-
Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders Mar 2024The metabolic profile during prolactinoma may be subject to significant changes. We aimed to describe the different metabolic aspects in patients monitored for... (Review)
Review
The metabolic profile during prolactinoma may be subject to significant changes. We aimed to describe the different metabolic aspects in patients monitored for prolactinoma and to study the correlations between the size of the prolactinoma and the metabolic parameters. We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study of 77 cases of prolactinomas collected and monitored at the endocrinology and diabetology department of the Hedi Chaker Hospital in Sfax between 2000 and 2017. Our patients were divided into three groups according to the size of their prolactinomas. Statistical correlations were sought between tumor size and clinical and biological parameters. The mean age of our patients was 38.3 ± 14.2 years. They were divided into 51 women (66.2%) and 26 men (33.7%). Pituitary tumor syndrome was the most common circumstance of discovery in our population (62.3%). The clinical examination revealed an average waist circumference of 95.71 cm. Android fat distribution was observed in 25 women (49%) and 12 men (46.1%). A statistically significant positive correlation was objectified between waist circumference and tumor size ( = 0.29 and = 0.019). The average body mass index was 28.08 kg/m. Obesity was noted in 56 cases (72.7%). Glucose tolerance disorders and hypertriglyceridemia were also more evident each time prolactinoma size increased in contrast to the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol which decreased with adenoma size. Our study highlighted the metabolic and hormonal repercussions of prolactinomas. Metabolic syndrome was more common in patients with larger prolactinoma. These results should guide the initial assessment and therapeutic management of prolactin adenomas.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Prolactinoma; Retrospective Studies; Pituitary Neoplasms; Adenoma; Obesity; Metabolic Syndrome
PubMed: 38232370
DOI: 10.1089/met.2023.0174 -
Global & Regional Health Technology... 2024Prolactinoma, the most common pituitary adenoma, is usually treated with dopamine agonist (DA) therapy like cabergoline. Surgery is second-line therapy, and radiotherapy...
BACKGROUND
Prolactinoma, the most common pituitary adenoma, is usually treated with dopamine agonist (DA) therapy like cabergoline. Surgery is second-line therapy, and radiotherapy is used if surgical treatment fails or in relapsing macroprolactinoma.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to provide economic evidence for the management of prolactinoma in Italy, using a cost-of-illness and cost-utility analysis that considered various treatment options, including cabergoline, bromocriptine, temozolomide, radiation therapy, and surgical strategies.
METHODS
The researchers conducted a systematic literature review for each research question on scientific databases and surveyed a panel of experts for each therapeutic procedure's specific drivers that contributed to its total cost.
RESULTS
The average cost of the first year of treatment was €2,558.91 and €3,287.40 for subjects with microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma, respectively. Follow-up costs from the second to the fifth year after initial treatment were €798.13 and €1,084.59 per year in both groups. Cabergoline had an adequate cost-utility profile, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3,201.15 compared to bromocriptine, based on a willingness-to-pay of €40,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in the reference economy. Endoscopic surgery was more cost-effective than cabergoline, with an ICER of €44,846.64. Considering a willingness-to-pay of €40,000/QALY, the baseline findings show cabergoline to have high cost utility and endoscopic surgery just a tad above that.
CONCLUSIONS
Due to the favorable cost-utility profile and safety of surgical treatment, pituitary surgery should be considered more frequently as the initial therapeutic approach. This management choice could lead to better outcomes and an appropriate allocation of healthcare resources.
PubMed: 38230389
DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2024.2601 -
JCEM Case Reports Feb 2024We present a patient who, when treated for macroprolactinoma with a dopamine agonist (DA), was able to stop insulin treatment of his autoimmune diabetes for 2 years. The...
We present a patient who, when treated for macroprolactinoma with a dopamine agonist (DA), was able to stop insulin treatment of his autoimmune diabetes for 2 years. The patient was diagnosed with autoimmune diabetes after presenting to emergency services in diabetic ketoacidosis aged 50 years. On presentation, he had high titers of autoantibodies associated with pancreatic islet cell destruction and a high level of glycated hemoglobin. On review in the endocrinology clinic, he displayed signs and symptoms of hypogonadism. Subsequent investigations revealed low testosterone and high prolactin with a pituitary macroadenoma on magnetic resonance imaging. He was diagnosed with a macroprolactinoma and treated with DA. This treatment reversed his insulin requirement and he achieved excellent glycemic control without any hypoglycemic agent. At this point, his diagnosis was revised to latent autoimmune diabetes of adults. Two years after commencing the DA, insulin had to be restarted. We hypothesize that in addition to autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic β cells, there were several other causes of hyperglycemia in this patient, including hyperprolactinemia and hypogonadism. The correct diagnosis led to significant weight loss and appropriate therapy, with a dramatic improvement in quality of life.
