-
The Journal of Biological Chemistry May 2024As part of the classical renin-angiotensin system, the peptidase angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) makes angiotensin II which has myriad effects on systemic... (Review)
Review
As part of the classical renin-angiotensin system, the peptidase angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) makes angiotensin II which has myriad effects on systemic cardiovascular function, inflammation, and cellular proliferation. Less well known is that macrophages and neutrophils make ACE in response to immune activation which has marked effects on myeloid cell function independent of angiotensin II. Here, we discuss both classical (angiotensin) and nonclassical functions of ACE and highlight mice called ACE 10/10 in which genetic manipulation increases ACE expression by macrophages and makes these mice much more resistant to models of tumors, infection, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease. In another model called NeuACE mice, neutrophils make increased ACE and these mice are much more resistant to infection. In contrast, ACE inhibitors reduce neutrophil killing of bacteria in mice and humans. Increased expression of ACE induces a marked increase in macrophage oxidative metabolism, particularly mitochondrial oxidation of lipids, secondary to increased peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α expression, and results in increased myeloid cell ATP. ACE present in sperm has a similar metabolic effect, and the lack of ACE activity in these cells reduces both sperm motility and fertilization capacity. These nonclassical effects of ACE are not due to the actions of angiotensin II but to an unknown molecule, probably a peptide, that triggers a profound change in myeloid cell metabolism and function. Purifying and characterizing this peptide could offer a new treatment for several diseases and prove potentially lucrative.
PubMed: 38763333
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107388 -
PeerJ 2024This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 and hypertension who were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin...
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 and hypertension who were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor B (ARB) drugs and to identify key features affecting patient prognosis using an unsupervised learning method.
METHODS
A large-scale clinical dataset, including patient information, medical history, and laboratory test results, was collected. Two hundred patients with COVID-19 and hypertension were included. After cluster analysis, patients were divided into good and poor prognosis groups. The unsupervised learning method was used to evaluate clinical characteristics and prognosis, and patients were divided into different prognosis groups. The improved wild dog optimization algorithm (IDOA) was used for feature selection and cluster analysis, followed by the IDOA-k-means algorithm. The impact of ACEI/ARB drugs on patient prognosis and key characteristics affecting patient prognosis were also analysed.
RESULTS
Key features related to prognosis included baseline information and laboratory test results, while clinical symptoms and imaging results had low predictive power. The top six important features were age, hypertension grade, MuLBSTA, ACEI/ARB, NT-proBNP, and high-sensitivity troponin I. These features were consistent with the results of the unsupervised prediction model. A visualization system was developed based on these key features.
CONCLUSION
Using unsupervised learning and the improved k-means algorithm, this study accurately analysed the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 and hypertension. The use of ACEI/ARB drugs was found to be a protective factor for poor clinical prognosis. Unsupervised learning methods can be used to differentiate patient populations and assess treatment effects. This study identified important features affecting patient prognosis and developed a visualization system with clinical significance for prognosis assessment and treatment decision-making.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Hypertension; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Male; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Female; Unsupervised Machine Learning; Middle Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; SARS-CoV-2; Aged; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Algorithms; Cluster Analysis
PubMed: 38756444
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17340 -
Translational Breast Cancer Research :... 2023The ACE study previously demonstrated that tucidinostat (chidamide), a subtype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, plus exemestane significantly improved...
Tucidinostat plus exemestane for postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a long-term safety and overall survival update from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND
The ACE study previously demonstrated that tucidinostat (chidamide), a subtype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, plus exemestane significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR) breast cancer patients with a manageable safety profile. The analysis of long-term safety and overall survival (OS) is presented here.
METHODS
ACE is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial comparing tucidinostat 30 mg/twice weekly plus exemestane 25 mg/day versus placebo plus exemestane 25 mg/day in postmenopausal patients with advanced, HR breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PFS, and OS was the secondary endpoint.
