-
Journal of Psychiatric Research Nov 2020The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and acceptability among drug treatments for adults with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) through a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and acceptability among drug treatments for adults with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) through a systematic review, random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses.
METHODS
Double-blind randomized controlled trials comparing pharmacological interventions for adults with PTSD were searched from database inception through Aug. 28, 2018, on Cochrane (Central), Embase, LILACS, PILOTS, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Clinical trial registries and the websites of pharmaceutical companies were also searched. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of the evidence.
RESULTS
The systematic review included 58 studies comprising 6766 patients randomized to 26 different interventions. Regarding efficacy, topiramate (SMD = -0.57; 95%CrI: -1.07,-0.10), risperidone (SMD = -0.53; 95%CrI: -0.93,-0.15), quetiapine (SMD = -0.59; 95%CrI: -1.06,-0.11), paroxetine (SMD = -0.35; 95%CrI: -0.48,-0.21), venlafaxine (SMD = -0.25; 95%CrI: -0.44,-0.05), fluoxetine (SMD = -0.28; 95%CrI: -0.46,-0.08), and sertraline (SMD = -0.21; 95%CrI: -0.33,-0.09) outperformed placebo. Moreover, phenelzine (RR = 3.39; 95%CrI: 1.43,11.09), lamotrigine (RR = 4.39; 95%CrI: 1.18,26.38), and fluoxetine (RR = 1.28%CrI: 1.01,1.59) outperformed placebo in terms of acceptability.
CONCLUSIONS
The NMA supports topiramate, risperidone, quetiapine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine and sertraline as effective pharmacological choices for the treatment of PTSD. Quetiapine and topiramate have the shortcoming of relying on a few small studies, but the clinically meaningful change in symptoms is noteworthy and merits further investigation. Among the pharmacological treatments with evidence of efficacy compared to placebo, fluoxetine achieved a relatively high rank regarding acceptability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest contemporary NMA on the subject and the addition of new medications is an important extension of previous meta-analyses, enabling a larger number of drug comparisons.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Paroxetine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sertraline; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 32891916
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.07.046 -
Journal of Child Psychology and... Jun 2021Clinically significant attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms are common and impairing in children and youth with autism spectrum disorder(ASD). The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Practitioner Review: Pharmacological treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Clinically significant attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms are common and impairing in children and youth with autism spectrum disorder(ASD). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to (a) evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ADHD symptoms in ASD and (b) distil findings for clinical translation.
METHODS
We searched electronic databases and clinical trial registries (1992 onwards). We selected randomized controlled trials conducted in participants <25 years of age, diagnosed with ASD that evaluated ADHD outcomes (hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention) following treatment with stimulants (methylphenidate or amphetamines), atomoxetine, alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists, antipsychotics, tricyclic antidepressants, bupropion, modafinil, venlafaxine, or a combination, in comparison with placebo, any of the listed medications, or behavioral therapies. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies (4 methylphenidate, 4 atomoxetine, 1 guanfacine, 14 antipsychotic, 1 venlafaxine, and 1 tianeptine) were included. Methylphenidate reduced hyperactivity (parent-rated: standardized mean difference [SMD] = -.63, 95%CI = -.95,-.30; teacher-rated: SMD = -.81, 95%CI = -1.43,-.19) and inattention (parent-rated: SMD = -.36, 95%CI = -.64,-.07; teacher-rated: SMD = -.30, 95%CI = -.49,-.11). Atomoxetine reduced inattention (parent-rated: SMD = -.54, 95%CI = -.98,-.09; teacher/investigator-rated: SMD = -0.38, 95%CI = -0.75, -0.01) and parent-rated hyperactivity (parent-rated: SMD = -.49, 95%CI = -.76,-.23; teacher-rated: SMD = -.43, 95%CI = -.92, .06). Indirect evidence for significant reductions in hyperactivity with second-generation antipsychotics was also found. Quality of evidence for all interventions was low/very low. Methylphenidate was associated with a nonsignificant elevated risk of dropout due to adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Direct pooled evidence supports the efficacy and tolerability of methylphenidate or atomoxetine for treatment of ADHD symptoms in children and youth with ASD. The current review highlights the efficacy of standard ADHD pharmacotherapy for treatment of ADHD symptoms in children and youth with ASD. Consideration of the benefits weighed against the limitations of safety/efficacy data and lack of data evaluating long-term continuation is undertaken to help guide clinical decision-making regarding treatment of co-occurring ADHD symptoms in children and youth with ASD.
Topics: Adolescent; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Guanfacine; Humans; Methylphenidate
PubMed: 32845025
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13305 -
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica May 2020In fixed-dose antidepressant trials, the lower range of the licensed dose achieves the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability. Whether flexible upward...
BACKGROUND
In fixed-dose antidepressant trials, the lower range of the licensed dose achieves the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability. Whether flexible upward titration while side-effects permit provides additional benefits is unknown.
