-
Cancer Imaging : the Official... Jan 2022To demonstrate and analyze the relatively common imaging findings in this rare primary pleural angiosarcoma (PPA).
BACKGROUND
To demonstrate and analyze the relatively common imaging findings in this rare primary pleural angiosarcoma (PPA).
CASE PRESENTATION
Three cases of PPA, proven by video-assisted thoracic surgery biopsies are retrospectively reviewed. Patients were all male. Age ranges from 65 to 75 years old age (mean; 69). Major chief complaints were dyspnea and chest pain. One has a history of colon cancer, the other has a tuberculosis history and the other has no known history. Multidetector chest CT and PET CT were all done. Immunohistochemical studies were performed including CD31, CD34, or factor VIII-related antigen, vimentin, and cytokeratin. We also review the literatures on recently published PPA. All masses were from 1 to 10 cm. All three patients had multiple pleural based masses, which were ovoid in shape with relatively sharp margin in unilateral hemithorax. Multiple small circumscribed pleural masses are limited in the pleural space in two patients, whereas two, huge lobulated masses about up to 10 cm were present with pleural and extrapleural involvement in one patient. In two patients with pleural mass only, multiple pleural masses were only seen in parietal pleura in one patient and were in both visceral and parietal pleura in one patient. Pleural effusion were found in one side in one patient and in both sides in one patient. One angiosarcoma was arised from chronic tuberculotic pleurisy sequelae. All pleural masses are heterogenous with irregular internal low densities in all patients. Hematogenous metastases were found in liver, vertebra, rib in one patient, and were in lungs with mediastinal lymph node metastases in the other patient. Three patients survived for longer than 3months after diagnosis, but continued to deteriorate rapidly. Two patients underwent chemotherapy after surgical excision, and the other one with multiple metastases treated chemotherapy after CT-guided biopsy, but eventually all died. As a result of comparative analysis of a total of 13 patients' images including 10 cases previously published, there was pleural effusion in all except 2 cases.
CONCLUSIONS
PPA were all necrotic without any vascularized enhancing nature, and manifested as unilateral circumscribed or localized pleural-based masses.
Topics: Aged; Hemangiosarcoma; Humans; Male; Pleura; Pleural Effusion; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 35022068
DOI: 10.1186/s40644-021-00435-1 -
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Jan 2022Tuberculosis poses a severe threat to human health. At present, compared with the traditional diagnostic methods for tuberculosis pleural effusion, such as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis poses a severe threat to human health. At present, compared with the traditional diagnostic methods for tuberculosis pleural effusion, such as Löwenstein-Jensen culture, pleural biopsy, and Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF was regarded as an emerging technology for its efficiency. The Xpert MTB/RIF accuracy for tuberculous pleural effusion diagnosis was evaluated in this systematic study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched the relevant literature published before January 2021 in PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Utilizing Review Manager 5.3 software, the quality of the included literature was evaluated based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, and the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and analyzed with Metadisc 1.40 software. We used Stata 12.0 software to evaluate the publication bias of this study.
RESULTS
Eighteen articles were identified in total. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF in the pleural effusion was 0.24, and specificity was 1.00, respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9737, which indicated that the overall accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF was high. In addition, based on the Deeks funnel plot, no publication bias of the study was found.
CONCLUSION
Xpert MTB/RIF is a rapid method with high specificity but relatively low sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pleural effusion. Its less sensitivity made it difficult to be used clinically, but the high specificity suggests that it can be used as a specific diagnostic method for tuberculous pleural effusion.
Topics: Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques; Pleural Effusion; ROC Curve; Reference Standards; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 34919739
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24185 -
Medicine Aug 2021The detection of interleukin 33 (IL-33) in pleural effusion may be more sensitive in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). The present study aimed to assess the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The detection of interleukin 33 (IL-33) in pleural effusion may be more sensitive in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of pleural IL-33 for the diagnosis of TPE by means of meta-analysis and systematic review of relevant studies.
