-
Pediatrics Jul 2023Pediatric mental health emergency department (ED) visits are rising in the United States, with more visits involving medication for acute agitation. Timely, standardized...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Pediatric mental health emergency department (ED) visits are rising in the United States, with more visits involving medication for acute agitation. Timely, standardized implementation of behavioral strategies and medications may reduce the need for physical restraint. Our objective was to standardize agitation management in a pediatric ED and reduce time in physical restraints.
METHODS
A multidisciplinary team conducted a quality improvement initiative from September 2020 to August 2021, followed by a 6-month maintenance period. A barrier assessment revealed that agitation triggers were inadequately recognized, few activities were offered during long ED visits, staff lacked confidence in verbal deescalation techniques, medication choices were inconsistent, and medications were slow to take effect. Sequential interventions included development of an agitation care pathway and order set, optimization of child life and psychiatry workflows, implementation of personalized deescalation plans, and adding droperidol to the formulary. Measures include standardization of medication choice for severe agitation and time in physical restraints.
RESULTS
During the intervention and maintenance periods, there were 129 ED visits with medication given for severe agitation and 10 ED visits with physical restraint use. Among ED visits with medication given for severe agitation, standardized medication choice (olanzapine or droperidol) increased from 8% to 88%. Mean minutes in physical restraints decreased from 173 to 71.
CONCLUSIONS
Implementing an agitation care pathway standardized and improved care for a vulnerable and high-priority population. Future studies are needed to translate interventions to community ED settings and to evaluate optimal management strategies for pediatric acute agitation.
Topics: Humans; Child; United States; Droperidol; Quality Improvement; Psychomotor Agitation; Emergency Service, Hospital; Restraint, Physical
PubMed: 37317809
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-059586 -
The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology... 2023As a result of recent legislative changes allowing for increased access to marijuana products, there have been increasing rates of cannabis abuse among adolescents and...
OBJECTIVE
As a result of recent legislative changes allowing for increased access to marijuana products, there have been increasing rates of cannabis abuse among adolescents and subsequent diagnoses of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). Most available literature on this syndrome exists within the adult population and describes benzodiazepines, haloperidol, and topical capsaicin as potentially efficacious in the management of CHS. The objectives of this study were to identify antiemetics and compare their efficacy and safety in the management of pediatric CHS.
METHODS
A retrospective review of Penn State Children's Hospital electronic health record was performed to identify patients 18 years or younger who had an emergency department or inpatient encounter, a cannabis hyperemesis-related diagnosis code, and met diagnostic criteria for CHS. Antiemetic efficacy was determined using subjective patient perception of nausea and objective documentation of vomiting. Benzodiazepines, haloperidol, and topical capsaicin were classified as nontraditional antiemetics, whereas all other antiemetics were classified as traditional.
RESULTS
Nontraditional antiemetic medications appeared to be more effective in resolving patient symptoms compared with traditional antiemetics. Analysis of all ordered antiemetics demonstrated a gap in partial or full symptom resolution between nontraditional and traditional agents. Reported adverse effects were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS
Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is an underrecognized and underdiagnosed condition characterized by cyclic vomiting related to chronic cannabis use. Abstinence from cannabis remains the most effective approach to mitigating morbidity associated with CHS. Medications such as lorazepam or droperidol may have benefit in managing toxidrome symptoms. Traditional antiemetic prescribing remains a key barrier to effective management of pediatric CHS.
PubMed: 37303765
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.3.222 -
International Immunopharmacology Aug 2023Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a decline in cognitive function affecting the mental health of aged patients after surgery. The pathological mechanisms...
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a decline in cognitive function affecting the mental health of aged patients after surgery. The pathological mechanisms underlying POCD have not yet been clarified. The overexpression of the P2X4 receptor in the central nervous system (CNS) was reported to be associated with the onset of POCD. Fast green FCF (FGF), a widely used food dye, could decrease the expression of the P2X4 receptor in the CNS. This study aimed to explore whether FGF could prevent POCD via the down-regulation of CNS P2X4 receptor. Exploratory laparotomy under the anesthesia of fentanyl and droperidol was carried to establish an animal model of POCD in 10-12-months-olds mice. FGF significantly attenuated cognitive impairments and down-regulated the expression of the P2X4 receptor induced by surgery in mice. Moreover, the blockade of CNS P2X4 receptor by intrahippocampal injection of 5-BDBD induced cognitive-enhancing effects on POCD mice. In addition, the effects of FGF were abolished by ivermectin, which is a positive allosteric modulator of the P2X4 receptor. FGF also inhibited M1 polarization of microglia cells, decreased the phosphorylation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and reduced the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These results suggested that FGF produced anti-POCD cognitive-enhancing effects via down-regulation of the P2X4 receptor-associated neuroinflammation, providing a support that FGF might be a potential treatment for POCD.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Postoperative Cognitive Complications; Down-Regulation; Receptors, Purinergic P2X4; Cognitive Dysfunction
PubMed: 37301120
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110462 -
Clinical Practice and Cases in... May 2023Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a poorly understood phenomenon experienced by amputees. The pain is typically classified as neuropathic, and there is no established...
