-
Journal of Applied Physiology... Dec 2023Hormonal changes around ovulation divide the menstrual cycle (MC) into the follicular and luteal phases. In addition, oral contraceptives (OCs) have active (higher... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Hormonal changes around ovulation divide the menstrual cycle (MC) into the follicular and luteal phases. In addition, oral contraceptives (OCs) have active (higher hormone) and placebo phases. Although there are some MC-based effects on various physiological outcomes, we found these differences relatively subtle and difficult to attribute to specific hormones, as estrogen and progesterone fluctuate rather than operating in a complete on/off pattern as observed in cellular or preclinical models often used to substantiate human data. A broad review reveals that the differences between the follicular and luteal phases and between OC active and placebo phases are not associated with marked differences in exercise performance and appear unlikely to influence muscular hypertrophy in response to resistance exercise training. A systematic review and meta-analysis of substrate oxidation between MC phases revealed no difference between phases in the relative carbohydrate and fat oxidation at rest and during acute aerobic exercise. Vascular differences between MC phases are also relatively small or nonexistent. Although OCs can vary in composition and androgenicity, we acknowledge that much more work remains to be done in this area; however, based on what little evidence is currently available, we do not find compelling support for the notion that OC use significantly influences exercise performance, substrate oxidation, or hypertrophy. It is important to note that the study of females requires better methodological control in many areas. Previous studies lacking such rigor have contributed to premature or incorrect conclusions regarding the effects of the MC and systemic hormones on outcomes. While we acknowledge that the evidence in certain research areas is limited, the consensus view is that the impact of the MC and OC use on various aspects of physiology is small or nonexistent.
Topics: Female; Humans; Contraceptives, Oral; Menstrual Cycle; Hormones; Progesterone; Hypertrophy
PubMed: 37823207
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00346.2023 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrinopathy causing infertility in childbearing women. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol has recently... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
UNLABELLED
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrinopathy causing infertility in childbearing women. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol has recently been used for infertile women. However, whether PPOS provides a significant benefit over gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue protocols in PCOS is still controversial. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the efficacy of PPOS in patients with PCOS during fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We searched Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 1, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the efficacy between PPOS and conventional GnRH analogue protocols in patients with PCOS in English were included. The primary outcomes included live birth rate, the incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and the number of metaphase II oocytes. The pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects models as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Three RCTs and six cohort studies involving 2289 patients were included. Results from RCTs suggest that PPOS leads to no significant difference in the risk of OHSS, the number of metaphase II oocytes, or the rate of live birth when compared to GnRH analogue protocols. The pooling estimates of cohort studies showed consistent results. Additionally, in cohort studies, PPOS required a higher dose of Gn and tended to improve the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate. For subgroup analyses, the higher implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate were found in PPOS compared to the GnRH agonist short protocol. However, the certainty of the evidence for the outcomes was generally low. Overall, There is currently no evidence to support that PPOS could reduce the risk of OHSS, increase oocyte maturation, or improve pregnancy outcomes in women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI when compared to GnRH analogue protocols. Considering its efficiency and safety, this protocol could be a patient-friendly and viable alternative for PCOS patients, especially when frozen-thawed embryo transfer is planned. Future high-quality randomized trials with children's long-term safety and cost-effective analyses are still required.
SYSTEM REVIEW REGISTRATION
NPLASY (202340059). https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-4-0059/.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Progestins; Steroids
PubMed: 37795363
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1224858 -
Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive... 2023Fertility preservation is an important quality of life issue for women of reproductive age undergoing gonadotoxic treatment. The possibility of administering an adjuvant... (Review)
Review
Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with malignancies undergoing treatment with long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND
Fertility preservation is an important quality of life issue for women of reproductive age undergoing gonadotoxic treatment. The possibility of administering an adjuvant long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) with the aim of reducing the number of follicles susceptible to the effects of chemotherapy and thus reducing the risk of ovarian damage is considered in some international society guidelines, particularly in certain cancers such as breast cancer. Nowadays, the administration of long-acting GnRHa after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for fertility preservation by cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos is increasingly used. However, cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) have been reported following the use of long-acting GnRHa after COH for fertility preservation, indicating that the potential adverse effects of this treatment need to be further investigated.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to comprehensively characterize patients who developed OHSS after treatment with long-acting GnRHa following COH for fertility preservation.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of major electronic databases through January 2023 was performed. Studies reporting the use of long-acting GnRHa after COH for fertility preservation and the development of OHSS were included. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results were synthesized qualitatively.
RESULTS
Three studies with five patients met the eligibility criteria. The majority of patients were diagnosed with breast cancer and all patients underwent COH for oocyte cryopreservation. OHSS occurred in all patients after administration of long-acting GnRHa. The interval between ovulation induction and administration of long-acting GnRHa thereafter ranged from 3 to 5 days. All patients were treated conservatively and recovered without complications.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence suggests that the use of long-acting GnRHa after COH for fertility preservation may be associated with OHSS. Healthcare providers should thoroughly discuss the benefits and risks of this intervention with their patients before making a decision. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the causal relationship between long-acting GnRHa and OHSS in this population.
