-
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia =... Apr 2023Ancillary tests are frequently used in death determination by neurologic criteria (DNC), particularly when the clinical neurologic examination is unreliable.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Ancillary tests are frequently used in death determination by neurologic criteria (DNC), particularly when the clinical neurologic examination is unreliable. Nevertheless, their diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively studied. Our objective was to synthesize the sensitivity and specificity of commonly used ancillary tests for DNC.
SOURCE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and CINAHL Ebsco from their inception to 4 February 2022. We selected cohort and case-control studies including patients with 1) clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria or 2) clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria who underwent ancillary testing for DNC. We excluded studies without a priori diagnostic criteria and studies conducted solely on pediatric patients. Accepted reference standards were clinical examination, four-vessel conventional angiography, and radionuclide imaging. Data were directly extracted from published reports. We assessed the methodological quality of studies with the QUADAS-2 tool and estimated ancillary test sensitivities and specificities using hierarchical Bayesian models with diffuse priors.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
Overall, 137 records met the selection criteria. One study (0.7%) had a low risk of bias in all QUADAS-2 domains. Among clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 8,891), ancillary tests had similar pooled sensitivities (range, 0.82-0.93). Sensitivity heterogeneity was greater within (σ = 0.10-0.15) than between (σ = 0.04) ancillary test types. Among clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 2,732), pooled ancillary test sensitivities ranged between 0.81 and 1.00 and specificities between 0.87 and 1.00. Most estimates had high statistical uncertainty.
CONCLUSION
Studies assessing ancillary test diagnostic accuracy have an unclear or high risk of bias. High-quality studies are required to thoroughly validate ancillary tests for DNC.
STUDY REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42013005907); registered 7 October 2013.
Topics: Humans; Child; Bayes Theorem; Sensitivity and Specificity; Case-Control Studies
PubMed: 37155120
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02426-1 -
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia =... Apr 2023We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of ancillary investigations for declaration of death by neurologic criteria... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of ancillary investigations for declaration of death by neurologic criteria (DNC) in infants and children.
SOURCE
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from their inception to June 2021 for relevant randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and abstracts published in the last three years. We identified relevant studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology and a two-stage review. We assessed the risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool, and applied Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to determine the certainty of evidence. A fixed-effects model was used to meta-analyze pooled sensitivity and specificity data for each ancillary investigation with at least two studies.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
Thirty-nine eligible manuscripts assessing 18 unique ancillary investigations (n = 866) were identified. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.00 to 1.00 and 0.50 to 1.00, respectively. The quality of evidence was low to very low for all ancillary investigations, with the exception of radionuclide dynamic flow studies for which it was graded as moderate. Radionuclide scintigraphy using the lipophilic radiopharmaceutical Tc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) with or without tomographic imaging were the most accurate ancillary investigations with a combined sensitivity of 0.99 (95% highest density interval [HDI], 0.89 to 1.00) and specificity of 0.97 (95% HDI, 0.65 to 1.00).
CONCLUSION
The ancillary investigation for DNC in infants and children with the greatest accuracy appears to be radionuclide scintigraphy using HMPAO with or without tomographic imaging; however, the certainty of the evidence is low. Nonimaging modalities performed at the bedside require further investigation.
STUDY REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42021278788); registered 16 October 2021.
Topics: Humans; Child; Infant; Bias; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 37131035
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02418-1 -
International Journal of Chronic... 2023Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) combined with bronchodilators have been identified to improve outcomes in COPD but also to be associated with certain adverse effects. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) combined with bronchodilators have been identified to improve outcomes in COPD but also to be associated with certain adverse effects.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compile and summarize data on the efficacy and safety of dosing levels (high versus medium/low) of ICS alongside ancillary bronchodilators following PRISMA guidelines.
DATA SOURCES
Medline and Embase were systematically searched until December 2021. Randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) that met predefined inclusion criteria were included.