RESULTS
Of the 365 patients enrolled between July 2015, and June 2017, 244 were assigned to tucidinostat plus exemestane (tucidinostat group) and 121 to placebo plus exemestane group (placebo group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. The median follow-up from randomization to data cut-off (February 25, 2021) of this analysis was 26.5 months (range, 13.9-45.5 months). A total of 231 deaths (63.3%) from 365 patients occurred, including 155 deaths (63.5%) in the tucidinostat group and 76 deaths (62.8%) in the placebo group. The median OS was 30.3 months (95% CI, 26.7-36.7) in the tucidinostat group and 30.3 months (95% CI, 24.8-38.1) in the placebo group. The safety profiles of both tucidinostat and placebo groups remained consistent with those previously reported, and no new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. Neutropenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 51.6% of the patients in the tucidinostat group and 2.5% of the patients in the placebo group. Adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuations from any cause occurred in 28 (11.5%) patients in the tucidinostat group and 4 (3.3%) in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS
Although tucidinostat in combination with exemestane had produced a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint PFS, the ACE study did not show a prolongation of the secondary endpoint OS in the tucidinostat combination regimen. Ongoing studies have been considered in terms of potential identification of what patient subpopulations could benefit most from the tucidinostat combination regimens in advanced HR breast cancer.
PubMed: 38751475
DOI: 10.21037/tbcr-23-31 -
Experimental and Molecular Pathology Jun 2024The aim of this study was to investigate the potential antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and sperm function-preserving properties of sodium acetate (ACE), a histone...
AIMS
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and sperm function-preserving properties of sodium acetate (ACE), a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, in a rat model of testicular torsion/detorsion (T/D).
MAIN METHODS
Littermate Wistar rats of identical weight were subjected to sham surgery or testicular T/D by rotating the left testis at 720° around its axis along the spermatic cord clockwise and fixing it in this position for two and a half hours. 1 h before detorsion, T/D + ACE-treated rats were treated with ACE (200 mg/kg/day, per os) while T/D rats were vehicle-treated by administering 0.5 mL of distilled water. After 72 h, animals were euthanized, and the left testes were harvested for bio-molecular and histological analysis.
KEY FINDINGS
Acetate administration attenuated T/D-induced rises in serum and testicular HDAC and testicular xanthine oxidase, uric acid, MDA, GSSG, MPO, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, NFkB, HIF-1α, and VCAM-1. In addition, acetate treatment alleviated T/D-induced decline in sperm quality (count, motility, viability, and normal morphology) and testicular 3β-HSD, 17β-HSD, testosterone, GSH, GSH/GSSG, SOD, catalase, GPx, GST, Nrf2, and HO-1. Furthermore, acetate prevented T/D-distorted testicular histoarchitecture and spermatogenic germ cell loss.
SIGNIFICANCE
Sodium acetate during the post-ischaemic phase of testicular T/D may be beneficial in preventing I/R injury and maintaining fertility.
Topics: Male; Animals; Reperfusion Injury; Rats, Wistar; Testis; Rats; Spermatic Cord Torsion; Sodium Acetate; Oxidative Stress; Antioxidants; Spermatozoa; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
PubMed: 38749364
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2024.104901 -
Journal of Rare Diseases (Berlin,... 2024Alport syndrome is a genetic kidney disease that causes worsening of kidney function over time, often progressing to kidney failure. Some types of Alport syndrome cause... (Review)
Review
Alport syndrome is a genetic kidney disease that causes worsening of kidney function over time, often progressing to kidney failure. Some types of Alport syndrome cause other symptoms and signs, including hearing loss and eye abnormalities. Research now indicates that Alport syndrome (autosomal dominant inheritance) is the most common form. Alport syndrome can have X-linked or a rare form of autosomal recessive inheritance. Traditionally, a kidney biopsy was used to diagnose Alport syndrome, but genetic testing provides a more precise and less invasive means of diagnosis and reveals the underlying pattern of inheritance. At present, there are no specific curative treatments for Alport syndrome however there is a strong international effort in pursuit of future therapies. Currently, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) if a patient cannot tolerate an ACEi, slow down the progression of kidney disease and can delay the onset of kidney failure by years. There are other potential treatments in research that potentially can help delay the onset of kidney issues. Early treatment of patients and identification of their at-risk relatives is a priority. People living with Alport syndrome and their doctors now benefit from an active international research community working on translating further treatments into clinical practice and providing up-to-date clinical guidelines.