PubMed: 37674690
DOI: 10.1177/26334941231196545 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023To determine whether progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is more effective for women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) than clomiphene citrate (CC)/letrozole... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To determine whether progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is more effective for women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) than clomiphene citrate (CC)/letrozole (LE) plus gonadotropin in IVF or ICSI treatment.
METHODS
Nine databases were searched until May 24, 2023, to identify relevant studies. Forest plots were used to present the results of this meta-analysis. Begg's and Egger's tests were applied to estimate publication bias. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were performed to check the potential sources of heterogeneity and verify the robustness of the pooled results, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies with 4182 participants were included for meta-analysis. There was evidence of a statistically notable increase in clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.39, 95%CI [1.01, 1.91], = 0.05), optimal embryos rate (OR = 1.50, 95%CI [1.20, 1.88], = 0.0004), and cumulative pregnancy rate (OR = 1.73, 95%CI [1.14, 2.60], = 0.009), the duration and the amount of gonadotropin required (MD = 1.56, 95%CI [0.47, 2.66], = 0.005; SMD = 1.51, 95%CI [0.90, 2.12], < 0.00001), along with decrease cycle cancellation rate (OR = 0.78, 95%CI [0.64, 0.95], = 0.02), luteinizing hormone (LH) level on the day of hCG (SMD = -0.81, 95%CI [-1.10, -0.53], < 0.00001), and premature LH surge rate (OR = 0.10, 95%CI [0.07, 0.15], < 0.00001) when PPOS was used. No evidence for publication bias within results was revealed.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on evidence-based results, PPOS protocol seems to improve IVF/ICSI outcomes for women with DOR. More research with larger sample sizes and rigorous designs are required to further explore the value of PPOS among women diagnosed with DOR.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
www.crd.york.ac.uk, identifier CRD42023430202.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Ovarian Diseases; Ovarian Reserve; Ovulation Induction; Progestins; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Steroids; Clinical Protocols
PubMed: 37670890
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1232935 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Oct 2023To conduct a systematic review andmeta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated whether dual triggering [a combination of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review andmeta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated whether dual triggering [a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] of final oocyte maturation can improve the number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate in low or normal responders undergoing in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol.
STUDY DESIGN
Studies up to October 2022 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risks (RR), and continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature [metaphase II (MII)] oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate; other IVF outcomes were considered as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
Seven studies were identified, and 898 patients were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the number of oocytes retrieved [WMD = 1.38 (95% CI 0.47-2.28), I = 66%, p = 0.003, low evidence], number of MII oocytes [WMD = 0.7 (95% CI 0.35-1.05), I = 42%, p < 0.0001, moderate evidence], number of embryos [WMD = 0.68 (95% CI 0.07-1.3), I = 67%, p = 0.03, low evidence] and number of good-quality embryos [WMD = 1.14 (95% CI 0.35-1.93), I = 0%, p = 0.005, moderate evidence] in the dual trigger group were significantly higher than in the hCG trigger group. The results of the ovarian response subgroup analysis showed significant differences in all of these outcomes in normal responders, and no differences in any of the outcomes in low responders, except for the number of MII oocytes. In low responders, clinical pregnancy rates may be improved in the dual trigger group [RR = 2.2 (95% CI 1.05-4.61), I = 28%, p = 0.04, low evidence].
