-
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Dec 2022This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on Parkinson's disease (PD) in diabetes patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on Parkinson's disease (PD) in diabetes patients.
METHODS
A study search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to July 22, 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of the eligible studies. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effect size indicators in this meta-analysis to evaluate the risk association between pioglitazone and PD. The Cochran's Q and I tests were used to assess statistical heterogeneity. A dose-response meta-analysis was conducted using the least squares trend estimation method.
RESULTS
Three studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared with diabetes patients who did not use pioglitazone, there was a significant reduction in the risk of PD (RR of 0.87 [95 % CI 0.62-0.99, P = 0.039]) in pioglitazone users. No significant difference in PD risk was noted in diabetes patients taking 438 dose-duration-days (DDDs) of pioglitazone or lower compared with those who did not. When the DDD of pioglitazone was 438, the RR was 0.85 (95 % CI [0.72-1.00], P = 0.05). When the DDD of pioglitazone was > 438, the risk of PD in patients with diabetes was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) and showed an approximate linear correlation trend.
CONCLUSION
Pioglitazone administration in PD in diabetes patients is significantly associated with a decrease in the risk of PD.
Topics: Humans; Pioglitazone; Parkinson Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Risk; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 36335768
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.10.023 -
Journal of Clinical and Experimental... 2022Due to lack of targeted treatment options and inconsistent utilization of histologic endpoints among clinical trials, identifying efficacious pharmacotherapies for...
BACKGROUND
Due to lack of targeted treatment options and inconsistent utilization of histologic endpoints among clinical trials, identifying efficacious pharmacotherapies for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH] has proven challenging.
METHODS
A thorough systematic review and frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed across all randomized clinical trials reporting a pharmacotherapeutic intervention on biopsy-proven NASH. Primary outcomes were based on the most current, up-to-date recommended histologic endpoints.
RESULTS
A total of 40 RCTs were identified including 6593 total patients. The most effective and statistically significant treatment interventions for minimum two-point improvement in NAFLD Activity Score were aldafermin 1 mg [RR 7.69, 95% CI 2.00; 29.57], vitamin E 800 IU in combination with pioglitazone 45 mg [RR 3.38, 95% CI 1.88; 6.07], pioglitazone 45 mg [RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.74; 6.22], vitamin E 800 IU [RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.33; 3.18], resmetirom 80 mg [RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.03; 2.94], obeticholic acid 25 mg [RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.32; 2.01], and obeticholic acid 10 mg [RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02; 1.67]). The most robust pharmacotherapies for NASH resolution without worsening fibrosis were found to be aldafermin 1 mg [RR 5.77, 95% CI 1.48; 22.51], pioglitazone 45 mg [RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.43; 4.91], vitamin E 800 IU in combination with pioglitazone 45 mg [RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36; 5.12], pioglitazone 30 mg [RR 2.46, 95% CI 1.56; 3.88], vitamin E 800 IU [RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.20; 3.00], and obeticholic acid 25 mg [RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03; 2.23]). Obeticholic acid had a significant improvement on fibrosis. Multiple interventions were found to improve individual histologic scores across secondary outcome analyses and are detailed below.
CONCLUSION
This novel systematic review and network meta-analysis represents the most comprehensive investigation to date regarding the pharmacotherapeutic options for biopsy-proven NASH using current recommended histologic endpoints.
PubMed: 35814516
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.01.011 -
Cureus May 2022Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a broad term encompassing hepatic steatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a form of chronic hepatitis. This may,... (Review)
Review
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a broad term encompassing hepatic steatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a form of chronic hepatitis. This may, unfortunately, lead to terminal complications like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NAFLD is strongly associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. The growing prevalence of NAFLD, its associated conditions, and its complications are alarming. The insulin sensitizer group "thiazolidinediones" has shown some therapeutic benefits in this condition. This systematic review is intended to focus on the clinical efficacy of this group in patients with NAFLD, employing PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library as databases. We discovered 10 randomized control trials (RCTs; nine involving pioglitazone and one involving rosiglitazone) involving 887 participants. All studies varied in duration from 6 to 24 months. Most of the involved trials had a small number of participants, and the intrinsic quality of the studies was mixed. Pioglitazone consistently improved histological parameters and normalized liver transaminases, although evidence supporting the benefits of other drugs in this class was minimal. Thiazolidinediones, particularly pioglitazone, have proven efficacious in patients with NAFLD/NASH. However, more extensive trials need to be carried out to investigate this drug class's benefits further. Unfortunately, this drug has attendant side effects like weight gain and fractures, limiting its widespread use; hence, careful selection for likely candidates is imperative.
