-
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Mar 2022Numerous therapeutic agents specifically targeting the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) oncogene are being developed. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Numerous therapeutic agents specifically targeting the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) oncogene are being developed.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the current review was to systematically identify and analyze clinical trials that have evaluated MET inhibitors in various cancer types and to provide an overview of their clinical outcomes.
METHODS
An electronic literature search was carried out in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify published clinical trials related to MET inhibitors. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement was followed for the systematic appraisal of the literature. Data related to clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and overall tumor response, were extracted.
RESULTS
In total, 49 publications were included. Among these, 51.02% were phase II studies, 14.28% were randomized controlled trials, three were phase III studies, two were prospective observational studies, and the remainder were either phase I or Ib studies. The majority (44.89%) of articles reported the clinical outcomes of MET inhibitors, including small molecules, monoclonal antibodies, and other agents, in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring MET alterations. MET amplification, overexpression, and MET exon 14 skipping mutations were the major MET alteration types reported across the included studies. Clinical responses/outcomes varied considerably.
CONCLUSION
This systematic literature review provides an overview of the literature available in Embase and PubMed regarding MET-targeted therapies. MET-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (capmatinib, tepotinib, and savolitinib) may become a new standard of care in NSCLC, specifically with MET exon 14 skipping mutations. A combination of MET TKIs with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKIs (osimertinib + savolitinib, tepotinib + gefitinib) may be a potential solution for MET-driven EGFR TKI resistance. Further, MET alteration (MET amplification/overexpression) may be an actionable target in gastric cancer and papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; ErbB Receptors; Gefitinib; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Observational Studies as Topic; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met
PubMed: 35266116
DOI: 10.1007/s40291-021-00568-w -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2022Complete deletion of both the short arm of chromosome 1 (1p) and the long arm of chromosome 19 (19q), known as 1p/19q codeletion, is a mutation that can occur in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Complete deletion of both the short arm of chromosome 1 (1p) and the long arm of chromosome 19 (19q), known as 1p/19q codeletion, is a mutation that can occur in gliomas. It occurs in a type of glioma known as oligodendroglioma and its higher grade counterpart known as anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Detection of 1p/19q codeletion in gliomas is important because, together with another mutation in an enzyme known as isocitrate dehydrogenase, it is needed to make the diagnosis of an oligodendroglioma. Presence of 1p/19q codeletion also informs patient prognosis and prediction of the best drug treatment. The main two tests in use are fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) assays (also known as PCR-based short tandem repeat or microsatellite analysis). Many other tests are available. None of the tests is perfect, although PCR-based LOH is expected to have very high sensitivity.
OBJECTIVES
To estimate the sensitivity and specificity and cost-effectiveness of different deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based techniques for determining 1p/19q codeletion status in glioma.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase and BIOSIS up to July 2019. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication. We sought economic evaluation studies from the results of this search and using the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included cross-sectional studies in adults with glioma or any subtype of glioma, presenting raw data or cross-tabulations of two or more DNA-based tests for 1p/19q codeletion. We also sought economic evaluations of these tests.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We followed procedures outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews. Two review authors independently screened titles/abstracts/full texts, performed data extraction, and undertook applicability and risk of bias assessments using QUADAS-2. Meta-analyses used the hierarchical summary ROC model to estimate and compare test accuracy. We used FISH and PCR-based LOH as alternate reference standards to examine how tests compared with those in common use, and conducted a latent class analysis comparing FISH and PCR-based LOH. We constructed an economic model to evaluate cost-effectiveness.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 53 studies examining: PCR-based LOH, FISH, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, next-generation sequencing (NGS), comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH), array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH), multiplex-ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), real-time PCR, chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH), mass spectrometry (MS), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, G-banding, methylation array and NanoString. Risk of bias was low for only one study; most gave us concerns about how patients were selected or about missing data. We had applicability concerns about many of the studies because only patients with specific subtypes of glioma were included. 