-
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery Jul 2024Microsatellite instability is rare in rectal cancer and associated with younger age of onset and Lynch syndrome. All rectal cancers should be tested for microsatellite... (Review)
Review
Microsatellite instability is rare in rectal cancer and associated with younger age of onset and Lynch syndrome. All rectal cancers should be tested for microsatellite instability prior to treatment decisions. Patients with microsatellite instability are relatively resistant to chemotherapy. However, recent small studies have shown dramatic response with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Patients with Lynch syndrome have a hereditary predisposition to cancer and thus an elevated risk of metachronous cancer. Therefore, while "watch and wait" is a well-established practice for sporadic rectal cancers that obtain a complete clinical response after chemoradiation, its safety in patients with Lynch syndrome has not yet been defined. The extent of surgery for patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is controversial and there is significant debate as to the relative advantages of a segmental proctectomy with postoperative endoscopic surveillance versus a therapeutic and prophylactic total proctocolectomy. Surgical decision making for the patient with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is complex and demands a multidisciplinary approach, taking into account both patient- and tumor-specific factors. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy show great promise in the treatment of these patients, and further maturation of data from prospective trials will likely change the current treatment paradigm. Patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer who do not undergo total proctocolectomy require yearly surveillance colonoscopies and should consider chemoprophylaxis with aspirin.
PubMed: 38882941
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770717 -
International Journal of Surgery Case... Jul 2024Few cases of intestinal obstruction after colostomy are caused by internal hernia. Some institutions perform stomas through the extraperitoneal route because some...
INTRODUCTION
Few cases of intestinal obstruction after colostomy are caused by internal hernia. Some institutions perform stomas through the extraperitoneal route because some patients experience an internal hernia outside the stoma performed through the intraperitoneal route.
PRESENTATION OF CASE
A 72-year-old woman presented with a history of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). A sigmoid colostomy was performed via the extraperitoneal route during APR. One month after APR, the patient presented to the emergency department of our hospital with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed that the small intestine had passed through the extraperitoneal tunnel, resulting in strangulated intestinal obstruction, and emergency laparotomy was performed. During surgery, the ileum passed behind the elevated sigmoid colon in a caudal-to-cranial direction and formed an unusual closed loop. The strangulated part of the small intestine showed ischemic change; however, the intestine quickly normalized soon after strangulation was released, and the operation was completed without resection of the intestine.
DISCUSSION
The major cause of intestinal obstruction after colostomy is intraperitoneal adhesion. Looseness of the elevated sigmoid colon can cause internal hernia, if under pneumoperitoneum, when a colostomy is created through the extraperitoneal route in laparoscopic APR. Furthermore, the patient had lost more than 5 kg of body weight after the surgery, which may have led to the looseness of the elevated sigmoid colon.
CONCLUSION
Releasing the pneumoperitoneum during the elevation of the sigmoid colon is necessary to prevent internal hernia, even with a colostomy performed through the extraperitoneal route..
PubMed: 38880000
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109911 -
The Journal of Surgical Research Jun 2024Despite being a key metric with a significant correlation with the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer, the optimal surgical approach for total mesorectal excision...
INTRODUCTION
Despite being a key metric with a significant correlation with the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer, the optimal surgical approach for total mesorectal excision (TME) has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to assess the association of the surgical approach on the quality of TME and surgical margins and to characterize the surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, and open TME for rectal cancer.
METHODS
Patients with primary, nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent either lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection via robotic (Rob), laparoscopic (Lap), or open approaches were selected from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2007-2017). Quasi-Poisson regression analysis with backward selection was used to investigate the relationship between the surgical approach and outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
Among the 664 patients included in the study, the distribution of surgical approaches was as follows: 351 (52.9%) underwent TME via the open approach, 159 (23.9%) via the robotic approach, and 154 (23.2%) via the laparoscopic approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics among the three cohorts. The laparoscopic cohort had fewer patients with low rectal cancer (<6 cm from the anal verge) than the robotic and open cohorts (Lap 28.6% versus Rob 59.1% versus Open 45.6%, P = 0.015). Patients who underwent Rob and Lap TME had lower intraoperative blood loss compared with the Open approach (Rob 200 mL [Q1, Q3: 100.0, 300.0] versus Lap 150 mL [Q1, Q3: 75.0, 250.0] versus Open 300 mL [Q1, Q3: 150.0, 600.0], P < 0.001). There was no difference in the operative time (Rob 243 min [Q1, Q3: 203.8, 300.2] versus Lap 241 min [Q1, Q3: 186, 336] versus Open 226 min [Q1, Q3: 178, 315.8], P = 0.309) between the three approaches. Postoperative length of stay was shorter with robotic and laparoscopic approach compared to open approach (Rob 5.0 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8.2] versus Lap 5 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8] versus Open 7.0 d [Q1, Q3: 5, 9], P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches (79.2%, 64.9%, and 64.7%, respectively; P = 0.46). The margin positivity rate, a composite of circumferential margin and distal margin, was higher with the robotic and open approaches than with the laparoscopic approach (Rob 8.2% versus Open 6.6% versus Lap 1.9%, P = 0.17), Rob versus Lap (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.83) and Rob versus Open (odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.22, 1.12). There was no difference in long-term survival, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, between patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, or open TME (Figure 1).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for rectal cancer, we did not observe a difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, or open approaches. Robotic and open TME compared to laparoscopic TME were associated with higher margin positivity rates in our study. This was likely due to the higher percentage of low rectal cancers in the robotic and open cohorts. We also reported no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the aforementioned surgical techniques.
