-
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2021Over the past 20 years or so, the drug misuse scenario has seen the emergence of both prescription-only and over-the-counter (OTC) medications being reported as...
Over the past 20 years or so, the drug misuse scenario has seen the emergence of both prescription-only and over-the-counter (OTC) medications being reported as ingested for recreational purposes. OTC drugs such as antihistamines, cough/cold medications, and decongestants are reportedly the most popular in being diverted and misused. While the current related knowledge is limited, the aim here was to examine the published clinical data on OTC misuse, focusing on antihistamines (e.g., diphenhydramine, promethazine, chlorpheniramine, and dimenhydrinate), dextromethorphan (DXM)- and codeine-based cough medicines, and the nasal decongestant pseudoephedrine. A systematic literature review was carried out with the help of Scopus, Web of Science databases, and the related gray literature. For data gathering purposes, both the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and PROSPERO guidelines were followed (PROSPERO identification code CRD42020209261). After completion of the selection, eligibility, and screening phases, some 92 articles were here taken into consideration; case reports, surveys, and retrospective case series analyses were included. Findings were organized according to the specific OTC recorded. Most articles focused here on DXM ( = 54) and diphenhydramine ( = 12). When specified, dosages, route(s) of administration, toxicity symptoms (including both physical and psychiatric ones), and outcomes were here reported. Results from the systematic review showed that the OTC misusing issues are both widespread worldwide and popular; vulnerable categories include adolescents and young adults, although real prevalence figures remain unknown, due to a lack of appropriate monitoring systems. Considering the potential, and at times serious, adverse effects associated with OTC misusing issues, healthcare professionals should be vigilant, and preventative actions should be designed and implemented.
PubMed: 34025478
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.657397 -
International Journal of Environmental... Apr 2021Vertigo is not itself a disease, but rather a symptom of various syndromes and disorders that jeopardize balance function, which is essential for daily activities. It is...
Vertigo is not itself a disease, but rather a symptom of various syndromes and disorders that jeopardize balance function, which is essential for daily activities. It is an abnormal sensation of motion that usually occurs in the absence of motion, or when a motion is sensed inaccurately. Due to the complexity of the etiopathogenesis of vertigo, many pharmacological treatments have been tested for efficacy on vertigo. Among these drugs, cinnarizine, usually given together with dimenhydrinate, appears to be the first-line pharmacotherapy for the management of vertigo and inner ear disorders. Based on these considerations, the present non-interventional study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of cinnarizine (20 mg) and dimenhydrinate (40 mg) in patients suffering from vertigo-related symptoms. To this end, we enrolled 120 adults-70 males, and 50 females-with an average age of 64 years. Before beginning pharmacological treatment, all patients were screened for the intensity of vertigo, dizziness, and concomitant symptoms through the Visual Scale of Dizziness Disorders and Dizziness Handicap Inventory scales. At the end of the anamnestic evaluation, patients received the fixed-dose combination of cinnarizine (20 mg) plus dimenhydrinate (40 mg) 3 times daily, for 60 days. The results of this study provide further insight regarding the efficacy of the fixed combination when used to reduce symptoms of vestibular vertigo of central and/or peripheral origin, after both the 15- and 60-day therapies. Independent of the type of vertigo, the fixed combination was able to reduce dizziness- and vertigo-associated symptoms in more than 75% of all patients treated, starting from 15 days of therapy, and improving 60 days after starting the therapy. Interestingly, we also found differences between male and female patients in the framework of the pharmacological effects of therapy. This study provides further details concerning the therapeutic efficacy of the fixed combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate, and also focuses attention on the possibility that these drugs could act in a gender-specific manner, paving the way for further research.
Topics: Adult; Cinnarizine; Dimenhydrinate; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Vertigo
PubMed: 33946152
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094787 -
Australian Prescriber Apr 2021
Review
PubMed: 33911336
DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2021.009 -
Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular... Sep 2021Antiemetic drugs are used to control excessive vomiting and nausea and generally absorbed through gastrointestinal tract. In present study, the in-vitro binding...