CONCLUSION
Dual triggering by GnRH agonist and hCG improved oocyte maturity and embryo grading for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Dual triggering for final oocyte maturation may improve clinical pregnancy rates in low responders.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ovulation; Fertilization in Vitro; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Hormone Antagonists; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
PubMed: 37639817
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.014 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023To evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pregnancy and ovulation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pregnancy and ovulation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
METHOD
We searched Pubmed, Medline (via Ovid, 1974 to 2020), EMBASE (via Ovid, 1974 to 2020), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Ovid), Web of Science, CNKI, WangFang and the Vip database from inception until April 2021. Two researchers independently screened articles, collected data and evaluated the quality, with Review manager 5.3 for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Totally 20 randomized controlled studies with 1961 subjects were included. Meta analysis showed that pregnancy rate [RR=1.44 (1.28, 1.62), p<0.00,001], ovulation rate [RR=1.42 (1.14, 1.78), p=0.002] and matured oocytes rate [RR=1.08 (1.03, 1.13), p=0.002] of vitamin D supplementation group were significantly higher than those of control group. Meanwhile, early miscarriage rate [RR=0.44 (0.30, 0.66), p<0.00,001], androgen level [MD=-2.31 (-3.51, -1.11), p=0.0002], luteinizing hormone [MD=-1.47 (-2.57, -0.36), p=0.009], follicle stimulating hormone [MD=-0.15 (-0.24, -0.05), p=0.002], and premature delivery rate [RR=0.38, 95% CI (0.21, 0.70), p=0.002] were declined significantly than the controls. However, only one article suggested that the progesterone [MD=6.52 (4.52, 8.52), p<0.05] in the vitamin D intervention group was increased. There was no notable difference in the biochemical pregnancy rate [RR=0.95 (0.55, 1.63), p=0.84], gestational hypertension rate [RR=0.40, 95% CI (0.15, 1.11), p=0.08], gestational diabetes mellitus rate [RR=0.27, 95% CI (0.05, 1.39), p=0.11], fertilization rate [RR=1.05 (1.00, 1.10), p=0.04], cleavage rate [RR=1.03 (0.99, 1.06), p=0.17], high-quality embryo rate [RR=1.08 (0.98, 1.20), p=0.10], endometrial thickness [MD=0.10], 77 (-0.23, 1.77), p=0.13], estrogen level [MD=-0.34 (-1.55, 0.87), p=0.59], LH/FSH [MD=-0.14, 95% CI (-0.48, 0.20), p=1.00] and anti-Mullerian hormone [MD=-0.22 (-0.65, 0.21), p=0.32].
CONCLUSION
Vitamin D supplementation contribute to the higher pregnancy and ovulation rates, and lower androgen, LH, FSH and early miscarriage rates in women with PCOS, regardless of the use of ovulation induction drugs or assisted reproductive technologies. However, no significant improvement was observed in fertilization rate or cleavage rate. Due to the limitation in quality of involved studies, more high-quality RCTs are needed for further validation.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021250284.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; Androgens; Dietary Supplements; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human; Ovulation; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Vitamin D
PubMed: 37593349
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148556 -
Biomedicines Jul 2023A better understanding of interindividual differences and the development of targeted therapies is one of the major challenges of modern medicine. The sex of a person... (Review)
Review
A better understanding of interindividual differences and the development of targeted therapies is one of the major challenges of modern medicine. The sex of a person plays a crucial role in this regard. This systematic review aimed to summarise and analyse available evidence on the mutual interactions between non-invasive brain stimulation and sex/polypeptide hormones. The PubMed database was searched from its inception to 31 March 2023, for (i) studies that investigated the impact of sex and/or polypeptide hormones on the effects induced by non-invasive brain stimulation, or (ii) studies that investigated non-invasive brain stimulation in the modulation of sex and/or polypeptide hormones. Eighteen studies (319 healthy and 96 disabled participants) were included. Most studies focused on female sex hormone levels during the menstrual cycle. The later follicular phase is associated with a weak between hemispheric and intracortical inhibition, strong intracortical facilitation, and high stimulation-induced neural and behavioural changes. The opposite effects are observed during the luteal phase. In addition, the participant's sex, presence and/or absence of real ovulation and increase in oestradiol level by chorionic gonadotropin injection influence the stimulation-induced neurophysiological and behavioural effects. In Parkinson's disease and consciousness disorders, the repetitive application of non-invasive brain stimulation increases oestradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone levels and reduces disability. To date, male hormones have not been sufficiently included in these studies. Here, we show that the sex and/or polypeptide hormones and non-invasive brain stimulation methods are in reciprocal interactions. This may be used to create a more effective and individualised approach for healthy individuals and individuals with disabilities.
PubMed: 37509620
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071981 -
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology... Jul 2023Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has brought good news to infertile patients, but how to improve the pregnancy outcome of poor ovarian response (POR) patients is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has brought good news to infertile patients, but how to improve the pregnancy outcome of poor ovarian response (POR) patients is still a serious challenge and the scientific evidence of some adjuvant therapies remains controversial.
AIM
Based on previous evidence, the purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of DHEA, CoQ10, GH and TEAS on pregnancy outcomes in POR patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transplantation (IVF-ET). In addition, we aimed to determine the current optimal adjuvant treatment strategies for POR.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and four databases in China (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed) were systematically searched up to July 30, 2022, with no restrictions on language. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant treatment strategies (DHEA, CoQ10, GH and TEAS) before IVF-ET to improve pregnancy outcomes in POR patients, while the control group received a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) regimen only. This study was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to provide a pooled measure of cumulative ranking for each outcome.
RESULTS
Sixteen RCTs (2323 women) with POR defined using the Bologna criteria were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, CoQ10 (OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.05 to 4.71) and DHEA (OR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.16 to 3.16) had obvious advantages in improving the clinical pregnancy rate. CoQ10 was the best in improving the live birth rate (OR 2.36, 95% CI: 1.07 to 5.38). DHEA increased the embryo implantation rate (OR 2.80, 95%CI: 1.41 to 5.57) and the high-quality embryo rate (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.07 to 3.78) and number of oocytes retrieved (WMD 1.63, 95% CI: 0.34 to 2.92) showed a greater advantage, with GH in second place. Several adjuvant treatment strategies had no significant effect on reducing the cycle canceling rate compared with the control group. TEAS was the least effective of the four adjuvant treatments in most pooled results, but the overall effect appeared to be better than that of the control group.
