-
Cancer Treatment Reviews Sep 2021Despite multimodality treatment for curatively-treated gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), prognosis remains dismal. The benefit of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy...
INTRODUCTION
Despite multimodality treatment for curatively-treated gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), prognosis remains dismal. The benefit of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy for advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2) positive GEA has been established in the ToGA trial. However, it remains unclear if HER2 inhibition might also be beneficial in the curative setting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the role of HER2 inhibitors for the curative treatment of GEA.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify clinical trials investigating HER2 inhibition for the curative treatment of GEA. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE methodology.
RESULTS
From the 1825 studies retrieved, 17 were included (seven published articles; three published conference abstracts; seven ongoing studies). From the published studies, eight studies investigated single-agent HER2 inhibition. Four studies had a nonrandomized design, and two were randomized controlled trials. Two published studies were assessed as high-quality. The addition of single-agent HER2 inhibition to chemo(radio)therapy showed a pathological complete response rate (pCR) of 22.2% (range, 9.6-25%) and dual HER2 inhibition of 34.5% (34-35%). Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 51.0% (40-71%) with single-agent and 70.0% (70-70%) with dual HER2 therapy.
DISCUSSION
Dual-agent HER2 inhibition showed promising pCR rates and DFS. Given the limited additional toxicity of the addition of HER2 targeting agents and the potential benefit of dual-targeting, further investigation is required in a phase III randomized clinical trial. Next steps include combining checkpoint inhibitors and HER2 blockade given the suggested synergism, as well as investigating new anti-HER2 agents.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, ErbB-2; Stomach Neoplasms; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 34171733
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102249 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021To compare the efficacy and safety between pyrotinib (Pyr) and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in pre-treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)...
PURPOSE
To compare the efficacy and safety between pyrotinib (Pyr) and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in pre-treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed in August 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety between different anti-HER2 regimens in patients pre-treated with trastuzumab (Tra) and a taxane in metastatic settings (≤second-line treatment) were included. A fixed effects network meta-analysis based on the Bayesian inferential framework was conducted for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Values of surface under cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) were calculated to offer a ranking of all regimens.
RESULTS
Twelve studies with 4,353 subjects were identified. Nine regimens were included into the network: T-DM1, lapatinib-capecitabine (Lap-Cap), Tra-Cap, Cap, neratinib (Ner), pertuzumab (Per)-Tra-Cap, Pyr-Cap, atezolizumab (Ate)-T-DM1, and Ner-Cap. For PFS, Pyr-Cap was more favorable than T-DM1 (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.70-0.86), Lap-Cap (0.64, 0.59-0.69), Tra-Cap (0.63, 0.56-0.70), Cap (0.50, 0.45-0.56), Ner (0.59, 0.51-0.69), Per-Tra-Cap (0.68, 0.59-0.79), and Ner-Cap (0.72, 0.64-0.81). For OS, Pyr-Cap showed further improvement than Lap-Cap (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.52-0.99), Cap (0.68, 0.49-0.96), and Ner (0.65, 0.45-0.94). For ORR, Pyr-Cap was significantly superior than Cap (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 7.87, 1.22-56.51). No significant difference was observed in grade ≥3 AEs among all the regimens. Pyr-Cap ranked in the highest in PFS, OS, ORR, and grade ≥3 AEs (SUCRA = 99.4, 89.7, 86.4, and 89.3%).
CONCLUSIONS
These results indicate that Pyr may be more effective than T-DM1 in HER2+ MBC patients pre-treated with Tra and a taxane. However, it may be associated with more grade ≥3 AEs.
PubMed: 34012912
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.608781 -
BMC Cancer Apr 2021Over than one third (28-58%) of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) cases are characterized by positive epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2)...
BACKGROUND
Over than one third (28-58%) of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) cases are characterized by positive epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2) expression. Trastuzumab anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody is still the benchmark treatment of HER2-positive breast tumors. However, FDA has categorized Trastuzumab as a category D drug for pregnant patients with breast cancer. This systemic review aims to synthesize all currently available data of trastuzumab administration during pregnancy and provide an updated view of the effect of trastuzumab on fetal and maternal outcome.