PubMed: 38222861
DOI: 10.1210/jcemcr/luad176 -
Menopause (New York, N.Y.) Feb 2024Prolactinomas occurring during the reproductive period exhibit a characteristic behavior. There are, however, gaps in the literature regarding the behavior of these...
IMPORTANCE
Prolactinomas occurring during the reproductive period exhibit a characteristic behavior. There are, however, gaps in the literature regarding the behavior of these tumors after menopause.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to review and characterize the influence of menopause on prolactinoma behavior.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A systematic review of observational prospective or retrospective studies and clinical trials on prolactinomas was conducted in two situations: tumors diagnosed in the reproductive period (before menopause), with follow-up in the postmenopausal period, or prolactinomas diagnosed in the postmenopausal period, without language or date restrictions. Data extracted from the articles included patient and tumor characteristics (prolactinoma type, previous treatment, symptoms, and serum prolactin [PRL] levels).
FINDINGS
This study included five studies comprising 180 participants. Prolactinomas diagnosed in women of reproductive age are treated with dopaminergic agonists (DAs), with indications of treatment withdrawal after menopause, exhibited stable tumor behavior and PRL levels. Considering the diagnosis during the postmenopausal period, macroprolactinomas were more prevalent and showed tumor shrinkage when DAs were used. Cabergoline, the most commonly used drug, lowers PRL levels and reduces symptoms associated with adenoma.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Microadenomas diagnosed before menopause can be followed up without treatment. Prolactinomas diagnosed after menopause are typically macroadenomas. Cabergoline remains the treatment of choice in the presence of clinical or compressive symptoms. We recommend at least one annual follow-up for such patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Prolactinoma; Cabergoline; Postmenopause; Pituitary Neoplasms; Dopamine Agonists; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Prolactin
PubMed: 38194617
DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002303 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Jan 2024To summarize the clinical features, both medication and surgical outcomes of prolactinomas in children and adolescents in a large retrospective cohort from China.
PURPOSE
To summarize the clinical features, both medication and surgical outcomes of prolactinomas in children and adolescents in a large retrospective cohort from China.
METHODS
A cohort of patients with prolactinomas aged ≤20 years at diagnosis between 2012 and 2021 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS
The cohort comprised 170 patients (115 females and 55 males, median age 16.6 years), with 20.0% (23/115) girls without menarche and 33.3% (18/54) boys in prepuberty. The median maximal diameter was 15.0 mm (61.2% macroadenomas and 4.6% giant adenomas), and the median baseline prolactin (PRL) level was 211.0 ng/mL. Larger sizes and higher PRL levels were observed in girls without menarche at diagnosis and in boys. Most girls presented with menstrual disturbance (86.7%), and boys were frequently bothered by headaches (42.6%), reduced height velocities (25.9%), and delayed puberty (18.2%). Dopamine agonists (DAs) were first-line used in 133 patients, and the resistance rate was 22.5% (25/111), independently associated with maximal tumor diameters (p=0.035). Surgery was performed in 76 patients. Long-term surgical remission rates were 32.9% (25/76) overall, negatively associated with cavernous sinus invasion independently (p=0.025), 59.4% (19/32) in noninvasive tumors (64.0% in 25 noninvasive macroadenomas), and 5.0% (1/20) in invasive tumors.
CONCLUSIONS
Pediatric prolactinomas exihibited more severe clinical characteristics in boys and in patients diagnosed during earlier stages of pubertal developments. Given the overall efficacy of PRL normalization by medication and considerable surgical remission rate in noninvasive tumors, DAs remain first-line recommendation for prolactinomas in children and adolescents, while surgery might be viable for noninvasive tumors.
PubMed: 38164002
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad769 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... May 2024To review experience regarding the treatment of prolactinomas by endoscopic endonasal surgery focusing on the association between presurgical dopamine agonist (DA)...
OBJECTIVE
To review experience regarding the treatment of prolactinomas by endoscopic endonasal surgery focusing on the association between presurgical dopamine agonist (DA) treatment and perioperative outcomes, surgical morbidities, endocrine outcomes, and pathological characteristics.
METHODS
A single-center series of 290 cases was analyzed retrospectively and clinical data were collected. Intratumoral collagen content was assessed by Masson trichrome staining.
