-
Frontiers in Oncology 2023The perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of patients with solitary small renal tumors (SRMs) treated with ablation (AT) or partial nephrectomy (PN) remain... (Review)
Review
Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after ablation or partial nephrectomy for solitary renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials.
OBJECTIVES
The perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of patients with solitary small renal tumors (SRMs) treated with ablation (AT) or partial nephrectomy (PN) remain controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these two surgical techniques.
METHODS
In April 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used databases worldwide, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Review Manager was used to compare various parameters. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022377157).
RESULTS
Our final meta-analysis included 13 cohort studies with a total of 2,107 patients. Compared to partial nephrectomy (PN), ablation (AT) had shorter hospital stays (WMD -2.37 days, 95% CI -3.05 to -1.69; p < 0.00001), shorter operating times (WMD -57.06 min, 95% CI -88.92 to -25.19; p = 0.0004), less postoperative creatinine increases (WMD -0.17 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.05; p = 0.006), less postoperative glomerular filtration rate decreases (WMD -9.84 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI -14.25 to -5.44; p < 0.0001), less postoperative new-onset chronic kidney disease (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.71; p = 0.005), and less intraoperative blood loss (WMD -285.92 ml, 95% CI -428.44 to -143.40; p < 0.0001). The transfusion rate was lower in the ablation group (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.51; p = 0.001). The risk of local recurrence was higher in the ablation group (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.27 to 6.89; p = 0.01), while the risk of distant metastasis was higher in the partial nephrectomy group (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.28 to 6.18; p = 0.01). The intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were lower in the ablation group (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.62; p = 0.004 and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.38; p < 0.00001, respectively). However, overall survival, postoperative dialysis rate, and tumor-specific survival were not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that ablation and partial nephrectomy are equally safe and effective in the treatment of small solitary kidney tumors and are better options for patients with poor preoperative physical condition or poor renal function.
PubMed: 37434978
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1202587 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Choroid plexus papilloma (CPP) is rare and even rarer in infants and young children, and it usually occurs in the ventricles. Due to the physical peculiarities of...
Microscopic and endoscopic "chopstick" technique removal of choroid plexus papilloma in the third ventricle of an infant: a case report with systematic review of literature.
BACKGROUND
Choroid plexus papilloma (CPP) is rare and even rarer in infants and young children, and it usually occurs in the ventricles. Due to the physical peculiarities of infants, tumor removal by microscopic or endoscopic surgery alone is difficult.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 3-month-old patient was found to have an abnormally enlarged head circumference for 7 days. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination revealed a lesion in the third ventricle. The patient underwent combined microscopic and endoscopic "chopstick" technique to remove the tumor. He recovered well after the surgery. Postoperative pathological examination revealed CPP. Postoperative MRI suggested total resection of the tumor. Follow-up for 1 month showed no recurrence or distant metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS
Combined microscopic and endoscopic "chopstick" technique may be a suitable approach to remove tumors in infant ventricles.
PubMed: 37434973
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1182261 -
European Journal of Breast Health Jul 2023To summarize the evidence on the current management and outcomes for metastatic and recurrent malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) of the breast. A systematic literature...
To summarize the evidence on the current management and outcomes for metastatic and recurrent malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) of the breast. A systematic literature review of all cases of metastatic or recurrent MPTs of the breast published between 2010 and 2021 was performed. In total, 66 patients from 63 articles were included. Fifty-two (78.8%) had distant metastatic disease (DMD subgroup), and 21 (31.8%) showed locoregional recurrent/progressive disease (LRPR subgroup). Locoregional recurrences in patients with no distant metastases were treated with surgical excision in all cases. Radiotherapy was administered in 8/21 cases (38.1%) and was combined with chemotherapy in 2/21 cases (9.5%). Metastatic disease was managed through metastases surgical excision, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of these three in 84.6% of cases, while the remaining patients received no oncological treatments. Chemotherapy was proposed in 75.0% of cases. Anthracycline and alkylating agent-based combination regimens were most frequently administered. The median survival time was 24 (2.0-152.0) months, and 72.0 (2.5-98.5) months in the DMD and LRPR subgroups, respectively. Management of recurrent or metastatic MPTs is challenging. Surgery is the fundamental approach, but the use of adjuvant radio- and chemo-therapy remains controversial due to the lack of scientific evidence. Further studies and international registers are needed to implement new and more efficient treatment strategies.
