-
JAMA Neurology Jul 2024Claims data with International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes are routinely used in clinical research. However, the use of ICD-10...
IMPORTANCE
Claims data with International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes are routinely used in clinical research. However, the use of ICD-10 codes to define incident stroke has not been validated against expert-adjudicated outcomes in the US population.
OBJECTIVE
To develop and validate the accuracy of an ICD-10 code list to detect incident stroke events using Medicare inpatient fee-for-service claims data.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cohort study used data from 2 prospective population-based cohort studies, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, and included participants aged 65 years or older without prior stroke who had linked Medicare claims data. Stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies were identified via active surveillance and adjudicated by expert review. Medicare-linked ARIC data (2016-2018) were used to develop a list of ICD-10 codes for incident stroke detection. The list was validated using Medicare-linked REGARDS data (2016-2019). Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023.
EXPOSURES
Stroke events detected in Medicare claims vs expert-adjudicated stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of incident stroke detection using ICD-10 codes.
RESULTS
In the ARIC study, there were 110 adjudicated incident stroke events among 5194 participants (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [5.3] years) over a median follow-up of 3.0 (range, 0.003-3.0) years. Most ARIC participants were women (3160 [60.8%]); 993 (19.1%) were Black and 4180 (80.5%) were White. Using the primary diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 81.8% (95% CI, 73.3%-88.5%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.8%-99.3%) to detect incident stroke. Using any diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the sensitivity was 94.5% (95% CI, 88.5%-98.0%) and the specificity was 98.4% (95% CI, 98.0%-98.8%). In the REGARDS study, there were 140 adjudicated incident strokes among 6359 participants (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.0] years) over a median follow-up of 4.0 (range, 0-4.0) years. More than half of the REGARDS participants were women (3351 [52.7%]); 1774 (27.9%) were Black and 4585 (72.1%) were White. For the primary diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 70.7% (95% CI, 63.2%-78.3%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.9%-99.4%). For any diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 77.9% (95% CI, 71.0%-84.7%) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.2%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings suggest that ICD-10 codes could be used to identify incident stroke events in Medicare claims with moderate sensitivity and high specificity.
PubMed: 38949838
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2044 -
Screening for Unhealthy Alcohol Use Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions in Primary Care.AJPM Focus Aug 2024Unhealthy alcohol use increases the risk for and exacerbation of chronic health conditions. As such, screening, prevention, and management of unhealthy alcohol use is...
INTRODUCTION
Unhealthy alcohol use increases the risk for and exacerbation of chronic health conditions. As such, screening, prevention, and management of unhealthy alcohol use is especially critical to improving health outcomes for patients with multiple chronic health conditions. It is unclear to what extent multiple chronic condition status is a barrier to screening for unhealthy alcohol use in the primary care setting. The authors hypothesized that patients with multiple chronic conditions would be at lower odds of being screened for unhealthy alcohol use than patients without multiple chronic conditions.
METHODS
The authors performed a secondary analysis of electronic health record data for patients from 67 primary care practices in Virginia (2020-2023). Using the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' chronic disease framework, they classified patients by multiple chronic condition status: no multiple chronic conditions, physical multiple chronic conditions, mental health multiple chronic conditions, and physical and mental health multiple chronic conditions. They used multiple logistic regressions with an added practice-level random effect to analyze the relationship between multiple chronic condition status and the odds of receiving an alcohol-related assessment, of being screened for unhealthy alcohol use with a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force-recommended instrument, and of screening positive for unhealthy alcohol use within the past 2 years.
RESULTS
Within a final cohort of =11,789, a total of 6,796 patients (58%) had multiple chronic conditions (29% physical multiple chronic conditions, 4% mental health multiple chronic conditions, and 25% physical and mental health multiple chronic conditions). In all, 69% of patients were screened for unhealthy alcohol use, whereas 16% were screened with a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force-recommended instrument, and 7% screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use. Patients with physical and mental health multiple chronic conditions had 0.9 times lower odds of receiving any screening for unhealthy alcohol use than those with no multiple chronic conditions (95% CI=0.8, 1.0; =0.0240), whereas patients with only physical multiple chronic conditions or only mental health multiple chronic conditions had similar odds. There was no difference in the odds of being screened with a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force-recommended instrument on the basis of multiple chronic condition status. Patients with mental health multiple chronic conditions and physical and mental health multiple chronic conditions had 1.8 and 1.5 times greater odds of screening positive for unhealthy alcohol use, respectively (95% CI=1.3, 2.7; =0.0014 and 95% CI=1.2, 1.8; =0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS
Although patients with chronic mental health conditions were more likely to screen positive for unhealthy alcohol use than patients without multiple chronic conditions, Virginia primary care patients with physical and mental health multiple chronic conditions were less likely to receive an alcohol-related assessment during the past 2 years. Given the overall modest rate of screening with a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force-recommended instrument, further efforts are needed to create the conditions for high-quality alcohol-related preventive service delivery in primary care, particularly for patients with high complexity and/or mental health conditions.