RESULTS
Tenacious tumor consistency (27.8% vs 9.8%, P < .001) was more common in DA-pretreated patients compared with patients who underwent initial surgery. Moreover, DA-pretreated macroadenomas presented more intraoperative blood loss (200 [100-400] mL vs 175 [100-300] mL; P = .014), longer surgical duration (177 ± 95 minutes vs 154 ± 57 minutes; P = .043), and more surgical morbidities (19.4% vs 8.9%; P = .034). Additionally, DA-pretreated macroadenomas presented a higher collagen volume fraction than that of the initial surgery group (23.6 ± 2.2% vs 13.2 ± 2.1%; P = .001). Correlation analysis revealed a close correlation between collagen volume fraction and the cumulative dose of bromocriptine (BRC) in macroadenomas (r = 0.438, P < .001). Regarding endocrine outcomes, DA-pretreated microadenomas showed a lower proportion of initial remission compared with patients who underwent initial surgery (86.7% vs 100%, P = .047).
CONCLUSION
This study described increased surgical difficulty and inferior endocrine outcomes associated with tumor fibrosis secondary to presurgical BRC treatment in prolactinomas. Neurosurgeons should note that presurgical BRC treatment may render subsequent surgery more challenging.
Topics: Humans; Prolactinoma; Female; Male; Adult; Pituitary Neoplasms; Dopamine Agonists; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Treatment Outcome; Bromocriptine; Aged; Preoperative Care
PubMed: 38163969
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad758 -
Endocrine Practice : Official Journal... Mar 2024To describe a practical approach of when and how often to perform imaging, and when to stop imaging pituitary adenomas (PAs). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To describe a practical approach of when and how often to perform imaging, and when to stop imaging pituitary adenomas (PAs).
METHODS
A literature review was carried out and recommendations provided are derived largely from personal experience.
RESULTS
Magnetic resonance imaging is the mainstay imaging modality of choice in the assessment, treatment planning, and follow-up of PAs. These adenomas are discovered incidentally during imaging for a variety of unrelated conditions, because of clinical symptoms related to mass effects on the adjacent structures, or during workup for functional alterations of the adenoma. Imaging is also used in the preoperative and postoperative phases of assessment of PAs, for surgical and radiotherapy planning, for postoperative surveillance to assess for adenoma stability and detection of adenoma recurrence, and for surveillance to monitor for adenoma growth in unoperated PAs. Currently, because there are no evidence-based consensus recommendations, the optimal strategy for surveillance imaging of PAs is not clearly established. Younger age, initial adenoma size, extrasellar extension, mass effect, cavernous sinus invasion, functional status, histopathologic characteristics, cost considerations, imaging accessibility, patient preference, and patient contraindications (eg, implanted metallic devices and patient claustrophobia) are all important factors that influence the strategy for surveillance imaging.
CONCLUSIONS
This review provides a practical approach of performing surveillance imaging strategies for PAs that should be individualized based on clinical presentation, history, adenoma morphology on imaging, and histopathologic characteristics.
Topics: Humans; Pituitary Neoplasms; Adenoma; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 38160940
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.12.014 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Germline succinate dehydrogenase subunit B () pathogenic variants are characteristic of familial paraganglioma (PGL) syndrome type 4. This syndrome frequently presents...
CONTEXT
Germline succinate dehydrogenase subunit B () pathogenic variants are characteristic of familial paraganglioma (PGL) syndrome type 4. This syndrome frequently presents with abdominal PGL and has high tendency for locally aggressive behavior and distant metastasis. The vast majority of pituitary adenomas (PAs) are sporadic. However, PAs can be part of a number of familial tumor syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) or more rarely in association with pheochromocytoma and PGL (referred to as 3P syndrome). Only a limited number of PAs in association with -related PGL has been reported and the vast majority occurred subsequently or simultaneously with pheochromocytoma/PGL (collectively abbreviated as PPGL). In this report, we describe a young patient who had a giant pituitary macroprolactinoma resistant to large doses of cabergoline (CBG) and external beam radiotherapy (XRT). The patient did not have personal history of PPGL but was found to carry a germline pathogenic variant.
CASE REPORT
A 38-year-old woman presented with headache, visual disturbances and galactorrhea and was found to have a 34-mm macroprolactinoma. She was treated with CBG 3-4 mg per week but PA continued to grow and caused significant cranial pressure symptoms. She underwent two transsphenoidal surgeries with rapid tumor recurrence after each one. She received XRT but PA continued to grow. She was finally treated with temozolomide with excellent response. Whole exome and subsequent Sanger sequencing confirmed that she has a pathogenic monoallelic mutation (NM_003000:c.C343T, p.R115*). PA tissue showed loss of heterozygosity for the same mutation and absent SDHB immunostaining confirming the pathogenic role of this mutation.
CONCLUSION
Germline mutations can rarely cause PA in the absence of PPGL. They should be considered as a possible cause of aggressiveness and resistance to dopamine agonists in similar cases.