DATA EXTRACTION
Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Any acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) risk was chosen as the primary efficacy outcome, mortality rate as the primary safety outcome, moderate/severe AECOPD risk as the secondary efficacy outcome and pneumonia risk as the secondary safety outcome. Subgroup analyses of individual ICS agents, of patients with baseline moderate/severe/very severe COPD and of patients with recent COPD exacerbation history were also performed. A random-effects model was used.
RESULTS
We included 13 RCTs in our study. No data on low doses were included in the analysis. High dose ICS was not associated with a statistically significant difference in any AECOPD risk (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.91-1.05, I: 41.3%), mortality rate (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.32, I: 0.0%), moderate/severe AECOPD risk (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06, I: 0.0%) or pneumonia risk (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86 -1.33, I: 9.3%) compared to medium dose ICS. The same trend was identified with the several subgroup analyses.
CONCLUSION
Our study collected RCTs investigating the optimal dosing level of ICS prescribed alongside ancillary bronchodilators to patients with COPD. We identified that the high ICS dose neither reduces AECOPD risk and mortality rates nor increases pneumonia risk relative to the medium dose.
Topics: Humans; Bronchodilator Agents; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Pneumonia; Administration, Inhalation
PubMed: 37056683
DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S401736 -
Frontiers in Public Health 2023Optimal breastfeeding (BF) practices are essential for child survival and proper growth and development. The purpose of this overview is to evaluate the effectiveness of...
BACKGROUND
Optimal breastfeeding (BF) practices are essential for child survival and proper growth and development. The purpose of this overview is to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions for promoting and optimizing breastfeeding.
METHODS
We included systematic reviews (SRs) [including trials from Low-Income (LICs) and Low Middle-Income countries (LMICs)] that have evaluated the effect of various interventions for promoting and optimizing breastfeeding and excluded non-systematic reviews, and SRs based on observational studies. We searched various electronic databases. We followed the standard methodology as suggested by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two sets of reviewers undertook screening followed by data extraction and assessment of the methodological quality of included SRs.
RESULT
We identified and screened 1,002 Cochrane SRs and included six SRs in this overview. Included SRs reported only two of the primary outcomes, early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) and/or exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). None of the included SR reported continued BF up to 2 years of age. The results were evaluated using two major comparisons groups: BF intervention against routine care and one type of BF intervention vs. other types of BF intervention. Overall results from included SRs showed that there were improvements in the rates of EIBF and EBF among women who received BF intervention such as BF education sessions and support compared to those women who received only standard care. However, BF intervention mobile devices showed no improvements. In Target Client Communication (TCC) mobile devices intervention group, no significant improvements were reported in BF practices, and also the reported evidence was of very low certainty.
CONCLUSION
Community Based Intervention Packages (CBIP) delivered to pregnant and reproductive-age women during their Antenatal care (ANC) and/or Postnatal care (PNC) periods by Ancillary Nurse-Midwives reported the highest improvement in EIBF compared to women who received standard care. However, insufficient evidence was reported to suggest that BF intervention showed improvements in EBF in both the comparison groups. This overview highlighted the gaps in primary research regarding the uncertainty about the settings such as LICs or LMICs, lack of evidence from LMICs, and also identified gaps in the availability of reliable up-to-date SRs on the effects of several BF interventions to promote and optimize practices.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020174998, PROSPERO [CRD42020174998].
Topics: Child; Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Breast Feeding; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Prenatal Care; Communication; Uncertainty
PubMed: 36761137
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.984876 -
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2022Extrathyroidal extension (ETE) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is an indication of disease progression and can influence treatment aggressiveness.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Extrathyroidal extension (ETE) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is an indication of disease progression and can influence treatment aggressiveness. This meta-analysis assesses the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) in detecting ETE. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies published up to April 2022. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. The areas under the curve (AUC) for summary receiver operating curves were compared. A total of 11 studies analyzed ETE in 3795 patients with PTC. The sensitivity of ETE detection was 76% (95%CI = 74-78%). The specificity of ETE detection was 51% (95%CI = 49-54%). The DOR of detecting ETE by US was 5.32 (95%CI = 2.54-11.14). The AUC of ETE detection was determined to be 0.6874 ± 0.0841. We report an up-to-date analysis elucidating the diagnostic accuracy of ETE detection by US. Our work suggests the diagnostic accuracy of US in detecting ETE is adequate. Considering the importance of ETE detection on preoperative assessment, ancillary studies such as adjunct imaging studies and genetic testing should be considered.