1520 participants contributed to analyses using FISH as the reference, 1304 participants to analyses involving PCR-based LOH as the reference and 262 participants to analyses of comparisons between methods from studies not including FISH or PCR-based LOH. Most evidence was available for comparison of FISH with PCR-based LOH (15 studies, 915 participants): PCR-based LOH detected 94% of FISH-determined codeletions (95% credible interval (CrI) 83% to 98%) and FISH detected 91% of codeletions determined by PCR-based LOH (CrI 78% to 97%). Of tumours determined not to have a deletion by FISH, 94% (CrI 87% to 98%) had a deletion detected by PCR-based LOH, and of those determined not to have a deletion by PCR-based LOH, 96% (CrI 90% to 99%) had a deletion detected by FISH. The latent class analysis suggested that PCR-based LOH may be slightly more accurate than FISH. Most other techniques appeared to have high sensitivity (i.e. produced few false-negative results) for detection of 1p/19q codeletion when either FISH or PCR-based LOH was considered as the reference standard, although there was limited evidence. There was some indication of differences in specificity (false-positive rate) with some techniques. Both NGS and SNP array had high specificity when considered against FISH as the reference standard (NGS: 6 studies, 243 participants; SNP: 6 studies, 111 participants), although we rated certainty in the evidence as low or very low. NGS and SNP array also had high specificity when PCR-based LOH was considered the reference standard, although with much more uncertainty as these results were based on fewer studies (just one study with 49 participants for NGS and two studies with 33 participants for SNP array). G-banding had low sensitivity and specificity when PCR-based LOH was the reference standard. Although MS had very high sensitivity and specificity when both FISH and PCR-based LOH were considered the reference standard, these results were based on only one study with a small number of participants. Real-time PCR also showed high specificity with FISH as a reference standard, although there were only two studies including 40 participants. We found no relevant economic evaluations. Our economic model using FISH as the reference standard suggested that the resource-optimising test depends on which measure of diagnostic accuracy is most important. With FISH as the reference standard, MLPA is likely to be cost-effective if society was willing to pay GBP 1000 or less for a true positive detected. However, as the value placed on a true positive increased, CISH was most cost-effective. Findings differed when the outcome measure changed to either true negative detected or correct diagnosis. When PCR-based LOH was used as the reference standard, MLPA was likely to be cost-effective for all measures of diagnostic accuracy at lower threshold values for willingness to pay. However, as the threshold values increased, none of the tests were clearly more likely to be considered cost-effective.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In our review, most techniques (except G-banding) appeared to have good sensitivity (few false negatives) for detection of 1p/19q codeletions in glioma against both FISH and PCR-based LOH as a reference standard. However, we judged the certainty of the evidence low or very low for all the tests. There are possible differences in specificity, with both NGS and SNP array having high specificity (fewer false positives) for 1p/19q codeletion when considered against FISH as the reference standard. The economic analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cross-Sectional Studies; DNA; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Glioma; Humans; Oligodendroglioma; State Medicine
PubMed: 35233774
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been found to have predictive potential...
Predictive Efficacy of Blood-Based Tumor Mutation Burden Assay for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been found to have predictive potential for survival. When compared to TMB detection in tissue (tTMB), detecting TMB in the blood (bTMB) has practical advantages; yet, the results of various studies are conflicting. The question of whether bTMB can be utilized as a predictive biomarker is becoming increasingly contentious. To confirm the predictive efficacy of bTMB, researchers did a systematic review and meta-analysis to look into the relationship between ICIs and bTMB.
METHOD
From the inception to March 2021, Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and other databases were systematically searched. The predictive value of bTMB in ICIs, or the efficacy of ICIs against chemotherapy, was studied. The results were presented as pooled ratio rate (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals for the Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis, heterogeneity analyses, and sensitivity analysis were also performed.
RESULTS
A total of 2,610 NSCLC patients were studied in seven trials. There were no significant differences in OS (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62-1.91, = 0.774) or PFS (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.20-2.65, = 0.629) between high and low bTMB groups in the ICIs cohort. When ICIs were compared to chemotherapy, ICIs were found to enhance OS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59-0.92, = 0.006), but the improvement in PFS and ORR was only a numerical trend (PFS: HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.63-1.09, = 0.173; ORR: RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.77-1.10, = 0.372). NSCLC patients treated with ICIs in the high bTMB group had better survival benefits than chemotherapy patients in terms of OS (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51-0.76, 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.52-0.76, 0.001), and ORR (RR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.32-2.62, 0.001), while in the low TMB group, the results were no different or even reversed (OS: HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.64-1.24, = 0.485; PFS: HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.93-1.58, = 0.154; ORR: RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.85, = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
TMB could predict the enhanced survival benefit of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs; however the role of bTMB is limited at this stage. For NSCLC patients with high TMB, ICIc may be a better option than chemotherapy.
