-
PCN Reports : Psychiatry and Clinical... Jun 2024Mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion (MERS) is increasingly recognized as a clinicoradiological syndrome. Its etiology is diverse,...
BACKGROUND
Mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion (MERS) is increasingly recognized as a clinicoradiological syndrome. Its etiology is diverse, encompassing a variety of triggers, including infections and metabolic abnormalities. Uniquely, MERS may present with psychiatric symptoms, such as delirium, visual hallucinations, and catatonia, posing diagnostic challenges. The variability of these neuropsychiatric symptoms necessitates early diagnosis through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to avoid prolonged antipsychotic treatment.
CASE PRESENTATION
This report details a case of MERS in a 39-year-old male. The patient initially presented with headache, sore throat, and abnormal laboratory results: leukocytosis, neutrophilia with a left shift, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and hyponatremia. On the fourth day of admission, he developed severe anxiety and restlessness, exhibited thoughts of death, and reported experiencing vivid hallucinations upon closing his eyes. MRI revealed a hyperintense lesion in the corpus callosum. A lumbar puncture showed no increase in cell count or protein. The patient showed a positive response to treatment with antibiotics and olanzapine, demonstrating rapid symptomatic improvement. A follow-up MRI on the 11th day showed complete resolution of the brain lesions. Six months later, no neurological or psychiatric sequelae were noted. The patient's clinical progression and imaging findings led to a definitive diagnosis of MERS.
CONCLUSION
The early presentation of symptoms such as restlessness, hallucinations, and death ideation played a critical role in diagnosing MERS, with early MRI examination being instrumental in both diagnosis and preventing prolonged antipsychotic medication use.
PubMed: 38868082
DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.191 -
The International Journal on Drug Policy Jun 2024Methamphetamine frequently causes substance-induced psychosis and related symptoms. There are currently no interventions to prevent or assist in self-management of these...
BACKGROUND
Methamphetamine frequently causes substance-induced psychosis and related symptoms. There are currently no interventions to prevent or assist in self-management of these symptoms.
METHODS
We evaluated a program providing "Methamphetamine Assist Packs" to patients who were seen in a psychiatric emergency services program for methamphetamine-induced psychosis. Methamphetamine Assist Packs included a small number of tablets of an antipsychotic medication (olanzapine), administration instructions, and referral information. We reviewed medical charts of patients who received Methamphetamine Assist Packs from January 2022 through May 2023 for sociodemographic and emergency visit characteristics. We assessed the changes between the number of psychiatric emergency visits before and after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt at two, six, and 12 months using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS
Ninety-two patients received a Methamphetamine Assist Pack, with a mean age of 40 years; 79 % were male and 49 % Black/African American; 77 % experienced housing instability or homelessness. The most common symptoms were suicidal ideation (54 %), paranoia or delusions (45 %), and hallucinations (40 %); 55 % were on involuntary psychiatric hold, 38 % required medications for agitation, and 18 % required seclusion or physical restraints. The rate of psychiatric emergency visits after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt was 0.68 and 0.87 times the rate prior to receipt at two and six months, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Methamphetamine Assist Packs were associated with fewer psychiatric emergency visits for six months after receipt, and represent a promising intervention to address acute psychiatric toxicity from methamphetamine in need of further research.
PubMed: 38861841
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104480 -
Drugs & Aging Jun 2024International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND
International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to describe the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use in delirium management with regard to best-practice recommendations. Primary outcomes investigated were prevalence of use, antipsychotic type, dosage and clinical indication.
METHODS
Eligibility criteria: studies of any design that examined antipsychotic use to manage delirium in adults in critical care, acute care, palliative care, rehabilitation, and aged care were included. Studies of patients in acute psychiatric care, with psychiatric illness or pre-existing antipsychotic use were excluded.
INFORMATION SOURCES
we searched five health databases on 16 August, 2023 (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycInfo, ProQuest Health and Medical Collection) using MeSH terms and relevant keywords, including 'delirium' and 'antipsychotic'. Risk of bias: as no included studies were randomised controlled trials, all studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS
descriptive data were extracted in Covidence and synthesised in Microsoft Excel.