INTRODUCTION
Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a poorly understood phenomenon experienced by amputees. The pain is typically classified as neuropathic, and there is no established first-line therapy. Droperidol is an antipsychotic with a wide array of pharmacologic activity including gamma-aminobutyric acid-A channel modulation, μ opioid receptor potentiation, dopamine-2-receptor blockade, and alpha-2-receptor agonism. Due to this broad therapeutic activity, droperidol is used for many off-label indications.
CASE REPORT
Our patient was a 25-year-old male with a history of lower limb amputation who presented for evaluation and management of an acute exacerbation of PLP. On arrival, the patient was in 10/10 pain (numeric pain rating scale) described as cramping and burning. He had been previously successfully managed with subdissociative ketamine. However, during a recent exacerbation he experienced an emergence reaction to ketamine. Literature guiding pharmacotherapy in the management of PLP is sparse and of low quality. Based on the prior emergence reaction to subdissociative ketamine we explored other pharmacotherapy options. Droperidol has a wide array of pharmacologic activity and is used off label for the management of some pain syndromes. Therefore, we administered an intravenous dose of droperidol 5 milligrams. Approximately 15 minutes after receiving droperidol the patient's pain was visibly improved, and 30 minutes later he rated his pain at 3/10.
CONCLUSION
The success in treating this patient provides encouragement for future research and bolsters confidence that droperidol could be another tool in the management of complex pain syndromes.
PubMed: 37285490
DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.1405 -
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial... Sep 2023In the fall of 2021, granisetron was approved for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) management in Japan. However, the comparative efficacy of droperidol and...
BACKGROUND
In the fall of 2021, granisetron was approved for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) management in Japan. However, the comparative efficacy of droperidol and granisetron in the field of orthognathic surgery has not been determined.
PURPOSE
We compare the efficacy of droperidol and granisetron for PONV prophylaxis following orthognathic surgery.
STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery at a single institution from September 2020 to December 2022. Patients who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with sagittal split ramus osteotomy or isolated sagittal split ramus osteotomy were included. Patients were divided into three groups; the isolated droperidol (D), isolated granisetron (G), and droperidol with granisetron (DG) groups. General anesthesia was performed using total intravenous anesthesia for all patients; however, droperidol and granisetron were administered at the anesthesiologist's discretion.
PREDICTOR VARIABLE
PONV prophylactic therapy included isolated droperidol, isolated granisetron, and droperidol with granisetron administration.
OUTCOME VARIABLES
Postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV) were determined through medical examination within 48 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes included complications due to droperidol and/or granisetron administration.
COVARIATES
Age, sex, body mass index, Apfel's score, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, intraoperative blood loss, and type of surgery.
ANALYSES
Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction for univariate comparison, and modified Poisson regression for comparison of PON and POV prophylactic efficacy for multivariate analyses. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Our study included 218 participants. There were no significant differences in covariates between groups D (n = 111), G (n = 52), and DG (n = 55). No significant difference in PON incidence was observed between groups. However, POV incidence was significantly lower in group DG than group D (relative risk, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.86; P = .03). No significant difference in complication incidence was observed between groups.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Granisetron was as effective as droperidol for PONV management, while droperidol combined with granisetron was more effective than isolated droperidol for POV management. As compared to the use of each drug separately, their combination was considered safe, with no increase in complication rates.
Topics: Humans; Droperidol; Granisetron; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Retrospective Studies; Antiemetics; Orthognathic Surgery; Vomiting; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37277099
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.05.010 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Jun 2023
Topics: Humans; Migraine Disorders
PubMed: 37266987
DOI: 10.58347/tml.2023.1678a -
Journal of Anesthesia Aug 2023Anesthesia maintenance using propofol and a propofol bolus dose at the end of surgery have been shown to prevent emergence agitation (EA). However, the preventive...
PURPOSE
Anesthesia maintenance using propofol and a propofol bolus dose at the end of surgery have been shown to prevent emergence agitation (EA). However, the preventive effect of subanesthetic propofol infusion during sevoflurane anesthesia on EA remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the effect of subanesthetic propofol infusion on EA in children.
METHODS
We retrospectively compared the incidences of severe EA requiring pharmacological intervention in children who underwent adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy, or strabismus surgery between maintenance with sevoflurane alone (sevoflurane group) and maintenance with subanesthetic propofol with sevoflurane (combination group). A multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for confounders was used to assess the association between anesthesia methods and the occurrence of EA. Additionally, we estimated the direct effect of anesthesia methods by a mediation analysis, excluding the indirect effects of intraoperative fentanyl and droperidol administration.
RESULTS
Among 244 eligible patients, 132 and 112 were in the sevoflurane and combination groups, respectively. The crude incidence of EA was significantly lower in the combination group (17.0% [n = 19]) than in the sevoflurane group (33.3% [n = 44]) (P = 0.005). After adjusting for confounders, the incidence of EA was still significantly lower in the combination group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.91). The mediation analysis revealed a direct association of anesthesia methods with a lower EA incidence in the combination group (aOR: 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.93) than in the sevoflurane group.