Topics: Female; Humans; Adult; Pheochromocytoma; Cabergoline; Temozolomide; Prolactinoma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Paraganglioma; Adenoma; Pituitary Neoplasms; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Succinate Dehydrogenase
PubMed: 38152133
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1273093 -
Journal of Child Neurology Jan 2024Current criteria help differentiate cluster headache from migraine. However, children may have overlapping features making it difficult to distinguish the 2 conditions,...
BACKGROUND
Current criteria help differentiate cluster headache from migraine. However, children may have overlapping features making it difficult to distinguish the 2 conditions, which may delay diagnosis. Differentiating cluster headache from migraine is important regarding treatment as well as diagnostic workup of secondary headache etiologies.
METHODS
Cases at a single pediatric children's hospital from 2015 to 2023 diagnosed with cluster headache before the age of 18 years were reviewed.
RESULTS
Twenty-five cases were identified of which 22 cases met criteria for either chronic, episodic, or probable cluster headache. Three cases were diagnosed with cluster headache by their provider, but documentation was insufficient to meet criteria for cluster headache. There were 16 females and 9 males between ages 6 and 17 years. Five cases were identified as symptomatic, 2 cases as chronic, 7 cases as episodic, and 13 cases as probable cluster headache. Symptomatic etiologies include Graves disease, optic neuritis, prolactinoma, hypothalamic pilocytic astrocytoma with carotid stenosis, and congenital right eye blindness. Migrainous features were common, including 76% with nausea, 36% with vomiting, 68% with photophobia, and 56% with phonophobia. Patients with cluster headache also had an independent diagnosis of migraine in 64%.
CONCLUSION
Children with cluster headache have a high frequency of migrainous symptoms and co-occurrent diagnosis of migraine. A careful history may differentiate cluster headache from migraine and treated accordingly. Children with cluster headache features should undergo screening for secondary causes with appropriate imaging and other studies. Except for prolactinoma, the symptomatic associations noted in this case series have not been reported before.
Topics: Humans; Cluster Headache; Male; Female; Child; Adolescent; Migraine Disorders; Diagnosis, Differential; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38146171
DOI: 10.1177/08830738231220415 -
Cureus Nov 2023Many antipsychotic (AP) medications work by reducing dopamine levels. As hyperdopaminergia is known to cause psychosis, antipsychotics work to relieve these symptoms by... (Review)
Review
Many antipsychotic (AP) medications work by reducing dopamine levels. As hyperdopaminergia is known to cause psychosis, antipsychotics work to relieve these symptoms by antagonizing dopamine receptors and lowering dopamine levels. Dopamine is also a known negative modulator of the prolactin pathway, which allows for drug agents like dopamine agonists (DAs) to be incredibly effective in managing tumors that secrete excess prolactin (prolactinomas). While the effects of DAs on prolactinoma size and growth have been studied for decades, the effects of APs on prolactinoma size remain to be seen. We hope to investigate the effects of APs on prolactinomas by conducting a thorough PubMed search, including patients with diagnosed prolactinoma on concurrent AP therapy. Our search led to 27 studies with a total of 32 patients. We identified themes regarding seven antipsychotics: risperidone, haloperidol, amisulpride, thioridazine, aripiprazole, olanzapine, and clozapine. Risperidone, haloperidol, amisulpride, and thioridazine caused a significant increase in prolactin in most cases where they were used, and prolactin decreased after their discontinuation. For example, risperidone discontinuation resulted in a decrease in prolactin levels by an average of 66%, while haloperidol, amisulpride, and thioridazine discontinuation lowered prolactin by an average of 82%, 72%, and 89.7%, respectively. However, there were some exceptions in regard to risperidone, haloperidol, and thioridazine, where prolactin levels were not as severely affected. Aripiprazole, olanzapine, and clozapine all had significant reductions in prolactin levels when patients were switched from another antipsychotic, such as risperidone or haloperidol. The average percent decrease in prolactin when switched to aripiprazole was 67.65%, while it was 54.16% and 68% for olanzapine and clozapine, respectively. The effect of individual antipsychotics on prolactinoma size was difficult to ascertain, as imaging was not obtained (or indicated) after every antipsychotic switch, and many patients were taking dopamine agonists concurrently. Therefore, it would be difficult to ascertain which factor affected size more. Also, some patients received surgery or radiotherapy, which completely negated our ability to make any assertions about the effects of certain pharmacological agents. Although it is difficult to ascertain the role that antipsychotic medications play in the formation of prolactinoma, we have found that the cessation of certain antipsychotic medications may lead to a reduction in prolactin levels and possibly the presence of a measurable prolactinoma.
PubMed: 38143631
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49342