PubMed: 38745975
DOI: 10.1007/s44162-024-00036-z -
EXCLI Journal 2024Coronary heart disease (CHD) continues to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. There are numerous therapeutic reperfusion methods, including thrombolytic... (Review)
Review
Coronary heart disease (CHD) continues to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. There are numerous therapeutic reperfusion methods, including thrombolytic therapy, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and anti-remodeling drugs like angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. Despite this, there is no pharmacological treatment that can effectively stop cardiomyocyte death brought on by myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. For the purpose of regenerating cardiac tissue, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy has recently gained more attention. The pleiotropic effects of MSCs are instead arbitrated by the secretion of soluble paracrine factors and are unrelated to their capacity for differentiation. One of these paracrine mediators is the extracellular vesicle known as an exosome. Exosomes deliver useful cargo to recipient cells from MSCs, including peptides, proteins, cytokines, lipids, miRNA, and mRNA molecules. Exosomes take part in intercellular communication processes and help tissues and organs that have been injured or are ill heal. Exosomes alone were found to be the cause of MSCs' therapeutic effects in a variety of animal models, according to studies. Here, we have focused on the recent development in the therapeutic capabilities of exosomal MSCs in cardiac diseases.
PubMed: 38741729
DOI: 10.17179/excli2023-6538 -
American Heart Journal Aug 2024The STRONG-HF trial showed that high-intensity care (HIC) consisting of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and close follow-up reduced... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The STRONG-HF trial showed that high-intensity care (HIC) consisting of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and close follow-up reduced all-cause death or heart failure (HF) readmission at 180 days compared to usual care (UC). We hypothesized that significant differences in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes over the enrolment period may exist.
METHODS
Two groups of the 1,078 patients enrolled in STRONG-HF were created according to the order of enrolment within center. The early group consisted of the first 10 patients enrolled at each center (N = 342) and the late group consisted of the following patients (N = 736).
RESULTS
Late enrollees were younger, had more frequently reduced ejection fraction, slightly lower NT-proBNP and creatinine levels compared with early enrollees. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in early compared to late enrollees (15% vs. 21%, aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-0.99, P = .044). No treatment-by-enrolment interaction was seen in respect to the average percentage of optimal dose of GDMT after randomization, which was consistently higher in early and late patients randomized to HIC compared to UC. The higher use of renin-angiotensin-inhibitors in the HIC arm was more pronounced in the late enrollees both after randomization (interaction-P = .013) and at 90 days (interaction-P < .001). No interaction was observed for safety events. Patients randomized late to UC displayed a trend toward more severe outcomes (26% vs. 16%, P = .10), but the efficacy of HIC showed no interaction with the enrolment group (aHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.35-1.67 in early and 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83 in late enrollees, adjusted interaction-P = .51) with similar outcomes in the HIC arm in late and early enrollees (16% vs. 13%, P = .73).
CONCLUSIONS
Late enrollees have different clinical characteristics and higher event rates compared to early enrollees. GDMT implementation in the HIC arm robustly achieved similar doses with consistent efficacy in early and late enrollees, mitigating the higher risk of adverse outcome in late enrollees.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03412201.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Heart Failure; Aged; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Treatment Outcome; Time Factors; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Peptide Fragments; Cause of Death; Patient Readmission; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
PubMed: 38740532
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.019 -
JID Innovations : Skin Science From... May 2024Some antihypertensive medications are photosensitizing. The implications for skin cancer risk remain unclear because results from prior studies are inconsistent and as...
