-
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience :... Sep 2020Several neuroablative procedures are available for severe and treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but limited knowledge about their relative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Several neuroablative procedures are available for severe and treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but limited knowledge about their relative clinical advantages and disadvantages poses obstacles for treatment decision-making.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane Library for reports up to February 2019. We reviewed the literature on the effectiveness (assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS]) and safety of various neuroablative interventions for severe and treatment-resistant OCD.
RESULTS
We included 23 studies involving 487 patients in the systematic review; 21 studies with 459 patients entered meta-analysis. Overall, neuroablation achieved a response rate (proportion of patients with ≥ 35% reduction in Y-BOCS) of 55%. Most of the adverse events (88.4%) were mild and transient. The top 3 adverse events were headache (14.9%), cognitive deficits (9.1%) and behaviour problems (8.1%). Severe or permanent adverse events included personality changes (2.3%) and brain edema or brain cyst (1.5%). The response rates associated with capsulotomy, limbic leucotomy and cingulotomy were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54-65), 47% (95% CI 23-72) and 36% (95% CI 23-50), respectively. Interventions with different coverages of the dorsal part of the internal capsule were associated with different adverse-event profiles but were unlikely to modify clinical effectiveness.
LIMITATIONS
The level of evidence of most included studies was relatively low.
CONCLUSION
Ablative surgeries are safe and effective for a large proportion of patients with severe and treatment-resistant OCD. Among the available procedures, capsulotomy seemed to be the most effective. Further research is needed to improve clinical effectiveness and minimize risks.
Topics: Humans; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychosurgery; Radiofrequency Ablation
PubMed: 32549057
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.190079 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Jan 2021Atonic seizures are associated with a particularly poor response to medical treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Atonic seizures are associated with a particularly poor response to medical treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of corpus callosotomy (CC) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in the management of atonic seizures in the pediatric population.
METHODS
A literature search was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and recommendations, focusing on atonic seizures, CC, and VNS in pediatric populations. Pertinent clinical data were extracted and analyzed. Pooled effects between groups were calculated as standardized error (SE) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To assess for statistical significance, the Z-test was performed, using the pooled effect size (ES) and 95% CI for each intervention.
RESULTS
A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 24 studies encompassing 425 children treated with CC and 7 studies encompassing 108 children treated with VNS. Twenty-four studies were included in a meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of atonic seizure control in favor of CC (overall effect size (ES) 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77 for CC, ES 0.4, 95% CI 0.28-0.51 for VNS, p = 0.003). There was a higher rate of complications requiring reoperation in the CC cohort (6.6% vs. 3.8%) and a 14% rate of symptomatic disconnection syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS
While both techniques are safe, CC provides a much higher chance of effectively managing this morbid seizure type albeit with a higher risk of re-operation and disconnection syndrome.
Topics: Child; Cohort Studies; Corpus Callosum; Humans; Psychosurgery; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Vagus Nerve Stimulation
PubMed: 32529546
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04698-0 -
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience :... Nov 2020Psychiatric surgery, including deep brain stimulation and stereotactic ablation, is an important treatment option in severe refractory psychiatric illness. Several large...
BACKGROUND
Psychiatric surgery, including deep brain stimulation and stereotactic ablation, is an important treatment option in severe refractory psychiatric illness. Several large trials have demonstrated response rates of approximately 50%, underscoring the need to identify and select responders preoperatively. Recent advances in neuroimaging have brought this possibility into focus. We systematically reviewed the psychiatric surgery neuroimaging literature to assess the current state of evidence for preoperative imaging predictors of response.
METHODS
We performed this study in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) frameworks, and preregistered it using PROSPERO. We systematically searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies reporting preoperative neuroimaging analyses correlated with clinical outcomes in patients who underwent psychiatric surgery. We recorded and synthesized the methodological details, imaging results and clinical correlations from these studies.
RESULTS
After removing duplicates, the search yielded 8388 unique articles, of which 7 met the inclusion criteria. The included articles were published between 2001 and 2018 and reported on the outcomes of 101 unique patients. Of the 6 studies that reported significant findings, all identified clusters of hypermetabolism, hyperconnectivity or increased size in the frontostriatal limbic circuitry.
