birth) than the HR followed by the levonorgestrel intrauterine system subgroup (82.5% CR, 25.3% pregnancy, 16.3% live birth).
CONCLUSIONS
Hysteroscopic resection followed by progestins appears to be a promising choice for fertility-sparing treatment in young patients with AH and EEC, with effective and safe responses. The live birth rate remains to be improved by providing medical guidance and encouragement.
PubMed: 38382917
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14815 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Feb 2024About 25% of pregnant women experience bleeding in the early stage, and half of them eventually progress to pregnancy loss. Progesterone serves as a useful biomarker to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
About 25% of pregnant women experience bleeding in the early stage, and half of them eventually progress to pregnancy loss. Progesterone serves as a useful biomarker to predict miscarriage in threatened miscarriage, yet its performance is still debated.
AIM
To evaluate the performance of single serum progesterone predicting miscarriage in early pregnant patients with threatened miscarriage.
METHOD
The online database was searched to yield the literature using the terms of 'Abortion', 'Miscarriage', and 'serum Progesterone', including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane library, and China national knowledge infrastructure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, likelihood ratio (LLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed. Publication bias was assessed by the deeks funnel plot asymmetry test. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the progesterone level (< 12 ng/mL), recruited location and region, progesterone measurement method, exogenous progesterone supplement and follow up.
RESULTS
In total, 12 studies were eligible to be included in this study, with sample sizes ranging from 76 to 1087. The included patients' gestational age was between 4 and 12 weeks. No significant publication bias was detected from all included studies. The threshold of progesterone reported ranged from 8 to 30 ng/ml. The synthesized area under the ROC curve (0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.88), positive LLR (6.2, 4.0 to 9.7) and DOR (18, 12 to 27) of single progesterone measurement distinguishing miscarriage were relatively good in early pregnant patients with threatened miscarriage. When the threshold of < 12 ng/mL was adapted, the progesterone provided a higher area under the ROC curve (0.90 vs. 0.78), positive LLR (8.3 vs. 3.8) and DOR (22 vs.12) than its counterpart (12 to 30 ng/mL).
CONCLUSION
Single progesterone measurement can act as a biomarker of miscarriage in early pregnant patients with threatened miscarriage, and it has a better performance when the concentration is <12 ng/mL.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42021255382).
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Infant, Newborn; Infant; Progesterone; Abortion, Spontaneous; Abortion, Threatened; Pregnant Women; Biomarkers
PubMed: 38350926
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06303-7 -
Human Reproduction Open 2024Is exposure to dydrogesterone a risk factor for congenital anomalies when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in... (Review)
Review
STUDY QUESTION
Is exposure to dydrogesterone a risk factor for congenital anomalies when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in assisted reproductive technology (ART)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Dydrogesterone, when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in ART, is not a relevant additional risk factor for congenital anomalies.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Despite large clinical trials and meta-analyses that show no association between dydrogesterone and congenital anomalies, some recently retracted publications have postulated an association with teratogenicity. Dydrogesterone is also often rated as less safe than bioidentical progestins.
STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION
A systematic review was conducted according to a pre-specified protocol with searches on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was limited to human studies, with no restrictions on language, geographical region, or date. The search algorithm used a PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome)-style approach combining both simple search terms and medical subject heading terms. As congenital anomalies are mostly reported as secondary outcomes, the search term 'safety' was added.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS
Interventional study and observational study (OS) designs were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were: women >17 years old treated for threatened miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss, and/or ART; the use of dydrogesterone in the first trimester compared with placebo, no treatment or other interventions; and reporting of congenital anomalies in newborns or infants ≤12 months old (primary outcome). Two authors (A.K., M.R.N.) independently extracted the following data: general study information, study population details, intervention and comparator(s), and frequencies of congenital anomalies (classification, time of determination, and type). Risk of bias focused on the reporting of congenital malformations and was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Version 2 or the ROBINS-I tool. The GRADEproGDT platform was used to generate the GRADE summary of findings table.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Of the 897 records retrieved during the literature search, 47 were assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included in the final analysis: six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three OSs. Among the RCTs, three had a low risk and three a high risk of bias. Two of the OSs were considered to have a serious risk of bias and one with critical risk of bias and was excluded for the evidence syntheses. The eight remaining studies included a total of 5070 participants and 2680 live births from 16 countries. In the meta-analysis of RCTs only, the overall risk ratio (RR) was 0.92 [95% CI 0.55; 1.55] with low certainty. When the two OSs were included, the overall RR was 1.11 [95% CI 0.73; 1.68] with low certainty.
LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION
The studies included in the analysis do not report congenital anomalies as the primary outcome; reporting of congenital anomalies was often not standardized.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
This systematic literature review and meta-analysis provide clear reassurance to both clinicians and patients that dydrogesterone is not associated with congenital anomalies above the rate that might be expected due to environmental and genetic factors. The results of this work represent the highest current level of evidence for the question of congenital anomalies, which removes the existing uncertainty caused by poor quality and retracted studies.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS
Editorial support was provided by Highfield Communication Consultancy, Oxford, UK, sponsored by Abbott Products Operations AG, Allschwil, Switzerland. A.K., J.A.G.-V., L.P.S., J.N.v.d.A., and J.F.S. received honoraria from Abbott for preparation and participation in an advisory board. J.A.G.-V. received grants and lecture fees from Merck, Organon, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex. M.R.N. has no conflicts of interest. J.N.v.d.A. and J.A.G.-V. have no other conflicts of interest. A.K. received payment from Abbott for a talk at the IVF Worldwide congress on 22 September 2023. J.F.S. has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, royalties/licences from Elsevier and Prescient Medicine (SOLVD Health), consulting fees from Burroughs Wellcome Fund (BWF) and Bayer, honoraria from Magee Women's Research Institute, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, University of Kansas and Oakridge National Research Laboratory, Agile, Daiichi Sankyo/American Regent, and Bayer, and travel support to attend meetings for the International Academy of Human Reproduction (IAHR). J.F.S. has patents related to diagnosis and treatment of PCOS and prediction of preterm birth. J.F.S. participates on advisory boards for SOLVD Health, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, and FHI360, was the past President board member of the Society for Reproductive Investigation, has a leadership role for the following organizations: Scientific Advisory Board, SOLVD Health, EAB Chair for contraceptive technology initiative, FHI360, EAB member, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, Advisory Board for MWRI Summit, Chair of BWF NextGen Pregnancy Research Panel, Medical Executive Committee at the Howard, and Georgeanna Jones Foundation, and is Vice President, IAHR. L.P.S. has received consulting fees from Shield Pharmaceuticals, Scynexis, Organon, Natera, Celula China, AiVF, Agile, Daiichi Sankyo, American Regent, and Medicem, honoraria from Agile, Daiichi Sankyo/American Regent, and Bayer, and travel support from BD Diagnostics. L.P.S. participates on the data safety monitoring board for Astellas and is a Chair of DSMB for fezolinetant. Abbott played no role in the funding of the study or in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022356977.
PubMed: 38344249
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae004 -
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) Apr 2024Does the change in endometrial thickness (EMT) from the end of the follicular/estrogen phase to the day of embryo transfer (ET) determine subsequent pregnancy outcomes? (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY QUESTION
Does the change in endometrial thickness (EMT) from the end of the follicular/estrogen phase to the day of embryo transfer (ET) determine subsequent pregnancy outcomes?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Endometrial compaction from the late-proliferative to secretory phase is not associated with live birth rate (LBR) and other pregnancy outcomes.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Endometrial compaction has been suggested to be indicative of endometrial responsiveness to progesterone, and its association with ET outcome has been investigated but is controversial.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
A systematic review with meta-analysis was carried out. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant studies from inception to 18 November 2022. The reference lists of included studies were also manually screened for any additional publications.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Cohort studies comparing ET pregnancy outcomes between patients with and without endometrial compaction were included. A review of the studies for inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment was performed by two independent reviewers. The effect size was synthesized as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed by the I2 statistic and Egger's test, respectively. The primary outcome was LBR. Secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate (MR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and ectopic pregnancy rate (EPR).
