-
Scientific Reports Jun 2024Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) can be one of the causes of transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought...
Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) can be one of the causes of transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to clarify the formation process of SLT and thrombogenicity during the perioperative period of TAVI. This multicenter, prospective, single-arm interventional study enrolled 26 patients treated with edoxaban for atrial fibrillation and who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis between September 2018 and September 2022. We investigated changes in maximal leaflet thickness detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography between 1 week and 3 months after TAVI in 18 patients and measured the thrombogenicity by Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System (T-TAS) and flow stagnation volume by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (n = 11). SLT was observed in 16.7% (3/18) at 1 week, but decreased to 5.9% (1/17) at 3 months after TAVI. Patients with SLT at 1 week had a significantly decreased maximal leaflet thickness compared to those without SLT. Thrombogenicity assessed by T-TAS decreased markedly at 1 week and tended to increase at 3 months. The stagnation volume assessed by CFD was positively associated with a higher maximum leaflet thickness. This study showed the course of leaflet thrombus formation and visualization of stagnation in neo-sinus of THV in the acute phase after TAVI.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Atrial Fibrillation; Thrombosis; Female; Male; Aged, 80 and over; Aged; Prospective Studies; Aortic Valve; Severity of Illness Index; Pyridines; Thiazoles
PubMed: 38942790
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65600-5 -
The International Journal of... Jun 2024Right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling has been linked to clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter valve...
Right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling has been linked to clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI). However, the best timing for prognostic assessment remains uncertain. Our aim was to determine the impact of RV longitudinal function parameters and RV-PA coupling on mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. Retrospective, single center, analysis including patients with AS who underwent TAVI between 2007 and 2021. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed before, shortly after the procedure, and during follow-up. RV-PA uncoupling was defined as a TAPSE/PASP ratio<0.55 (severe RV uncoupling was defined as TAPSE/PASP ratio<0.32. The effect of RV parameters on all-cause mortality up to 12 months was assessed. Among the 577 patients included, pre-procedural TAPSE/PASP ratio data were available for 205. RV-PA uncoupling was present in 113 patients (55.1%), with severe uncoupling observed in 31 (15.1%). Within the first 12 months after TAVI, 51 patients (9%) died. Severe RV-PA uncoupling was associated with mortality in univariable Cox regression; however, this association was lost after adjusting for EuroSCORE II. A significant association was found between the TAPSE/PASP ratio (per 0.1-unit increase) after the procedure and the primary endpoint (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97; p=0.029). Higher postprocedural PASP (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.06; p<0.001 was also associated with all-cause mortality. V-PA uncoupling and PASP after TAVI are associated with all-cause mortality in patients and may be valuable for patient selection and for planning post-procedural care.
PubMed: 38940965
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03165-0 -
Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) Jun 2024Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in genomics research and practice, and generative AI has garnered significant recent attention. In clinical...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in genomics research and practice, and generative AI has garnered significant recent attention. In clinical applications of generative AI, aspects of the underlying datasets can impact results, and confounders should be studied and mitigated. One example involves the facial expressions of people with genetic conditions. Stereotypically, Williams (WS) and Angelman (AS) syndromes are associated with a "happy" demeanor, including a smiling expression. Clinical geneticists may be more likely to identify these conditions in images of smiling individuals. To study the impact of facial expression, we analyzed publicly available facial images of approximately 3500 individuals with genetic conditions. Using a deep learning (DL) image classifier, we found that WS and AS images with non-smiling expressions had significantly lower prediction probabilities for the correct syndrome labels than those with smiling expressions. This was not seen for 22q11.2 deletion and Noonan syndromes, which are not associated with a smiling expression. To further explore the effect of facial expressions, we computationally altered the facial expressions for these images. We trained HyperStyle, a GAN-inversion technique compatible with StyleGAN2, to determine the vector representations of our images. Then, following the concept of InterfaceGAN, we edited these vectors to recreate the original images in a phenotypically accurate way but with a different facial expression. Through online surveys and an eye-tracking experiment, we examined how altered facial expressions affect the performance of human experts. We overall found that facial expression is associated with diagnostic accuracy variably in different genetic conditions.