PubMed: 35223476
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.795933 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021Lung adenocarcinoma can transform into small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) when resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) develops. Approximately 3% to 10% of epidermal...
Outcomes in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma With Transformation to Small Cell Lung Cancer After EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Resistance: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Lung adenocarcinoma can transform into small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) when resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) develops. Approximately 3% to 10% of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could transform to SCLC. This phenomenon has been described in several case reports and small patient series. However, the characteristics and treatment outcomes of this population have not been comprehensively reported, and their clinical course is poorly characterized.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the published literature to summarize the clinical and pathological features and prognosis of the reported cases and analyzed the demographics, disease features, and outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 72 patients (50 females and 22 males) initially diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma were included. EGFR mutations included 19-deletion (75%), L858R (22%), and G719X (3%). All patients received EGFR-TKIs before SCLC transformation. The median time from diagnosis to transformation was 20.5 months (95% CI, 15.45 to 26.55 months). Of the 67 patients with post-translational gene test results, 58 maintained their EGFR mutation, and only 1 of 18 with prior T790M positivity retained T790M mutation. After the pathological transformation, both conventional chemotherapy regimen and chemotherapy combined targeted therapy yielded high response rates. The disease control rate of first-line therapy after transformation was 76%, while the objective response rate was 48%. The median overall survival (OS) since diagnosis was 27 months (95% CI, 22.90 to 31.10 months), whereas median OS since SCLC transformation was 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.50 to 11.60 months).
CONCLUSION
The prognosis of transformed SCLC is worse than primary SCLC. The response rate to conventional chemotherapy was high. However, the progression-free survival and OS after transformation were short and the prognosis was poor with first-line therapies. New therapies are needed in the management of transformed SCLC.
PubMed: 35223450
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.766148 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021Systemic treatments, namely, either monotherapy or combination therapy, are commonly administered to patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This...
BACKGROUND
Systemic treatments, namely, either monotherapy or combination therapy, are commonly administered to patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to provide the complete efficacy and safety profiles and ranking of systemic therapies for the treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic CRC.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until June 30, 2021, and also the bibliographies of relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing two or more treatments, namely, at least capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, cetuximab, oxaliplatin, or panitumumab were investigated. A network meta-analysis using the Bayesian approach was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of treatments. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated for the probability of each treatment as the most effective. The overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated.
RESULTS
One hundred two publications with 36,147 participants were assigned to 39 different treatments. Among 11 treatments with full information on six outcomes, FOLFIRI/FOLFOX/FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab significantly improved both the ORR and DCR, compared to FOLFIRI. Although FOLFOX and FOLFIRI/FOLFOX + cetuximab significantly prolonged both OS and PFS, treatments were comparable in terms of AEs grade ≥3 and SAEs. The top highest SUCRA values were observed in the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab group for ORR (96%) and DCR (99%), FOLFIRI + bevacizumab + panitumumab group for OS (62%) and PFS (54%), and FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab group for AEs grade ≥3 (59%) and SAEs (59%) outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest an available range of systemic treatment therapies with different efficacy and safety profiles with patients. Further investigations of the side effects and mutation status are required to confirm our findings.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42019127772.
PubMed: 35223449
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.756214 -
Neurologia Medico-chirurgica Apr 2022Malignant progression of diffuse low-grade glioma (LGG) is a critical event affecting patient survival; however, the incidence and related factors have been inconsistent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Malignant progression of diffuse low-grade glioma (LGG) is a critical event affecting patient survival; however, the incidence and related factors have been inconsistent in literature. According to the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed articles from 2009, meta-analyzed the incidence of malignant progression, and clarified factors related to the transformation. Forty-one articles were included in this study (n = 7,122; n, number of patients). We identified two definitions of malignant progression: histologically proven (Htrans) and clinically defined (Ctrans). The malignant progression rate curves of Htrans and Ctrans were almost in parallel when constructed from the results of meta-regression by the mean follow-up time. The true transformation rate was supposed to lie between the two curves, approximately 40% at the 10-year mean follow-up. Risk of malignant progression was evaluated using hazard ratio (HR). Pooled HRs were significantly higher in tumors with a larger pre- and postoperative tumor volume, lower degree of resection, and notable preoperative contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging than in others. Oligodendroglial histology and IDH mutation (IDHm) with 1p/19q codeletion (Codel) also significantly reduced the HRs. Using Kaplan-Meier curves from eight studies with molecular data, we extracted data and calculated the 10-year malignant progression-free survival (10yMPFS). The 10yMPFS in patients with IDHm without Codel was 30.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 22.2-39.0) in Htrans and 38.3% (95% CI: 32.3-44.3) in Ctrans, and that with IDHm with Codel was 71.7% (95% CI: 61.7-79.5) in Htrans and 62.5% (95% CI: 55.9-68.5) in Ctrans. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy could not be determined.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Humans; Incidence; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Mutation
PubMed: 35197400
DOI: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0313 -
European Journal of Medical Research Feb 2022To determine the effect of polymorphisms and mutations in angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and Type 2 transmembrane serine proteases (TMPRSS2) genes on...
