-
Cancers Jul 2022Monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint have considerably improved the treatment of some cancers, but novel drugs, new combinations, and... (Review)
Review
Monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint have considerably improved the treatment of some cancers, but novel drugs, new combinations, and treatment modalities are needed to reinvigorate immunosurveillance in immune-refractory tumors. An option to elicit antitumor immunity against cancer consists of using approved and marketed drugs known for their capacity to modulate the expression and functioning of the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint. Here, we have reviewed several types of drugs known to alter the checkpoint, either directly via the blockade of PD-L1 or indirectly via an action on upstream effectors (such as STAT3) to suppress PD-L1 transcription or to induce its proteasomal degradation. Specifically, the repositioning of the approved drugs liothyronine, azelnidipine (and related dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers), niclosamide, albendazole/flubendazole, and a few other modulators of the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint (repaglinide, pimozide, fenofibrate, lonazolac, propranolol) is presented. Their capacity to bind to PD-L1 or to repress its expression and function offer novel perspectives for combination with PD-1 targeted biotherapeutics. These known and affordable drugs could be useful to improve the therapy of cancer.
PubMed: 35884428
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143368 -
Health Psychology Research 2022The management of delusional disorder (DD) remains difficult due to poor patient insight and a lack of definitive treatment guidelines. For the somatic subtype...
INTRODUCTION
The management of delusional disorder (DD) remains difficult due to poor patient insight and a lack of definitive treatment guidelines. For the somatic subtype specifically, prior studies have shown successful treatment with the first-generation antipsychotics (FGA) pimozide, but these studies did not specify the nature of the delusions. It has been theorized that pimozide effectiveness is due to its unique ability to relieve itching sensations, which are commonly associated with somatic delusions (e.g., delusions of parasitosis). The use of FGAs is not without risk, however, and should be avoided when possible due to the significant side-effect profile. Thus, there is a need for safer alternatives for the treatment of somatic-type DD. This manuscript discusses a case of DD characterized by painful sensations of glass under the skin managed with the second-generation antipsychotic olanzapine.
CASE
A 67-year-old female with a past medical history including depression presented to the ED with complaints of glass in her hands and fingernails bilaterally. The patient has been evaluated by several physicians in the past without any evidence of glass being found. She was able factually able to describe that others viewed her complaints as irrational, but she refused to accept this as truth. Cognitive screening testing was normal, and a physical exam showed several areas of excoriation on the hands and arms bilaterally, a removed left thumbnail, and a thin frame (BMI: 18.02). The patient was admitted to the psychiatry service, where organic causes were ruled out (infection, metabolic abnormalities, drug use). The patient received olanzapine 5mg PO nightly treatment with adjunctive psychotherapy and experienced acute psychotic relief after a two-day admission period. She did not endorse any side effects from the medication.
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, there haven't been prior studies exploring treatment efficacy in somatic-type DD subdivided by the nature of false bodily sensation. Despite this limitation, it was found that most cases of somatic-type DD characterized by foreign bodies under the skin were treated with pimozide. Although this drug appears to be a reasonable option for the more common presentation involving false pruritis, it might not be recommended for rare presentations that don't involve itchiness due to the high risk of adverse symptoms. Accordingly, clinicians should consider the nature of the delusions along with the unique side effect profile of the pharmacological therapy as any harm might outweigh the potential benefit. This was highlighted in the current presentation as clinicians determined olanzapine to be the most appropriate treatment despite no similar cases of DD described in the literature. Furthermore, this case exemplified the utility of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of somatic-type DD.
PubMed: 35774915
DOI: 10.52965/001c.35500 -
British Journal of Pharmacology Sep 2022HERG blocking drugs known for their propensity to trigger Torsades de Pointes (TdP) were reported to induce a sympatho-vagal coactivation and to enhance High Frequency...