PubMed: 37415652
DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-3-2 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Minimally invasive total mesorectal excision (MiTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) are popular trends in mid and low rectal cancer. However, there is...
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive total mesorectal excision (MiTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) are popular trends in mid and low rectal cancer. However, there is currently no systematic comparison between MiTME and TaTME of mid and low-rectal cancer. Therefore, we systematically study the perioperative and pathological outcomes of MiTME and TaTME in mid and low rectal cancer.
METHODS
We have searched the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science for articles on MiTME (robotic or laparoscopic total mesorectal excision) and TaTME (transanal total mesorectal excision). We calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The protocol for this review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022374141).
RESULTS
There are 11010 patients including 39 articles. Compared with TaTME, patients who underwent MiTME had no statistical difference in operation time (SMD -0.14; CI -0.31 to 0.33; I84.7%, P=0.116), estimated blood loss (SMD 0.05; CI -0.05 to 0.14; I48%, P=0.338), postoperative hospital stay (RR 0.08; CI -0.07 to 0.22; I0%, P=0.308), over complications (RR 0.98; CI 0.88 to 1.08; I25.4%, P=0.644), intraoperative complications (RR 0.94; CI 0.69 to 1.29; I31.1%, P=0.712), postoperative complications (RR 0.98; CI 0.87 to 1.11; I16.1%, P=0.789), anastomotic stenosis (RR 0.85; CI 0.73 to 0.98; I7.4%, P=0.564), wound infection (RR 1.08; CI 0.65 to 1.81; I1.9%, P=0.755), circumferential resection margin (RR 1.10; CI 0.91 to 1.34; I0%, P=0.322), distal resection margin (RR 1.49; CI 0.73 to 3.05; I0%, P=0.272), major low anterior resection syndrome (RR 0.93; CI 0.79 to 1.10; I0%, P=0.386), lymph node yield (SMD 0.06; CI -0.04 to 0.17; I39.6%, P=0.249), 2-year DFS rate (RR 0.99; CI 0.88 to 1.11; I0%, P = 0.816), 2-year OS rate (RR 1.00; CI 0.90 to 1.11; I0%, P = 0.969), distant metastasis rate (RR 0.47; CI 0.17 to 1.29; I0%, P = 0.143), and local recurrence rate (RR 1.49; CI 0.75 to 2.97; I0%, P = 0.250). However, patients who underwent MiTME had fewer anastomotic leak rates (SMD -0.38; CI -0.59 to -0.17; I19.0%, P<0.0001).
CONCLUSION
This study comprehensively and systematically evaluated the safety and efficacy of MiTME and TaTME in the treatment of mid to low-rectal cancer through meta-analysis. There is no difference between the two except for patients with MiTME who have a lower anastomotic leakage rate, which provides some evidence-based reference for clinical practice. Of course, in the future, more scientific and rigorous conclusions need to be drawn from multi-center RCT research.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022374141.
PubMed: 37377919
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167200 -
Microorganisms Jun 2023() has definite or possible associations with multiple local and distant manifestations. has been isolated from multiple sites throughout the body, including the nose....
BACKGROUND
() has definite or possible associations with multiple local and distant manifestations. has been isolated from multiple sites throughout the body, including the nose. Clinical non-randomized studies with report discrepant data regarding the association between infection and nasal polyps. The aim of this first systematic review and meta-analysis was the assessment of the strength of the association between infection and incidence of nasal polyps.