Topics: Humans; Facial Expression; Deep Learning; Artificial Intelligence; Genetics, Medical; Williams Syndrome
PubMed: 38940144
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae239 -
JACC. Advances Jan 2024Multilevel obstruction in left ventricular inflow and outflow predisposes to arrhythmias in Shone's complex (SC).
BACKGROUND
Multilevel obstruction in left ventricular inflow and outflow predisposes to arrhythmias in Shone's complex (SC).
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to study the prevalence and outcomes (heart failure [HF] hospitalization, cardiac transplant, death) of cardiac arrhythmias in adults with SC.
METHODS
Adults with SC (defined as ≥2 lesions out of supramitral ring, parachute mitral valve, subvalvular/valvular aortic stenosis (AS), and aortic coarctation) seen at Mayo Clinic between January 1999 and March 2020 were identified and evaluated for the presence of sustained atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the occurrence of these arrhythmias.
RESULTS
Seventy-three patients with SC (mean age at first visit 33 ± 13 years) were identified. Most common anomalies were valvular AS (88%), coarctation (85%), parachute mitral valve (44%), subvalvular AS (44%), and supramitral ring (25%). Atrial arrhythmias were diagnosed in 24 patients (33%) at a mean age of 34.6 ± 12.7 years. Patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter had higher number of surgeries, left atrial size, right ventricular systolic pressure, and HF hospitalizations. A rhythm control approach was used in majority of patients (75% on antiarrhythmic drugs and 50% underwent catheter ablation). Sustained VA occurred in 6 of 73 patients of whom 4 had an ejection fraction <40%. Death and cardiac transplantation occurred in 11 and 3 patients, respectively, during a median follow-up of 7.3 ± 6.0 years.
CONCLUSIONS
In adults with SC, atrial arrhythmias occurred in one-third of patients, were associated with more HF hospitalizations, and frequently required rhythm control. Prevalence of sustained VA was 8% and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation should be considered in those with reduced ejection fraction.
PubMed: 38939811
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100715 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024
PubMed: 38939666
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100882 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024The progression rate of aortic stenosis differs between patients, complicating clinical follow-up and management.
BACKGROUND
The progression rate of aortic stenosis differs between patients, complicating clinical follow-up and management.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to identify predictors associated with the progression rate of aortic stenosis.
METHODS
In this retrospective longitudinal single-center cohort study, all patients with moderate aortic stenosis who presented between December 2011 and December 2022 and had echocardiograms available were included. The individual aortic stenosis progression rate was calculated based on aortic valve area (AVA) from at least 2 echocardiograms performed at least 6 months apart. Baseline factors associated with the progression rate of AVA were determined using linear mixed-effects models, and the association of progression rate with clinical outcomes was evaluated using Cox regression.
RESULTS
The study included 540 patients (median age 69 years and 38% female) with 2,937 echocardiograms (median 5 per patient). Patients had a linear progression with a median AVA decrease of 0.09 cm/y and a median peak jet velocity increase of 0.17 m/s/y. Rapid progression was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.26-2.48) and aortic valve replacement (HR: 3.44, 95% CI: 2.55-4.64). Older age, greater left ventricular mass index, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease were associated with a faster decline of AVA.
CONCLUSIONS
AVA decreases linearly in individual patients, and faster progression is independently associated with higher mortality. Routine clinical and echocardiographic variables accurately predict the individual progression rate and may aid clinicians in determining the optimal follow-up interval for patients with aortic stenosis.