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Seventeen cohort studies involving 18 973 ET cycles fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The pooled results revealed that there were no significant differences between endometrial compaction and non-compaction groups in LBR (crude OR (cOR) = 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.04; I2 = 0%; adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.19, I2 = 79%), BPR (cOR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.06; I2 = 0%; aOR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.03, I2 = 0%), CPR (cOR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.18; I2 = 70%; aOR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02, I2 = 13%), MR (cOR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.90-1.32; I2 = 0%; aOR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.64-1.31; I2 = 0%), and EPR (cOR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.31-1.61; I2 = 61%). The OPR was marginally higher in crude analysis (cOR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.16; I2 = 81%) among women with compacted endometrium, but was not evident in adjusted results (aOR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.86-2.14; I2 = 84%). Consistently, the pooled estimate of LBR remained comparable in further subgroup and sensitivity analyses according to the degree of compaction (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20%), type of ET (fresh, frozen, or euploid only), and endometrial preparation protocol (natural or artificial). No publication bias was observed based on Egger's test.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
Although the number of included studies is sufficient, data on certain measures, such as EPR, are limited. The inherent bias and residual confounding were also inevitable owing to the observational study design. Furthermore, inconsistent definitions of pregnancy outcomes may affect the accuracy of our pooled analysis.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Given the lack of prognostic value, assessing endometrial compaction or repeated EMT measurement on the day of ET may not be necessary or warranted.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20224BAB216025), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82260315), and Central Funds Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development (20221ZDG020071). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022384539 (PROSPERO).
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Rate; Embryo Transfer; Progesterone; Birth Rate; Abortion, Spontaneous; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Retrospective Studies; Live Birth; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38323525
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae012 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute May 2024We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine outcomes of patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia treated with oral progestins or a... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device therapy vs oral progestin treatment for reproductive-aged patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine outcomes of patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia treated with oral progestins or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review across 5 databases to examine outcomes of progestational treatment (oral progestins or levonorgestrel-releasing IUD) for patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. The primary outcome was the best complete response rate within 12 months of primary progestational treatment. Sensitivity analyses were performed by removing studies with extreme effect sizes. Secondary outcomes included the pooled pregnancy rate.
RESULTS
We identified 21 eligible studies, including 824 premenopausal patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, for our meta-analysis. Among these, 459 patients received oral progestin, and 365 patients received levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as a primary progestational treatment. The pooled best complete response proportion within 12 months was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69% to 91%) following oral progestin treatment and 95% (95% CI = 81% to 99%) following levonorgestrel-releasing IUD treatment. After removing outlier studies, the pooled proportion was 86% (95% CI = 75% to 92%) for the oral progestin group and 96% (95% CI = 91% to 99%) for the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD group, with reduced heterogeneity. The pooled pregnancy rate was 50% (95% CI = 35% to 65%) after oral progestin and 35% (95% CI = 23% to 49%) after levonorgestrel-releasing IUD treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis provides data on the effectiveness of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing IUD treatment within 12 months of treatment among premenopausal patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Although based on small numbers, the rate of pregnancy after treatment is modest. These data may be beneficial for selecting progestational therapies that allow fertility preservation for patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Administration, Oral; Carcinoma in Situ; Endometrial Neoplasms; Intrauterine Devices, Medicated; Levonorgestrel; Pregnancy Rate; Progestins; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38305500
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae023 -
BMC Women's Health Jan 2024Menopause hormone therapy (MHT), as an effective method to alleviate the menopause-related symptoms of women, its benefits, risks, and potential influencing factors for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Menopause hormone therapy (MHT), as an effective method to alleviate the menopause-related symptoms of women, its benefits, risks, and potential influencing factors for the cardiovascular system of postmenopausal women are not very clear.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate cardiovascular benefits and risks of MHT in postmenopausal women, and analyze the underlying factors that affect both.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from 1975 to July 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) that met pre-specified inclusion criteria were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers extracted data independently. A meta-analysis of random effects was used to analyze data.