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
HERG blocking drugs known for their propensity to trigger Torsades de Pointes (TdP) were reported to induce a sympatho-vagal coactivation and to enhance High Frequency heart rate (HFHR) and QT oscillations (HFQT) in telemetric data. The present work aimed to characterize the underlying mechanism(s) leading to these autonomic changes.
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH
Effects of 15 torsadogenic hERG blocking drugs (astemizole, chlorpromazine, cisapride, droperidol, ibutilide, dofetilide, haloperidol, moxifloxacin, pimozide, quinidine, risperidone, sotalol, sertindole, terfenadine, and thioridazine) were assessed by telemetry in beagle dogs. Haemodynamic effects on diastolic and systolic arterial pressure were analysed from the first doses causing QTc prolongation and/or HFQT oscillations enhancement. Autonomic control changes were analysed using the high frequency autonomic modulation (HFAM) model.
KEY RESULTS
Except for moxifloxacin and quinidine, all torsadogenic hERG blockers induced parasympathetic activation or sympatho-vagal coactivation combined with enhancement of HFQT oscillations. These autonomic effects result from reflex compensatory mechanisms in response to mild haemodynamic side effects. These haemodynamic mechanisms were characterized by transient HR acceleration during HF oscillations. A phenomenon of concealed QT prolongation was unmasked for several torsadogenic hERG blockers under β-adrenoceptor blockade with atenolol. Resulting enhancement of HFQT oscillations was shown to contribute directly to triggering dofetilide-induced ventricular arrhythmias.
CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS
This work supports for the first time a contribution of haemodynamic side properties to ventricular arrhythmias triggered by torsadogenic hERG blocking drugs. These haemodynamic side effects may constitute a second component of their arrhythmic profile, acting as a trigger alongside their intrinsic arrhythmogenic electrophysiological properties.
Topics: Animals; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Dogs; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Electrocardiography; Ether-A-Go-Go Potassium Channels; Heart Rate; Long QT Syndrome; Moxifloxacin; Quinidine; Reflex; Torsades de Pointes
PubMed: 35751378
DOI: 10.1111/bph.15905 -
Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi = Turkish... 2022Dear Editor, The costs of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) used in the treatment of mental disorders with psychosis are mentioned in treatment guidelines (APA 2021, NICE...
Dear Editor, The costs of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) used in the treatment of mental disorders with psychosis are mentioned in treatment guidelines (APA 2021, NICE 2014). While the American Psychiatric Association guideline states that every specialist should make decisions according to the rules and conditions of their country and their region, the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guideline emphasizes that drug costs must be taken into consideration in the treatment process. Classical or first-generation antipsychotic drugs (FAPDs) are relatively cheaper in terms of sales prices compared to atypical or second-generation antipsychotic drugs (SAPDs) with a slightly different effect mechanism. The price difference between the two drug groups can be so large that sometimes it may be necessary to consider whether the cost of a second-generation drug is worth its benefit. While deciding on the use of first-generation or second-generation drugs, a multifaceted assessment should be made, such as the patient's level of compliance with the treatment, the possibility of occurrence of side effects, the possible effects of these side effects on body health and treatment compliance, and whether or not the costs are covered. The most important criterion that determines the choice of medication for psychiatrists is of course the multi-dimensional benefit/harm ratio that the drug used will reveal in the long term. We think that in our country, which, in terms of economic indicators is not in a strong position as an importer of pharmaceutical raw materials from abroad, APDs' cost