-
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2024We aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine as supplemental analgesia in reducing intraoperative visceral pain... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Esketamine Combined with Dexmedetomidine to reduce Visceral Pain During elective Cesarean Section Under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia: A double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.
PURPOSE
We aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine as supplemental analgesia in reducing intraoperative visceral pain during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 269 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under CSEA between May 2023 and August 2023 were assessed. The parturients were randomly allocated to receiving either intravenous infusion of 0.3-mg/kg esketamine combined with 0.5-μg/kg dexmedetomidine (group ED, n=76), 0.5-μg/kg dexmedetomidine (group D, n=76), or normal saline (group C, n=76) after umbilical cord clamping. The primary outcome was intraoperative visceral pain. Secondary outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain evaluation and other intraoperative complications.
RESULTS
The incidence of visceral pain was lower in group ED [9 (12.7%)] than in group D [32 (43.8%)] and group C [36 (48.6%), <0.0001]. The VAS score was also lower in group ED when exploring abdominal cavity [0 (0), <0.0001] and suturing the muscle layer [0 (0), =0.036]. The mean arterial pressure was higher in group D [83 (9) mmHg] and group ED [81 (11) mmHg] than in group C [75 (10) mmHg, <0.0001] after solution infusion. The heart rate after infusion of the solution was lower in group D [80 (12) bpm] than in group C [86 (14) bpm] and group ED [85 (12) bpm, = 0.016]. The incidence of transient neurologic or mental symptoms was higher in group ED compared to group C and group D (76.1% vs 18.9% vs 23.3%, <0.0001).
CONCLUSION
During cesarean section, 0.3-mg/kg esketamine combined with 0.5-μg/kg dexmedetomidine can alleviate visceral traction pain and provide stable hemodynamics. Parturients receiving this regimen may experience transient neurologic or mental symptoms that can spontaneously resolve at the end of the surgery.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Double-Blind Method; Cesarean Section; Female; Adult; Visceral Pain; Anesthesia, Spinal; Pregnancy; Anesthesia, Epidural; Drug Therapy, Combination; Elective Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38911034
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S460924 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2024Shivering occurs frequently after caesarean delivery. The present study aimed to investigate the ED50 and ED95 of an intravenous (i.v.) bolus of dexmedetomidine for... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Intravenous Bolus of Dexmedetomidine for Treatment of Severe Shivering After Caesarean Delivery Under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anaesthesia: A Randomized Dose-Response Study.
PURPOSE
Shivering occurs frequently after caesarean delivery. The present study aimed to investigate the ED50 and ED95 of an intravenous (i.v.) bolus of dexmedetomidine for treating severe shivering after caesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Seventy-five parturients with severe shivering after caesarean delivery were randomized into one of the five groups to receive an i.v. bolus of 0.2 (Group D1), 0.25 (Group D2), 0.3 (Group D3), 0.35 (Group D4) or 0.4 (Group D5) μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. Effectiveness of shivering treatment was defined as a standardized shivering score decreasing to ≤1 within 10 min of dexmedetomidine injection. The ED50 and ED95 were determined by probit regression. Adverse effects were also compared among the groups.
RESULTS
The ED50 and ED95 of i.v. dexmedetomidine to treat severe shivering were 0.23 (95% CI, 0.16-0.26) μg/kg and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.34-0.52) μg/kg, respectively. No difference in the incidence of adverse effects was found between groups.
CONCLUSION
An i.v. bolus of 0.39 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine will treat 95% of parturients experiencing severe shivering after caesarean delivery.
Topics: Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Shivering; Cesarean Section; Female; Anesthesia, Spinal; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Anesthesia, Epidural; Pregnancy; Injections, Intravenous; Young Adult
PubMed: 38911029
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S456289 -
Chinese Medical Journal Jun 2024
Effects of dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and electroencephalogram during the recovery period in older patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
PubMed: 38910364
DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003191 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular... Jun 2024To evaluate systemic levels of bupivacaine after bilateral ultrasound-guided deep parasternal intercostal plan (PIP) block in cardiac surgical patients undergoing median...
