-
Annals of Coloproctology Apr 2024The estimation of the risk posed by malignant polyps for residual or lymphatic disease plays a central role. This study investigated colorectal surgeons' assessment of...
PURPOSE
The estimation of the risk posed by malignant polyps for residual or lymphatic disease plays a central role. This study investigated colorectal surgeons' assessment of these risks associated with malignant polyps.
METHODS
A cross-sectional questionnaire was electronically administered to colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand in October 2022. The questionnaire contained 17 questions on demographics, when surgeons consider colorectal resection appropriate, and the risk assessment for 5 hypothetical malignant polyps.
RESULTS
The mean risk of residual or lymphatic disease that would prompt surgeons to recommend colonic resection was 5%. However, this increased to a mean risk of 10% if the malignant polyp was located in the rectum, and the only resection option was abdominoperineal resection with end-colostomy. There was high concordance between the estimated risk of residual or lymphatic disease by colorectal surgeons and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) guidelines for the 5 hypothetical malignant polyps, with the ACPGBI estimated risk lying within the 95% confidence interval for 4 of the 5 malignant polyps. Nonetheless, 96.6% of surgeons felt that an online risk calculator would improve clinical practice.
CONCLUSION
Colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand accurately estimated the risk posed by malignant polyps. An online risk calculator may assist in better conveying risk to patients.
PubMed: 38523290
DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00178.0025 -
JAMA Surgery Jun 2024Surgical site infections (SSIs)-especially anastomotic dehiscence-are major contributors to morbidity and mortality after rectal resection. The role of mechanical and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Surgical site infections (SSIs)-especially anastomotic dehiscence-are major contributors to morbidity and mortality after rectal resection. The role of mechanical and oral antibiotics bowel preparation (MOABP) in preventing complications of rectal resection is currently disputed.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether MOABP reduces overall complications and SSIs after elective rectal resection compared with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) plus placebo.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 university hospitals in Finland between March 18, 2020, and October 10, 2022. Patients aged 18 years and older undergoing elective resection with primary anastomosis of a rectal tumor 15 cm or less from the anal verge on magnetic resonance imaging were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who were randomly allocated to and underwent elective rectal resection with an anastomosis.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were stratified according to tumor distance from the anal verge and neoadjuvant treatment given and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive MOABP with an oral regimen of neomycin and metronidazole (n = 277) or MBP plus matching placebo tablets (n = 288). All study medications were taken the day before surgery, and all patients received intravenous antibiotics approximately 30 minutes before surgery.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was overall cumulative postoperative complications measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index. Key secondary outcomes were SSI and anastomotic dehiscence within 30 days after surgery.
RESULTS
In all, 565 patients were included in the analysis, with 288 in the MBP plus placebo group (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-74] years; 190 males [66.0%]) and 277 in the MOABP group (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-75] years; 158 males [57.0%]). Patients in the MOABP group experienced fewer overall postoperative complications (median [IQR] Comprehensive Complication Index, 0 [0-8.66] vs 8.66 [0-20.92]; Wilcoxon effect size, 0.146; P < .001), fewer SSIs (23 patients [8.3%] vs 48 patients [16.7%]; odds ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.27-0.77]), and fewer anastomotic dehiscences (16 patients [5.8%] vs 39 patients [13.5%]; odds ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.72]) compared with patients in the MBP plus placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that MOABP reduced overall postoperative complications as well as rates of SSIs and anastomotic dehiscences in patients undergoing elective rectal resection compared with MBP plus placebo. Based on these findings, MOABP should be considered as standard treatment in patients undergoing elective rectal resection.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281667.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Double-Blind Method; Middle Aged; Surgical Wound Infection; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Rectal Neoplasms; Administration, Oral; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Preoperative Care; Neomycin; Cathartics; Metronidazole; Proctectomy; Rectum; Surgical Wound Dehiscence; Elective Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38506889
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0184 -
Journal of Surgical Case Reports Mar 2024Primary acquired perineal hernia is rare with only 100 reported cases in the literature. Emergency presentations of intestinal obstruction secondary to perineal hernia...
Primary acquired perineal hernia is rare with only 100 reported cases in the literature. Emergency presentations of intestinal obstruction secondary to perineal hernia are very rare and to-date, there are only eight cases reported in the literature. We present a case of a 74-year-old lady who presented with a small bowel obstruction secondary to strangulated perineal hernia in the absence of pelvic exenteration or abdominoperineal resection requiring operative repair via combined open transabdominal and transperineal approach. To our knowledge, this case represents the first reported case of intestinal obstruction secondary to primary acquired perineal hernia in the absence of pelvic exenteration or abdominoperineal resection.
PubMed: 38505337
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae164 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Mar 2024Anastomotic leak (AL) is a complication of low anterior resection (LAR) that results in substantial morbidity. There is immense interest in evaluating immediate...