METHOD
After retrieving the published studies, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve were assessed to estimate the usefulness of pleural IL-33 in diagnosing TPE using meta-analysis with a random-effects model. We also performed meta-regression and subgroup analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 639 patients from 6 studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.91), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80), 6.54 (95% CI, 2.65-16.15), 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-1.27), and 45.40 (95% CI, 12.83-160.70) respectively. The area under the curve was 0.94. The composition of the included population was the main cause of heterogeneity and subgroup analysis showed that pleural IL-33 had a higher specificity (0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.96) when used for differential diagnosis between TPE and malignant pleural effusion.
CONCLUSION
The detection of IL-33 alone in pleural effusion seems to not be an efficient diagnostic marker for TPE but may serve as a novel biomarker to differentiate between TPE and malignant pleural effusion.
Topics: Biomarkers; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Humans; Interleukin-33; Pleural Effusion; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 34397818
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026755 -
Tropical Medicine & International... Nov 2021Tuberculous pleurisy (TP) is a common disease of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, but its diagnosis is challenging. Recently, studies have found that the pleural fluid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Tuberculous pleurisy (TP) is a common disease of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, but its diagnosis is challenging. Recently, studies have found that the pleural fluid interferon gamma release assay (PF-IGRA) has important diagnostic value in TP, but the sample size of these studies was small, and the conclusions were inconsistent. Therefore, this study evaluated the diagnostic value of PF-IGRA in TP through a meta-analysis.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search in multiple databases to identify studies and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS
All 26 publications, including 30 case-control studies, were eventually included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC with their 95% confidence intervals were 0.90 (0.88-0.91), 0.87 (0.85-0.89), 7.64 (4.46-13.07), 0.13 (0.09-0.19), 65.45 (32.13-133.33) and 0.9508, respectively. The subgroup analysis suggested that the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of PF-IGRA for TP in areas with a high tuberculosis burden were significantly higher than those in areas with a low tuberculosis burden. The sensitivity and AUC of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method were higher than those of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method for IGRA, but the specificity was similar. More importantly, PF-IGRA combined with adenosine deaminase (ADA) could increase the diagnostic value of TP.
CONCLUSIONS
The current meta-analysis indicated that PF-IGRA has high diagnostic value in diagnosing TP, especially in areas with a high TB burden. We recommended that the combination of PF-IGRA and ADA is the best way to diagnose TP.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Humans; Interferon-gamma; Interferon-gamma Release Tests; Pleural Effusion; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 34297877
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13659 -
PloS One 2021We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) through... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) through systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.
METHODS
We queried PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies providing paired data for sensitivity and specificity of both pleural fluid ADA and IFN-γ for diagnosing TPE. We used hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) plots and HSROC meta-regression to model individual and comparative diagnostic performance of the two tests.
RESULTS
We retrieved 376 citations and included 45 datasets from 44 publications (4974 patients) in our review. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for ADA were 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.92), while for IFN-γ they were 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97), respectively. HSROC plots showed consistently greater diagnostic accuracy for IFN-γ over ADA across the entire range of observations. HSROC meta-regression using test-type as covariate yielded a relative diagnostic odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI 1.68-2.94) in favour of IFN-γ, along with better summary sensitivity and specificity figures. No prespecified subgroup variable significantly influenced the summary diagnostic accuracy estimates.
CONCLUSION
Pleural fluid IFN-γ estimation has better diagnostic accuracy than ADA estimation for diagnosis of TPE.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Biomarkers; Humans; Interferon-gamma; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 34166463
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253525 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2021Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) and Xpert MTB/RIF are World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended rapid nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) widely used for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) and Xpert MTB/RIF are World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended rapid nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) widely used for simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance in sputum. To extend our previous review on extrapulmonary tuberculosis (Kohli 2018), we performed this update to inform updated WHO policy (WHO Consolidated Guidelines (Module 3) 2020).
OBJECTIVES
To estimate diagnostic accuracy of Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive extrapulmonary tuberculosis.