Topics: Humans; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Thyroid Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Papillary; Ultrasonography; Odds Ratio; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36613811
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010371 -
European Urology Open Science Jan 2023The advent of immune check inhibitors (ICIs) has tremendously changed the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), adding an unseen substantial overall... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
The advent of immune check inhibitors (ICIs) has tremendously changed the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), adding an unseen substantial overall survival benefit. These agents could be administered alone or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies. So far, treatment allocation is based only on clinical stratification risk models.
OBJECTIVE
Herein, we aimed to report the different molecular classifications reported in the first-line treatment of mRCC and discuss the awaited clinical implications in terms of treatment selection.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Medline database as well as European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference proceedings were searched to identify biomarker studies. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials that included patients treated in the first line of mRCC setting, patients treated with anti-VEGF therapies or ICIs, biological modeling, and available survival outcomes.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Four classification models were identified with subsequent clinical implications: Beuselinck model (34 gene signatures), IMmotion150, Hakimi, and JAVELIN 101 model. Tumor profiling shows distinct outcomes when treated with one or other combination. Patients are clustered into two gene signatures: angiogenic and proinflammatory (as per JAVELIN). The first is more likely to respond to therapy that includes anti-VEGF agents, while the best outcomes are obtained with an ICI combination with the second.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings presented here were mostly derived from ancillary registered studies of new drugs in the setting of mRCC. Further validation is needed, which sets new paradigms for investigation in clinical research based on tumor biology for treatment allocation and not only on clinical stratification tools.
PATIENT SUMMARY
First-line treatment of metastatic kidney includes immunotherapy alone or in combination with antiangiogenic therapy. However, clinical practice demonstrated that the "one treatment fits all" strategy might not be the best approach. In fact, recent studies showed that the addition of immunotherapy agents will not benefit all patients equally, and some still respond either equally to or better than anti-vascular endothelial growth factor alone. This review revealed biomarker modeling that impacts treatment selection. Recent tumor profiling into "angiogenic signature" more sensitive to angiogenic agents versus "immune signature" more likely to achieve the best response with immunotherapy should be validated. Tumor biology features might be more powerful than clinical classification for a tailored treatment approach.
PubMed: 36573246
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.006 -
Epilepsia Feb 2023Despite improved ancillary investigations in epilepsy care, patients' narratives remain indispensable for diagnosing and treatment monitoring. This wealth of information... (Review)
Review
Despite improved ancillary investigations in epilepsy care, patients' narratives remain indispensable for diagnosing and treatment monitoring. This wealth of information is typically stored in electronic health records and accumulated in medical journals in an unstructured manner, thereby restricting complete utilization in clinical decision-making. To this end, clinical researchers increasing apply natural language processing (NLP)-a branch of artificial intelligence-as it removes ambiguity, derives context, and imbues standardized meaning from free-narrative clinical texts. This systematic review presents an overview of the current NLP applications in epilepsy and discusses the opportunities and drawbacks of NLP alongside its future implications. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases with a "natural language processing" and "epilepsy" query (March 4, 2022) and included original research articles describing the application of NLP techniques for textual analysis in epilepsy. Twenty-six studies were included. Fifty-eight percent of these studies used NLP to classify clinical records into predefined categories, improving patient identification and treatment decisions. Other applications of NLP had structured clinical information retrieval from electronic health records, scientific papers, and online posts of patients. Challenges and opportunities of NLP applications for enhancing epilepsy care and research are discussed. The field could further benefit from NLP by replicating successes in other health care domains, such as NLP-aided quality evaluation for clinical decision-making, outcome prediction, and clinical record summarization.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Natural Language Processing; PubMed; Electronic Health Records; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 36462150
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17474 -
Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2022To systematically review the effects (benefits and harms) of different types of physical exercise on insomnia outcomes in adult populations with no mood disorders.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the effects (benefits and harms) of different types of physical exercise on insomnia outcomes in adult populations with no mood disorders. Objective and subjective sleep outcomes and related mismatches were analyzed.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality of evidence was also examined.