Some antihypertensive medications are photosensitizing. The implications for skin cancer risk remain unclear because results from prior studies are inconsistent and as new evidence is published. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between antihypertensives and common skin cancers (cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma) and to evaluate dose-response relationships. Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria, and 42 could be meta analyzed. Increased risks were seen for basal cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (relative risk [RR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.22), diuretics (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.10), and thiazides (RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04-1.16); for squamous cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01-1.14), diuretics (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17-1.43), and thiazides (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.15-1.61); and for melanoma in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03-1.14), calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03-1.12), and thiazides (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02-1.17). The quality of evidence was low or very low. We observed evidence for dose-response for thiazides with basal cell carcinoma; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with squamous cell carcinoma; and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with melanoma. Our meta-analysis supports a potential causal association between some antihypertensives, particularly diuretics, and skin cancer risk.
PubMed: 38736521
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100272 -
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders May 2024Despite the strong evidence supporting guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), prescription... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Despite the strong evidence supporting guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), prescription rates in clinical practice are still lacking.
METHODS
A survey containing 20 clinical vignettes of patients with HFrEF was answered by a national sample of 127 cardiologists and 68 internal/family medicine physicians. Each vignette had 4-5 options for adjusting GDMT and the option to make no medication changes. Survey respondents could only select one option. For analysis, responses were dichotomized to the answer of interest.
RESULTS
Cardiologists were more likely to make GDMT changes than general medicine physicians (91.8% vs. 82.0%; OR 1.84 [1.07-3.19]; p = 0.020). Cardiologists were more likely to initiate beta-blockers (46.3% vs. 32.0%; OR 2.38 [1.18-4.81], p = 0.016), angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) (63.8% vs. 48.1%; OR 1.76 [1.01-3.09], p = 0.047), and hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate (HYD/ISDN) (38.2% vs. 23.7%; OR 2.47 [1.48-4.12], p < 0.001) compared to general medicine physicians. No differences were found in initiating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARBs), initiating mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), sodium-glucose transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, digoxin, or ivabradine.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate cardiologists were more likely to adjust GDMT than general medicine physicians. Future focus on improving GDMT prescribing should target providers other than cardiologists to improve care in patients with HFrEF.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Stroke Volume; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Guideline Adherence; Male; Cardiologists; Female; Cardiovascular Agents; Health Care Surveys; Ventricular Function, Left; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Clinical Decision-Making; Healthcare Disparities; Internal Medicine; General Practitioners; Aged; United States
PubMed: 38730379
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-03911-1 -
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and... Nov 2023Proteinuria is a manifestation of sickle cell anemia (SCA)-related renal disease and is a risk factor of renal impairment. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors...
Proteinuria is a manifestation of sickle cell anemia (SCA)-related renal disease and is a risk factor of renal impairment. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have benefits, but their role in SCA remains undefined. This study aimed to assess the role of lisinopril, an ACE inhibitor, in reducing proteinuria in SCA patients. Thirty-five patients older than 15 years with known SCA (HbSS or HbS-β0) and a 24-h urinary protein level of 150 mg or more participated in this study. Urine was collected over 24 h to quantify proteinuria. The patients had a mean age of 28.5 ± 6.98 years. The median 24-h urinary protein before treatment was 0.3006 g and that after treatment was 0.150 g (P = 0.01). After a median follow-up of 38 months, 24-h urinary protein decreased in 27 (77%) patients and normalized in 18 (52%) patients. Urinary protein increased in 2 (6%) patients and remained stable (no change) in 6 (17%) patients. There was no significant difference in blood pressure (BP) before and after treatment. The average dose of lisinopril was 5 mg. Twenty patients were still on lisinopril at last follow-up. The reasons for stopping lisinopril included normalization of protein, noncompliance, adverse effects, and pregnancy. Lisinopril effectively reduced proteinuria in SCA patients, without significantly reducing BP. Only a few patients developed adverse effects, including coughing, dizziness, and diarrhea. It is unclear how long lisinopril should be continued and whether it can be stopped in patients with normalized urinary protein.
Topics: Humans; Lisinopril; Proteinuria; Female; Male; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Adult; Young Adult; Treatment Outcome; Time Factors; Blood Pressure; Adolescent
PubMed: 38725203
DOI: 10.4103/sjkdt.sjkdt_312_22