calculation should be considered because drug costs constitute an important part of the direct treatment costs of psychotic disorders in developing countries such as Turkey (Yıldız and Cerit 2006). We calculated the unit (mg) price based on the box prices of the APDs in use in 2020, thinking that it might work when calculating the cost of the illness using APDs as the main component of the treatment and calculated the annual average drug costs with the daily average dosage. Although the daily treatment dose varies with the stage of the illness and the individual characteristics of the patient, the average doses recommended for maintenance treatment were used here (Öztürk and Ulusahin 2018). The daily and annual cost calculations based on the assumption that the average maintenance treatment dose was used with the unit price obtained from (Drug Prices 2020) the drugs in the Turkish pharmaceutical market in September 2020 are shown in Table 1. A similar study was done in 2005 (Yıldız 2005). The purpose of this article is to redetermine the average costs of APDs in the Turkish pharmaceutical market every 15 years and to bring them to the attention of experts in terms of cost-effectiveness studies. When the costs in 2005 are examined, it is seen that the annual costs of the FAPDs were around 450 TRY, and the annual cost of oral preparations of SAPDs was 2,500 TRY (5 times the first generation). In 2005, there was only one depot of SAPD (risperidon consta) that allowed intramuscular (IM) administration, and its average annual cost was 5,400 TRY, 3 times more than the tablet form (1,700 TRY). In 2005, when the price of risperidone consta, which was the first second-generation depot APD, were compared with the prices of the first-generation depot drugs (fluphenazine = 380 TRY, flupentixol = 876 TRY, zuclopentixol = 730 TRY), the cost difference was 6-14 times. This almost-10-fold difference between the cost of the first and second generation APDs was remarkable. It is seen that this difference (risperidone consta = 10,807 TRY, fluphenazine = 916 TRY, flupentixol = 1,007 TRY, zuclopenthixol = 2,372 TRY, and haloperidol deconate 237 TRY) did not change in 2020. In 2020, the average RETHINKING THE COST OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC TREATMENT: THE AVERAGE COST OF THE DRUGS USED IN TURKEY IN 2020 2 Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2 Turkish Journal of Psychiatry Letter to the Editor 146 147 annual cost of oral use preparations of FAPDs is 925 TRY, while the average annual cost of oral forms of SAPDs is 2,580 TRY. The 5-fold difference observed in 2005 between the first and second-generation ones of the oral APDs decreased to 2.5 times in 2020. It is clear that while the difference between the cost of oral use of first- and second-generation drugs was halved in 2020, the difference between the costs of depot preparations applied with IM did not change. In 2005, the average dollar rate was 1.34 TRY, and in 2020 it was 7.02 TRY (Republic of Turkey Central Bank Exchange Rates, 2021). It is understood that the 5-fold increase in dollar exchange rate is not reflected in all drug prices in the same way. For example, there was a 3 to 4-fold increase in the prices of haloperidol, chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, trifluperazine and zuclopenthixol, while a less than two-fold increase in pimozide, flupenthixol, sulpiride, amisulpride and quetiapine and a decrease in the prices of clozapine, olanzapine, ziprasidone and risperidone in the tablet form. There is also a two-fold increase in the price of risperidone consta. The fluctuations in drug prices in 2005 and 2020 are shown in Table 2 in 500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 and 5,000 TRY brackets. It is noteworthy that while some drugs have moved into an upper price bracket in terms of annual costs, some have fallen into a lower price bracket. The prices of the second generation long-acting (depot) antipsycotic drugs (LA-APDs), which were not available in the Turkish pharmaceutical market in 2005, are quite high compared to others. In 2020, the annual cost of all of them, including risperidone consta, is over 10 thousand TRY. It is understood that the underlying reason for such