CONCLUSION
Subanesthetic propofol infusion may effectively prevent severe EA requiring the administration of opioids or sedatives.
PubMed: 37188963
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03201-8 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Jul 2023Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has been identified as a big (very frequently encountered) little (not linked to life-threatening outcomes) problem. Traditional...
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has been identified as a big (very frequently encountered) little (not linked to life-threatening outcomes) problem. Traditional drugs (dexamethasone, droperidol or similar drugs, serotonin receptor antagonists) each have significant but limited effect, leading to an increasing use of combination therapies. High-risk patients, often identified through use of risk scoring systems, remain with a significant residual risk despite combining up to three traditional drugs. A recent correspondence in this Journal proposes the use of up to five anti-emetic drugs to further minimise the risk. This disruptive strategy was supported by favourable initial results, absence of side-effects and lower acquisition costs of the added new drugs (aprepitant and palonosetron) because of their recent loss of patent protection. These results are provocative and hypothesis generating, but need confirmation and do not warrant immediate changes in clinical practice. The next steps will also necessitate wider implementation of protocols protecting patients from PONV and a search for additional drugs and techniques aimed at treating established PONV.
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Antiemetics; Droperidol; Serotonin Antagonists; Risk Factors; Vomiting; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination
PubMed: 37179157
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.004 -
Journal of Clinical PsychopharmacologyDroperidol is an antipsychotic medication used in psychiatric emergencies to manage acute behavioral disturbance. Droperidol use carries a risk of prolonged QT interval...
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND
Droperidol is an antipsychotic medication used in psychiatric emergencies to manage acute behavioral disturbance. Droperidol use carries a risk of prolonged QT interval on the electrocardiogram and associated cardiac arrhythmias including torsades de pointes and ventricular fibrillation. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of droperidol in adults admitted to the psychiatric inpatient unit of a large Australian hospital.
METHODS/PROCEDURES
In this retrospective cohort study, psychiatric inpatients admitted between October 22, 2018, and March 1, 2021, who received at least 1 dose of intramuscular droperidol were consecutively included. Outcomes of interest were death, cardiac arrhythmias, and QT prolongation. QT prolongation was identified using the QT-interval nomogram.
FINDINGS/RESULTS
This study included 263 patients without exclusion. No deaths or cases of cardiac arrhythmia were recorded within 24 hours of droperidol administration. Electrocardiogram data were available for 41.1% of patients (n = 108) within 7 days of droperidol administration. Two cases of QT prolongation were identified using the QT-interval nomogram, but these patients were also prescribed other medications that may have contributed to QT prolongation.
IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS
This study contributes the first known large retrospective study of safety outcomes including QT prolongation after droperidol administration in a psychiatric inpatient setting. Our findings corroborate mounting evidence supporting the clinical safety of droperidol use in psychiatric settings. Nonetheless, we note that significant barriers remain with regard to timely electrocardiogram monitoring after droperidol use.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Droperidol; Inpatients; Retrospective Studies; Australia; Long QT Syndrome; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Torsades de Pointes; Electrocardiography
PubMed: 37068031
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001688 -
The American Journal of Emergency... Jul 2023Acute agitation and violent behavior in the emergency department (ED) can lead to significant patient morbidity and contribute to the growing problem of workplace... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
PURPOSE
Acute agitation and violent behavior in the emergency department (ED) can lead to significant patient morbidity and contribute to the growing problem of workplace violence against health care providers. To our knowledge, there is no available literature directly comparing intramuscular ketamine to intramuscular droperidol in ED patients presenting with undifferentiated agitation. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effectiveness and safety of these agents for acute agitation in the ED.
METHODS
This was a retrospective observational study conducted at an urban, academic ED. The primary endpoint was time from the first dose of study medication to restraint removal. Safety endpoints included incidence of bradycardia (heart rate < 60 bpm), hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg), hypoxia (oxygen saturation < 90% or need for respiratory support), and incidence of intubation for ongoing agitation or respiratory failure.
RESULTS
An initial 189 patients were screened, of which, 92 met inclusion criteria. The median time from initial drug administration to restraint removal was 49 min (IQR 30, 168) in the ketamine group and 43 min (IQR 30, 80) in the droperidol group (Median difference 6 min; 95% CI [-7, 26]). There was no significant difference in rates of bradycardia (3% vs 3%, 95% CI [-7%, 8%]), hypotension (0% vs 2%, 95% CI [-5%, 2%]), or hypoxia (7% vs 10%, 95% CI [-15%, 9%]) in the ketamine versus droperidol groups respectively. One patient in the ketamine group was intubated for ongoing agitation, and one patient in the droperidol group was intubated for respiratory failure.
CONCLUSIONS
Intramuscular droperidol and intramuscular ketamine were associated with similar times from drug administration to restraint removal in patients presenting to the ED with undifferentiated agitation. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate IM droperidol and IM ketamine head-to-head as first line agents for acute agitation in the ED.
Topics: Humans; Droperidol; Ketamine; Retrospective Studies; Bradycardia; Psychomotor Agitation; Emergency Service, Hospital; Respiratory Insufficiency
PubMed: 37031618
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.03.058