PubMed: 35765391
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25380 -
Acta Gastro-enterologica Belgica 2022Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the evidence of steatosis in the setting of a metabolic risk condition such as type 2 diabetes mellitus... (Review)
Review
Non-invasive screening, staging and management of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: what do we know so far ?
Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the evidence of steatosis in the setting of a metabolic risk condition such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Indeed, T2DM and liver steatosis share common pathophysiological mechanisms, and one can lead to the other. MAFLD can progress from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis and cirrhosis as well as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the lack / disparity of guidelines for MAFLD screening, which is asymptomatic in its early stages, it is not rare that diabetic patients are belatedly diagnosed with NASH cirrhosis or HCC. We therefore recommend systematic non-invasive tests (NITs) that calculate an estimate of the risk based on readily available anthropometric and biological parameters. These include the fatty liver index (FLI) for steatosis detection and at least one of the following for fibrosis: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) or Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS). Indeed, NFS and FIB-4 are the best predictors of liver-related events, while FIB-4 and HFS correlate with overall mortality. Systematic literature review found only few retrospective or cross-sectional studies using NITs for systematic steatosis and fibrosis screening in T2DM patients, with a crucial need for prospective studies. This screening strategy will allow targeted patients to be referred for further liver investigation (e.g. ultrasound, elastometry) and care. Current treatment modalities of MAFLD in T2DM patients range from lifestyle and dietary interventions to specific glucose-lowering drugs that recently showed some benefits regarding MAFLD, such as pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Other treatments are currently under investigation.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 35709779
DOI: 10.51821/85.2.9775 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022To assess the impact of the HbA1c levels achieved with antidiabetic therapies (ADTs) on the risk of MACE.
AIM
To assess the impact of the HbA1c levels achieved with antidiabetic therapies (ADTs) on the risk of MACE.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials. gov for RCTs published up to March 2022 reporting the occurrence of MACE and all-cause mortality in individuals with T2DM treated with all marketed ADTs, including a sample size ≥100 individuals in each study arm and follow-up ≥24 weeks. A systematic review and additive-effects network meta-analysis with random effects and a multivariate meta-regression were utilized to assess the impact of achieved HbA1c on incident MACE.
RESULTS
We included 126 RCTs with 143 treatment arms, 270,874 individuals, and 740,295 individuals-years who were randomized to an active treatment vs. control group. Among all ADTs, only therapy with SGLT2i, GLP1-RA, or pioglitazone similarly reduced the risk of MACE compared to placebo. The achievement of HbA1c ≤ 7.0% in RCTs with the 3 drug classes in the active arm was associated with an adjusted HR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.80, 0.97; = 0.017) compared with HbA1c>7.0%, without affecting all-cause mortality. These results, however, were not maintained among all ADTs.
CONCLUSIONS
Achieving lower glucose levels with SGLT2i, GLP1-RA, or pioglitazone is linearly associated with a reduced risk of MACEs, without affecting all-cause mortality.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020213127, identifier: CRD42020213127.
PubMed: 35571207
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.876795 -
Andrology Feb 2023Erectile dysfunction is recognized as one of the complications of diabetes mellitus. To date, a wide gap of knowledge is present on the efficacy of pharmacological... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Erectile dysfunction is recognized as one of the complications of diabetes mellitus. To date, a wide gap of knowledge is present on the efficacy of pharmacological treatments of diabetes mellitus on erectile function, acting not only through metabolic control. Similarly, the effects of different diet regimens on erectile dysfunction are still debated.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to explore the effects of diet and antihyperglycemic drugs, considering both old and novel therapeutic approaches, on erectile function.
MATERIALS/METHODS
We performed a systematic review, following the PRISMA guidelines. The research was conducted on studies reporting erectile dysfunction assessment in subjects with diabetes and the relationship with diet and antihyperglycemic drugs.