METHODS
Eligible articles were identified by a search of MEDLINE bibliographic database and ClinicalTrials.gov for the period up to 01/09/2020; The algorithm consisted of a predefined combination of the words "breast", "cancer", "trastuzumab" and "pregnancy". This study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 28 eligible studies were identified (30 patients, 32 fetuses). In more than half of cases, trastuzumab was administered in the metastatic setting. The mean duration of trastuzumab administration during gestation was 15.7 weeks (SD: 10.8; median: 17.5; range: 1-32). Oligohydramnios or anhydramnios was the most common (58.1%) adverse event reported in all cases. There was a statistically significant decrease in oligohydramnios/anhydramnios incidence in patients receiving trastuzumab only during the first trimester (P = 0.026, Fisher's exact test). In 43.3% of cases a completely healthy neonate was born. 41.7% of fetuses exposed to trastuzumab during the second and/or third trimester were born completely healthy versus 75.0% of fetuses exposed exclusively in the first trimester. All mothers were alive at a median follow-up of 47.0 months (ranging between 9 and 100 months). Of note, there were three cases (10%) of cardiotoxicity and decreased ejection fraction during pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, treatment with trastuzumab should be postponed until after delivery, otherwise pregnancy should be closely monitored.
Topics: Adult; Amniotic Fluid; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Cardiotoxicity; Female; Fetus; Humans; Middle Aged; Oligohydramnios; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic; Pregnancy Trimesters; Receptor, ErbB-2; Time Factors; Trastuzumab; Young Adult
PubMed: 33902516
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08162-3 -
BMC Women's Health Apr 2021Trastuzumab is currently the standard treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, it is not recommended for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Trastuzumab is currently the standard treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, it is not recommended for HER2-positive breast cancer patients during pregnancy as it may jeopardize safety of the fetus. Nevertheless, there is evidence that fetuses exposed to trastuzumab in early stages of pregnancy remain healthy METHODS: To evaluate the possible effects of trastuzumab on fetus and provide evidence on the safety of trastuzumab in early pregnancy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients, we analyzed 22 studies involving 22 pregnant women and 23 fetuses.
RESULTS
Based on the meta-analysis, the gestational week of exposure to trastuzumab is 0-34 weeks, the average duration of use is 17 weeks, and the average gestational week of delivery is 34.3 weeks. Complications occurred in 77.27% of patients during pregnancy and 56.52% of newborns。The main complication during pregnancy was anhydramnios (68.18%), while the main complications at birth were Respiratory distress or tachypnea (30%). After an average of 25.28 months of follow-up, 17.39% (4/23) of the children died. There was no complication during pregnancy or at birth in patients treated with trastuzumab during early pregnancy (P = 0.043). Patients older than 30 who received trastuzumab during pregnancy were more likely to have neonatal complications (OR = 7.778, 95%CI = 1.2-50.424, P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
These results suggest that trastuzumab use during pregnancy can cause pregnancy,fetal and newborn complications. However, exposed to trastuzumab only in the first trimester are less likely to have pregnancy and fetal complications. Patients with gestational age below 30 years are less likely to have neonatal complications after trastuzumab during pregnancy. Terminating pregnancy should not be the only option for such patients. But more evidence is needed to verify this conclusion.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Child; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 33882925
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01301-9 -
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jun 2021Trastuzumab, a key treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, is available in weight-based IV and fixed-dose (600 mg) SC formulations. While the Phase 3 HannaH trial... (Review)
Review
Trastuzumab, a key treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, is available in weight-based IV and fixed-dose (600 mg) SC formulations. While the Phase 3 HannaH trial indicated non-inferiority of the SC formulation, there is some concern that the target plasma concentration may not be reached in overweight/obese patients whereas low-body-weight patients may be at risk of toxicity. This scoping review evaluated whether overweight/obese patients are at risk of below-target exposure with fixed-dose SC trastuzumab, whether low-body-weight patients are at risk of increased toxicity, especially cardiotoxicity, and whether IV and SC trastuzumab are equivalent in terms of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (e.g. infections). Thirty-seven publications that met the eligibility criteria were included. Body weight is not an important determinant of exposure to trastuzumab at steady state (i.e. pre-dose cycle 8); however, real-world evidence suggests that the target concentration (20 μg/mL) may not be reached with the first SC dose in overweight/obese patients. There is no evidence that low-body-weight patients are at increased risk of cardiotoxicity with SC trastuzumab, although this may be confounded by the higher rate of cardiovascular comorbidities in overweight patients. In Phase 3 trials, SC trastuzumab was associated with higher rates of ISRs, ADAs and SAEs, the latter often requiring hospitalization and occurring during adjuvant treatment when patients are not burdened by chemotherapy. The route of administration of trastuzumab (IV vs SC) in different treatment settings should be discussed with the patient, taking into account the risks and benefits associated with each route.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Body Weight; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Infusions, Subcutaneous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33799233
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.03.003 -
Medicine Mar 2021Adjuvant trastuzumab improves survival outcomes of human epidermal receptor 2 positive early breast cancer patients. Currently, administration of 12 months adjuvant... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Adjuvant trastuzumab improves survival outcomes of human epidermal receptor 2 positive early breast cancer patients. Currently, administration of 12 months adjuvant trastuzumab is the standard therapy. However, whether 6 months treatment is non-inferior to the standard 12 months treatment remains controversial.