MAIN RESULTS
This systematic review identified 33 RCTs using MHT involving 44,639 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 60.3 (range 48 to 72 years). There was no significant difference between MHT and placebo (or no treatment) in all-cause death (RR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.09, I = 14%) and cardiovascular events (RR = 0.97, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.14, I = 38%) in the overall population of postmenopausal women. However, MHT would increase the risk of stroke (RR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.41,I = 0%) and venous thromboembolism (RR = 1.86, 95%CI 1.39 to 2.50, I = 24%). Compared with placebo, MHT could improve flow-mediated arterial dilation (FMD) (SMD = 1.46, 95%CI 0.86 to 2.07, I = 90%), but it did not improve nitroglycerin-mediated arterial dilation (NMD) (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI - 0.08 to 0.62, I = 76%). Compared with women started MHT more than 10 years after menopause, women started MHT within 10 years after menopause had lower frequency of all-cause death (P = 0.02) and cardiovascular events (P = 0.002), and more significant improvement in FMD (P = 0.0003). Compared to mono-estrogen therapy, the combination therapy of estrogen and progesterone would not alter the outcomes of endpoint event. (all-cause death P = 0.52, cardiovascular events P = 0.90, stroke P = 0.85, venous thromboembolism P = 0.33, FMD P = 0.46, NMD P = 0.27).
CONCLUSIONS
MHT improves flow-mediated arterial dilation (FMD) but fails to lower the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events, and increases the risk of stroke and venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women. Early acceptance of MHT not only reduces the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events but also further improves FMD, although the risk of stroke and venous thrombosis is not reduced. There is no difference in the outcome of cardiovascular system endpoints between mono-estrogen therapy and combination therapy of estrogen and progesterone.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Venous Thromboembolism; Postmenopause; Progesterone; Arteries; Stroke; Estrogens; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Venous Thrombosis; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 38263123
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02788-0 -
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology Apr 2024To evaluate the effect of hormonal suppression of endometriosis on the size of endometriotic ovarian cysts. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of hormonal suppression of endometriosis on the size of endometriotic ovarian cysts.
DATA SOURCES
The authors searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2012 to December 2022.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
We included studies of premenopausal women undergoing hormonal treatment of endometriosis for ≥3 months. The authors excluded studies involving surgical intervention in the follow-up period and those using hormones to prevent endometrioma recurrence after endometriosis surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022385612).
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
The primary outcome was the mean change in endometrioma volume, expressed as a percentage, from baseline to at least 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the change in volume at 3 months and analyses by class of hormonal therapy. The authors included 16 studies (15 cohort studies, 1 randomized controlled trial) of 888 patients treated with dienogest (7 studies), other progestins (4), combined hormonal contraceptives (2), and other suppressive therapy (3). Globally, the decrease in endometrioma volume became statistically significant at 6 months with a mean reduction of 55% (95% confidence interval, -40 to -71; 18 treatment groups; 730 patients; p <.001; I = 96%). The reduction was the greatest with dienogest and norethindrone acetate plus letrozole, followed by relugolix and leuprolide acetate. The volume reduction was not statistically significant with combined hormonal contraceptives or other progestins. There was high heterogeneity, and studies were at risk of selection bias.
CONCLUSION
Hormonal suppression can substantially reduce endometrioma size, but there is uncertainty in the exact reduction patients may experience.
Topics: Humans; Female; Endometriosis; Progestins; Hormones; Ovarian Diseases; Contraceptive Agents
PubMed: 38190884
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.002 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology :... Dec 2024The number of patients desiring fertility-preserving treatment for endometrial cancer rather than standard surgical management continues to increase. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The number of patients desiring fertility-preserving treatment for endometrial cancer rather than standard surgical management continues to increase.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to evaluate the efficacies of fertility-preserving treatments on the live birth rate, remission and relapse rates for women with stage 1a grade 1 endometrial carcinoma to support patient counselling.
METHODS
We performed a meta-analysis for our primary outcomes of overall remission and relapse rate, and for secondary analysis, we divided papers into treatment type: systemic progestins, intrauterine progestins or hysteroscopic resection and adjuvant hormonal treatment.
RESULTS
Thirty-five observational studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 624 patients. Overall, conservative treatment of endometrial cancer showed a remission rate of 77% (95% CI: 70-84%), a relapse rate of 20% (95% CI: 13-27%) and a live birth rate of 20% (95% CI: 15-25%) with more favourable outcomes for the hysteroscopic resection group.
CONCLUSIONS
Hysteroscopic resection and adjuvant hormonal treatment had the most favourable fertility and oncological outcomes. Further high-quality prospective multi-centre trials are warranted to determine the optimal treatment regimen and dosage and risk stratification for these patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Progestins; Prospective Studies; Fertility Preservation; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Endometrial Neoplasms; Fertility; Recurrence; Endometrial Hyperplasia
PubMed: 38126736
DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2294329