price increase is the fact that the drug is wanted/sought after/new/marketed rather than the dollar exchange rate. For example, while there was a certain increase in the price of FAPDs, the increase in the price of some of the SAPDs (sulpiride, amisulpride, quetiapine tablet) was low, while the price of some others (clozapine, olanzapine, ziprasidone, risperidone tablet) decreased. It should also be taken into account that the effect of generic drugs entering the market during this period may have had an impact on price changes. It is noteworthy that while the annual cost of risperidone consta was approximately 3 times higher than the tablet form (5,400 TRY versus 1,700 TRY) in 2005, this difference reached 14 folds (10,807 TRY versus 742 TRY) in 2020. In 2005, the difference between the lowest daily cost (0.07 TRY) and the highest daily cost (14.80 TRY) was 211 times (Yıldız 2005), this difference had receded to 111 times (0.35 TRY versus 38.72 TRY) in 2020. Still a huge difference, isn't it? Table 1. Current Forms, Box Prices, Daily and Annual Costs in For Maintenance Treatment of Antipsychotic Drugs Available in the Pharmaceutical Market in September 2020 in Turkey No Generic name Trade name Dosage forms (mg) BV Price# TRY/Mg ADD Cost/d Cost/y 2005** 1 Haloperidol Norodol 5, 10, 20 tb 5/50 17.57 0.070 5 0.35 127 26 5, 10 amp 5/5 5.35 0.214 5 1.07 390 - 50, 150 LAI 50/1 9.80 0.196 1/15* 0.65 237 - 2 Chlorpromazine Largactil 25,100 tb 100/30 17.92 0.006 300 1.79 653 197 3 Fluphenazine Prolixin 25 LAI 25/1 17.57 0.703 1/7* 2.51 916 380 4 Trifluoperazine Stilizan 1, 2, 5 drj; 1 amp 5/30 14.52 0.096 10 0.97 354 91 5 Pimozide Nörofren 2 tb 2/30 19.33 0.322 4 1.29 470 365 6 Flupenthixol Fluanxol 3 drj 3/50 65.75 0.438 6 2.63 960 526 20 LAI 20/1 19.33 0.966 1/7* 2.76 1,007 876 7 Zuklopenthixol Clopixol 2, 10, 25 tb 2/50 38.65 0.386 20 7.72 2,817 701 200 LAI, 50 acu 200/1 45.55 0.227 1/7* 6.50 2,372 730 8 Sulpirid Dogmatil 200 tb 200/24 23.15 0.005 600 3.00 1,095 876 9 Amisulpirid Solian 200 tb 200/60 146.92 0.012 600 7.20 2,628 2,387 10 Quetiapine Seroquel 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 tb 300/30 137.17 0.015 600 9.00 3,285 2,628 11 Clozapine Leponex 25, 100 tb 100/50 32.56 0.006 400 2.40 876 1,898 12 Olanzapine Zyprexa 5, 10, 20 tb 10/28 152.96 0.546 10 5.46 1,992 2,606 13 Ziprasidone Zeldox 20, 40, 60, 80 tb 60/56 189.89 0.056 120 6.72 2,452 3,541 14 Sertindole Serdolect 4, 12, 16, 20 tb 16/28 453.53 1.012 16 16.19 5,909 - 15 Risperidone Risperdal 1, 2, 3, 4 tb; 1 sol 2/20 20.34 0.508 4 2.03 741 1,719 Ris. Consta 25, 37.5, 50 LAI 37.5/1 444.17 11.840 1/15* 29.61 10,807 5,402 16 Paliperidone Invega 3, 6, 9 tb 6/28 213.15 1.268 6 7.61 2,777 - Xeplion 50, 75, 100, 150 LAI 100/1 1161.56 11.615 1/30* 38.72 14,132 - Trevicta 175, 263, 350, 525 LAI 350/1 3426.95 9.788 1/90* 38.08 13,899 - 17 Aripiprazole Abilify 5, 10, 15, 20 tb; 1 sol 20/28 113.25 0.404 20 8.08 2,949 - Abilify Main. 400 LAI 400/1 971.17 2.420 1/30* 32.37 11,815 - BV: Baseline value (in mg of the form and the number in the box), Price#: Box price of the base value in TRY, TRY/mg: Value per milligram in Turkish Lira, ADD: Average daily dose, Cost/d: Daily cost in TRY, Cost/y: Annual cost in TRY, mg: Milligram, tb: Tablet, drj: Dragee, amp: Ampoule, LAI: Long-acting injectable, acu: Acuphase, d: Day, TRY: Turkish Lira, *LAI per 7,15,30 or 90 days, **Annual cost in TRY in 2005. 148 Received: 14.01.2021, Accepted: 31.03.2021, Available Online Date: 07.01.2022 1Prof., 2Res. Assis., Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Kocaeli, Turkey. e-mail: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.5080/u26315 The difference in 2005 between oral FAPDs prices and SAPDs prices seems to have halved in 2020. In 2020, the average daily treatment cost of oral drugs, whether for the first generation or the second generation, is 3 TRY (approximately the same for FAPDs applied with IM), while the daily cost of LA-SAPDs is around 33 TRY. It is seen that the difference between costs is approximately 11 times. This difference increases to 50 times for haloperidol deconate. From here, the following judgment can be made: in order for LA-SAPDs to be preferred, they must be at a value that will constitute at least 11 times higher