CONCLUSION
Compared with COS regimen, the adjuvant use of CoQ10, DHEA and GH before IVF may have a better clinical effect on the pregnancy outcome of POR patients. TEAS needs careful consideration in improving the clinical pregnancy rate. Future large-scale RCTs with direct comparisons are needed to validate or update this conclusion.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42022304723.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Ovulation Induction; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Fertilization in Vitro; Pregnancy Rate; Dehydroepiandrosterone
PubMed: 37464357
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01119-0 -
Medicine Jul 2023To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture for the treatment of ovulation dysfunction infertility (ODI). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture in the treatment of ovulation dysfunction infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture for the treatment of ovulation dysfunction infertility (ODI).
METHODS
From January 1, 2018 to March 12, 2023, 7 electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database, and CBM, were systematically searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trial studies.
RESULTS
Meta analysis showed that traditional Chinese medicine combined with acupuncture can more effectively improve sex hormone levels compared to Western medicine alone, including follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in older patients (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-3.66; P = .024, I 2 = 28%), FSH in younger patients (SMD: 0.45; 95% CI: -0.15, 1.05; P = .03, I 2 = 71%), estradiol (E2) (SMD: 7.50; 95% CI: v0.47, 15.48; P < .00001, I 2 = 99%), and progesterone (P) (SMD: 2.20; 95% CI: 2.07-2.33; P < .00001, I 2 = 29%). Compared to Western medicine alone, traditional Chinese medicine combined with acupuncture also had a better effect to increase ovulation rate (risk ratio [RR]: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.72-3.52; P < .00001, I 2 = 0%), pregnancy rate (RR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.96-3.18; P < .00001, I 2 = 0%), maximum follicle diameter (MFD) (SMD: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.37-3.16; P < .00001, I 2 = 91%), and endometrial thickness (SMD: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.31-2.11; P < .00001, I 2 = 87%). The combination of traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture also had better effects on quality of life (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.15-0.23; P < .00001, I 2 = 0%) and reduced adverse reactions (RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.05-0.48; P = .001, I 2 = 0%), compared to Western medicine alone.
CONCLUSION
This study shows evidence that traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture are an effective and safe treatment approach. However, this conclusion requires further confirmation due to the insufficient quality of the included trials.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Aged; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Quality of Life; Acupuncture Therapy; Infertility; Ovulation; Follicle Stimulating Hormone
PubMed: 37417606
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034310 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Fertility preservation is an important healthcare focus in the paediatric and adolescent population when gonadotoxic treatments are required. Ovarian stimulation (OS)...
BACKGROUND
Fertility preservation is an important healthcare focus in the paediatric and adolescent population when gonadotoxic treatments are required. Ovarian stimulation (OS) resulting in oocyte cryopreservation is a well-established fertility preservation option in the adult population. It's utility, however, is little known in young patients. The purpose of this review was to synthesise the available literature on OS in patients ≤18 years old, to identify gaps in current research and provide suggestions for future research directions.
METHODS
Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed for all relevant full-text articles published in English in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases. The search strategy used a combination of subject headings and generic terms related to the study topic and population. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Characteristics of the studies, objectives and key findings were extracted and summarised in a narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
Database search and manual review identified 922 studies, 899 were eliminated based on defined exclusion criteria. Twenty-three studies were included and comprised 468 participants aged ≤18 years who underwent OS (median 15.2, range 7-18 years old). Only three patients were premenarchal, and four patients were on treatment to suppress puberty. Patients had OS for a broad range of indications including oncology treatment, transgender care and Turner syndrome. A total of 488 cycles of OS were completed, with all but 18 of these cycles (96.3%) successfully resulting in cryopreserved mature oocytes (median 10 oocytes, range 0-35). Fifty-three cycles (9.8%) were cancelled. Complications were rare (<1%). One pregnancy was reported from a female who had OS aged 17 years old.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrates that OS and oocyte cryopreservation is achievable in young females however there are only a few cases in the literature describing OS in premenarcheal children or those who have suppressed puberty. There is little proof that OS can lead to pregnancy in adolescents, and no proof that this can be achieved in premenarchal girls. Therefore it should be regarded as an innovative procedure for adolescents and experimental for premenarcheal girls.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=265705, identifier CRD42021265705.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Male; Humans; Transgender Persons; Sexual Maturation; Cryopreservation; Oocytes; Ovulation Induction
PubMed: 37404308
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1146476