PURPOSE
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a complication of low anterior resection (LAR) that results in substantial morbidity. There is immense interest in evaluating immediate postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who undergo diverting loop ileostomies (DLI). The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between fecal diversion, AL, and oncologic outcomes.
METHODS
This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study using patient data obtained from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database compiled from six academic institutions. The study population included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing LAR. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL among patients who did or did not receive DLI during LAR. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for AL, receipt of adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year recurrence.
RESULTS
Of 815 patients, 38 (4.7%) suffered AL after LAR. Patients with AL were more likely to be male, have unintentional preoperative weight loss, and are less likely to undergo DLI. On multivariable analysis, DLI remained protective against AL (p < 0.001). Diverted patients were less likely to undergo future surgical procedures including additional ostomy creation, completion proctectomy, or pelvic washout for AL. Subgroup analysis of 456 patients with locally advanced disease showed that DLI was correlated with increased receipt of adjuvant therapy for patients with and without AL on univariate analysis (SHR:1.59; [95% CI 1.19-2.14]; p = 0.002), but significance was not met in multivariate models.
CONCLUSION
Lack of DLI and preoperative weight loss was associated with anastomotic leak. Fecal diversion may improve the timely initiation of adjuvant oncologic therapy. The long-term outcomes following routine diverting stomas warrant further study.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Anastomotic Leak; Cohort Studies; Anastomosis, Surgical; Rectal Neoplasms; Surgical Stomas; Proctectomy; Risk Factors; Weight Loss; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38498217
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04600-3 -
Surgical Endoscopy May 2024There is growing evidence that the use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in colorectal cancer resections is associated with improved short-term outcomes when compared to...
Robotic-assisted surgery for left-sided colon and rectal resections is associated with reduction in the postoperative surgical stress response and improved short-term outcomes: a cohort study.
INTRODUCTION
There is growing evidence that the use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in colorectal cancer resections is associated with improved short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopic surgery (LS) or open surgery (OS), possibly through a reduced systemic inflammatory response (SIR). Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is a sensitive SIR biomarker and its utility in the early identification of post-operative complications has been validated in a variety of surgical procedures. There remains a paucity of studies characterising post-operative SIR in RAS.
METHODS
Retrospective study of a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients undergoing OS, LS and RAS for left-sided and rectal cancer in a single high-volume unit. Patient and disease characteristics, post-operative CRP levels, and clinical outcomes were reviewed, and their relationships explored within binary logistic regression and propensity scores matched models.
RESULTS
A total of 1031 patients were included (483 OS, 376 LS, and 172 RAS). RAS and LS were associated with lower CRP levels across the first 4 post-operative days (p < 0.001) as well as reduced complications and length of stay compared to OS in unadjusted analyses. In binary logistic regression models, RAS was independently associated with lower CRP levels at Day 3 post-operatively (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.59, p < 0.001) and a reduction in the rate of all complications (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.56, p < 0.001) and major complications (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.26-0.95, p = 0.036). Within a propensity scores matched model comparing LS versus RAS specifically, RAS was associated with lower post-operative CRP levels in the first two post-operative days, a lower proportion of patients with a CRP ≥ 150 mg/L at Day 3 (20.9% versus 30.5%, p = 0.036) and a lower rate of all complications (34.7% versus 46.7%, p = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS
The present observational study shows that an RAS approach was associated with lower postoperative SIR, and a better postoperative complications profile.
Topics: Humans; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Female; Male; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Middle Aged; C-Reactive Protein; Postoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Rectal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Colectomy; Proctectomy; Length of Stay; Stress, Physiological
PubMed: 38498212
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10749-3 -
Medicine Mar 2024Locally advanced colon cancer is considered a relative contraindication for minimally invasive proctectomy (MIP), and minimally invasive versus conventional open... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Locally advanced colon cancer is considered a relative contraindication for minimally invasive proctectomy (MIP), and minimally invasive versus conventional open proctectomy (COP) for locally advanced colon cancer has not been studied.
METHODS
We have searched the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science for articles on minimally invasive (robotic and laparoscopic) and COP. We calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The protocol for this review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023407029).
RESULTS
There are 10132 participants including 21 articles. Compared with COP, patients who underwent MIP had less operation time (SMD 0.48; CI 0.32 to 0.65; I2 = 0%, P = .000), estimated blood loss (MD -1.23; CI -1.90 to -0.56; I2 = 95%, P < .0001), the median time to semi-liquid diet (SMD -0.43; CI -0.70 to -0.15; I2 = 0%, P = .002), time to the first flatus (SMD -0.97; CI -1.30 to -0.63; I2 = 7%, P < .0001), intraoperative blood transfusion (RR 0.33; CI 0.24 to 0.46; I2 = 0%, P < .0001) in perioperative outcomes. Compared with COP, patients who underwent MIP had fewer overall complications (RR 0.85; CI 0.73 to 0.98; I2 = 22.4%, P = .023), postoperative complications (RR 0.79; CI 0.69 to 0.90; I2 = 0%, P = .001), and urinary retention (RR 0.63; CI 0.44 to 0.90; I2 = 0%, P = .011) in perioperative outcomes.