RESULTS
The Mediterranean diet was effective in most studies for the protection of erectile function. Furthermore, antihyperglycemic drugs seem to show an overall protective role on erectile function.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION
Although encouraging results are present for all classes of antihyperglycemic drugs, several studies are needed in humans, mainly on acarbose, pioglitazone, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.
Topics: Male; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Erectile Dysfunction; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Diet, Mediterranean
PubMed: 35485604
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13192 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022To evaluate the effects of vitamin E, pioglitazone, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients...
Efficacy of Off-Label Therapy for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Improving Non-invasive and Invasive Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effects of vitamin E, pioglitazone, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
DESIGN
A network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception until September 1, 2021.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of four different drugs in patients with NAFLD were included. All superiority, non-inferiority, phase II and III, non-blinded, single-blinded, and double-blinded trials were included. Interventions of interest included vitamin E (α-tocopherol and δ-tocotrienol), pioglitazone, three kinds of GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide), four SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, and tofogliflozin), and comparisons of these different drugs, and placebos.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The outcome measures included changes in non-invasive tests [alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, liver fat content (LFC), and keratin-18 (K-18)] and invasive tests [fibrosis score and resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)].
RESULTS
Twenty-seven trials including 3,416 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Results refer to vitamin E, pioglitazone, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors. First, placebos were used as a reference. δ-Tocotrienol was superior to placebo in decreasing the GGT level. Semaglutide, ipragliflozin, and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the ALT level than a placebo. Semaglutide, pioglitazone, and dapagliflozin were superior to placebo in decreasing the AST level. Tofogliflozin and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the K-18 level than a placebo. Liraglutide was superior to placebo in decreasing CAP. Liraglutide, pioglitazone, and vitamin E induced a significantly higher increase in resolution of NASH than a placebo. As for pairwise comparisons, semaglutide and pioglitazone were superior to liraglutide in decreasing the ALT level. Semaglutide induced a significantly higher decrease in the ALT level than dulaglutide. Semaglutide was obviously superior to empagliflozin, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and tofogliflozin in decreasing the AST level. Pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the GGT level than ipragliflozin. δ-Tocotrienol was superior to liraglutide in decreasing the GGT level. Tofogliflozin and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the K-18 level than dulaglutide. Pioglitazone was superior to vitamin E in increasing the resolution of NASH. Furthermore, liraglutide treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing CAP and ELF scores and increasing the resolution of NASH. Pioglitazone treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing LFC and fibrosis scores. Tofogliflozin treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing K-18, while dapagliflozin treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing the GGT level. Semaglutide treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing the levels of ALT and AST.
CONCLUSION
The network meta-analysis provided evidence for the efficacy of vitamin E, pioglitazone, SGLT2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists in treating patients with NAFLD. To find the best guide-level drugs, it is necessary to include more RCTs with these off-label drugs, so that patients and clinicians can make optimal decisions together.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42021283129.
PubMed: 35280867
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.793203 -
Nutrition, Metabolism, and... Mar 2022In 2019, the Italian Society of Diabetology and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists nominated an expert panel to develop guidelines for drug treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
In 2019, the Italian Society of Diabetology and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists nominated an expert panel to develop guidelines for drug treatment of type 2 diabetes. After identifying the effects of glucose-lowering agents on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) as critical outcomes, the experts decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of pioglitazone with this respect.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A MEDLINE database search was performed to identify RCTs, up to June 1st, 2021, with duration≥52 weeks, in which pioglitazone was compared with either placebo or active comparators. The principal endpoints were MACE and HHF (restricted for RCT reporting MACEs within their outcomes), all-cause mortality (irrespective of the inclusion of MACEs among the pre-specified outcomes). Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (MH-OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) was calculated for all the endpoints considered. Eight RCTs were included in the analysis for MACEs and HF (5048 and 5117 patients in the pioglitazone and control group, respectively), and 24 in that for all-cause mortality (10,682 and 9674 patients). Pioglitazone neither significantly increased nor reduced the risk of MACE, all-cause mortality, and HHF in comparison with placebo/active comparators (MH-OR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.78-1.03, 0.91, 95% CI 0.77, 1.09, and 1.16, 95% CI 0.73, 1.83, respectively). Pioglitazone was associated with a significant reduction of MACE in patients with prior cardiovascular events (MH-OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis showed no significant effects of pioglitazone on incident MACE, all-cause mortality, and HHF.
Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Pioglitazone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35144855
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.12.006 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2021Available data on the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on fracture risk are contradictory. Therefore, our study aimed to analyze all available data on the effects of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Available data on the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on fracture risk are contradictory. Therefore, our study aimed to analyze all available data on the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on fracture risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.
METHODS
Embase, Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for relevant trials. All data analyses were performed with STATA (12.0) and R language (3.6.0). Risk ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by combining data for the fracture effects of anti-diabetic drugs, including sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, meglitinides, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, biguanides, insulin, and sulfonylureas.
RESULTS
One hundred seventeen eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 221,364 participants were included in this study. Compared with placebo, trelagliptin (RR 3.51; 1.58-13.70) increased the risk of fracture, whereas albiglutide (RR 0.29; 0.04-0.93) and voglibose (RR 0.03; 0-0.11) decreased the risk of fracture. Other medications were comparable in terms of their effects on fracture risk, and no statistical significance was observed. In terms of fractures, voglibose (0.01%) may be the safest option, and trelagliptin (13.64%) may be the worst. Sensitivity analysis results were consistent with those of the main analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in the regression coefficients of age (1.03; 0.32-2.1), follow-up duration (0.79; 0.27-1.64), and sex distribution (0.63; 0.15-1.56).
CONCLUSIONS
We found varied results on the association between the use of anti-diabetic drugs and fracture risk. Specifically, trelagliptin raised the risk of fracture, whereas voglibose and albiglutide showed benefit with statistical difference. Other drugs were comparable in terms of their effects on fracture risk. Some drugs (omarigliptin, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and nateglinide) may increase the risk of fracture, while others (such as dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, lixisenatide, linagliptin, alogliptin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, glipizide, gliclazide, glibenclamide, glimepiride, metformin, and insulin) may show benefits. The risk of fracture was independent of age, sex distribution, and the duration of exposure to anti-diabetic drugs. When developing individualized treatment strategies, the clinical efficacy of anti-diabetic drugs must be weighed against their benefits and risks brought about by individual differences of patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
This Systematic Review was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, registration number CRD42020189464).
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Network Meta-Analysis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34721294
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.735824 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Oct 2021Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common cause of chronic liver disease. There is a major need to understand the efficacy of different pharmacological agents for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common cause of chronic liver disease. There is a major need to understand the efficacy of different pharmacological agents for the treatment of NASH.
AIM
To assess the relative rank-order of different pharmacological interventions in fibrosis improvement and NASH resolution.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of several databases was conducted by an experienced librarian. We included randomised controlled-trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions in patients with biopsy-proven NASH. The primary outcome was ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis. The secondary outcome was NASH resolution.
RESULTS
A total of 26 RCTs with 23 interventions met the eligibility criteria. Lanifibranor and obeticholic acid had the highest probability of being ranked the most effective intervention for achieving ≥1 stage of fibrosis improvement (SUCRA 0.78) and (SUCRA 0.77), respectively. For NASH resolution, semaglutide, liraglutide and vitamin E plus pioglitazone had the highest probability of being ranked the most effective intervention for achieving NASH resolution (SUCRA 0.89), (SUCRA 0.84) and (SUCRA 0.83), respectively. Lanifibranor, obeticholic acid, pioglitazone and vitamin E were significantly better than placebo in achieving ≥1 stage of fibrosis improvement. Conversely, semaglutide, liraglutide, vitamine E plus pioglitazone, pioglitazone, lanifibranor and obeticholic acid were significantly better than placebo in achieving NASH resolution.
CONCLUSION
These data provide relative rank-order efficacy of various NASH therapies in terms of their improvements in liver fibrosis and NASH resolution. Therapies that have been shown to improve NASH resolution may be combined with therapies that have an antifibrotic effect to further boost treatment response rate in future.
Topics: Biopsy; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Network Meta-Analysis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Pioglitazone; Vitamin E
PubMed: 34435378
DOI: 10.1111/apt.16583