SEARCH METHODS
Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, Web of Science, Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry, and ProQuest, 2 August 2019 and 28 January 2020 (Xpert Ultra studies), without language restriction.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Cross-sectional and cohort studies using non-respiratory specimens. Forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: tuberculous meningitis and pleural, lymph node, bone or joint, genitourinary, peritoneal, pericardial, disseminated tuberculosis. Reference standards were culture and a study-defined composite reference standard (tuberculosis detection); phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and line probe assays (rifampicin resistance detection).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and applicability using QUADAS-2. For tuberculosis detection, we performed separate analyses by specimen type and reference standard using the bivariate model to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). We applied a latent class meta-analysis model to three forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
69 studies: 67 evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF and 11 evaluated Xpert Ultra, of which nine evaluated both tests. Most studies were conducted in China, India, South Africa, and Uganda. Overall, risk of bias was low for patient selection, index test, and flow and timing domains, and low (49%) or unclear (43%) for the reference standard domain. Applicability for the patient selection domain was unclear for most studies because we were unsure of the clinical settings. Cerebrospinal fluid Xpert Ultra (6 studies) Xpert Ultra pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% CrI) against culture were 89.4% (79.1 to 95.6) (89 participants; low-certainty evidence) and 91.2% (83.2 to 95.7) (386 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have tuberculous meningitis, 168 would be Xpert Ultra-positive: of these, 79 (47%) would not have tuberculosis (false-positives) and 832 would be Xpert Ultra-negative: of these, 11 (1%) would have tuberculosis (false-negatives). Xpert MTB/RIF (30 studies) Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity against culture were 71.1% (62.8 to 79.1) (571 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and 96.9% (95.4 to 98.0) (2824 participants; high-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have tuberculous meningitis, 99 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-positive: of these, 28 (28%) would not have tuberculosis; and 901 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-negative: of these, 29 (3%) would have tuberculosis. Pleural fluid Xpert Ultra (4 studies) Xpert Ultra pooled sensitivity and specificity against culture were 75.0% (58.0 to 86.4) (158 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and 87.0% (63.1 to 97.9) (240 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have pleural tuberculosis, 192 would be Xpert Ultra-positive: of these, 117 (61%) would not have tuberculosis; and 808 would be Xpert Ultra-negative: of these, 25 (3%) would have tuberculosis. Xpert MTB/RIF (25 studies) Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity against culture were 49.5% (39.8 to 59.9) (644 participants; low-certainty evidence) and 98.9% (97.6 to 99.7) (2421 participants; high-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have pleural tuberculosis, 60 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-positive: of these, 10 (17%) would not have tuberculosis; and 940 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-negative: of these, 50 (5%) would have tuberculosis. Lymph node aspirate Xpert Ultra (1 study) Xpert Ultra sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) against composite reference standard were 70% (51 to 85) (30 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and 100% (92 to 100) (43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have lymph node tuberculosis, 70 would be Xpert Ultra-positive and 0 (0%) would not have tuberculosis; 930 would be Xpert Ultra-negative and 30 (3%) would have tuberculosis. Xpert MTB/RIF (4 studies) Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity against composite reference standard were 81.6% (61.9 to 93.3) (377 participants; low-certainty evidence) and 96.4% (91.3 to 98.6) (302 participants; low-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have lymph node tuberculosis, 118 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-positive and 37 (31%) would not have tuberculosis; 882 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-negative and 19 (2%) would have tuberculosis. In lymph node aspirate, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled specificity against culture was 86.2% (78.0 to 92.3), lower than that against a composite reference standard. Using the latent class model, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled specificity was 99.5% (99.1 to 99.7), similar to that observed with a composite reference standard. Rifampicin resistance Xpert Ultra (4 studies) Xpert Ultra pooled sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% (95.1 to 100.0), (24 participants; low-certainty evidence) and 100.0% (99.0 to 100.0) (105 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have rifampicin resistance, 100 would be Xpert Ultra-positive (resistant): of these, zero (0%) would not have rifampicin resistance; and 900 would be Xpert Ultra-negative (susceptible): of these, zero (0%) would have rifampicin resistance. Xpert MTB/RIF (19 studies) Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity were 96.5% (91.9 to 98.8) (148 participants; high-certainty evidence) and 99.1% (98.0 to 99.7) (822 participants; high-certainty evidence). Of 1000 people where 100 have rifampicin resistance, 105 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-positive (resistant): of these, 8 (8%) would not have rifampicin resistance; and 895 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-negative (susceptible): of these, 3 (0.3%) would have rifampicin resistance.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF may be helpful in diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Sensitivity varies across different extrapulmonary specimens: while for most specimens specificity is high, the tests rarely yield a positive result for people without tuberculosis. For tuberculous meningitis, Xpert Ultra had higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF against culture. Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF had similar sensitivity and specificity for rifampicin resistance. Future research should acknowledge the concern associated with culture as a reference standard in paucibacillary specimens and consider ways to address this limitation.