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate systemic levels of bupivacaine after bilateral ultrasound-guided deep parasternal intercostal plan (PIP) block in cardiac surgical patients undergoing median sternotomy.
DESIGN
Prospective, observational study SETTING: Single institution; academic university hospital PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy received a PIP block with 2.5 mg/kg bupivacaine with or without dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine.
MEASUREMENTS
Arterial blood samples were analyzed for total serum bupivacaine concentration at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after placement of PIP. Local anesthetic volume, local anesthetic adjuncts, time to extubation, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption were recorded.
MAIN RESULTS
The mean peak bupivacaine concentration was 0.60 ± 0.62 µg/mL, and the mean time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 16.92 ± 12.97 minutes. Two patients (7.1%) had a concentration >2.0 µg/mL within 15 minutes of block placement. The mean Tmax of bupivacaine was significantly greater in patients who did not receive additives compared to those patients who did (22.86 ± 14.77 minutes v 10.0 ± 5.22 minutes; p = .004). The times to extubation and postoperative pain were not improved with additives.
CONCLUSIONS
Bilateral PIP placed at the end of cardiac surgery resulted in low systemic bupivacaine levels. The inclusion of additives shortened Tmax without improving outcome.
PubMed: 38908936
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.06.006 -
Animal Reproduction Science May 2024Several studies have demonstrated the correlation between Doppler velocimetric parameters of testicular artery and semen quality in domestic species, but in felines data...
Several studies have demonstrated the correlation between Doppler velocimetric parameters of testicular artery and semen quality in domestic species, but in felines data are scarce. This study aimed to correlate the Doppler velocimetry of the testicular artery with sperm kinetics and sperm defects, in sedated and non-sedated cats. Forty tomcats were divided into two groups: sedated (SG; n=20) with dexmedetomidine (10 µm/kg) and ketamine (12 mg/kg), and non-sedated (NSG; n=20). The animals were subjected to ultrasound Doppler velocimetry of the distal supratesticular and marginal region of the testicular artery and subsequently orchiectomized. Epididymal tail spermatozoa were recovered and analyzed using a CASA system for motility, and morphology took place. Animals of SG presented a significantly higher velocity in the marginal region of the cat's testicular artery [peak systolic velocity (PSV) 11.51 cm/s; end-diastolic velocity (EDV) 7.72 cm/s] compared to NSG (PSV 7.72 cm/s, P < 0.001; EDV 4.93 cm/s, P < 0.001). Sedated cats presented higher pulsatility and resistivity indexes than non-sedated cats. The supratesticular PSV of NSG was moderately correlated with major (r = 0621; P < 0.001) and total sperm defects (r = 0614; P < 0001). Doppler velocimetry was fairly correlated with minor, major, and total sperm defects. In conclusion, Doppler velocimetric evaluation emerges as an important possibility in the reproductive evaluation of tomcats, once the testicular artery hemodynamics were associated with sperm defects. However, it is advisable to carry out this evaluation in non-sedated animals. If sedation is necessary, peripheral vasoconstriction should be considered.
PubMed: 38908170
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107515 -
Journal of Pharmacy Practice Jun 2024The management of sedation in critically ill adults poses a unique challenge to clinicians. Dexmedetomidine, an α agonist, has a unique mechanism and favorable... (Review)
Review
The management of sedation in critically ill adults poses a unique challenge to clinicians. Dexmedetomidine, an α agonist, has a unique mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetics, making it an attractive intravenous option for sedation and delirium in the intensive care unit. However, patients may be at risk for withdrawal with prolonged use, adding to the complexity of sedation and agitation management in this patient population. Enteral α agents have the benefit of cost savings and ease of administration, thus playing a role in the ability to decrease intravenous sedative use and prevent dexmedetomidine withdrawal. Clonidine and guanfacine are the two most common enteral α agents utilized for this purpose, however, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the comparative benefit between the two agents. The decision to use one vs the other agent should be determined based on their differing pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and side effect profile. The most effective dosing strategy for these agents is also unknown. Ultimately, more robust literature is required to determine enteral α agonists place in therapy. This narrative review evaluates the currently available literature on the use of α agonists in critically ill adults with an emphasis on sedation, delirium, and withdrawal.
