-
BMC Endocrine Disorders Nov 2021Prolactinoma is the major cause of hyperprolactinemia, and dopamine agonists (DAs) are generally the first-line treatment for them. Several studies have reviewed the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prolactinoma is the major cause of hyperprolactinemia, and dopamine agonists (DAs) are generally the first-line treatment for them. Several studies have reviewed the recurrent rate of hyperprolactinemia after DAs withdrawal. However, few of them have concerned the recurrence risk of prolactinoma following the withdrawal of DAs.
METHODS
Three medical databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, were retrieved up to February, 14, 2021 to identify studies related to recurrence of prolactinoma and withdrawal of DAs. Statistical analyses including meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, funnel plot and Egger test were performed through software R.
RESULTS
A total of 3225 studies were retrieved from the three data bases, and 13 studies consisted of 616 patients and 19 arms were finally included in this systematic analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity among the included studies, and fixed effect model was thus used. The pooled recurrence proportion of prolactinoma after withdrawal of DA was 2% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1-3%.
CONCLUSION
Our study showed a very low recurrent rate of prolactinomas after DAs withdrawal. Much more prospective studies with larger cases and longer follow-up period are encouraged to confirm our finding.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Registration number CRD42021245888 (PROSPERO).
Topics: Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Deprescriptions; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pituitary Neoplasms; Prolactinoma
PubMed: 34774043
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-021-00889-1 -
International Journal of Endocrinology 2021Dopamine agonists (DAs) are recommended as the first-line treatment for prolactinomas; however, tumour recurrence after drug withdrawal remains a clinical problem.... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Dopamine agonists (DAs) are recommended as the first-line treatment for prolactinomas; however, tumour recurrence after drug withdrawal remains a clinical problem. Recent studies have reported high remission rates via surgery in microprolactinomas. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical result of DA treatment with surgery as initial therapy in patients with treatment-naive microprolactinoma.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search for studies and reports regarding microprolactinoma patients treated with DAs and/or surgery published between January 1970 and November 2020 was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library). Clinical treatment outcome was evaluated by the biochemical remission of serum prolactin level to normal after treatment. The statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity. Pooled data were analysed according to a random effect model.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies with 661 patients were included for analysis. The DA treatment group achieved a higher remission rate at ≥12 months follow-up (96% vs. 86%; =0.019). Surgery showed a higher remission rate than the DA treatment group after the treatment withdrawal (78% vs. 44%; =0.003). Patients with preoperative prolactin level of ≤200 ng/mL had a higher remission rate than patients with preoperative prolactin level of >200 ng/mL (92% vs. 40%; =0.029).
CONCLUSION
Surgery showed a high remission rate in treatment-naive microprolactinoma patients after treatment withdrawal and may be an alternative first-line treatment strategy in addition to DAs, particularly in patients with a preoperative prolactin level of ≤200 ng/mL.
PubMed: 34504526
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9930059 -
Journal of the Endocrine Society Oct 2021Surgical management of prolactinomas is an important treatment for patients intolerant of dopamine agonist therapy. However, predictors of postoperative outcomes remain...
CONTEXT
Surgical management of prolactinomas is an important treatment for patients intolerant of dopamine agonist therapy. However, predictors of postoperative outcomes remain unclear.
OBJECT
While transsphenoidal surgical resection (TSSR) is important second-line therapy in prolactinoma patients, predictors of surgical cure and biochemical remission following TSSR remain sparse.
METHODS
A retrospective review of prolactinoma patients undergoing TSSR at the USC Pituitary Center from 1995 to 2020 was conducted. Participants were categorized as surgical cure (normalization of serum prolactin without medical treatment), surgical noncure, biochemical control (prolactin normalization with or without adjuvant therapy), and nonbiochemical control. A systematic review of the outcomes of surgically managed prolactinomas was performed.
RESULTS
The 40 female and 16 male participants had an average age of 35.6 years. Prior treatment included transsphenoidal resection (6, 11%) and dopamine agonist treatment (47, 84%). The 40 macroadenomas and 15 microadenomas exhibited suprasellar extension (24, 43%) and parasellar invasion (20, 36%). Fifteen (27%) were purely intrasellar. Gross total resection was achieved in 25 patients (45%) and subtotal in 26 (46%). Surgical cure was achieved in 25 patients (46%) and biochemical control in 35 (64%). Surgical cure was more likely in smaller, noninvasive tumors, those that were fully resected, and patients with lower preoperative (< 1000 ng/mL) and immediately postoperative (< 7.6 ng/mL) prolactin levels. Ten of 26 patients (38%) undergoing adjuvant therapy achieved biochemical control, which was less likely in men and those with higher preoperative prolactin or invasive tumors.