Topics: Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Bias; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; False Negative Reactions; False Positive Reactions; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; Rifampin; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Lymph Node; Tuberculosis, Meningeal; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 33448348
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012768.pub3 -
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2021Unstimulated interferon gamma may be a useful pleural fluid biomarker in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). However, the exact threshold of pleural... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Unstimulated interferon gamma may be a useful pleural fluid biomarker in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). However, the exact threshold of pleural fluid interferon gamma and its accuracy during routine clinical decision-making is not clear. We assessed the performance of pleural fluid interferon gamma in diagnosing TPE and tried to identify a useful assay threshold. We queried the PubMed and Embase databases for publications indexed until May 2020 that provided both sensitivity and specificity data on unstimulated pleural fluid interferon gamma for diagnosis of TPE. A bivariate random effects model was employed to compute summary estimates for diagnostic accuracy parameters, both overall as well as at threshold ranges of <2, 2 to 5, and >5 IU/ml. We retrieved 2,048 citations, of which 67 publications (7,153 patients) were assessed in our review. The summary estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 0.95), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.97), and 310.72 (95% CI, 185.24 to 521.18), respectively. Increasing interferon gamma thresholds did not translate into any substantial change in diagnostic performance; however, eight studies using thresholds of >5 IU/ml showed poorer diagnostic accuracy estimates than other studies with lower thresholds. None of the prespecified subgroup variables significantly influenced relative diagnostic odds ratios in a multivariate meta-regression model. All publications demonstrated a high risk of bias. Unstimulated pleural fluid interferon gamma level provides excellent accuracy for diagnosing TPE and has the potential of becoming a first-line test for this purpose.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Biomarkers; Exudates and Transudates; Humans; Interferon-gamma; Pleural Effusion; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 33208475
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02112-20 -
Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) May 2020Diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy (TP) remains a clinical challenge and the best method to diagnose it is controversial. Although several studies have investigated the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy (TP) remains a clinical challenge and the best method to diagnose it is controversial. Although several studies have investigated the performance of pleural fluid (PF) T-SPOT for pleural tuberculosis (plTB) diagnosis, the heterogeneity of its accuracy exists. Therefore, we performed an updated meta-analysis of the existing evidence on the utility of PF T-SPOT to diagnose TP.
METHODS
PubMed and EmBase were searched for relevant English articles up to July 29, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata, Revman, and Meta-Disc. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize the overall diagnostic performance.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies (997 patients with TP and 656 patients without TP) were identified and enrolled to meta-analysis, giving the following pooled values for diagnostic accuracy of PF T-SPOT: sensitivity, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.92, I = 80.9%); specificity, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91, I = 87.3%); PLR, 6.28 (95% CI, 2.88-13.69, I = 93.3%); NLR, 0.12 (95% CI, 0.07-0.21, I = 84.9%); DOR, 59.74 (95% CI, 24.13-147.93, I = 78.3%); and the area under the SROC curve, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis suggests that PF T-SPOT has important diagnostic value for plTB. However, the standardization of the operating procedure needs to be further promoted, which would make the results more credible.
Topics: Host-Pathogen Interactions; Humans; Interferon-gamma; Interferon-gamma Release Tests; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 32501259
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101941