PubMed: 38875948
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.032 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Jun 2024Although accurate preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis is essential for optimizing treatment strategies for low rectal cancer, the accuracy of present...
BACKGROUND
Although accurate preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis is essential for optimizing treatment strategies for low rectal cancer, the accuracy of present diagnostic modalities has room for improvement.
OBJECTIVE
To establish a high-precision diagnostic method for lymph node metastasis of low rectal cancer using artificial intelligence.
DESIGN
A retrospective observational study.
SETTINGS
A single cancer center and a college of engineering in Japan.
PATIENTS
Patients with low rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent proctectomy, bilateral lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (slice ≤1 mm) between July 2015 and August 2021 were included in the present study. All pelvic lymph nodes from the aortic bifurcation to the upper edge of the anal canal were extracted, regardless of whether within or beyond the total mesenteric excision area, and pathological diagnoses were annotated for training and validation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy.
RESULTS
A total of 596 pathologically negative and 43 positive nodes from 52 patients were extracted and annotated. Four diagnostic methods, with and without using super-resolution images and without using 3D shape data, were performed and compared. The super-resolution + 3D shape data method had the best diagnostic ability for the combination of sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy (0.964, 0.966, and 0.968, respectively), while the super-resolution only method had the best diagnostic ability for the combination of specificity and positive predictive value (0.994 and 0.993, respectively).
LIMITATIONS
Small number of patients at a single center and the lack of external validation.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results enlightened the potential of artificial intelligence for the method to become another game changer in the diagnosis and treatment of low rectal cancer. See Video Abstract.
PubMed: 38871678
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003381 -
Annals of Surgery Jun 2024To investigate fecal incontinence and defecatory, urinary, and sexual functional outcomes after taTME.
Functional Outcomes After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) for Rectal Cancer: Results from the Phase II North American Multicenter Prospective Observational Trial.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate fecal incontinence and defecatory, urinary, and sexual functional outcomes after taTME.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
Proctectomy for rectal cancer may result in alterations in defecatory, urinary, and sexual function that persist beyond 12 months. The recent multicenter Phase II taTME trial demonstrated the safety of taTME in patients with stage I-III tumors.
METHODS
Prospectively registered self-reported questionnaires were collected from 100 taTME patients. Fecal continence (FIQL, Wexner), defecatory function (COREFO), urinary function (IPSS), and sexual function (FSFI-female, IIEF-male) were assessed preoperatively (PQ), 3-4 months post-ileostomy closure (FQ1), and 12-18 months post-taTME (FQ2).
RESULTS
Among 83 patients who responded at all three time points, FIQL, Wexner, and COREFO significantly worsened post-ileostomy closure. Between FQ1 and FQ2, FIQL lifestyle and coping, Wexner, and COREFO incontinence, social impact, frequency, and need for medication significantly improved, while FIQL depression and embarrassment did not change. IPSS did not change relative to preoperative scores. For females, FSFI declined for desire, orgasm, and satisfaction between PQ and FQ1, and did not improve between FQ1 and FQ2. In males, IIEF declined with no change between FQ1 and FQ2.
CONCLUSIONS
Although taTME resulted in initial decline in defecatory function and fecal continence, most functional domains improved by 12 months after ileostomy closure, without returning to preoperative status. Urinary function was preserved while sexual function declined without improvement by 18 months post-taTME. Our results address patient expectations and inform shared decision-making regarding taTME.
PubMed: 38869440
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006374 -
Surgical Endoscopy Jun 2024Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely...
BACKGROUND
Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely discharged. The study aim was to determine if patients discharged ≤ 3 days after rectal resections are associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of enhanced recovery low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy patients in a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal surgery database from 01/01/2018 to 07/15/2022. Clinic visits were scheduled within 4-7 days and at 30 days after discharge, and every 1-2 weeks for stoma patients until no longer needed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of discharge on postoperative days (POD)-1-3, POD-4-5, and POD ≥ 6 days with incidence of ED visits and readmissions.
RESULTS
A total of 118 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 with stomas. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 [IQR 6.5] days. Mean age was 58.6 years; 59.3% were ASA-3; and 69.5% had a minimally invasive surgical approach. ED visits were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (p = 0.096). No patients were discharged same-day, one without a stoma was discharged on POD-1, ten patients (2 with stomas) on POD-2, and twenty-four patients (13 with stomas) on POD-3. ED visits were lowest for the POD-1-3 group (14.3%) but not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.166). Readmission rate was also lowest for the POD-1-3 group (11.4%) and also not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.261) and this was confirmed with logistic regression. Complication rate was lowest in the POD-1-3 group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Early discharge after enhanced recovery partial or complete proctectomy is not associated with increased ED visits and readmissions. Follow up studies should identify post-discharge resources that allow safe early discharge and that may be standardized and generalizable.