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effect of polymorphisms and mutations in angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and Type 2 transmembrane serine proteases (TMPRSS2) genes on susceptibility to corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and patient prognosis.
INTRODUCTION
From December 2019 to the current time, an outbreak of epidemic of COVID-19, characterized by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has occurred around the world. It is now clear that SARS-CoV-2 binds to human ACE2 receptors, with expression of these receptors correlated with the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality. Polymorphisms in individual patient factors, such as ACE2 and TMPRSS2 genes have been linked with an increase in negative outcomes, although evidence to affirm remains debatable.
METHODS
Here, we performed a systematic review, based on guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, with the aim of assessing whether polymorphisms in ACE2 and TMPRSS2 genes affect the COVID-19 condition. We extensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, for relevant articles and reports published in English between December 2019 and December 2021.
RESULTS
A total of 495 full-text articles were downloaded, of which 185 were excluded after preliminary examination as they were duplicates. Finally, 310 articles were evaluated, by reading their titles and abstracts, and 208 of them eliminated based on our selection criteria. Finally, 33 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final assessment. Genetic data from 33,923 patients with COVID-19 drawn from the general population and deriving from over 160 regions and 50 countries, as well as approximately 560,000 samples from global-public genetic databases, were included in our analysis. Ultimately, we identified 10 SNPs and 21 mutations in the ACE2 gene, along with 13 SNPs and 12 variants in the TMPRSS2 gene, which may be associated with COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS
ACE2 and TMPRSS2 play vital roles in the onset, development, and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and have both been strongly associated with vulnerability, intensity, and the clinical result of COVID-19. Overall, these genetic factors may have potential for future development of personalized drugs and vaccines against COVID-19.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
CRD42021239400 in PROSPERO 2021.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; COVID-19; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Mutation; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; SARS-CoV-2; Serine Endopeptidases
PubMed: 35193695
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00647-6 -
Advances in Therapy Apr 2022Tazemetostat is an enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor recommended for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after demonstrating...
A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Single-Arm Trials in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Who Received at Least Two Prior Systemic Treatments: Tazemetostat was Associated with a Lower Risk for Safety Outcomes Versus the PI3-Kinase Inhibitors Idelalisib, Duvelisib,...
INTRODUCTION
Tazemetostat is an enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor recommended for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after demonstrating single-agent, antitumor activity in patients with wild-type or mutant EZH2. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors idelalisib, copanlisib, umbralisib and (formerly) duvelisib are indicated for third-line, fourth-line, and later (3L/4L+) treatment of R/R FL. The objective of this analysis was to provide an indirect treatment comparison of tazemetostat with each PI3K inhibitor for 3L/4L+ R/R FL treatment.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted to identify trials for idelalisib (DELTA), duvelisib (DYNAMO), copanlisib (CHRONOS-1 Part B), and umbralisib (UNITY-NHL) in 3L+ R/R FL. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were conducted by weighting tazemetostat individual patient data with available baseline characteristics from each comparator trial: age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease stage, histology, prior treatment lines, prior stem cell therapy, progression within 24 months, and refractory status to last therapy. Only the tazemetostat trial included patients with grade 3b or transformed FL, or recorded EZH2 mutation status. Primary safety outcomes included risk of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); primary efficacy outcomes included objective response rate (ORR).