RESULTS
Included studies: 39 studies published between March 2004 and August 2023 from 13 countries (n = 1,359,519 patients). Most study designs were retrospective medical record audits (n = 16).
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS
in 18 studies, participants' mean age was ≥65 years (77.79, ±5.20). Palliative care had the highest average proportion of patients with delirium managed with antipsychotics (70.87%, ±33.81%); it was lower and varied little between intensive care unit (53.53%, ±19.73%) and non-intensive care unit settings [medical, surgical and any acute care wards] (56.93%, ±26.44%) and was lowest in in-patient rehabilitation (17.8%). Seventeen different antipsychotics were reported on. In patients aged ≥65 years, haloperidol was the most frequently used and at higher than recommended mean daily doses (2.75 mg, ±2.21 mg). Other antipsychotics commonly administered were olanzapine (mean 11 mg, ±8.54 mg), quetiapine (mean 64.23 mg, ±43.20 mg) and risperidone (mean 0.97 mg, ±0.64 mg).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of antipsychotics to manage delirium is strongly discouraged in international guidelines. Antipsychotic use in delirium care is a risk for adverse health outcomes and a longer duration of delirium, especially in older people. However, this study has provided evidence that clinicians continue to use antipsychotics for delirium management, the dose, frequency and duration of which are often outside evidence-based guideline recommendations. Clinicians continue to choose antipsychotics to manage delirium symptoms to settle agitation and maintain patient and staff safety, particularly in situations where workload pressures are high. Sustained efforts are needed at the individual, team and organisational levels to educate, train and support clinicians to prioritise non-pharmacological interventions early before deciding to use antipsychotics. This could prevent delirium and avert escalation in behavioural symptoms that often lead to antipsychotic use.
Topics: Humans; Delirium; Antipsychotic Agents; Aged; Adult; Hospitals
PubMed: 38856874
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01122-z -
Palliative Care and Social Practice 2024Nausea and vomiting are common experiences and are often dreaded more than pain. This review discusses blonanserin, mirtazapine, and isopropyl alcohol as antiemetics.... (Review)
Review
Nausea and vomiting are common experiences and are often dreaded more than pain. This review discusses blonanserin, mirtazapine, and isopropyl alcohol as antiemetics. Blonanserin, an atypical antipsychotic with a high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors and serotonin receptor 5-HT2A, has less of a risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Transdermal blonanserin, available in Korea, Japan, and China in a small number of trials, has improved nausea in patients not responding to standard antiemetics. Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant that has been used for multiple symptoms besides depression. There is little evidence that mirtazapine improves anorexia or nausea in advanced cancer but is as effective as olanzapine in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Isopropyl alcohol aromatherapy has been successfully used in the emergency department for nausea and vomiting with an onset to benefit more rapidly than standard antiemetics. Isopropyl alcohol prep pads can be used for home-going antiemetic therapy and as a bridge to treating acute nausea until standard antiemetics take effect.
PubMed: 38855566
DOI: 10.1177/26323524241257701 -
Industrial Psychiatry Journal 2024Antipsychotics are the mainstay treatment for the majority of severe mental illnesses. Such patients are also more prone to develop medical comorbidities, which...
Antipsychotics are the mainstay treatment for the majority of severe mental illnesses. Such patients are also more prone to develop medical comorbidities, which complicate the treatment decisions. It is estimated that up to 40% of individuals with schizophrenia have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or diabetes, which can be attributed to a combination of genetic, lifestyle, and medication-related factors. Some widely used antipsychotic medications like olanzapine, risperidone, and clozapine have been associated with an increased risk of weight gain, insulin resistance, and other metabolic abnormalities, which can worsen IGT and increase the risk of developing diabetes. Among second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), amisulpride, aripirazole, and ziprasidone have a fairly low potency to cause obesity and hyperglycemia. In this context, clinicians must balance the benefits and risks of different antipsychotic medications and consider the individual's specific needs and preferences. Here, we shall discuss three cases, to ascertain how the use of amisulpride helped in glycemic control, and also reflect on probable etiologies leading to deranged glucose levels.