METHODS
We performed an electronic search in the three major medical databases, namely PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane, to extract and analyze data as per PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
Out of 57 articles, 12 studies were graded as good quality for analysis. Male-to-female ratio was 2:1, and age ranged between 17-78 years. The cumulative pooled rate of infection in the nasal polyp group was 32.3% (controls 17.8%). The comparison between the two groups revealed a more significant incidence of infection among the nasal polyp group (OR 4.12), though with high heterogeneity I = 66%. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that in European studies, the prevalence of infection among the nasal polyp group was significantly higher than in controls, yielding null heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis based on immunohistochemistry resulted in null heterogeneity with preserving a statistically significant difference in infection prevalence between the groups.
CONCLUSION
The present study revealed a positive association between infection and nasal polyps.
PubMed: 37375083
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11061581 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jun 2023Various papers have introduced the use of positron emission tomography (PET) with [Ga]Ga-radiolabeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPi) radiopharmaceuticals... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Various papers have introduced the use of positron emission tomography (PET) with [Ga]Ga-radiolabeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPi) radiopharmaceuticals in different subtypes of gastric cancer (GC). Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of this novel molecular imaging technique in GC with a systematic review and meta-analysis. A straightforward literature search of papers concerning the diagnostic performance of FAP-targeted PET imaging was performed. Original articles evaluating this novel molecular imaging examination in both newly diagnosed GC patients and GC patients with disease relapse were included. The systematic review included nine original studies, and eight of them were also eligible for meta-analysis. The quantitative synthesis provided pooled detection rates of 95% and 97% for the assessment of primary tumor and distant metastases, respectively, and a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 89%, respectively, for regional lymph node metastases. Significant statistical heterogeneity among the included studies was found only in the analysis of the primary tumor detection rate (I = 64%). Conclusions: Beyond the limitations of this systematic review and meta-analysis (i.e., all the included studies were conducted in Asia, and using [F]FDG PET/CT as a comparator of the index test), the quantitative data provided demonstrate the promising diagnostic performance of FAP-targeted PET imaging in GC. Nevertheless, more prospective multicentric studies are needed to confirm the excellent performances of FAP-targeted PET in this cluster of patients.
Topics: Humans; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Stomach Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Gallium Radioisotopes
PubMed: 37373285
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210136 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are types of endogenous noncoding RNAs produced by selective splicing that are expressed highly specifically in various organisms and tissues...
BACKGROUND
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are types of endogenous noncoding RNAs produced by selective splicing that are expressed highly specifically in various organisms and tissues and have numerous clinical implications in the regulation of cancer development and progression. Since circRNA is resistant to digestion by ribonucleases and has a long half-life, there is increasing evidence that circRNA can be used as an ideal candidate biomarker for the early diagnosis and prognosis of tumors. In this study, we aimed to reveal the diagnostic and prognostic value of circRNA in human pancreatic cancer (PC).
METHODS
A systematic search for publications from inception to 22 July 2022 was conducted on Embase, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Library databases. Available studies that correlated circRNA expression in tissue or serum with the clinicopathological, diagnostic, and prognostic values of PC patients were enrolled. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate clinical pathological characteristics. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were adopted to assess diagnostic value. Hazard ratios (HRs) were utilized to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
This meta-analysis enrolled 32 eligible studies, including six on diagnosis and 21 on prognosis, which accounted for 2,396 cases from 245 references. For clinical parameters, high expression of carcinogenic circRNA was significantly associated with degree of differentiation (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.47-2.34), TNM stage (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.35-0.62), lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.32-0.48), and distant metastasis (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.13-0.51). As for clinical diagnostic utility, circRNA could discriminate patients with pancreatic cancer from controls, with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), a relatively high sensitivity of 84%, and a specificity of 80% in tissue. In terms of prognostic significance, carcinogenic circRNA was correlated with poor OS (HR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.76-2.26) and DFS (HR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.47-2.62).
CONCLUSION
In summary, this study demonstrated that circRNA may act as a significant diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer.
PubMed: 37361594
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1174577 -
Cancer Medicine Aug 2023Positron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.