RESULTS
Six studies including 295 participants with insomnia diagnosis were selected. Yoga, Tai Chi, resistance exercise and aerobic exercise were used in protocols with different duration, intensity and frequency. Studies involved different populations, including inactive or sedentary individuals, older adults and postmenopausal women. Physical exercise improved subjective sleep quality (very low quality of evidence) and reduced insomnia severity (high quality of evidence).
CONCLUSION
Findings suggest individualized physical exercise must be addressed to design optimal protocols, with standardized type, duration, intensity, and frequency. For the time being, physical exercise may be considered an alternative and/or ancillary therapeutic modality for patients diagnosed with insomnia. Physical exercise can be used to improve subjective complaints, but not objective sleep outcomes.
Topics: Aged; Exercise; Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Sleep; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Yoga
PubMed: 35894372
DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO8058 -
Journal of Crohn's & Colitis Nov 2022Ultrasound elastography [USE] is an innovative, non-invasive, promptly available, ancillary technique that has been proposed in the evaluation of intestinal fibrosis as...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Ultrasound elastography [USE] is an innovative, non-invasive, promptly available, ancillary technique that has been proposed in the evaluation of intestinal fibrosis as a monitorable biomarker, in terms of stiffness. The non-invasive estimate of fibrosis by USE appears appealing for dedicated physicians, in order to optimise the treatments for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients [surgical vs non-surgical]. We aimed to systematically review literature evidence on ultrasound elastography in IBD patients.
METHODS
For this qualitative systematic review, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify all studies, published until October 2021, investigating the application of USE in IBD patients compared with histopathological assessment.
RESULTS
Overall, 12 papers published between 2011 and 2019 were included. A total of 275 IBD patients were included: 272 Crohn's disease [CD] [98.9%] and three ulcerative colitis [UC] [1.1%]. Seven [58.3%] and four [41.6%] studies investigated strain elastography [SE] and shear wave elastography [SWE], respectively; in one study [0.1%] both techniques were addressed. The histological evaluation was largely conducted on surgical specimens and in two studies endoscopic biopsies were also included. The histological assessment was semi-quantitative in all the included studies, except for two where the fibrosis was evaluated only qualitatively. In 10/12 publications USE could accurately distinguish inflammation from fibrosis in the examined bowel tracts.
CONCLUSIONS
From the preliminary available data, an overall moderate-to-good accuracy of USE in detecting histological fibrosis [10/12 studies] was found. Point-shear wave elastography has been shown to perform superiorly. Further studies are needed to confirm these evidences.
Topics: Humans; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Crohn Disease; Colitis, Ulcerative; Intestines; Fibrosis; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
PubMed: 35696668
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac082 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) May 2022The objective of this study is to create an overview of the possible aetiologies of windswept deformity and to emphasize the points of attention when presented with a... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to create an overview of the possible aetiologies of windswept deformity and to emphasize the points of attention when presented with a case.
METHODS
A systematic search according to the PRISMA statement was conducted using PubMed, African Journals Online, Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Articles investigating the aetiology of windswept deformity at the knee in children, and articles with windswept deformity as an ancillary finding were included. The bibliographic search was limited to English-language articles only. The level of evidence and methodological appraisal were assessed.
RESULTS
Forty-five articles discussing the aetiology of windswept deformity were included. A variety of aetiologies can be brought forward. These can be divided into the following groups: 'Rickets and other metabolic disorders', 'skeletal dysplasias and other genetic disorders', 'trauma' and 'descriptive articles without specific underlying disorder'. With rickets being the largest group. Interestingly, in the group without a specific underlying disorder, all patients were from African descent, being otherwise healthy and presented with windswept deformity between two and three years of age.
CONCLUSION
We have presented an overview that may help identify the underlying disorder in children with windswept deformity. A step-by-step guide for clinicians who see a child with windswept deformity is provided. Even though, according to the Oxford level of evidence, most articles have a low level of evidence.
PubMed: 35626880
DOI: 10.3390/children9050703