-
Orthopaedic Surgery Dec 2023Although the incidence of distal junctional problems (DJPs) following long construct-based treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) is lower, affected patients...
PURPOSE
Although the incidence of distal junctional problems (DJPs) following long construct-based treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) is lower, affected patients are more likely to require revision surgery when they occur. So the aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with DJPs to avoid its occurrence by at least 1-year follow-up.
METHODS
A total of 182 DLS patients undergoing long instrumented fusion surgery (≥4 levels) between February 2011 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were placed into the DJP group if a DJP occurred at the final follow-up; patients without mechanical complications were matched 1:2 according to age, sex and BMI as the control group. Patient characteristics, surgical variables, radiographic parameters, lumbar muscularity and fatty degeneration were analyzed statistically. The statistical differences in the results between the two groups (p values <0.05) and other variables selected by experts were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model, and the forwards likelihood ratio method was used to analyze the independent risk factors for DJPs.
RESULTS
Twenty-four (13.2%) patients suffered a DJP in the postoperative period and the reoperation rate was 8.8%. On univariate analysis, the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) CT value (p = 0.042); instrumented levels (p = 0.030); preoperative coronal vertical axis (CVA) (p = 0.046), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) (p = 0.006), L4-S1 lordosis (p = 0.013), sacral slop (SS) (p = 0.030), pelvic tilt (PT) classification (p = 0.004), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p = 0.021); TLK correction (p = 0.049); post-operative CVA (p = 0.029); Overall, There was no significant difference in the paraspinal muscle parameters between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, instrumented levels (OR = 1.595; p = 0.035), preoperative SVA (OR = 1.016; p = 0.022) and preoperative PT (OR = 0.873; p = 0.001) were identified as significant independent risk factors for DJP.
CONCLUSION
Longer instrumented levels, a greater preoperative SVA and a smaller PT were found to be strongly associated with the presence of DJPs in patients treated for DLS. The degeneration of the paraspinal muscles may not be related to the occurrence of DJPs. For DLS patients, the occurrence of DJP can be reduced by selecting reasonable fusion segments and evaluating the patient's sagittal balance and spino-pelvic parameters before operation.
Topics: Humans; Scoliosis; Paraspinal Muscles; Retrospective Studies; Lumbar Vertebrae; Thoracic Vertebrae; Kyphosis; Risk Factors; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 37749777
DOI: 10.1111/os.13878 -
Clinical Spine Surgery Feb 2024National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) review and propensity-matched analysis.
STUDY DESIGN
National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) review and propensity-matched analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate differences in clinical outcomes by operative management.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Odontoid type II fractures are the most prevalent cervical fracture. Operative intervention on these fractures is frequently debated; surgical risks are compounded by clinical severity, patient age, and comorbidities.
METHODS
This registry review included index admissions for odontoid type II fractures [International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes beginning with S12.11] from 1/1/2017 to 1/1/2020; patients who died in the emergency department (ED) were excluded. Propensity score techniques were used to match patients 1:1 by surgical management, using a caliper distance of 0.05, after matching on the following covariates that differed significantly between surgical and nonsurgical patients: age, sex, race, cause of injury, transfer status, injury severity score, ED Glasgow coma score, ED systolic blood pressure, presence of transverse ligamentous injury, cervical dislocation, and 8 comorbidities. The following outcomes were analyzed with McNemar tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests: near-term survival (discharged from the hospital to locations other than morgue or hospice), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital complications, median hospital length of stay (LOS), and median ICU LOS.
RESULTS
There were 16,607 patients, 2916 (17.6%) were operatively managed and 13,691 were nonoperatively managed. Before matching, survival was greater for patients managed operatively compared with nonoperatively (95.0% vs. 88.2%). The matched population consisted of 5334 patients: 2667 patients in the operative group (91.5% of this population) and 2667 well-matched patients in the nonoperative group. After matching, there was a survival benefit for patients who were operatively managed compared with nonoperative management (94.8% vs. 91.4% P <0.001). However, operative management was associated with greater development of complications, ICU admission, and longer hospital and ICU LOS.
CONCLUSION
Compared with nonoperative management, operative management demonstrated a significant near-term survival benefit for patients with odontoid type II fractures in select patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fractures; Comorbidity; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37651564
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001511 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Oct 2023The proper selection of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) remains controversial in the surgical treatment of Scheuermann's disease and there is a paucity of studies...
OBJECTIVE
The proper selection of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) remains controversial in the surgical treatment of Scheuermann's disease and there is a paucity of studies investigating the clinical outcomes of fusion surgery when selecting the vertebra one level proximal to the sagittal stable vertebra (SSV-1) as LIV. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether SSV-1 could be a valid LIV for Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) patients with different curve patterns.