BACKGROUND
Positron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular levels. Therefore, PET radiomics-based prediction and prognostic models have the potentials to understand tumour heterogeneity and assist clinicians with diagnosis, prognosis and management of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of published modelling information to evaluate the usefulness of PET radiomics in the prediction and prognosis of HNSCC patients.
METHODS
We searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from 2010 to 2021 and considered 31 studies with pre-defined inclusion criteria. We followed the CHARMS checklist for data extraction and performed quality assessment using the PROBAST tool. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of the prediction and prognostic models using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and average C-statistic, respectively.
RESULTS
Manual segmentation method followed by 40% of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV ) thresholding is a commonly used approach. The area under the receiver operating curves of externally validated prediction models ranged between 0.60-0.87, 0.65-0.86 and 0.62-0.75 for overall survival, distant metastasis and recurrence, respectively. Most studies highlighted an overall high risk of bias (outcome definition, statistical methodologies and external validation of models) and high unclear concern in terms of applicability. The meta-analysis showed the estimated pooled DOR of 6.75 (95% CI: 4.45, 10.23) for prediction models and the C-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.74) for prognostic models.
CONCLUSIONS
Both prediction and prognostic models using clinical variables and PET radiomics demonstrated reliable accuracy for detecting adverse outcomes in HNSCC, suggesting the prospect of PET radiomics in clinical settings for diagnosis, prognosis and management of HNSCC patients. Future studies of prediction and prognostic models should emphasise the quality of reporting, external model validation, generalisability to real clinical scenarios and enhanced reproducibility of results.
Topics: Humans; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Prognosis; Reproducibility of Results; Positron-Emission Tomography; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
PubMed: 37353996
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6278 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2023Total mesorectal excision is the standard of care for stage I rectal cancer. Despite major advances and increasing enthusiasm for modern endoscopic local excision (LE),... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Total mesorectal excision is the standard of care for stage I rectal cancer. Despite major advances and increasing enthusiasm for modern endoscopic local excision (LE), uncertainty remains regarding its oncologic equivalence and safety relative to radical resection (RR).
OBJECTIVES
To assess the oncologic, operative, and functional outcomes of modern endoscopic LE compared to RR surgery in adults with stage I rectal cancer.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to present), four trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN registry, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials database), two thesis and proceedings databases, and relevant scientific societies' publications in February 2022. We performed handsearching and reference checking and contacted study authors of ongoing trials to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in people with stage I rectal cancer comparing any modern LE techniques to any RR techniques with or without the use of neo/adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) and standard errors for time-to-event data and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes, using generic inverse variance and random-effects methods. We regrouped surgical complications from the included studies into major and minor according to the standard Clavien-Dindo classification. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework.
MAIN RESULTS
Four RCTs were included in data synthesis with a combined total of 266 participants with stage I rectal cancer (T1-2N0M0), if not stated otherwise. Surgery was performed in university hospital settings. The mean age of participants was above 60, and median follow-up ranged from 17.5 months to 9.6 years. Regarding the use of co-interventions, one study used neoadjuvant CRT in all participants (T2 cancers); one study used short-course radiotherapy in the LE group (T1-T2 cancers); one study used adjuvant CRT selectively in high-risk patients undergoing RR (T1-T2 cancers); and the fourth study did not use any CRT (T1 cancers). We assessed the overall risk of bias as high for oncologic and morbidity outcomes across studies. All studies had at least one key domain with a high risk of bias. None of the studies reported separate outcomes for T1 versus T2 or for high-risk features. Low-certainty evidence suggests that RR may result in an improvement in disease-free survival compared to LE (3 trials, 212 participants; HR 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 4.24). This would translate into a three-year disease-recurrence risk of 27% (95% CI 14 to 50%) versus 15% after LE and RR, respectively. Regarding sphincter function, only one study provided objective results and reported short-term deterioration in stool frequency, flatulence, incontinence, abdominal pain, and embarrassment about bowel function in the RR group. At three years, the LE group had superiority in overall stool frequency, embarrassment about bowel function, and diarrhea. Local excision may have little to no effect on cancer-related survival compared