LIMITATIONS
The included studies were few and highly varied, spanning 2 decades.
CONCLUSION
Although few studies have analyzed preoperative imaging for predictors of response to psychiatric surgery, we found consistency among the reported results: most studies implicated overactivity in the frontostriatal limbic network as being correlated with clinical response. Larger prospective studies are needed.
REGISTRATION
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131151.
Topics: Deep Brain Stimulation; Humans; Mental Disorders; Neuroimaging; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Preoperative Care; Psychosurgery; Radiofrequency Ablation; Stereotaxic Techniques
PubMed: 32293838
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.190208 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Nov 2019Temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy is the standard surgical treatment for appropriate candidates with medically-intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. More...
OBJECT
Temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy is the standard surgical treatment for appropriate candidates with medically-intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. More recently, because of the risk of postoperative language/memory decline in a subset of patients with intact memory, a multiple hippocampal transection (MHT) approach has been proposed to preserve function.
METHODS
Studies of MHT reporting both Engel and verbal memory outcome measures were included in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews. Data were extracted on verbal memory function pre- and postoperatively, seizure outcome, and demographic factors. A random effects model was used to determine overall verbal memory function after MHT, and a meta-regression model was applied to identify factors associated with outcome.
RESULTS
A total of 114 patients across five studies were included. Engel class I seizure outcome across all studies ranged from 64.7% to 94.7%, with 84 of the 114 patients achieving this outcome. Preoperative verbal memory score was most strongly associated with postoperative verbal memory preservation (p = 0.003). Of 59 patients with full verbal memory outcome scores, 86.8% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6%-96%) had complete preservation of verbal memory relative to preoperative functional baseline.
CONCLUSION
Multiple hippocampal transection is an evolving surgical technique. Although the present data are limited, the current systematic review suggests that this approach is effective at preserving verbal memory in patients with good baseline function. Although reasonable seizure outcomes have been reported with MHT, comparison to a well-established procedure such as temporal lobectomy and amydalohippocampectomy must be guided by further evidence.
Topics: Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Hemispherectomy; Hippocampus; Humans; Memory Disorders; Neurosurgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Psychosurgery; Seizures; Verbal Learning
PubMed: 31654940
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106496 -
Epilepsy Research Aug 2019RCTs are the gold standard in determining intervention efficacy with journal impact factor assumed to index research quality. Flint et al's (2017) systematic review...
PURPOSE
RCTs are the gold standard in determining intervention efficacy with journal impact factor assumed to index research quality. Flint et al's (2017) systematic review examined neurocognitive outcomes following paediatric temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Retrieved evidence was restricted to non-RCTs, which pose greater risk of bias and thus diminish research quality. The current study evaluated risk of bias in sources retrieved by Flint et al. and explored whether impact factor related to research quality within this selected field.
METHODS
Methodological and reporting bias was evaluated using categories of bias specified by Cochrane. The relationship between the identified number of biases and journal impact factors of retrieved sources was examined.
RESULTS
All studies carried substantial risk for bias. Methodology bias included low sample size (76.71%; 56/73), risk of confounding cognitive outcomes due to failure to report pre-surgery neurocognitive data (21.92%; 16/73) and to determine whether patients were prescribed antiepileptic drugs at follow-up (53.42%; 39/73). Reporting bias included overstating claims based on findings (53.42%; 39/73), failure to report individual patient characteristics (66%; 33/50) and omitting the nature of surgical interventions (15.07%; 11/73). The number of sources of common bias within studies was not associated significantly with journal impact factor (p = .878).
CONCLUSION
This evaluation highlights risk of bias when sources are predominantly uncontrolled non-RCTs and provides evidence that journal impact factor is not a reliable indicator of quality within this field. Authors should limit bias in their methods and reporting of results, to ensure the highest quality evidence possible is used to inform treatment decisions and prognosis.
Topics: Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Humans; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Neurocognitive Disorders; Psychosurgery; Qualitative Research; Retrospective Studies; Temporal Lobe; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31125839
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.03.013