CONCLUSION
Surgical resection of prolactinomas is a safe procedure that, when offered judiciously, can achieve symptom and/or biochemical control in a majority of patients. A variety of predictors may be useful in advising patients on likelihood of postoperative remission.
PubMed: 34466765
DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab074 -
Journal of Endocrinological... Oct 2021Salivary gland (SG) tissue and derived neoplasms may occur in the sellar region. As the current literature is mostly limited to case reports, the puzzling case of an...
PURPOSE
Salivary gland (SG) tissue and derived neoplasms may occur in the sellar region. As the current literature is mostly limited to case reports, the puzzling case of an inflammatory SG removed by transsphenoidal surgery (TS) and mimicking a prolactinoma prompted us to perform the first systematic review of these unusual conditions.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Forty-four individual cases-non-neoplastic enlarged salivary glands (NNESG, n = 15), primary benign (n = 7) and malignant (n = 8) ectopic salivary tumours (ST) and sellar metastasis from eutopic primary ST (n = 14)-were suitable for the analysis of clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics. Therapeutic outcome was reviewed as a secondary endpoint.
RESULTS
All cases were diagnosed after surgery. NNESG commonly affected young and/or female patients, typically leading to headaches and hyperprolactinemia and originating close to the neurohypophysis. Submucosal SG should be excluded before concluding to an intrasellar NNESG after TS. No gender or age predominance was found for primary ectopic ST, which present as large tumors, with histological phenotypes similar to common ST. Hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus were more frequent in ST than in NNESG. NNESG and benign ectopic ST rarely recur. Malignant ectopic ST should be distinguished from secondary localizations of eutopic ST reaching the sella by contiguity or metastatic spread; both share a frequent unfavorable outcome.
CONCLUSION
Sellar neoplasms derived from SG are rare but misleading conditions and pituitary dysfunction is likely to be more common than currently reported. Appropriate pathological evaluation and multidisciplinary approach are required.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Pituitary Neoplasms; Prolactinoma; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Salivary Glands; Sella Turcica
PubMed: 33939106
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-021-01577-6 -
International Journal of Transgender... 2020Gender-affirming hormone therapy for transgender women includes estrogen and antiandrogens (cyproterone acetate, spironolactone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Gender-affirming hormone therapy for transgender women includes estrogen and antiandrogens (cyproterone acetate, spironolactone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists). Both estrogen and antiandrogens are reported to increase prolactin levels. The objective is to systematically review the evidence of the effects of antiandrogens on prolactin levels, hyperprolactinemia, and prolactinomas among transgender women on estrogen therapy.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo up to May 2020. We included studies with at least 3 months follow-up that evaluated the effects of antiandrogens among transgender women and reported on prolactin levels, hyperprolactinemia, or image-confirmed prolactinomas. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, serially abstracted data, and independently assessed risk of bias and graded strength of evidence.
FINDINGS
We included 17 studies (16 publications): 8 prospective cohorts, 8 retrospective cohorts, and 1 cross-sectional study, each with a moderate to serious risk of bias. Among transgender women on estrogen, prolactin levels increased by over 100% with cyproterone acetate and by up to 45% with spironolactone. However, we were unable to isolate the effects of antiandrogens from estrogen therapy. We were unable to draw conclusions about effects of antiandrogens on hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas.
INTERPRETATION
Prolactin levels may be increased in transgender women who are taking both estrogens and an antiandrogen. Future research is needed to determine the effects of different antiandrogens on prolactin levels separately from estrogen therapy. Ideally, future studies would be prospective, provide either a comparison of two different antiandrogens or compare combination of estrogen and antiandrogen therapy to estrogen alone, and control for possible confounders.
PubMed: 34993517
DOI: 10.1080/15532739.2020.1819505 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2019Pituitary adenomas (PA) are amongst the most prevalent intracranial tumors, causing complications by hormonal overproduction or deficiency and tumor mass effects, with...