PubMed: 38947491
DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100233 -
Annals of Surgery Jul 2024To assess the association between the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) payment model and shifts to the outpatient setting for surgical procedures among Medicare...
OBJECTIVE
To assess the association between the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) payment model and shifts to the outpatient setting for surgical procedures among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in Maryland versus control states.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
The GBR model provides fixed global payments to hospitals to reduce spending growth and incentivize hospitals to reduce the costs of care while improving care quality. Since surgical care is a major contributor to hospital spending, the GBR model might accelerate the ongoing shift from the inpatient to the outpatient setting to generate additional savings.
METHODS
A difference-in-differences (DiD) design was used to compare changes in surgical care settings over time from pre-GBR (2011-2013) to post-GBR (2014-2018) for Maryland versus control states for common surgeries that could be performed in the outpatient setting. A cross-sectional approach was used to compare the difference in care settings in 2018 for total knee arthroplasty which was on Medicare's Inpatient-Only List before then.
RESULTS
We studied 47,542 surgical procedures from 44,410 beneficiaries in Maryland and control states. GBR's 2014 implementation was associated with an acceleration in the shift from inpatient to outpatient settings for surgical procedures in Maryland (DiD: 3.9 percentage points, 95% CI: 2.3, 5.4). Among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in 2018, the proportion of outpatient surgeries in Maryland was substantially higher than that in control states (difference: 27.6 percentage points, 95% CI: 25.6, 29.6).
CONCLUSIONS
Implementing Maryland's GBR payment model was associated with an acceleration in the shift from inpatient to outpatient hospital settings for surgical procedures.
PubMed: 38946545
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006427 -
Radiation Oncology Journal Jun 2024Surface mould brachytherapy is a conformal radiotherapy technique that can deliver high dose to the target while sparing nearby normal structures, Here, we aim to...
Surface mould brachytherapy is a conformal radiotherapy technique that can deliver high dose to the target while sparing nearby normal structures, Here, we aim to describe the procedurals details for high-dose rate (HDR) surface mould brachytherapy in sebaceous carcinoma of eyelid in a 54-year old lady. She was hesitant for surgery and any form of invasive intervention like interstitial brachytherapy. So, she was treated with surface mould HDR brachytherapy to a total dose of 52 Gy in 13 fractions at a dose of 4 Gy per fraction delivered twice daily using Iridium-192 isotope with no acute side effects. She was evaluated on a weekly basis for any radiation side effects and now she is disease-free for 6 months post-treatment with only mild dry eye. A detailed step-by-step procedure of surface mould technique, simulation procedure, dose prescription, planning, plan evaluation and treatment has been described in this paper. Surface mould HDR brachytherapy can be safely used as organ preserving modality of treatment for eyelid carcinoma.
PubMed: 38946078
DOI: 10.3857/roj.2023.00682 -
Journal of the American College of... Jun 2024The aim of this study was to examine radiology's and other specialties' market shares for diagnostic imaging interpretation for Medicare fee-for-service claims by...
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to examine radiology's and other specialties' market shares for diagnostic imaging interpretation for Medicare fee-for-service claims by modality, body region, and place of service.
METHODS
In this cross-sectional study of Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data for 2022, the authors examined the proportion of diagnostic imaging interpretation by specialty. All claims for CT, MR, nuclear medicine (NM), ultrasound, and radiography and fluoroscopy (XR) were included. Claims were aggregated into 52 specialty groups using Medicare specialty codes. The market share for each specialty group was computed by modality, body region, and place of service.