METHODS
This was a prospective study on consecutive SK patients treated with posterior surgery between January 2018 and September 2020, in which the distal fusion level ended at SSV-1. The LIV was selected at SSV-1 only in patients with Risser >2 and with LIV translation less than 40 mm. All of the patients had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients were further grouped based on the sagittal curve pattern as thoracic kyphosis (TK, n = 23) and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK, n = 13). Radiographic parameters including global kyphosis (GK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), LIV translation, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores were performed to evaluate clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 36 patients were recruited in this study, with 23 in the TK group and 13 in the TLK group. In TK group, the GK was significantly decreased from 80.8° ± 10.1° to 45.4° ± 7.7° after surgery, and was maintained at 45.3° ± 8.6° at the final follow-up. While in the TLK group, GK was significantly decreased from 70.7° ± 9.2° to 39.1° ± 5.4° after surgery (p < 0.001) and to 39.3° ± 4.5° at the final follow-up. Meanwhile, despite presenting with different sagittal alignment, significant improvement was observed in LL, SVA, and LIV translation for both TK and TLK groups (p < 0.05). Self-reported scores of pain and self-image in TK group and scores of self-image and function in TLK group showed significant improvement at the final follow-up (all p < 0.05). Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) was observed in two patients (8.7%) in TK group, and one patient (7.7%) in TLK group. No revision surgery was performed.
CONCLUSION
Selecting SSV-1 as LIV can achieve satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes for SK patients with different curve patterns without increasing the risk of DJK. This selection strategy could be a favorable option for SK patients with Risser sign >2 and LIV translation less than 40 mm.
Topics: Humans; Scheuermann Disease; Prospective Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Thoracic Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; Kyphosis; Lordosis; Lumbar Vertebrae
PubMed: 37620983
DOI: 10.1111/os.13854 -
American Journal of Veterinary Research Nov 2023To investigate the feasibility of using shape memory alloy (SMA) implants for atlantoaxial joint stabilization using a rabbit model as a substitute for canines.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the feasibility of using shape memory alloy (SMA) implants for atlantoaxial joint stabilization using a rabbit model as a substitute for canines.
ANIMALS
20 rabbit cadavers.
METHODS
We prepared rabbit cadavers from the middle of the skull to the third cervical vertebra. The vertebral body and canal sizes of the atlas and axis were compared using CT data from rabbits, normal dogs, and dogs with atlantoaxial instability (AAI) to assess the feasibility of using rabbits as substitutes for toy-breed dogs. The shape memory alloy (SMA) implants were designed to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint without compromising the spinal canal passage for safety and were classified into SMA-1 and SMA-2 based on their design. To evaluate the strength, the ventrodorsal force was measured with atlantoaxial ligaments intact, after removing the ligaments, and after applying conventional wire or SMA implants to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint. The time taken for implant application was measured.
RESULTS
No significant difference in vertebral body size of the atlas and axis was observed. A significant difference in vertebral canal size was observed between the animals. In biomechanical testing, the SMA-2 implant provided more stabilization, while the SMA-1 implant had lower strength than the conventional method using wires. The application time of wire was the longest, while that of SMA-1 was the shortest.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
SMA implants provide comparable strength and demonstrate superior efficacy compared to conventional dorsal wire fixation of atlantoaxial stabilization. Therefore, SMA implants can be an effective surgical option for AAI.
Topics: Rabbits; Dogs; Animals; Shape Memory Alloys; Atlanto-Axial Joint; Joint Instability; Ligaments; Cadaver; Dog Diseases
PubMed: 37591491
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.23.07.0158 -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Case Lessons Aug 2023Single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for L4-5 isthmic...
BACKGROUND
Single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for L4-5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Postoperative L5 pedicle fracture with rapidly progressive spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 segment after L4-5 PLIF/TLIF is quite rare, and the etiology remains unclear. This report describes this rare complication and proposes a possible etiology focusing on the lumbosacral sagittal imbalance characterized by an anteriorly shifted lumbar loading axis.
OBSERVATIONS
The authors report a case complicated by L5 bilateral pedicle fractures and rapidly progressive spondylolisthesis at the L5-S1 segment very early after a single-level PLIF for L4-5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Meyerding grade III anterolisthesis was observed at L5-S1 segment by 3 months after the initial surgery. Additional surgery was performed, and the fixation was extended to L4-ilium. Fracture healing was observed at 6 months postoperatively.
LESSONS
This complication may have been caused by abnormal local shear forces on the posterior neural arch of L5 vertebra and L5-S1 intervertebral disc, which were triggered by the fusion surgery for L4 shear-type spondylolisthesis. L4 sagittal vertical axis is considered a reasonable parameter representing lumbosacral sagittal imbalance with an anteriorly shifted loading axis and may be a candidate for the predictive parameters of this rare complication.