CONCLUSION
This study comprehensively and systematically evaluated the difference between the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive and open treatment of locally advanced colon cancer through meta-analysis. Minimally invasive proctectomy is better than COP in postoperative and perioperative outcomes. However, there is no difference in oncological outcomes. This also provides an evidence-based reference for clinical practice. Of course, multi-center RCT research is also needed to draw more scientific and rigorous conclusions in the future.
Topics: Humans; Colonic Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Robotics; Proctectomy; Laparoscopy
PubMed: 38489676
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037474 -
Surgical Endoscopy May 2024Conversion to laparotomy is among the serious intraoperative complications and carries an increased risk of postoperative complications. In this cohort study, we...
Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on conversion to laparotomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in Japan (a secondary analysis of the EnSSURE study).
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Conversion to laparotomy is among the serious intraoperative complications and carries an increased risk of postoperative complications. In this cohort study, we investigated whether or not the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) affects the conversion rate among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective secondary analysis of data collected from patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cStage II and III rectal cancer from 2014 to 2016 across 56 institutions affiliated with the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Data from the original EnSSURE study were analyzed to investigate risk factors for conversion to laparotomy by performing univariate and multivariate analyses based on the reason for conversion.
RESULTS
Data were collected for 3,168 cases, including 65 (2.1%) involving conversion to laparotomy. Indicated conversion accounted for 27 cases (0.9%), while technical conversion accounted for 35 cases (1.1%). The multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for indicated conversion to laparotomy: tumor diameter [mm] (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, p = 0.0002), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/-] (OR 7.92, 95% CI 3.14-19.97, p < 0.0001), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [-/+] (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.01-9.90, p = 0.0002). The multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for technical conversion to laparotomy: registered case number of institution (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p = 0.0029), institution type [non-university/university hospital] (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.54-8.04, p = 0.0028), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/-] (OR 5.96, 95% CI 2.15-16.53, p = 0.0006), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [-/+] (OR 6.26, 95% CI 3.01-13.05, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
Participation of ESSQS-certified physicians may reduce the risk of both indicated and technical conversion. Referral to specialized institutions, such as high-volume centers and university hospitals, especially for patients exhibiting relevant background risk factors, may reduce the risk of conversion to laparotomy and lead to better outcomes for patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000040645.
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Female; Male; Japan; Retrospective Studies; Clinical Competence; Laparotomy; Middle Aged; Aged; Laparoscopy; Conversion to Open Surgery; Proctectomy; Risk Factors; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38459211
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10740-y -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Jul 2024Studies on grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors are limited, and the optimal treatment for these tumors is not well established. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Studies on grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors are limited, and the optimal treatment for these tumors is not well established.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to compare the oncologic results of local excision versus radical resection for the treatment of grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
DESIGN
Retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study to minimize heterogeneity between groups and focus on the differences between surgery strategies.
SETTINGS
Seventeen large-scale Chinese medical centers participated in this study.
PATIENTS
A total of 144 patients with pathologically confirmed grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were retrospectively analyzed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival were assessed to compare surgery strategies.
RESULTS
A total of 144 patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven patients underwent endoscopic resection, 55 underwent transanal excision, 50 underwent radical resection, and 12 underwent palliative surgery or biopsy for distant metastasis. Of the 50 patients who underwent radical resection, 30 (60.0%) had clinically positive lymph nodes on the basis of the histopathology results. The optimal cutoff value for tumor size to predict cancer-specific survival was 1.5 cm. In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of ≤1.5-cm size, there were no significant differences in cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival between local excision and radical resection groups ( p > 0.05). In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of >1.5-cm size, relapse-free survival was significantly lower in the local excision group than in the radical resection group ( p = 0.04).
LIMITATIONS
The nature of retrospective reviews and a relatively short follow-up period are limitations of this study.
CONCLUSIONS
Grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors have a nonnegligible rate of lymph node metastasis. Local excision is a feasible choice for tumors of ≤1.5 cm size without metastasis, whereas radical resection is more beneficial in those of >1.5 cm size. See Video Abstract .
