-
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII Oct 2021Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be complicated by cardiovascular toxicity, including pericardial disease. To date, no prospective studies...
Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be complicated by cardiovascular toxicity, including pericardial disease. To date, no prospective studies specifically investigated the optimal treatment of ICI-associated pericardial disease, and the available evidence is based on case reports and series only. We performed a systematic review of case reports and series including 20 publications for a total of 28 cases of ICI-associated pericardial disease. In this review, pericardial disease was reversible in the majority of cases (75%), although 2 deaths were reported. The majority of cases were life-threatening (G4, 53.6%) or severe (G3, 21.4%), requiring pericardiocentesis. Higher rates of improvement were associated with administration of corticosteroids (86.7% vs 61.5%), presence of other immune-related adverse events (90.9% vs. 64.7%), and non-malignant effusions (86.7% vs 42.8%). ICIs were discontinued in the majority of cases and then restarted in 7 patients with no recurrence of pericardial disease. Based on these results, ICI-associated G3-G4 pericardial disease as well as G2 pericardial disease with moderate-severe effusion should be treated with ICIs discontinuation and high-dose steroids, also performing pericardiocentesis, pericardial drainage or pericardial window in case of cardiac tamponade. For G2 with small effusion or G1 pericardial disease, ICIs might be continued and colchicine or NSAIDs could be considered. For patients requiring ICIs discontinuation, a rechallenge with ICIs seems to be feasible after resolution or meaningful improvement of pericardial disease.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Pericardial Effusion
PubMed: 33877385
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02938-z -
Current Cardiology Reviews 2021Pericardial Decompression Syndrome (PDS) is defined as paradoxical hemodynamic deterioration and/or pulmonary edema, commonly associated with ventricular dysfunction....
BACKGROUND
Pericardial Decompression Syndrome (PDS) is defined as paradoxical hemodynamic deterioration and/or pulmonary edema, commonly associated with ventricular dysfunction. This phenomenon was first described by Vandyke in 1983. PDS is a rare but formidable complication of pericardiocentesis, which, if not managed appropriately, is fatal. PDS, as an entity, has discrete literature; this review is to understand its epidemiology, presentation, and management.
METHODOLOGY
Medline, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases were utilized to do a systemic literature search. PRISMA protocol was employed. Abstracts, case reports, case series and clinical studies were identified from 1983 to 2019. A total of 6508 articles were reviewed, out of which, 210 were short-listed, and after removal of duplicates, 49 manuscripts were included in this review. For statistical analysis, patient data was tabulated in SPSS version 20. Cases were divided into two categories surgical and percutaneous groups. t-test was conducted for continuous variable and chi-square test was conducted for categorical data used for analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 42 full-length case reports, 2 poster abstracts, 3 case series of 2 patients, 1 case series of 4 patients and 1 case series of 5 patients were included in the study. A total of 59 cases were included in this manuscript. Our data had 45.8% (n=27) males and 54.2% (n=32) females. The mean age of patients was 48.04 ± 17 years. Pericardiocentesis was performed in 52.5% (n=31) cases, and pericardiostomy was performed in 45.8% (n=27). The most common identifiable cause of pericardial effusion was found to be malignancy in 35.6% (n=21). Twenty-three 23 cases reported pre-procedural ejection fraction, which ranged from 20%-75% with a mean of 55.8 ± 14.6%, while 26 cases reported post-procedural ejection fraction which ranged from 10%-65% with a mean of 30% ± 15.1%. Data was further divided into two categories, namely, pericardiocentesis and pericardiostomy. The outcome as death was significant in the pericardiostomy arm with a p-value of < 0.00. The use of inotropic agents for the treatment of PDS was more common in needle pericardiocentesis with a p-value of 0.04. Lastly, the computed recovery time did not yield any significance with a p-value of 0.275.
CONCLUSION
Pericardial decompression syndrome is a rare condition with high mortality. Operators performing pericardial drainage should be aware of this complication following drainage of cardiac tamponade, since early recognition and expeditious supportive care are the only therapeutic modalities available for adequate management of this complication.
Topics: Decompression; Female; Humans; Male; Pericardiocentesis; Syndrome
PubMed: 32515313
DOI: 10.2174/1573403X16666200607184501 -
Cardiovascular Revascularization... Nov 2019Hemorrhagic cardiac tamponade (HCT) is characterized by rapid accumulation of blood in the pericardium causing hemodynamic collapse. We report a case of HCT due to...
BACKGROUND
Hemorrhagic cardiac tamponade (HCT) is characterized by rapid accumulation of blood in the pericardium causing hemodynamic collapse. We report a case of HCT due to Apixaban use in a patient with renal cell carcinoma, supplemented with a systematic review of pericardial tamponade associated with the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
CASE REPORT
A 62-year-old African American male with a history of metastatic renal cell carcinoma presented with dyspnea while taking Apixaban. He was diagnosed with pericardial tamponade and 800 ml of hemorrhagic effusion was drained. The pericardial fluid analysis was negative for malignancy and suggestive of HCT. He had a complicated hospital course and died several days later.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources for published cases of pericardial tamponade associated with DOACs. Our outcomes of interest included patient characteristics, risk factors, timing from the start of anticoagulation to tamponade, treatment and mortality. Simple descriptive statistics using percentages for categorical variables were used to describe the included cases.
RESULTS
A total of 26 cases were included in the final systematic review after searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources. The mean age was 70 years (range 43-88) with 19 (73%) males. Twelve cases (46%) were associated with Rivaroxaban, 9 (37%) with Dabigatran and 5(19%) with Apixaban. Sixteen cases had elevated INR and 15 had elevated creatinine. Only 2 patients died but 24 had to undergo pericardiocentesis.
CONCLUSION
Cardiac tamponade is rarely associated with DOACs and elderly male patients with renal and coagulation abnormalities appear to have the highest risk.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Tamponade; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pericardial Effusion; Pericardiocentesis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31088720
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.04.002