Antiemetic drugs are used to control excessive vomiting and nausea and generally absorbed through gastrointestinal tract. In present study, the in-vitro binding interactions two of the antiemetic drugs (dimenhydrinate and ondansetron) between Trypsin (Tsn) secreted from pancreas to small intestine for protein digestion were investigated by fluorescence emission spectroscopy (FES), UV-VIS spectroscopy, synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy (SFS), FT-IR spectroscopy and molecular modeling methods. Also, the effect of these drugs on the catalytic activity of Tsn was determined. The fluorescence quenching experiments indicated that each drugs quenched the intrinsic fluorescence of Tsn with their increased concentrations. The results of SFS and UV-VIS spectra proved the interaction of dimenhydrinate and ondansetron with Tsn. FT-IR spectra showed that the secondary structure of enzyme was altered in the presence of the drugs. All these spectroscopy results were validated and explained by molecular docking studies. Both drugs have inhibition effect on the catalytic activity of Tsn and the IC values were determined as 2.6 × 10 M and 6.4 × 10 M for dimenhydrinate and ondansetron, respectively. Docking results revealed that the hydrogen bond interaction of dimenhydrinate with active-site residue Ser195 and ondansetron with active-site residues His57 and Ser195 hydrogen bonds might be cause the inhibition of enzyme activity. The results of this study can provide valuable information in the field of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Topics: Antiemetics; Binding Sites; Hydrogen Bonding; Molecular Docking Simulation; Protein Binding; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Thermodynamics; Trypsin
PubMed: 33901946
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119817 -
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 2020Vestibular migraine (VM) is one of the most debilitating chronic diseases that is currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. The treatment of VM is a dynamic and rapidly... (Review)
Review
Vestibular migraine (VM) is one of the most debilitating chronic diseases that is currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. The treatment of VM is a dynamic and rapidly advancing area of research. New developments in this field have the potential to improve the diagnosis and provide more individualized treatments for this condition. In this review, we discussed the progress of evidence-based treatment of VM, including pharmacotherapy and nonmedical methods. A search of the literature was conducted up to September 2019. In order to control or cure VM, patients should follow three steps. First, patients should comply with diet and behavioral medication; Second, during the attack of VM, patients should take medicine to control the symptoms. These acute attack treatment of VM consists of antiemetic medications (e.g., dimenhydrinate and benzodiazepines), anti-vertigo medicine, and analgesics (e.g. triptans). Third, prophylactic medicine (e.g., propranolol, topiramate, valproic aid, lamotrigine, and flunarizine) can be used to reduce the frequency and severity of VM attack. Also, vestibular rehabilitation (VR) treatment should be considered for all VM. Meanwhile, we also propose to establish a culture of prevention which is essential for reducing the personal, social and economic burden of VM.
PubMed: 33623258
DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_591_19 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Dec 2020
Topics: Administration, Intravesical; Amisulpride; Antiemetics; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33451177
DOI: No ID Found -
RSC Advances Jan 2021Recently, experimental design has beaten the traditional optimization approach (one variable at a time) by providing better quality for chromatographic separation using...
Recently, experimental design has beaten the traditional optimization approach (one variable at a time) by providing better quality for chromatographic separation using minimal effort and resources. Benzophenone (BZP) and [1-(diphenylmethyl)piperazine] (DPP) were reported to be the most toxic impurities for dimenhydrinate (DMH) and cinnarizine (CIN), respectively. Additionally, there is no reported HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of DMH, CIN and their toxic impurities. A custom experimental design was adopted to estimate the optimum conditions that achieved the most acceptable resolution with adequate peak symmetry within the shortest run time. Desirability function was used to define the optimum chromatographic conditions and the optimum separation was achieved using XBridge® HPLC RP-C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm), acetonitrile: 0.1% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) in water (90 : 10, v/v) as a mobile phase at flow rate 2 mL min and UV detection at 215 nm. Method validation was carried out according to ICH guidelines and linearity was achieved in the ranges of 2-25, 1-25, 1-12.5, and 1-12.5 μg mL for DMH, CIN, BZP and DPP, respectively. By application of the proposed method to the market dosage form, no interference from excipients was observed. Moreover, the greenness of the method was evaluated using the National Environmental Method Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) metrics and the results revealed the green environmental impact of the developed method.
PubMed: 35424104
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra09585k -
The American Journal of Emergency... Feb 2021This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of dimenhydrinate and metoclopramide in patients with nausea and vertigo. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of dimenhydrinate and metoclopramide in patients with nausea and vertigo.
METHODS
A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed on patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with nausea and vertigo in the six month period between Nov 1st 2012 and May 1st 2013. Adult patients who were 18 to 65 years old presenting to the ED with nausea and vertigo or motion sickness were included in the study. A total of 200 patients were divided into 2 groups who were admitted to ED with complaints of vertigo accompanied by nausea. In the first group, 50 mg dimenhydrinate and 10 mg metoclopramide infusions were given intravenously for 15 min. The efficacy of treatment was measured by using a 10 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) performed at 0, 15 and the 30th minute. The primary outcome variable was a reduction in vertigo intensity documented on the VAS at the 30th minute after medication administration.
RESULTS
A total of 200 patients were included in the randomization (n=100 in both groups). The baseline vertigo VAS scores were 7.57±1.42 in the dimenhydrinate (DMT) group and 7.27±1.40 in the metoclopramide (MTP) group (p=0.09). In the 30th minute of treatment, the average vertigo VAS score was 2.46 ± 2.39 in the DMT group and 2.31±1.96 in the MTP group; no significant differences were detected between groups. The baseline nausea VAS scores were 7.62±1.48 in the DMT group and 7.45±1.27 in the MTP group (p=0.36). In the 30th minute of treatment the average vertigo VAS score decreased to 2.27±2.24 in the DMT group and 2.70±2.48 in the MTP group, no significant differences were detected between groups. No significant differences were detected between nausea VAS changes and vertigo VAS changes at 30th minutes of the treatment (p=0.06, p=0.85 respectively). Rescue medication need was similar in both treatment groups (p=0.94). No significant differences were detected about the side effects which are sedation (p=0.56) and hypotension (p=0.57).