METHODS
We did a systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized trials that examined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), venlafaxine or mirtazapine in the acute treatment of major depression. Our primary outcome was response, defined as 50% or greater reduction in depression severity. Secondary outcomes included drop-outs due to adverse effects and drop-outs for any reason. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to calculate the ratios of odds ratios (RORs) between trials comparing the flexible dose titrating above the minimum licensed dose against placebo and those comparing the fixed minimum licensed dose against placebo.
RESULTS
We included 123 published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (29 420 participants). There was no evidence supporting efficacy of the flexible dosing over the fixed low dose of SSRIs (ROR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.25), venlafaxine (1.24, 0.96 to 1.60) or mirtazapine (0.77, 0.33 to 1.78). No important differences were noted for tolerability or for any subgroup analyses except the superior efficacy of venlafaxine flexible dosing between 75 and 150 mg over the fixed 75 mg (1.30, 1.02 to 1.65).
CONCLUSION
There was no evidence to support added value in terms of efficacy, tolerability or acceptability of flexibly titrating up the dosage over the minimum licensed dose of SSRIs or mirtazapine. For venlafaxine, increased efficacy can be expected by flexibly titrating up to 150 mg.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mirtazapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 31891415
DOI: 10.1111/acps.13145 -
Psychiatry Research Nov 2019Depression has brought huge disease burden to the world. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological...
Depression has brought huge disease burden to the world. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD). We searched electronic databases with time range from 1990.1.1 to 2018.9.5. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adult patients with MDD were eligible for inclusion. We conducted network meta-analyses using multivariate meta-analyses models under the frequency framework. Primary outcomes were efficacy (response rate) and safety (overall risk of adverse events). We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) based on group-level data. 20,937 citations were identified, 91 trials comprising 10,991 participants were included in efficacy study, and 32 trials comprising 5245 participants were included in safety study. In terms of efficacy, all treatments studied (acupuncture, mirtazapine, herbal medicine, venlafaxine, physical exercise, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), bupropion, fluoxetine, and vortioxetine) except for probiotics were significantly more effective than placebo. In terms of safety, bupropion, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine were significantly less safe than placebo. Herbal medicine and mirtazapine had no significant difference in overall risk of adverse events compared with placebo. Acupuncture, CBT, physical exercise and probiotics were lack of eligible safety data.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Bupropion; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Depressive Disorder, Major; Fluoxetine; Humans; Mirtazapine; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Vortioxetine
PubMed: 31627074
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112595 -
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry :... Nov 2019Anxiety in late-life is a frequently encountered condition. The aim of this review is to systematically examine the efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for...
BACKGROUND
Anxiety in late-life is a frequently encountered condition. The aim of this review is to systematically examine the efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for treating anxiety disorders among older adults.
METHODS
Electronic searches of The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the standard bibliographic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were performed in August 2018 and updated in October 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antidepressants for late-life anxiety. The quality of each study was appraised using criteria developed by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
RESULTS
Data from 12 papers describing 10 RCTs of antidepressants for late-life anxiety are included in this review. There were 2 studies each of sertraline, escitalopram, and duloxetine, and 1 study each of citalopram, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and imipramine. Across all trials, antidepressants were associated with a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms at the end of the study period. Limitations of the trials include a preponderance of generalized anxiety disorder and relatively less data on other anxiety disorders, and limited data on long-term use of antidepressants for anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS
Antidepressants are beneficial for treating anxiety disorders in late life and are generally well tolerated.
Topics: Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Citalopram; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Humans; Late Onset Disorders; Paroxetine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline
PubMed: 31369663
DOI: No ID Found -
Pharmacopsychiatry Sep 2019The association between CYP2D6 metabolizer status and clinical outcomes of venlafaxine was extensively investigated previously, but no widely accepted conclusion has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The association between CYP2D6 metabolizer status and clinical outcomes of venlafaxine was extensively investigated previously, but no widely accepted conclusion has been reached so far. To obtain a more precise estimation of the association, a systematic review by meta-analysis was conducted in the present study.
METHODS
The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Technology of Chongqing, and Wan Fang Database were searched for eligible studies up to August 2018.
RESULTS
Fourteen related studies involving 1035 patients were finally included. Significant associations were found among 3 CYP2D6 phenotypes (NM, IM, and PM) and most pharmacokinetic parameters of venlafaxine. However, CYP2D6 phenotypes were not associated with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale response of venlafaxine. In addition, we also found no significant association between CYP2D6 phenotype and overall rate of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
CYP2D6 metabolizer status had significant influence on venlafaxine pharmacokinetics, but insufficient evidence demonstrated that CYP2D6 metabolizer status was associated with its therapeutic effects and overall rate of adverse events, which provided further evidence regarding the relationship between CYP2D6 metabolizer status and venlafaxine.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Depression; Humans; Treatment Outcome; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 30485867
DOI: 10.1055/a-0792-1340