METHODS
Relevant records were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE through Jan 14, 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were meta-analyzed. The primary endpoint was DFS with a non-inferiority hazard margin of 1.2 and the second was OS with 1.43.
RESULTS
Three randomized clinical studies met the inclusion criteria, including 3974 patients in 6 months group and 3976 in 12 months group. HR for DFS was 1.18 (95% CI 0.97-1.44, P = .09), with the non-inferiority margin comprised in the 95% CI. HR for OS was 1.14 (95% CI 0.98-1.32, P= .08), whereas the upper limit of 95% CI did not exceed the non-inferiority hazard margin.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis failed to show that 6 months treatment was non-inferior to 12 months treatment in improving the DFS. Although the non-inferiority of the 6-month adjuvant trastuzumab treatment was found for OS, considering that breast cancer patients should receive additional systematic therapies when disease progression or relapse happens, we suggest that 12 months adjuvant trastuzumab treatment should remain the standard therapeutic strategy for patients with early human epidermal receptor 2 positive breast cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Breast; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Mastectomy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Receptor, ErbB-2; Time Factors; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 33725875
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024995 -
Journal of Cancer 2021Different second-line treatments of patients with trastuzumab-resistant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer were examined in...
Efficacy of second-line treatments for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer after trastuzumab-based treatment: a systematic review and bayesian network analysis.
Different second-line treatments of patients with trastuzumab-resistant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer were examined in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A network meta-analysis is helpful to evaluate the comparative survival benefits of different options. We performed a bayesian network meta-analysis using R-4.0.0 software and fixed consistency model to compare the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits of different second-line regimens. 13 RCTs (19 publications, 4313 patients) remained for qualitative synthesis and 12 RCTs (17 publications, 4022 patients) were deemed eligible for network meta-analysis. For PFS, we divided network analysis into two parts owing to insufficient connections among treatments. The first part involved 8 treatments in 9 studies and we referred it as PFS (#1). Amid the following 8 interventions: pyrotinib + capecitabine, T-DM1 + atezolizumab, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine, T-DM1, trastuzumab + capecitabine, lapatinib + capecitabine, neratinib, and capecitabine, we found consistent benefits between the first three interventions; moreover, pyrotinib + capecitabine was most likely to be associated with the best benefits; capecitabine monotherapy was associated with the worst PFS. The second part included 3 treatments in 2 studies and we referred it as PFS (#2): everolimus + trastuzumab + vinorelbine had better PFS benefits versus trastuzumab + vinorelbine and afatinib + vinorelbine. For OS, we analyzed 7 treatments in 7 studies, and observed T-DM1 + atezolizumab, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine, and T-DM1 had similar effectiveness, and the first had the highest probability to yield the longest OS; capecitabine or neratinib alone yielded the worst OS benefits. Our work comprehensively summarized and analyzed current available RCT-based evidence of the second-line treatments for trastuzumab-treated, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer. These results provide clinicians and oncologists meaningful references for clinical drug administration and the development of novel effective therapies.