cost. This cost can and should be taken, especially for patients who are non-adherend with treatment and who do not adapt to LA-FAPDs. Because for clinicians, preventing the multi-dimensional destructiveness of psychosis in the individual, families and the society should be the priority. In this case, calculating the cost should not be a primary consideration. However, it is also known that patients who are non-adherend with treatment gain the ability to understand their illness and make consistent evaluations with its' results. If a psychosocial therapy has been carried out for a patient using IM medication for six months or a year, it is likely that this period provides insight and increases the level of treatment compliance. After one year of IM application, whether or not the patient will comply with oral treatment should be re-evaluated and the transition to oral treatment should be considered. If there is no problem in the patient's oral treatment compliance, it should be taken into account that the benefit of this transition will be at least 11-folds a year with this transition. Naturally, it will be necessary to apply IM for some patients for years. Moreover, there will be patients who need to switch from monthly administration of LA-SAPDs to quarterly usage patterns. However, we can say that most patients using LA-APDs will not need such use after a while, based on our clinical practice, although there is no study done in this field. With this study, we wanted to emphasize that while prescribing drugs used in the treatment of illnesses with psychotic symptoms, they should take into account the side effects of the drugs, as well as the daily, monthly, annual, and lifetime costs of the drugs. The principle of 'using an effective drug recommended for a specific disorder at the required dose, in sufficient time, at the lowest cost' adopted in the rational drug use guidelines should not be forgotten. It is expected that the modification of drug treatments, considering their costs as well as their efficiency, will contribute significantly to the country's economy in the long run. Mustafa Yıldız1, Emre Osman2 REFERENCES American Psychiatric Association (2021) The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Third edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Drug Prices. https://www.ilacrehberi.com/ilac-fihrist/ Accession date: 25th September 2020. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2014) Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management. NICE Guideline CG178; https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178. Accession date: 4th April 2018. Öztürk MO, Uluşahin NA (2018) Mental Health and Disorders. 18th Edit. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri. (In Turkish) Republic of Turkey Central Bank Exchange Rates. https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/kurlar_tr.html Accession date: 10th January 2021. Yıldız M (2005) The cost of treatment of psychotic disorders. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 16:146-7. (In Turkish) Yıldız M, Cerit C (2006) Annual cost of treatment for schizophrenia: Estimation from a university hospital data in Turkey. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology 16:239-44. Table 2. Comparison of the Annual Costs of Antipsychotic Drugs Calculated By The Daily Standard Average Dose Use, at Certain Price Ranges, for the Years 2005 and 2020 Price bracket (TRY) 2005 2020 500 ↓ Haloperidol tb, amp, Trifluoperazine drj, Chlorpromazine tb, Pimozid tb, Fluphenazine LAI Haloperidol tb, amp, depo, Trifluoperazine drj, Pimozid tb 500-1,000 Flupenthixol drj, LAI, Zuklopenthixol tb, acu, LAI, Sulpirid tb Chlorpromazine tb, Fluphenazine LAI, Flupenthixol drj, LAI, Clozapine tb, Risperidone tb 1,000-2,000 Clozapine tb, Risperidone tb Olanzapine tb, Sulpirid tb 2,000-3,000 Amisulpirid tb, Olanzapine tb, Quetiapine tb Zuklopenthixol tb, acu, LAI, Amisulpirid tb, Ziprasidone tb, Paliperidone tb, Aripiprazole tb 3,000-5,000 Ziprasidone tb Quetiapine tb 5,000-10,000 Risperidone consta Sertindole tb 10,000 ↑ Risperidone consta, Paliperidone monthly, Paliperidone 3 monthly, Aripiprazole maintana tb: Tablet, drj: Dragee, amp: Ampoule, LAI: Long-acting injectable, acu: Acuphase.
Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Clopenthixol; Clozapine; Flupenthixol; Fluphenazine; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pimozide; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sulpiride; Trifluoperazine
PubMed: 35730516
DOI: 10.5080/u26315 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Jul 2022Guidelines recommend a number of pharmacotherapeutic options used as monotherapy or in combination with others for treating the pain of trigeminal neuropathy.
INTRODUCTION
Guidelines recommend a number of pharmacotherapeutic options used as monotherapy or in combination with others for treating the pain of trigeminal neuropathy.
AREAS COVERED
The authors examine the pharmacotherapeutic options for treating trigeminal neuralgia and supporting evidence in the literature. Guidelines reported the most effective treatment for trigeminal neuropathy, in particular trigeminal neuralgia, appears to be carbamazepine or oxcabazepine, but side effects can be treatment limiting. Lamotrigine and gabapentin are also recommended in guidance. In real-world clinical practice, baclofen, cannabinoids, eslicarbazepine, levetiracetam, brivaracetam, lidocaine, misoprostol, opioids, phenytoin, fosphenytoin, pimozide, sodium valproate, sumatriptan, tizanidine, tocainide, tricyclic antidepressants, and vixotrigine are sometimes used, either as monotherapy or in combination. The relatively small patient population has limited the number of large-scale studies and there is limited evidence on which to base prescribing choices.
EXPERT OPINION
While there is no optimal pharmacotherapy for treating trigeminal neuropathy, advancements in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of this condition and drug development indicate promise for NaV inhibitors, despite the fact that not all patients respond to them and they may have potentially treatment-limiting side effects. Nevertheless, better understanding of NaV channels may be important avenues for future drug development for trigeminal neuropathy.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Humans; Lamotrigine; Neuralgia; Trigeminal Neuralgia
PubMed: 35695796
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2087507 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jun 2022The Warburg effect is a promising target for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, referring to the ability of cancer cells to generate energy through high levels of...
The Warburg effect is a promising target for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, referring to the ability of cancer cells to generate energy through high levels of glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen, allowing them to grow and proliferate rapidly. The antipsychotic Pimozide has strong anti-breast cancer effects both in vivo and in vitro, whether Pimozide has an inhibitory effect on aerobic glycolysis has not been elucidated. In this study, Pimozide inhibited the Warburg effect of breast cancer cells by hindering glucose uptake, ATP level and lactate production; reducing the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR); suppressing the expression of PKM2, a rate-limiting enzyme in glycolysis. Intriguingly, Pimozide was significantly involved in reprogramming glucose metabolism in breast cancer cells through a p53-dependent manner. Mechanistic studies demonstrated Pimozide increased the expression of p53 through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/MDM2 signaling pathway, which in turn downregulated the expression of PKM2. In sum, our results suggest that Pimozide mediates the p53 signaling pathway through PI3K/AKT/MDM2 to inhibit the Warburg effect and breast cancer growth, and it may be a potential aerobic glycolysis inhibitor for the treatment of breast cancer.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Female; Glycolysis; Humans; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Pimozide; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Signal Transduction; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 35658233
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113063 -
International Journal of Molecular... Apr 2022The aim of this study was to assess the potency of selected antipsychotic drugs (haloperidol (HAL), bromperidol (BRMP), benperidol (BNP), penfluridol (PNF), pimozide...