PubMed: 38853806
DOI: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_133_23 -
Industrial Psychiatry Journal 2024Psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Various studies have reported QT interval (QTc) prolongation with the use of...
BACKGROUND
Psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Various studies have reported QT interval (QTc) prolongation with the use of psychotropics. However, some studies have found no significant risk of QTc changes with these medications.
AIM
To assess the effect of psychotropics on QTc in drug-naive psychiatric patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Our study was a prospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients aged 18-45 years, drug-naïve, with no medical comorbidity or substance use history, were recruited for the study. ECG to assess QTc was recorded at baseline, second and fourth week after the starting of psychotropic medications.
RESULTS
N=8 (4%) patients had QTc prolongation at baseline and were excluded. No clinically significant QTc prolongation was noticed, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment with any of the psychotropic medications. However, among patients on escitalopram, a significant effect on QTc was noted ( = 0.001) as compared to those on sertraline, risperidone, and olanzapine ( > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The short-term risk of QTc prolongation with the use of newer psychotropics at optimal doses appears low among young patients with normal baseline QTc and no significant medical or substance use comorbidity.
PubMed: 38853785
DOI: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_149_23 -
Schizophrenia Research Jun 2024Despite the high prevalence of anxiety in schizophrenia, no established guideline exists for the management of these symptoms. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Despite the high prevalence of anxiety in schizophrenia, no established guideline exists for the management of these symptoms. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the effect of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) on anxiety in patients with schizophrenia.
METHODS
We systematically searched Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane library to identify randomized controlled trials of SGAs that reporting anxiety measures in schizophrenia. The search was limited to English-language articles published before February 2024. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Among 48 eligible studies, 29 (n = 7712) were included in the meta-analyses comparing SGAs to placebo, haloperidol, or another SGAs for their effect on anxiety/depression. SGAs had a small effect on anxiety/depression versus placebo (SMD = -0.28 (95 % CI [-0.34, -0.21], p < .00001, I = 47 %, n = 5576)) associated with efficacy for positive (z = 5.679, p < .001) and negative symptoms (z = 4.490, p < .001). Furthermore, SGAs were superior to haloperidol (SMD = -0.44, 95 % CI [-0.75, -0.13], p = .005, n = 1068) with substantial study-level heterogeneity (I = 85 %). Excluding one study of quetiapine in first-episode patients (SMD = -3.05, n = 73), SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression versus haloperidol without heterogeneity (SMD = -0.23, 95 % CI [-0.35, -0.12], p = 01; I = %0). Risperidone's effect on anxiety/depression was comparable to olanzapine (SMD = -0.02, 95 % CI [-0.24,0.20], p = .87, I = 45 %, n = 753) and amisulpride (SMD = 0.27, 95 % CI [-1.08,0.61], p = .13, I = 50 %, n = 315).
CONCLUSION
While SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression, the findings are inconclusive due to scarcity of research on comorbid anxiety in schizophrenia, heterogeneity of anxiety symptoms, and the scales used to measure anxiety. Further studies employing specific anxiety scales are required to explore antipsychotics, considering their receptor affinity and augmentation with serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or benzodiazepines for managing anxiety in schizophrenia.
PubMed: 38843584
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.05.020 -
Drug Testing and Analysis Jun 2024Olanzapine (OLZ), a second-generation antipsychotic drug, is effective in the treatment of acute psychosis, schizophrenia, agitation, bipolar mania, and other...