PubMed: 38862825
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10967-9 -
Radiology and Oncology Jun 2024Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop early colorectal adenomas and if left untreated, progression to cancer is an inevitable event. Prophylactic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop early colorectal adenomas and if left untreated, progression to cancer is an inevitable event. Prophylactic surgery does not prevent further development of cancer in the rectal remnant, rectal cuff in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and even on the ileal mucosa of the pouch body. The aim of this review is to assess long-term rates of cancer and adenoma development in patients with FAP after prophylactic surgery and to summarise current recommendations for endoscopic management and surveillance of these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search of studies from January 1946 through to June 2023 was conducted using the PRISMA checklist. The electronic database PubMed was searched.
RESULTS
Fifty-four papers involving 5010 patients were reviewed. Cancer rate in the rectal remnant was 8.8-16.7% in the western population and 37% in the eastern population. The cumulative risk of cancer 30 years after surgery was 24%. Mortality due to cancer in the rectal remnant is 1.1-11.1% with a 5-year survival rate of 55%. The adenoma rate after primary IPAA was 9.4-85% with a cumulative risk of 85% 20 years after surgery and a cumulative risk of 12% for advanced adenomas 10 years after surgery. Cumulative risk for adenomas after ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) was 85% after 5 and 100% after 10 years. Adenomas developed more frequently after stapled (33.9-57%) compared to hand-sewn (0-33%) anastomosis. We identified reports of 45 cancers in patients after IPAA of which 30 were in the pouch body and 15 in the rectal cuff or at the anastomosis.
CONCLUSIONS
There was a significant incidence of cancer and adenomas in the rectal remnant and ileal pouch of FAP patients during the long-term follow-up. Regular endoscopic surveillance is recommended, not only in IRA patients, but also in pouch patients after proctocolectomy.
Topics: Humans; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Colectomy; Adenoma; Prophylactic Surgical Procedures; Colorectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 38860690
DOI: 10.2478/raon-2024-0029 -
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology Jun 2024Rectal implantation cysts can occur at anastomotic sites after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. Herein, we report a case of primary adenocarcinoma arising...
Rectal implantation cysts can occur at anastomotic sites after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. Herein, we report a case of primary adenocarcinoma arising from a rectal implantation cyst after LAR for rectal cancer. A 70-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for diagnosis and treatment of a growing cystic lesion. She had LAR performed for rectal cancer 29 years previously and had a rectal implantation cyst detected 13 years previously. On the first visit to our hospital, serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were elevated, and computed tomography (CT) scans revealed a cystic lesion near the anastomosis. CT-guided biopsy revealed no cancer tissue in the cystic lesion. After that, the cystic lesion naturally shrank, and serum CEA and CA19-9 levels became normal. Follow-up included 3 monthly serum CEA and CA19-9 testing and 6 monthly CT scans. Two years later, serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were elevated again. Colonoscopy revealed an ulcerative lesion at the anastomotic site, in which adenocarcinoma was confirmed. Abdominoperineal resection with sacral resection was performed, and postoperative histopathological examination revealed a primary adenocarcinoma with mucinous component at the implantation cyst. Since rectal implantation cysts can become malignant after extended periods, clinicians need to be aware of this disease.
PubMed: 38853185
DOI: 10.1007/s12328-024-02002-0 -
Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Jul 2024
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Topics: Humans; Ileostomy; Rectal Neoplasms; Proctectomy; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38847868
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02120-y -
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2024Presacral/Retrorectal tumors (RRT) are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histological types. Data on surgical management are limited to case reports and small... (Review)
Review
Presacral/Retrorectal tumors (RRT) are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histological types. Data on surgical management are limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathological subtypes, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes. A PubMed search using terms "retrorectal tumor" and "presacral tumor" was used to identify articles reporting RRT of non-urological, non-gynecologic, and non-metastatic origin. Articles included were between 2015 and 2023. A total of 68 studies were included, comprising 570 patients. About 68.2% of patients were female, and the mean overall age of both sexes was 48.6 years. Based on histopathology, 466 patients (81.8%) had benign lesions, and 104 (18.2%) were malignant. In terms of surgical approach, 191 (33.5%) were treated anteriorly, 240 (42.1%) through a posterior approach, and 66 (11.6%) combined. The mean length of stay was 7.6 days. Patients treated using the posterior approach had a shorter length of stay (5.7 days) compared to the anterior and combined approaches. RRT are rare tumors of congenital nature with prevalence among the female sex. R0 resection is crucial in its management, and minimal access surgery appears to be a safer option in appropriate case selection.
PubMed: 38841312
DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_27_2024