-
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health Jan 2022Studies reporting factors associated with paediatric/adolescent acute behavioural disturbance (ABD) in the Emergency Department (ED) are lacking. The aim of this study...
AIM
Studies reporting factors associated with paediatric/adolescent acute behavioural disturbance (ABD) in the Emergency Department (ED) are lacking. The aim of this study is to describe paediatric/adolescent ED presentations involving ABD events.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review of presentations involving ABD events, identified via hospital security log, to a tertiary referral paediatric ED during the 2017 calendar year. Data reported included: cause of presentation, use of sedation/physical restraint, ED/inpatient length of stay (LOS) and time requiring security staff presence.
RESULTS
From 280 reported ABD episodes 26 were excluded leaving 254 events involving 150 patients across 233 presentations of whom 38 (25.3%) presented on multiple occasions. Median age was 14 years (interquartile range (IQR): 13-16), 132/233 (56.7%) were female, 167/233 (71.7%) primary mental health complaints, 30/233 (12.9%) deliberate self-harm, 18/233 (7.7%) deliberate self-poisoning, 11/233 (4.7%) acute intoxication and 7/233 (3.0%) other. Transport to hospital involved police and ambulance in 124/233 (53.2%), ambulance only 71/233 (30.5%), police only 16/233 (6.9%), relative or carer 20/233 (8.6%), with self-presentation in 2/233 (0.9%). Sedation or physical restraint was used in 81/233 (34.8%), both 38/233 (16.3%), restraint only 26/233 (11.2%) and sedation only 17/234 (7.3%). Intra-muscular droperidol accounted for 57/96 (59.4%) sedations, IM/IV benzodiazepines 15/96 (15.6%), IM/IV ketamine 5/96 (5.2%) and 19/96 (19.8%) other. Discharge from ED occurred in 171/233 (73.1%) with median ED LOS 5.1 h (IQR: 3.5-7.7) and median hospital LOS 92.4 h (IQR: 47.5-273.4) for those admitted. The Mental Health Act was utilised in 183/233 (78.5%) presentations. Median security staff time requirement per presentation was 2.4 h (IQR: 1.0-3.9).
CONCLUSIONS
Paediatric/adolescent ED presentations involving ABD are primarily due to mental health complaints. Less than half require the use of sedation/physical restraint. Time requiring security staff involvement is a significant resource consumption.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Patient Discharge; Police; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34375471
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.15668 -
Cureus Jun 2021Prophylactic doses of droperidol are effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, due to concerns of QT interval prolongation and...
Prophylactic doses of droperidol are effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, due to concerns of QT interval prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias, the safety of droperidol for PONV prophylaxis has been debated. A 70-year-old woman was scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. She had a history of aortic valve replacement. Oral aprindine (40 mg/day) was prescribed. Preoperative electrocardiogram showed mild QT interval prolongation (QTc = 475 ms). Anesthesia was induced using propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium, and maintained using desflurane, remifentanil, and a bolus dose of rocuronium. The surgery was uneventful. At the time of skin closure, droperidol (1.25 mg) was administered intravenously for PONV prophylaxis. Twenty-three minutes after administration of droperidol, a sudden onset of premature cardiac contraction was observed, which progressed directly to ventricular tachycardia and atrioventricular block. Arrhythmia due to droperidol-induced QT interval prolongation was strongly suspected. Intravenous magnesium sulfate (2 g) and atropine (0.5 mg) were administered immediately. The ventricular tachycardia resolved quickly after the magnesium injection. Following the resolution of the arrhythmia, the patient was extubated. The patient experienced ventricular tachycardia after a prophylactic dose of droperidol that resulted from QT interval prolongation due to the preoperative medication. It may be prudent to avoid even low-dose droperidol in the background of already present QT prolongation, especially when multiple putative QT-prolonging drugs are used.
PubMed: 34277183
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15560 -
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology... 2022Procedures for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) prevention are mostly based on identification of the risk factors before administering antiemetic drugs. The...
BACKGROUNDS
Procedures for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) prevention are mostly based on identification of the risk factors before administering antiemetic drugs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the extended use of antiemetic on the PONV in the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU).
METHODS
Two separate 4-year periods (2007...2010, P1, and (2015...2018, P2) were evaluated. During P1, the protocol consisted of dexamethasone and droperidol for patients with a locally adapted high PONV score, followed by ondansetron for rescue in the PACU. For Period 2, dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) were administered in patients under general or regional anesthesia, or sedation longer than 30 minutes, while droperidol (1.25 mg) in rescue was injected in cases of PONV in the PACU. An Anesthesia Information Management System was used to evaluate the intensity score of PONV (1 to 5), putative compliance, sedation, and perioperative opioid consumption upon arrival in the PACU.
RESULTS
A total of 27,602 patients were assessed in P1 and 36,100 in P2. The administration of dexamethasone and ondansetron increased several fold (p < 0.0001). The high PONV scores were more improved in P2 than in P1, with scores (3+4+5) for P1 vs. P2, p < 0.0001. Overall, 99.7% of the patients in P2 were asymptomatic at discharge. Morphine consumption decreased from 6.9..1.5 mg in P1 to 3.5 .. 1.5 mg in P2 (p < 0.0001).