RESULTS
For Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, there were 122,851,716 imaging studies, of which 88,559,272 (72.1%) were interpreted by radiologists. This percentage varied by modality: 97.3% for CT, 91.0% for MR, 76.6% for XR, 50.9% for NM, and 33.9% for ultrasound. Radiologists interpreted a lower percentage of cardiac (67.6% for CT, 42.2% for MR, 11.8% for NM, and 0.4% for ultrasound) than noncardiac studies (97.6% for CT, 91.4% for MR, 95.6% for NM, and 53.0% for ultrasound). Among noncardiac studies, radiologists interpreted nearly all in the outpatient hospital, inpatient, and emergency department (99.5% for CT, 99.4% for MR, 98.9% for NM, 79.3% for ultrasound, and 97.9% for XR) compared with the office setting (84.4% for CT, 78.7% for MR, 85.4% for NM, 29.2% for ultrasound, and 43.1% for XR).
CONCLUSIONS
Radiologists perform the dominant share of CT and MR interpretation and more so for noncardiac imaging and imaging performed in outpatient hospital, inpatient, and emergency department places of service.
PubMed: 38944790
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.05.003 -
JAMA Health Forum Jun 2024Households have high burden of health care payments. Alternative financing approaches could reduce this burden for some households.
IMPORTANCE
Households have high burden of health care payments. Alternative financing approaches could reduce this burden for some households.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the distribution of household health care payments across income under health care reform policies.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Cross-sectional study with microsimulation used nationally representative data of the US population in 2030. Civilian, noninstitutionalized population from the 2022 Current Population Survey linked to expenditures from the 2018 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and 2022 National Health Expenditure Accounts were included.
EXPOSURE
Rate regulation of hospital, physician, and other health care professional payments equal to the all-payer mean in the status quo, spending growth target at 4% annual per capita growth, and single-payer health care financed through taxes.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Household health care payments (out-of-pocket expenses, premiums, and taxes) as a share of compensation.
RESULTS
The synthetic population contained 154 456 records representing 339.5 million individuals, with 51% female, 7% Asian, 14% Black, 18% Hispanic White, 56% non-Hispanic White, and 5% other races and ethnicities (American Indian or Alaskan Native only; Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander only; and 2 or more races). In the status quo, mean household health care payments as a share of compensation was 24% to 27% (standard error [SE], 0.2%-1.2%) across income groups (median [IQR] 22% [4%-52%] below 139% of the federal poverty level [FPL]; 21% [4%-34%] for households above 1000% FPL [11% of the population]). Under rate setting, mean (SE) payments by households above 1000% FPL increased to 29% (0.6%) (median [IQR], 22% [6%-35%]) and decreased to 23% to 25% for other income groups. Under the spending growth target, mean (SE) payments decreased from 23% to 26% (SE, 0.2%-1.2%) across income groups. Under the single-payer system, mean (SE) payments declined to 15% (0.7%) (median [IQR], 4% [0%-30%]) for those below 139% FPL and increased to 31% (0.6%) (median [IQR], 23% [3%-39%]) for those above 1000% FPL. Uninsurance fell from 9% to 6% under rate setting due to improved Medicaid access, and to zero under the single-payer system.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Single-payer financing based on the current federal income tax schedule and a payroll tax could substantially increase progressivity of household payments by income. Rate setting led to slight increases in payments by higher-income households, who financed higher payment rates in Medicare and Medicaid. Spending growth targets reduced payments slightly for all households.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Health Expenditures; Female; United States; Male; Adult; Middle Aged; Family Characteristics; Single-Payer System; Financing, Personal; Health Care Reform; Income; Aged
PubMed: 38944764
DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1932 -
JAMA Health Forum Jun 2024The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' mandatory End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model, launched on January 1, 2021, randomly assigned...
IMPORTANCE
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' mandatory End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model, launched on January 1, 2021, randomly assigned approximately 30% of US dialysis facilities and managing clinicians to financial incentives to increase the use of home dialysis and kidney transplant.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the ETC's association with use of home dialysis and kidney transplant during the model's first 2 years and examine changes in these outcomes by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective cross-sectional study used claims and enrollment data for traditional Medicare beneficiaries with kidney failure from 2017 to 2022 linked to same-period transplant data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. The study data span 4 years (2017-2020) before the implementation of the ETC model on January 1, 2021, and 2 years (2021-2022) following the model's implementation.
EXPOSURE
Receiving dialysis treatment in a region randomly assigned to the ETC model.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Primary outcomes were use of home dialysis and kidney transplant. A difference-in-differences (DiD) approach was used to estimate changes in outcomes among patients treated in regions randomly selected for ETC participation compared with concurrent changes among patients treated in control regions.