PubMed: 38907529
DOI: 10.1177/08971900241263171 -
BMC Anesthesiology Jun 2024Dexmedetomidine and midazolam are commonly used sedatives in children. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and effectiveness of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dexmedetomidine and midazolam are commonly used sedatives in children. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and effectiveness of sedation provided by dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam versus other sedatives including chloral hydrate, midazolam and other sedatives in pediatric sedation.
METHODS
The Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases, and Clinicaltrials.gov register of controlled trials were searched from inception to June 2022. All randomized controlled trials used dexmedetomidine-midazolam in pediatric sedation were enrolled. The articles search, data extraction, and quality assessment of included studies were performed independently by two researchers. The success rate of sedation was considered as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included onset time of sedation, recovery time of sedation and occurrence of adverse events.
RESULTS
A total of 522 studies were screened and 6 RCTs were identified; 859 patients were analyzed. The administration of dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam was associated with a higher sedation success rate and a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting in computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, Auditory Brainstem Response test or fiberoptic bronchoscopy examinations than the other sedatives did (OR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.39-6.13, P = 0.005, I = 51%; OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.68, P = 0.008, I = 0%, respectively). Two groups did not differ significantly in recovery time and the occurrence of adverse reactions (WMD = - 0.27, 95% CI: - 0.93 to - 0.39, P = 0.42; OR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.48-1.02, P = 0.06, I = 45%. respectively). However, the results of the subgroup analysis of ASA I-II children showed a quicker onset time in dexmedetomidine-midazolam group than the other sedatives (WMD=-3.08; 95% CI: -4.66 to - 1.49, P = 0.0001, I = 30%).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam group provided higher sedation success rates and caused a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting in completing examinations, indicating a prospective outpatient clinical application for procedural sedation.
Topics: Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Midazolam; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38907338
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02570-1 -
International Journal of Medical... 2024Continuous intravenous infusion of remimazolam may be suitable for sedation in patients undergoing regional anaesthesia. However, there have been no studies comparing... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Continuous intravenous infusion of remimazolam may be suitable for sedation in patients undergoing regional anaesthesia. However, there have been no studies comparing remimazolam and dexmedetomidine for this purpose. This study compared emergence from sedation between dexmedetomidine and remimazolam following continuous intravenous infusion in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia. This double-blinded, randomised controlled trial assessed the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and remimazolam. Following spinal anaesthesia, patients were sedated using continuous intravenous infusion of either dexmedetomidine (D group) or remimazolam (R group).The D group received dexmedetomidine administered at 6 mL/kg/h (6 µg/kg/h) for 10 minutes, followed by 1 mL/kg/h (1 µg/kg/h). The R group received remimazolam administered at 6 mL/kg/h (6 mg/kg/h) for 10 minutes, followed by 1 mL/kg/h (1 mg/kg/h). Sedation levels were evaluated using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale. The time to reach MOAA/S ≤ 3 from the start of drug infusion and the time to reach MOAA/S = 5 from the end of infusion were recorded. Hemodynamic parameters and respiratory rate were also monitored. The R group reached MOAA/S ≤ 3 significantly faster than the D group during induction of sedation (4 ± 1 minutes and 11 ± 3 minutes, respectively, < 0.001). The R group also reached MOAA/S = 5 significantly faster than the D group during emergence from sedation (11 ± 3 minutes and 16 ± 5 minutes, respectively, < 0.001). Both groups maintained stable hemodynamic parameters and respiratory rate without any significant differences, although the mean heart rate was significantly lower in the D group than in the R group after the start of infusion. Remimazolam demonstrated significantly faster induction of and emergence from sedation compared to dexmedetomidine, with no significant differences in haemodynamics or respiratory depression.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Anesthesia, Spinal; Male; Female; Adult; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Middle Aged; Double-Blind Method; Infusions, Intravenous; Benzodiazepines; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Hemodynamics; Conscious Sedation
PubMed: 38903925
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.95736 -
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Jun 2024Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective intervention for psychiatric patients. Succinylcholine is considered the drug of choice for muscle relaxation for ECT....