PubMed: 37581583
DOI: 10.3171/CASE23279 -
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Aug 2023Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) clinical effects are believed to be linked to its force-time profile characteristics. Previous studies have revealed that the force...
BACKGROUND
Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) clinical effects are believed to be linked to its force-time profile characteristics. Previous studies have revealed that the force measured at the patient-table interface is most commonly greater than the one applied at the clinician-patient interface. The factors explaining this force amplification remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the difference between the force applied to a cadaveric specimen's thoracic spine and the resulting force measured by a force-sensing table, as well as to evaluate the relationship between this difference and both the SMT force-time characteristics and the specimens' characteristics.
METHODS
Twenty-five SMTs with different force-time profiles were delivered by an apparatus at the T7 vertebra of nine human cadaveric specimens lying prone on a treatment table equipped with a force plate. The difference between the force applied by the apparatus and the resulting force measured by the force plate was calculated in absolute force (F) and as the percentage of the applied force (F). Kinematics markers were inserted into T6 to T8 spinous and transverse processes to evaluate vertebral displacements during the SMT thrusts. Mixed-effects linear models were run to evaluate the variance in F and F explained by SMT characteristics (peak force, thrust duration and force application rate), T6 to T8 relative and total displacements, and specimens' characteristics (BMI, height, weight, kyphosis angle, thoracic thickness).
RESULTS
Sixty percent of the trials showed lower force measured at the force plate than the one applied at T7. F¸ was significantly predicted (R = 0.54) by peak force, thrust duration, thoracic thickness and T6-T7 relative displacement in the z-axis (postero-anterior). F was significantly predicted (R = 0.56) by force application rate, thoracic thickness and total T6 displacements. For both dependant variables, thoracic thickness showed the highest R out of all predictors.
CONCLUSION
Difference in force between the clinician-patient and the patient-table interfaces is influenced by SMT force-time characteristics and by thoracic thickness. How these differences in force are associated with vertebral displacements remains unclear. Although further studies are needed, clinicians should consider thorax thickness as a possible modulator of forces being transmitted through it during prone SMT procedures.
Topics: Humans; Manipulation, Spinal; Thoracic Vertebrae; Thorax; Biomechanical Phenomena; Cadaver
PubMed: 37550682
DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00493-1 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2023Some older adults with spinal deformity maintain standing posture via pelvic compensation when their center of gravity moves forward. Therefore, evaluations of global...
Some older adults with spinal deformity maintain standing posture via pelvic compensation when their center of gravity moves forward. Therefore, evaluations of global alignment should include both pelvic tilt (PT) and seventh cervical vertebra-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA). Here, we evaluate standing postures of older adults using C7-SVA with PT and investigate factors related to postural abnormality. This cross-sectional study used an established population-based cohort in Japan wherein 1121 participants underwent sagittal whole-spine radiography in a standing position and bioelectrical impedance analysis for muscle mass measurements. Presence of low back pain (LBP), visual analog scale (VAS) of LBP, and LBP-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) were evaluated. Based on the PT and C7-SVA, the participants were divided into four groups: normal, compensated, non-compensated, and decompensated. We defined the latter three categories as "malalignment" and examined group characteristics and factors. There were significant differences in ODI%, VAS and prevalence of LBP, and sarcopenia among the four groups, although these were non-significant between non-compensated and decompensated groups on stratified analysis. Moreover, the decompensated group was significantly associated with sarcopenia. Individuals with pelvic compensation are at increased risk for LBP and related disorders even with the C7-SVA maintained within normal range.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Sarcopenia; Back Pain; Low Back Pain; Cervical Vertebrae
PubMed: 37481604
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39044-2 -
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society Jan 2024The integrity of the high cervical spine, the transition zone from the brainstem to the spinal cord, is crucial for survival and daily life. The region protects the...
The integrity of the high cervical spine, the transition zone from the brainstem to the spinal cord, is crucial for survival and daily life. The region protects the enclosed neurovascular structure and allows a substantial portion of the head motion. Injuries of the high cervical spine are frequent, and the fractures of the C2 vertebra account for approximately 17-25% of acute cervical fractures. We review the two major types of C2 vertebral fractures, odontoid fracture and Hangman's fracture. For both types of fractures, favorable outcomes could be obtained if the delicately selected conservative treatment is performed. In odontoid fractures, as the most common fracture on the C2 vertebrae, anterior screw fixation is considered first for type II fractures, and C1-2 fusion is suggested when nonunion is a concern or occurs. Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture. Many stable extension type I and II fractures can be treated with external immobilization, whereas the predominant flexion type IIA and III fractures require surgical stabilization. No result proves that either anterior or posterior surgery is superior, and the surgeon should decide on the surgical method after careful consideration according to each clinical situation. This review will briefly describe the basic principles and current treatment concepts of C2 fractures.
PubMed: 37461838
DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0098