RESULTS
The study population included 724 406 persons with kidney failure (mean [IQR] age, 62.2 [53-72] years; 42.5% female). The proportion of patients receiving home dialysis increased from 12.1% to 14.3% in ETC regions and from 12.9% to 15.1% in control regions, yielding an adjusted DiD estimate of -0.2 percentage points (pp; 95% CI, -0.7 to 0.3 pp). Similar analysis for transplant yielded an adjusted DiD estimate of 0.02 pp (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.04 pp). When further stratified by sociodemographic measures, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, dual Medicare and Medicaid enrollment, and poverty quartile, there was not a statistically significant difference in home dialysis use across joint strata of characteristics and ETC participation.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cross-sectional study, the first 2 years of the ETC model were not associated with increased use of home dialysis or kidney transplant, nor changes in racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in these outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Female; Male; Cross-Sectional Studies; Hemodialysis, Home; United States; Reimbursement, Incentive; Retrospective Studies; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Aged; Middle Aged; Medicare
PubMed: 38944762
DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2055 -
The Journal of Arthroplasty Jun 2024Despite the potential advantage of all-polyethylene tibial components, modular metal-backed component use predominates the market in the United States for total knee...
BACKGROUND
Despite the potential advantage of all-polyethylene tibial components, modular metal-backed component use predominates the market in the United States for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is partially driven by concerns about the associated revision risk due to the lack of modularity with all-polyethylene components. This study utilized the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) to compare the associated risk of all-cause revision and revision for infection for all-polyethylene versus modular metal-backed tibial components.
METHODS
An analysis of primary TKA cases in patients aged 65 years and older was performed with AJRR data linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2012 to 2019. Analyses compared all-polyethylene to modular metal-backed tibial components. We identified 485,024 primary TKA cases, consisting of 479,465 (98.9%) metal-backed and 5,559 (1.1%) all-polyethylene. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses created hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the association of design and the risk of all-cause revision while adjusting for sex, age and the competing risk of mortality. Event-free survival curves evaluate time to revision.
RESULTS
The all-polyethylene tibia group demonstrated a decreased risk for all-cause revision (HR = 0.37, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.24 to 0.55, P < 0.0001) and revision for infection (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.77, P < 0.0001). Event-free survival curves demonstrated a decreased risk of all-cause revision that persisted across time points until 8 years post-TKA.
CONCLUSION
In the United States, all-polyethylene tibial component use for TKA remains low compared to modular metal-backed designs. A decreased associated risk for revision should ease concerns about the use of all-polyethylene components in patients aged 65 years or older, and future investigations should investigate the potential cost and value savings associated with expanded use in this population.
PubMed: 38944062
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.060 -
Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Jun 2024
PubMed: 38943723
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2024.100748 -
Journal of Hand Therapy : Official... Jun 2024Therapy use is common following carpal tunnel release (CTR), trigger finger release, ganglion cyst excision, De Quervain tenosynovitis release, carpometacarpal...
BACKGROUND
Therapy use is common following carpal tunnel release (CTR), trigger finger release, ganglion cyst excision, De Quervain tenosynovitis release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty, and distal radius fracture, open reduction internal fixation or percutaneous pinning (DRF). Policy that improves coverage influences the cost and use of health care services.
PURPOSE
This study aims to evaluate changes to the cost and use of postoperative hand therapy by race and procedure following the repeal of a longstanding annual Medicare outpatient therapy cap.
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS
This is a longitudinal retrospective cohort study using a quasi-experimental interrupted time series design, including patients who underwent common hand surgeries from January 1, 2016-December 31, 2019.
RESULTS
This study included 203,672 patients with a mean age of 71.4 years. Neither White (1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.999-1.007, p = 0.45) nor non-White (1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01, p = 0.06) patients experienced monthly changes in therapy use before policy implementation. Therapy frequency increased following CTR (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI: 1.11-1.14, p < 0.001), trigger finger release (OR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.07-1.10, p < 0.001), and DRF (OR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06, p < 0.001) following implementation.
CONCLUSIONS
This study found that improved coverage was associated with increased postoperative therapy use among some subsets, including CTR and DRF, suggesting the need to optimize coverage by means such as prior authorization or bundled payments, rather than only increasing coverage benefits.
PubMed: 38942653
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2024.05.002