ESCISIN LOCAL VERSUS RESECCIN RADICAL PARA TUMORES NEUROENDOCRINOS RECTALES GRADO ANLISIS MULTICNTRICO CON PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN COINCIDENTE
ANTECEDENTES:Los estudios sobre los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales de grado 2 son limitados y el tratamiento óptimo para estos tumores no está bien establecido.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados oncológicos de la escisión local versus la resección radical para el tratamiento de tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2.DISEÑO:Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo emparejado por puntuación de propensión para minimizar la heterogeneidad entre grupos y centrarse en la diferencia entre estrategias quirúrgicas.ESCENARIO:Diecisiete centros médicos chinos de gran tamaño participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 patológicamente confirmados.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída para comparar las estrategias quirúrgicas.RESULTADOS:En este estudio se inscribieron un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2. Veintisiete pacientes se sometieron a resección endoscópica, 55 a escisión transanal, 50 a resección radical y 12 a cirugía paliativa o biopsia por metástasis a distancia. De los 50 pacientes que se sometieron a resección radical, 30 (60,0%) tenían ganglios linfáticos clínicamente positivos según los resultados histopatológicos. El valor de corte óptimo para el tamaño del tumor para predecir la supervivencia específica del cáncer fue de 1,5 cm. En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 ≤ 1,5 cm, no hubo diferencias significativas en la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída entre los grupos de escisión local y resección radical ( p >0,05). En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 > 1,5 cm, la supervivencia libre de recaída fue significativamente menor en el grupo de escisión local que en el grupo de resección radical ( p = 0,04).LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza de la revisión retrospectiva y el período de seguimiento relativamente corto son limitaciones de este estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 tienen una tasa no despreciable de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos. La escisión local es una opción factible para tumores ≤ 1,5 cm sin metástasis, mientras que la resección radical es más beneficiosa en aquellos > 1,5 cm. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Male; Female; Propensity Score; Middle Aged; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Proctectomy; Disease-Free Survival; Adult; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Lymphatic Metastasis
PubMed: 38452369
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003097 -
La Tunisie Medicale Jul 2023Surgery remains a cornerstone in the treatment of rectal cancer. Optimal surgical resection implies respect for carcinologic principles. The best way to evaluate a good...
INTRODUCTION
Surgery remains a cornerstone in the treatment of rectal cancer. Optimal surgical resection implies respect for carcinologic principles. The best way to evaluate a good quality of resection requires certainly an exhaustive evaluation of the surgical specimen by the surgeon and the pathologist.
AIM
To assess the quality of resected rectal cancers.
METHODS
This study included patients operated on for rectal malignant epithelial tumors, between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2020, in the general surgery department B at Charles Nicolle's Hospital in Tunis. Data relevant to the pathologic examination were recorded. We performed a descriptive study and an analytic bivariate study comparing the two groups "number of lymph nodes harvested less than 12" versus "number of lymph nodes harvested higher than or equal to 12".
RESULTS
Neoadjuvant therapy was performed in 39 patients (79%). Anterior resection (AR) was performed in 43 patients (43%) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 11 patients (20%). There were no invaded margins. The mean distal surgical margin was 3±1.4 cm. Mesorectum was complete in 38 surgical specimens (70%). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 14. Resection was considered R0 in 47 patients (87%). In bivariate analysis, there was no difference between the "number of harvested lymph nodes <12" and the "number of harvested lymph nodes ≥ 12"groups for the variables: laparotomy, laparoscopic approach, conversion to laparotomy and chemoradiotherapy.
CONCLUSION
Quality of surgical resection of rectal cancer in our department was in accordance with recommendations.
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Laparotomy; Carcinoma; Chemoradiotherapy; Hospitals
PubMed: 38445425
DOI: No ID Found -
International Journal of Colorectal... Mar 2024The long-term prognosis of stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomoses in familial adenomatous polyposis patients in Japan remains unknown. This study aimed to...
PURPOSE
The long-term prognosis of stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomoses in familial adenomatous polyposis patients in Japan remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the overall survival in familial adenomatous polyposis patients who underwent stapled or hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
METHODS
This multicenter retrospective study was conducted at 12 institutions in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. The clinical outcomes of 53 eligible familial adenomatous polyposis patients who underwent stapled (n = 24) and hand-sewn (n = 29) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were compared.
RESULTS
The median follow-up duration was 171.5 months. The incidence of adenoma in the remnant rectum or anal transitional zone and metachronous rectal cancer was significantly more common in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (adenoma: stapled, 45.8%, vs. hand-sewn, 10.3%, p = 0.005; metachronous rectal cancer: 29.2%, vs. none, p = 0.002). The number of deaths was remarkably higher in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (p = 0.002). Metachronous rectal cancer was the most common cause of death. Overall survival was worse in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than in hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (120 months, 90.7% vs. 96.6%; 240 months, 63.7% vs. 96.6%; p = 0.044). Cox regression analysis revealed the independent effects of preoperative advanced colorectal cancer and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on overall survival.
CONCLUSION
Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis negatively affected the overall survival of familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Therefore, hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is recommended for better prognosis in these patients.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Anastomosis, Surgical; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Prognosis; Adenoma; Rectal Neoplasms; Colonic Pouches; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38431759
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04608-9