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, this prospective, double-blind, randomized study showed that both DMT and MTP have similar efficacy in reducing nausea and vertigo symptoms in the ED.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Dimenhydrinate; Double-Blind Method; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Nausea; Prospective Studies; Vertigo
PubMed: 33360021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.010 -
Anaesthesia Jul 2021Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia. Although dozens of different anti-emetics are available for clinical practice, there is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia. Although dozens of different anti-emetics are available for clinical practice, there is currently no comparative ranking of efficacy and safety of these drugs to inform clinical practice. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analyses to compare, and rank in terms of efficacy and safety, single anti-emetic drugs and their combinations, including 5-hydroxytryptamine , dopamine-2 and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists; corticosteroids; antihistamines; and anticholinergics used to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia. We systematically searched for placebo-controlled and head-to-head randomised controlled trials up to November 2017 (updated in April 2020). We assessed how trustworthy the evidence was using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approaches for vomiting within 24 h postoperatively, serious adverse events, any adverse event and drug class-specific side-effects. We included 585 trials (97,516 participants, 83% women) testing 44 single drugs and 51 drug combinations. The studies' overall risk of bias was assessed as low in only 27% of the studies. In 282 trials, 29 out of 36 drug combinations and 10 out of 28 single drugs lowered the risk of vomiting at least 20% compared with placebo. In the ranking of treatments, combinations of drugs were generally more effective than single drugs. Single neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists were as effective as other drug combinations. Out of the 10 effective single drugs, certainty of evidence was high for aprepitant, with risk ratio (95%CI) 0.26 (0.18-0.38); ramosetron, 0.44 (0.32-0.59); granisetron, 0.45 (0.38-0.54); dexamethasone, 0.51 (0.44-0.57); and ondansetron, 0.55 (0.51-0.60). It was moderate for fosaprepitant, 0.06 (0.02-0.21) and droperidol, 0.61 (0.54-0.69). Granisetron and amisulpride are likely to have little or no increase in any adverse event compared with placebo, while dimenhydrinate and scopolamine may increase the number of patients with any adverse event compared with placebo. So far, there is no convincing evidence that other single drugs effect the incidence of serious, or any, adverse events when compared with placebo. Among drug class specific side-effects, evidence for single drugs is mostly not convincing. There is convincing evidence regarding the prophylactic effect of at least seven single drugs for postoperative vomiting such that future studies investigating these drugs will probably not change the estimated beneficial effect. However, there is still considerable lack of evidence regarding safety aspects that does warrant investigation.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, General; Antiemetics; Female; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33170514
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15295 -
Journal of Psychiatric Research Apr 2021Dimenhydrinate (DMH) is an antihistamine used to treat nausea and vomiting. Although widely available in pharmacies as an over the counter medication, there have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dimenhydrinate (DMH) is an antihistamine used to treat nausea and vomiting. Although widely available in pharmacies as an over the counter medication, there have been reports of potential DMH tolerance and dependence and a possible euphoric potential accompanying heavy use (>100 mg/day). Despite the potential for misuse, there is a gap in the literature concerning patterns, characteristics, and potential mechanisms of DMH misuse.
AIMS
This review aimed to synthesize evidence on the pharmacology, clinical effects, and management of DMH misuse and dependence to inform clinical decision making and relevant drug policy.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and using Cochrane collaboration methods. We searched seven databases from their inception through July 2019. To be included in the review, studies needed to measure or focus on one or more dimensions of morbidity or mortality related to the misuse of DMH. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method studies were included in order to capture the breadth of possible studies. Studies were excluded if they did not fit into the conceptual framework of the study of if they focused primarily on the misuse of other substances. A narrative synthesis of study findings was pursued given the limited capacity for a quantitative meta-analysis.
FINDINGS
We identified 24 studies, which described a range of neuropsychiatric sequelae related to DMH consumption, including seizures, psychosis, depression, intoxication (resembling anticholinergic syndrome) and withdrawal. The sedative and euphoric properties, readily available nature, and low cost of DMH appear to facilitate DMH dependence, which were more commonly reported among individuals who had concurrent psychiatric disorders, displaying symptoms such as low motivation, poor concentration, and delirium. The overall quality of studies identified by this review was low-largely because the majority of studies were case reports or review articles, with few intervention or cohort studies.
CONCLUSIONS
There is some evidence to suggest the existence of DMH-related syndromes involving intoxication, withdrawal, and dependence, more commonly among long-term, heavy DMH consumers. However, higher quality studies are needed to confirm preliminary findings that there may be a biological basis for such syndromes.
Topics: Dimenhydrinate; Humans; Psychotic Disorders
PubMed: 33153760
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.032