PubMed: 38939659
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100879 -
JACC. Advances May 2024The treatment of severe aortic stenosis (SAS) has evolved rapidly with the advent of minimally invasive structural heart interventions. Transcatheter aortic valve... (Review)
Review
The treatment of severe aortic stenosis (SAS) has evolved rapidly with the advent of minimally invasive structural heart interventions. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has allowed patients to undergo definitive SAS treatment achieving faster recovery rates compared to valve surgery. Not infrequently, patients are admitted/diagnosed with SAS after a fall associated with a hip fracture (HFx). While urgent orthopedic surgery is key to reduce disability and mortality, untreated SAS increases the perioperative risk and precludes physical recovery. There is no consensus on what the best strategy is either hip correction under hemodynamic monitoring followed by valve replacement or preoperative balloon aortic valvuloplasty to allow HFx surgery followed by valve replacement. However, preoperative minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement may represent an attractive strategy for selected patients. We provide a management pathway that emphasizes an early multidisciplinary approach to optimize time for hip surgery to improve orthopedic and cardiovascular outcomes in patients presenting with HFx-SAS.
PubMed: 38939644
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100912 -
JACC. Advances May 2024The prognostic value of cardiac damage staging classification based on the extent of extravalvular damage has been proposed in moderate/severe aortic stenosis (AS).
BACKGROUND
The prognostic value of cardiac damage staging classification based on the extent of extravalvular damage has been proposed in moderate/severe aortic stenosis (AS).
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to assess the association of cardiac damage staging with mortality across the spectrum of patients with AS following aortic surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS
We conducted a pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived reconstructed time-to-event data from studies published through February 2023.
RESULTS
In total, 16 studies (n = 14,499) met our eligibility criteria and included 12,282 patients with symptomatic severe AS and 2,217 patients with asymptomatic severe/moderate AS. For patients with symptomatic severe AS, all-cause mortality was 24.0%, 27.7%, 38.0%, 56.3%, and 57.3% at 5 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (stage 0 as reference; HR in stage 1: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.03-1.64]; = 0.029; stage 2: 1.74 [95% CI: 1.41-2.16]; < 0.001; stage 3: 2.92 [95% CI: 2.35-3.64]; < 0.001, and stage 4: 3.51 [95% CI: 2.79-4.41]; < 0.001). For patients with asymptomatic moderate/severe AS, all-cause mortality was 19.3%, 36.9%, 51.7%, and 67.8% at 8 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 to 4, respectively (HR in stage 1: 1.70 [95% CI: 1.21-2.38]; = 0.002; stage 2: 2.20 [95% CI: 1.60-3.02]; < 0.001; and stage 3 to 4: 3.90 [95% CI: 2.79-5.47]; < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients undergoing AVR across the symptomatic and severity spectrum of AS, cardiac damage staging at baseline has important prognostic implications. This pooled meta-analysis in patients undergoing AVR suggests that staging of baseline cardiac damage could be considered for timing and selection of therapy in patients with moderate or severe AS to determine the need for earlier AVR or adjunctive pharmacotherapy to prevent irreversible cardiac damage and improve the long-term prognosis.
PubMed: 38939639
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100959 -
JACC. Advances May 2024
PubMed: 38939634
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100926 -
JACC. Advances May 2024Persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been associated with poor outcomes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme...
BACKGROUND
Persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been associated with poor outcomes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), due to their favorable effects on ventricular remodeling, have been hypothesized to improve outcomes post-TAVR, yet there are no recommendations regarding their use.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs with those not receiving ACEIs/ARBs after TAVR.
METHODS
We performed a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Library until June 14, 2023, and included all studies comparing clinical outcomes between patients given ACEIs/ARBs and those not given ACEIs/ARBs after TAVR. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome. We used a random effects model with appropriate corrections to calculate relative risk (RR) and CIs, with all analyses carried out using R v4.0.3.
RESULTS
We included ten studies on the use of ACEIs/ARBs post-TAVR. Patients on ACEIs/ARBs had lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-0.86, I = 62%, chi-square < 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.88, I = 0%, chi-square = 0.54), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.96, I = 0%, chi-square = 0.59). Patients on ACEIs/ARBs had a similar risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, new permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, vascular complications, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS
We found that patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs had a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Risk of other outcomes was similar to patients not receiving ACEIs/ARBs. Randomized clinical trials are needed to explore the benefits of ACEIs/ARBs post-TAVR, so that definitive guidelines can be developed.
PubMed: 38939627
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100927