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective intervention for psychiatric patients. Succinylcholine is considered the drug of choice for muscle relaxation for ECT. Significant adverse effects of succinylcholine include fasciculation and myalgia. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenergic agonist. This study aims to determine the efficacy of a low dose of dexmedetomidine in reducing succinylcholine-induced myalgia in patients receiving ECT.
METHODS
This randomised controlled trial was conducted on 100 patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing ECT, who were randomly allocated into two groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group D received intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine 0.25 µg/kg, and Group C received IV normal saline (0.9%). Patients' self-reported myalgia scores were measured after 60 min of the procedure. Fasciculations were noted after IV succinylcholine administration. Heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) were measured at baseline, after infusion (5 min) and after ECT (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 30 min). Continuous data were analysed using a Student's -test for two-group comparisons, a mixed model analysis of variance for group comparisons and various time point analyses. Categorical data were analysed using the Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS
There were no differences between the groups regarding demographics. Myalgia and fasciculations were less in Group D than in Group C ( < 0.001). MBP and HR changes were comparable ( > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
A low dose of dexmedetomidine (0.25 µg/kg) effectively reduces myalgia and fasciculations due to succinylcholine in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy.
PubMed: 38903251
DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1159_23 -
Chemico-biological Interactions Jun 2024Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): Life-threatening medical conditions characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates, where...
Dexmedetomidine mitigates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by modulating heat shock protein A12B to inhibit the toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor-kappa B signaling pathway.
Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): Life-threatening medical conditions characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates, where the inflammatory process plays a crucial role in lung tissue damage, especially in models induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Heat shock protein A12B (HSPA12B) has strong anti-infammatory properties However, it is unknown whether increased HSPA12B is protective against LPS-induced ALI. And Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a potent α-adrenergic receptor (α-AR) agonist that has been shown to protect against sepsis-induced lung injury, however, the underlying mechanisms of this protection are not fully understood. This study utilized bioinformatics analysis and an LPS-induced ALI model to explore how DEX alleviates lung injury by modulating HSPA12B and inhibiting the Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor-kappa B (TLR4/NF-κB) signaling pathway. Results indicate that HSPA12B overexpression and DEX pre-treatment markedly mitigated LPS-induced lung injury, which was evaluated by the deterioration of histopathology, histologic scores, the W/D weight ratio, and total protein expression, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in the BALF, and the levels of NO, MDA,SOD and MPO in the lung. Moreover, HSPA12B overexpression and DEX pre-treatment significantly reduces lung injury and inflammation levels by upregulating HSPA12B and inhibiting the activation of the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. On the contrary, when the expression of HSPA12B is inhibited, the protective effect of DEX pre-treatment on lung tissue is significantly weakened.In summary, our research demonstrated that the increased expression of AAV-mediated HSPA12B in the lungs of mice inhibits acute inflammation and suppresses the activation of TLR4/NF-κB pathway in a murine model of LPS-induced ALI. DEX could enhance HSPA12B and inhibit the initiation and development of inflammation through down-regulating TLR4/NF-κB pathway.These findings highlight the potential of DEX as a therapeutic agent for treating ALI and ARDS, offering new strategies for clinical intervention.
PubMed: 38901789
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2024.111112