PubMed: 33613756
DOI: 10.7150/jca.51845 -
NPJ Breast Cancer Feb 2021Observational studies have suggested that HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab may be associated with an increased incidence of intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) due to... (Review)
Review
Observational studies have suggested that HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab may be associated with an increased incidence of intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) due to its ability to prolong survival. We hypothesized that prolonged survival associated with dual-agent HER2 inhibition may be associated with an even higher incidence of IMD. This study pooled estimates of IMD incidence and survival among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving dual- versus single-agent HER2 targeted therapy, as well as trastuzumab versus chemotherapy, observation, or another HER2-targeted agent. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to 25 March 2020. We included randomized controlled trials that reported IMD incidence for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab as the experimental or control arm irrespective of disease stage. Among 465 records identified, 19 randomized controlled trials (32,572 patients) were included. Meta-analysis of four studies showed that dual HER2-targeted therapy was associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87) and progression-free survival (HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.87) compared to single HER2-targeted therapy, but the risk of IMD was similar (RR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.83-1.27). Our study challenges the hypothesis that prolonged survival afforded by improved extracranial disease control is associated with increased IMD incidence.
PubMed: 33602948
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00220-0 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020The availability of oncology biosimilars is deemed as a fundamental strategy to achieve sustainable health care. However, there is scarce systematic evidence on... (Review)
Review
The availability of oncology biosimilars is deemed as a fundamental strategy to achieve sustainable health care. However, there is scarce systematic evidence on economic effectiveness of cancer biosimilars. We aimed to synthesize evidence from pharmacoeconomic evaluation of oncology biosimilars globally, provide essential data and methodological reference for involved stakeholders. This systematic review was conducted in PubMed, embase, the Cochrane library, CRD, ISPOR and NICE utill December 31, 2019. Information on basic characteristics, evaluation methodology and results were extracted. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Checklist. For 17 studies identified (13 from Europe and four from United States), the overall quality was generally acceptable. A total of seven biological molecules involved with filgrastim, EPOETIN , and trastuzumab leading the three. The mostly common evaluation perspective was payer, but the time horizon varied greatly. There were ten studies which adopted cost minimization analysis to evaluate efficiency while seven studies adopted budget impact analysis to address affordability, with cost ratio and cost saving being its corresponding primary endpoint. Although the comparability of included studies was limited and specific results were largely affected by uptake and price discount rates of the oncology biosimilar, the comprehensive results consistently favored its promotion. Globally, the economic evaluation of cancer biosimilars is in its initial phase. However, limited evidence from developed countries consistently supported both cost-effectiveness of efficiency and affordability of oncology biosimilars, while they were largely affected by uptake and price discount rate.
PubMed: 33536905
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.572569 -
Medicine Jan 2021To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) or meta-analysis of trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer.
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) or meta-analysis of trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane library, international prospective register of systematic reviews, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP database for SRs or meta-analysis. The methodological quality of included literatures was appraised by risk of bias in systematic review (ROBIS) tool.
RESULTS
Twenty three eligible systematic reviews or meta-analysis were included. Only 2 systematic reviews provided protocol. The most frequently searched databases were PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane. The two-reviewers model described in the screening for eligible original articles, data extraction, and methodological quality evaluation had 30%, 61%, and 26%, respectively. In methodological quality assessment, 52% SRs or meta-analysis used the Jadad scoring or Cochrane reviewer' handbook. Research question were well matched to all SRs or meta-analysis in phase 1 and 35% of them evaluated "high" risk bias in study eligibility criteria. The "high" risk of bias in all non-Cochrane SRs or meta-analyses, which involve methods used to identify and/or select studies. And more than half SRs or meta-analysis had a high risk of bias in data collection and study appraisal. More than two-third of SRs or meta-analysis were accomplished with high risk of bias in the synthesis and findings.
CONCLUSIONS
The study indicated poor methodological and reporting quality of SRs/meta-analysis assessing trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer. Registration or publishing the protocol and the reporting followed the PRISMA checklist are recommended in future research.
Topics: Female; Humans; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bias; Breast Neoplasms; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Research Design; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 33530234
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024389