Olanzapine (OLZ), a second-generation antipsychotic drug, is effective in the treatment of acute psychosis, schizophrenia, agitation, bipolar mania, and other psychiatric problems. Antipsychotics are prescribed drugs, which lead the drug abuser to illegal methods of access. This behavior also demonstrates the association of OLZ with criminal involvement, commonly observed at forensic crime scenes. The acute toxicity and even death resulting from OLZ exposure have been highlighted in numerous studies. Therefore, developing analytical techniques to detect OLZ is essential for forensic toxicology. This study aimed to develop a specific and reliable LC-MS/MS method for OLZ detection and quantification in hair samples. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), trueness, precision, and uncertainty. The range of linearity was between 0.1-100 ng/mg, with LOD and LOQ values established at 0.036 ng/mg and 0.1 ng/mg, respectively. All validation results are within acceptable parameters. The validated method has been applied to authentic hair samples. The variation of OLZ concentrations in 12 hair segments (2 from Case 1 and 10 from Case 2) from two drug-positive patients, ranging from 0.131 to 0.460 ng/mg, is presented in this study. Although several studies have been conducted to determine OLZ in hair samples using segmental analysis via hair solubilization, this study is the first to determine OLZ in hair samples after "digestion" with comparative parameters prior to chromatographic analysis.
PubMed: 38840461
DOI: 10.1002/dta.3744 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Jun 2024We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT) RA, and dexamethasone...
PURPOSE
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT) RA, and dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Chemotherapy-naïve patients scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC ≥5) were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine 5 mg once daily (olanzapine group) or placebo (placebo group) in combination with aprepitant, a 5-HT RA, and dexamethasone. The primary end point was the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate in the overall phase (0-120 hours). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients free of nausea and safety.
RESULTS
In total, 355 patients (78.6% male, median age 72 years, 100% thoracic cancer), including 175 and 180 patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, were evaluated. The overall CR rate was 86.9% in the olanzapine group versus 80.6% in the placebo group. The intergroup difference in the overall CR rate was 6.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 13.9). The proportions of patients free of chemotherapy-induced nausea in the overall (88.6% in the olanzapine group 75.0% in the placebo group) and delayed (89.7% 75.6%, respectively) phases were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group (both < .001). Somnolence was observed in 43 (24.6%) and 41 (22.9%) patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, and no events were grade ≥3 in severity.
CONCLUSION
The addition of olanzapine was not associated with a significant increase in the overall CR rate. Regarding the prevention of nausea, adding olanzapine provided better control in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, which needs further exploration.
PubMed: 38833659
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00278 -
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Jun 2024Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is strongly recommended for olanzapine due to its high pharmacokinetic variability. This study aimed to investigate the impact of...
BACKGROUND
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is strongly recommended for olanzapine due to its high pharmacokinetic variability. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various clinical factors on olanzapine plasma concentrations in patients with psychiatric disorders.
METHODS
The study used TDM data from the PsyMetab cohort, including 547 daily dose-normalized, steady-state, olanzapine plasma concentrations (C:D ratios) from 248 patients. Both intrinsic factors (eg, sex, age, body weight) and extrinsic factors (eg, smoking status, comedications, hospitalization) were examined. Univariate and multivariable, linear, mixed-effects models were employed, with a stepwise selection procedure based on Akaike information criterion to identify the relevant covariates.
RESULTS
In the multivariable model (based on 440 observations with a complete data set), several significant findings emerged. Olanzapine C:D ratios were significantly lower in smokers (β = -0.65, P < 0.001), valproate users (β = -0.53, P = 0.002), and inpatients (β = -0.20, P = 0.025). Furthermore, the C:D ratios decreased significantly as the time since the last dose increased (β = -0.040, P < 0.001). The male sex had a significant main effect on olanzapine C:D ratios (β = -2.80, P < 0.001), with significant interactions with age (β = 0.025, P < 0.001) and body weight (β = 0.017, P = 0.011). The selected covariates explained 30.3% of the variation in C:D ratios, with smoking status accounting for 7.7% and sex contributing 6.9%. The overall variation explained by both the fixed and random parts of the model was 67.4%. The model facilitated the prediction of olanzapine C:D ratios based on sex, age, and body weight.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical factors examined in this study, including sex, age, body weight, smoking status, and valproate comedication, remarkably influence olanzapine C:D ratios. Considering these factors, in addition to TDM and the clinical situation, could be important for dose adjustment.
PubMed: 38833576
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001227