RESULTS
Matched patients treated with tazemetostat had lower relative risk (RR) for all grouped safety outcomes, including any grade ≥ 3 TEAEs, compared with idelalisib (RR = 0.45), duvelisib (RR = 0.35), copanlisib (RR = 0.37), and umbralisib (RR = 0.65; all, p < 0.01), any serious TEAE, and any TEAE leading to dose reduction, drug discontinuation, or interruption. The ORR was not significantly different for tazemetostat versus other treatments (idelalisib 43% vs 56%, p = 0.16; duvelisib 48% vs 47%, p = 0.91; copanlisib 49% vs 61%, p = 0.11; and umbralisib 57% vs 47%, p = 0.10).
CONCLUSIONS
In this statistically adjusted comparison, tazemetostat was associated with lower RR for safety outcomes versus idelalisib, duvelisib, copanlisib, and umbralisib, while achieving similar efficacy outcomes.
Topics: Benzamides; Biphenyl Compounds; Child, Preschool; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Isoquinolines; Lymphoma, Follicular; Morpholines; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Purines; Pyridones; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Quinazolinones; Risk
PubMed: 35157216
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02054-z -
PloS One 2022Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet, some patients cannot benefit from immunotherapy, and reliable biomarkers... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet, some patients cannot benefit from immunotherapy, and reliable biomarkers for selecting sensitive patients are needed. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of tumor mutational burden (TMB) in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy.
METHODS
Eligible studies were comprehensively searched from electronic databases prior to August 31, 2021. Meta-analyses of high TMB versus low TMB as well as immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with high/low TMB were conducted. Hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI for objective response rate (ORR) were calculated.
RESULTS
A total of 31 datasets (3437 patients) and 6 randomized controlled trials (3662 patients) were available for meta-analyses of high TMB versus low TMB and immunotherapy versus chemotherapy, respectively. High TMB predicted significantly favorable PFS (HR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.46-0.63, P<0.001) and OS (HR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.57-0.87, P = 0.001), and higher ORR (OR = 3.14, 95%CI: 2.28-4.34, P<0.001) compared with low TMB. In patients with high TMB, immunotherapy was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.53-0.72), OS (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.57-0.79) and ORR (OR = 2.35, 95%CI: 1.74-3.18) when compared with chemotherapy. However, in patients with low TMB, immunotherapy seemed to predict inferior PFS (HR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.02-1.41) and ORR (OR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.44-0.84) and have no OS benefit (HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.74-1.05) as compared with chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis demonstrates more clinical benefits concerning treatment response and survival outcomes in high-TMB NSCLC patients who are treated with immunotherapy. TMB is a promising biomarker for discriminating NSCLC patients who can benefit more from immunotherapy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Immunotherapy; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Progression-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35113949
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263629 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021genes are mutated in approximately 8% of melanoma patients; however, the impact of gene alterations on the efficiency of immunotherapy has not been clarified. This...
BACKGROUND
genes are mutated in approximately 8% of melanoma patients; however, the impact of gene alterations on the efficiency of immunotherapy has not been clarified. This study focused on the correlation between gene mutations and the treatment response.
METHODS
Six metastatic melanoma clinical cohorts treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)] were recruited in this study. RNA expression profiling results from each of these six cohorts and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) melanoma cohort were analysed to explore the mechanism related to immune activation.
RESULTS
Compared to patients with wild-type , those with mutations in an independent anti-CTLA-4-treated cohort had higher objective response rates, longer progression-free survival, and longer overall survival (OS). These findings were further validated in a pooled anti-CTLA-4-treated cohort in terms of the OS. However, there was no correlation between mutations and OS in the anti-PD-1-treated cohort. Subgroup Cox regression analysis suggested that patients with mutations received fewer benefits from anti-PD-1 monotherapy than from anti-CTLA-4 treatment. Furthermore, transcriptome profiling analysis revealed that melanoma tumours with mutation was enriched in CD8 T cells, B cells, and neutrophil cells, also expressed high levels of CD33 and IL10, implying a potential mechanism underlying the benefit of melanoma patients with mutations from anti-CTLA-4 treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
mutations were identified as an independent predictive factor for anti-CTLA-4 therapy in melanoma patients. Anti-CTLA-4 treatment might be more effective than anti-PD-1 therapy for patients with mutated melanoma.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; MAP Kinase Kinase 2; Melanoma; Mutation; Progression-Free Survival; Survival Rate
PubMed: 35069558
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.785526