Pituitary adenomas (PA) are amongst the most prevalent intracranial tumors, causing complications by hormonal overproduction or deficiency and tumor mass effects, with 95% of cases occurring sporadically. Associated germline mutations () and microduplications are increasingly identified, but the clinical consequences in sporadic PA remain unclear. This systematic review evaluates predictors of a genetic cause of sporadic PA and the consequences for treatment outcome. We undertook a sensitive MEDLINE/Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science search with critical appraisal of identified studies. Thirty-seven studies on predictors of mutations and 10 studies on the influence on treatment outcome were included. and mutations were associated with young age of PA diagnosis. mutations were also associated with gigantism and macroadenomas at time of diagnosis. microduplications were associated with PA below the age of five. and mutation analysis is therefore recommended in young patients (≤30 years). mutation analysis is specifically recommended for patients with PA induced gigantism and macroadenoma. Screening for .3 microduplications is advisable in children below the age of five with increased growth velocity due to PA. There is no evidence supporting mutation analysis of other genes in sporadic PA. mutation related prolactinoma respond well to dopamine agonists while mutation associated somatotroph and lactotroph adenoma are frequently resistant to medical treatment. In patients harboring an microduplication treatment is challenging, although outcome is not different from other patients with PA induced gigantism. Effective use of genetic analysis may lead to early disease identification, while knowledge of the impact of germline mutations on susceptibility to various treatment modalities helps to determine therapeutic strategies, possibly lowering disease morbidity.
PubMed: 31920960
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00837 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Mar 2020The improved remission and complication rates of current transsphenoidal surgery warrant reappraisal of the position of surgery as a viable alternative to dopamine... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT
The improved remission and complication rates of current transsphenoidal surgery warrant reappraisal of the position of surgery as a viable alternative to dopamine agonists in the treatment algorithm of prolactinomas.
OBJECTIVE
To compare clinical outcomes after dopamine agonist withdrawal and transsphenoidal surgery in prolactinoma patients.
METHODS
Eight databases were searched up to July 13, 2018. Primary outcome was disease remission after drug withdrawal or surgery. Secondary outcomes were biochemical control and side effects during dopamine agonist treatment and postoperative complications. Fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled proportions. Robustness of results was assessed by sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
A total of 1469 articles were screened: 55 (10 low risk of bias) on medical treatment (n = 3564 patients) and 25 (12 low risk of bias) on transsphenoidal surgery (n = 1836 patients). Long-term disease remission after dopamine agonist withdrawal was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26-46) and 67% (95% CI, 60-74) after surgery. Subgroup analysis of microprolactinomas showed 36% (95% CI, 21-52) disease remission after dopamine agonist withdrawal, and 83% (95% CI, 76-90) after surgery. Biochemical control was achieved in 81% (95% CI, 75-87) of patients during dopamine agonists with side effects in 26% (95% CI, 13-41). Transsphenoidal surgery resulted in 0% mortality, 2% (95% CI, 0-5) permanent diabetes insipidus, and 3% (95% CI, 2-5) cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.
CONCLUSIONS
In the majority of prolactinoma patients, disease remission can be achieved through surgery, with low risks of long-term surgical complications, and disease remission is less often achieved with dopamine agonists.
Topics: Critical Pathways; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Hypophysectomy; Microsurgery; Pituitary Gland; Pituitary Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prolactin; Prolactinoma; Remission Induction; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31665485
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz144 -
Endocrine Connections Oct 2019Recent large cohort studies suggest an association between high plasma prolactin and cardiovascular mortality. The objective of this systematic review was to...
OBJECTIVES
Recent large cohort studies suggest an association between high plasma prolactin and cardiovascular mortality. The objective of this systematic review was to systematically assess the effect of reducing prolactin with dopamine agonist on established cardiovascular risk factors in patients with prolactinomas.
DESIGN
Bibliographical search was done until February 2019 searching the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, WHO and LILAC. Eligible studies had to include participants with verified prolactinomas where metabolic variables were assessed before and after at least 2 weeks treatment with dopamine agonists.
METHODS
Baseline data and outcomes were independently collected by two investigators. The study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42016046525).
RESULTS
Fourteen observational studies enrolling 387 participants were included. The pooled standardized mean difference of the primary outcome revealed a reduction of BMI and weight of -0.21 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.05; P = 0.01; I2 = 71%), after treatment. Subgroup analysis suggested that the reduction of weight was primarily driven by studies with high prolactin levels at baseline (P = 0.04). Secondary outcomes suggested a small decrease in waist circumference, a small-to-moderate decrease in triglycerides, fasting glucose levels, HOMA-IR, HbA1c and hsCRP, and a moderate decrease in LDL, total cholesterol and insulin.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review suggests a reduction of weight as well as an improved lipid profile and glucose tolerance after treatment with dopamine agonist in patients with prolactinomas. These data are based on low-quality evidence.
PubMed: 31518995
DOI: 10.1530/EC-19-0286