The aim of this study was to assess the potency of selected antipsychotic drugs (haloperidol (HAL), bromperidol (BRMP), benperidol (BNP), penfluridol (PNF), pimozide (PIM), quetiapine (QUET) and promazine (PROM)) on the main pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Binary mixtures of donepezil and antipsychotics produce an anti-BuChE effect, which was greater than either compound alone. The combination of rivastigmine and antipsychotic drugs (apart from PNF) enhanced AChE inhibition. The tested antipsychotics (excluding HAL and PNF) significantly reduce the early stage of Aβ aggregation. BRMP, PIM, QUET and PROM were found to substantially inhibit Aβ aggregation after a longer incubation time. A test of human erythrocytes hemolysis showed that short-term incubation of red blood cells (RBCs) with QUET resulted in decreased hemolysis. The antioxidative properties of antipsychotics were also proved in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC); all tested drugs were found to significantly increase cell viability. In the case of astrocytes, BNP, PNF, PIM and PROM showed antioxidant potential.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Endothelial Cells; Hemolysis; Humans; Quetiapine Fumarate; Rivastigmine
PubMed: 35563011
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094621 -
Hepatology International Jun 2022Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play pivotal roles in tumor growth, cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. Here, we aimed to identify proteins that contribute to the...
BACKGROUND
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play pivotal roles in tumor growth, cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. Here, we aimed to identify proteins that contribute to the functionality of EVs derived from metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells.
METHODS
Proteins of EVs derived from metastatic HCC cells and normal liver cells were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Proteomic profiling identified actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 2 (ARPC2) to be highly expressed in EVs of metastatic HCC cells. The expression of ARPC2 in EVs and HCC tissues was examined using immunoblotting and TCGA database, respectively. The functional roles of EV-ARPC2 were investigated by knockout approach and various in vitro and in vivo assays.
RESULTS
ARPC2 was highly expressed in EVs of metastatic cells but barely detected in non-metastatic HCC cells and normal liver cells. Immunogold labeling showed the presence of APRC2 on the surface of EVs. Analysis of TCGA database of liver cancer revealed ARPC2 overexpression was correlated with poor prognosis of patients. ARPC2 was knockout in metastatic HCC cells. EVs derived from knockout cells displayed compromised activity in enhancing cell growth, motility and metastasis compared to EVs of control cells. Pimozide, an inhibitor of APRC2, also inhibited the promoting effect of EVs of metastatic cells in lung colonization of tumor cells in mice.
CONCLUSION
This study reveals previously unreported expression and function of ARPC2 in EVs. EVs with highly expressed ARPC2 enhance cancer cell growth and metastasis. ARPC2 may provide a prospective target for the novel treatment of HCC patients.
Topics: Actin-Related Protein 2; Actin-Related Protein 2-3 Complex; Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Extracellular Vesicles; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Mice; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prospective Studies; Proteomics
PubMed: 35556226
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10338-3 -
Nature Communications Apr 2022The low-voltage activated T-type calcium channels regulate cellular excitability and oscillatory behavior of resting membrane potential which trigger many physiological...
The low-voltage activated T-type calcium channels regulate cellular excitability and oscillatory behavior of resting membrane potential which trigger many physiological events and have been implicated with many diseases. Here, we determine structures of the human T-type Ca3.3 channel, in the absence and presence of antihypertensive drug mibefradil, antispasmodic drug otilonium bromide and antipsychotic drug pimozide. Ca3.3 contains a long bended S6 helix from domain III, with a positive charged region protruding into the cytosol, which is critical for T-type Ca channel activation at low voltage. The drug-bound structures clearly illustrate how these structurally different compounds bind to the same central cavity inside the Ca3.3 channel, but are mediated by significantly distinct interactions between drugs and their surrounding residues. Phospholipid molecules penetrate into the central cavity in various extent to shape the binding pocket and play important roles in stabilizing the inhibitor. These structures elucidate mechanisms of channel gating, drug recognition, and actions, thus pointing the way to developing potent and subtype-specific drug for therapeutic treatments of related disorders.
Topics: Calcium Channels, T-Type; Humans; Membrane Potentials
PubMed: 35440630
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29728-0 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Aug 2022
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Delusions; Humans; Pimozide
PubMed: 35373694
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2062283