to RR (3 trials, 207 participants; HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.33; very low-certainty evidence). We did not pool studies for local recurrence, but the included studies individually reported comparable local recurrence rates for LE and RR (low-certainty evidence). It is unclear if the risk of major postoperative complications may be lower with LE compared with RR (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.28; low-certainty evidence; corresponding to 5.8% (95% CI 2.4% to 14.1%) risk for LE versus 11% for RR). Moderate-certainty evidence shows that the risk of minor postoperative complications is probably lower after LE (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.85); corresponding to an absolute risk of 14% (95% CI 8% to 26%) for LE compared to 30.1% for RR. One study reported an 11% rate of temporary stoma after LE versus 82% in the RR group. Another study reported a 46% rate of temporary or permanent stomas after RR and none after LE. The evidence is uncertain about the effect of LE compared with RR on quality of life. Only one study reported standard quality of life function, in favor of LE, with a 90% or greater probability of superiority in overall quality of life, role, social, and emotional functions, body image, and health anxiety. Other studies reported a significantly shorter postoperative period to oral intake, bowel movement, and off-bed activities in the LE group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on low-certainty evidence, LE may decrease disease-free survival in early rectal cancer. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that LE may have little to no effect on cancer-related survival compared to RR for the treatment of stage I rectal cancer. Based on low-certainty evidence, it is unclear if LE may have a lower major complication rate, but probably causes a large reduction in minor complication rate. Limited data based on one study suggest better sphincter function, quality of life, or genitourinary function after LE. Limitations exist with respect to the applicability of these findings. We identified only four eligible studies with a low number of total participants, subjecting the results to imprecision. Risk of bias had a serious impact on the quality of evidence. More RCTs are needed to answer our review question with greater certainty and to compare local and distant metastasis rates. Data on important patient outcomes such as sphincter function and quality of life are very limited. Results of currently ongoing trials will likely impact the results of this review. Future trials should accurately report and compare outcomes according to the stage and high-risk features of rectal tumors, and evaluate quality of life, sphincter, and genitourinary outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy as an emerging co-intervention for improving oncologic outcomes after LE needs to be further defined.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Infant; Abdominal Pain; Combined Modality Therapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Rectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37310167
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002198.pub3 -
Tricuspid valve repair concomitant with mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International Journal of Surgery... Jul 2023Uncertainties persist about whether to aggressively and effectively treat tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during mitral valve (MV) surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Uncertainties persist about whether to aggressively and effectively treat tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during mitral valve (MV) surgery.
REVIEW METHODS
Systematic literature searches were performed in five databases to collect all relevant studies published before May 2022 on whether the tricuspid valve was treated during MV surgery. Separate meta-analyses were performed on data from unmatched studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT)/adjusted studies.
MAIN RESULTS
A total of 44 publications were included, of which eight were RCT studies and the rest were retrospective studies. There was no difference in 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.00, 95% CI: 0.71-1.42, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.30-1.41)] or overall survival [hazard ratio (HR): 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85-1.19, HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52-1.14] in unmatched studies and RCT/adjusted studies. Late mortality (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.21-0.64) and cardiac-related mortality (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.21-0.62) were lower in the tricuspid valve repair (TVR) group in the RCT/adjusted studies. In the unmatched studies, overall cardiac mortality (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.88) was lower in the TVR group. In the late TR progression analysis, the late TR progression was lower among patients in the concomitantly intervened tricuspid group, and patients in the untreated tricuspid group were prone to TR progression in both studies (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.22-0.41, HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23-0.58).
CONCLUSIONS
TVR concomitant with MV surgery is most effective in patients with significant TR and dilated tricuspid annulus, especially those with a significantly reduced risk of distant TR progression.
Topics: Humans; Tricuspid Valve; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Treatment Outcome; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37300887
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000396