DISCUSSION
The extension of pharmacological prevention of PONV was associated with a decrease in the intensity of severe PONV. However, uncertainty regarding confounding factors should not be ignored. IRB: n.. 92012/33465.
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Ondansetron; Droperidol; Retrospective Studies; Antiemetics; Neoplasms; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 34216701
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.06.007 -
The Western Journal of Emergency... Dec 2020
Topics: Antiemetics; Droperidol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Risk
PubMed: 33856329
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2020.9.49870 -
The Western Journal of Emergency... Jan 2021
Topics: Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Incidence; Long QT Syndrome
PubMed: 33856328
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2020.9.49486 -
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology &... Jan 2021Opioid poisoning is a frequent cause of death in drug addicts and occurs with opioid treatment. Quetiapine is often found in forensic autopsies and may increase the risk...
Opioid poisoning is a frequent cause of death in drug addicts and occurs with opioid treatment. Quetiapine is often found in forensic autopsies and may increase the risk of fatal opioid poisoning by enhancing sedation, respiratory depression, hypotension and QT prolongation. We systematically searched for studies of acute toxicity of quetiapine or other antipsychotics combined with morphine or methadone. Case reports describing toxicity of quetiapine combined with morphine or methadone were also included. We retrieved one human study that observed pharmacokinetic interaction between quetiapine and methadone, and 16 other human studies. Fourteen investigated the combination of droperidol and morphine in treatment doses, and some indicated an additive sedative effect. Five animal studies with acepromazine in combination with morphine or methadone were located and indicated an additive effect on sedation and hypotension. Six forensic case reports in which death could have been caused solely by quetiapine, the opioid, or other drugs were found. Thus, acute toxicity of quetiapine combined with morphine or methadone has not been studied. Because of quetiapine's effects on alpha-adrenoceptors, muscarinic and histamine receptors, human ether-a-go-go-channels and methadone kinetics, we suggest further research to clarify if the indicated additive effects of opioids and droperidol or acepromazine are also true for quetiapine.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Autopsy; Cause of Death; Consciousness; Drug Interactions; Drug Overdose; Female; Forensic Toxicology; Humans; Hypotension; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Morphine; Opioid-Related Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Respiratory Insufficiency; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 33245632
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13480 -
European Journal of Clinical... May 2021Most psychiatric drugs, such as antidepressants (AD) and antipsychotics (AP), may cause cardiac adverse events (CAE). We used summaries of product characteristics (SmPC)...
PURPOSE
Most psychiatric drugs, such as antidepressants (AD) and antipsychotics (AP), may cause cardiac adverse events (CAE). We used summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) for assessing the likelihood of AD and AP to cause CAE.
METHODS
We identified all original medicinal products (OMP) of AD and AP approved in Germany. We searched for their SmPCs using the online services of PharmaNet.Bund, Gelbe liste®, Rote Liste®, Fachinfo-Service®, and via manufacturer contact. We extracted frequencies of reported CAE (QT prolongation, Torsade de Pointes tachycardia, and ventricular arrhythmia) and performed a risk assessment.
RESULTS
We obtained the SmPCs of 24 AD and 26 AP identified as OMP. Comparably high reported frequencies regarding QT prolongation were found for Invega® (paliperidone), Serdolect® (sertindole) (≥ 1/100 and < 1/10), and Zoloft® (sertraline) (≥ 1/10.000 and < 1/1000); regarding Torsade de Pointes tachycardia were found for Serdolect® (≥ 1/1000 to < 1/100), Zoloft®, and Trevilor® (venlafaxine) (≥ 1/10.000 and < 1/1000); regarding ventricular tachycardia for Solian® (amisulpride), Xomolix® (droperidol), Zyprexa® (olanzapine), and Trevilor® (≥ 1/10.000 and < 1/1000).
CONCLUSION
The risk and frequency of CAE, as reported in the SmPCs, varied significantly among substances and between groups. There are more reports for AP than AD. The AP with the most frequently reported CAE (QT prolongation and Torsade de Pointes tachycardia) was Serdolect®; for AD, Zoloft® (QT prolongation, Torsade de Pointes tachycardia) and Trevilor® (Torsade de Pointes tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia) carried a higher cardiac risk.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Germany; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Torsades de Pointes
PubMed: 33230596
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-03049-x -
Anaesthesia Jul 2021Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia. Although dozens of different anti-emetics are available for clinical practice, there is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia. Although dozens of different anti-emetics are available for clinical practice, there is currently no comparative ranking of efficacy and safety of these drugs to inform clinical practice. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analyses to compare, and rank in terms of efficacy and safety, single anti-emetic drugs and their combinations, including 5-hydroxytryptamine , dopamine-2 and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists; corticosteroids; antihistamines; and anticholinergics used to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia. We systematically searched for placebo-controlled and head-to-head randomised controlled trials up to November 2017 (updated in April 2020). We assessed how trustworthy the evidence was using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approaches for vomiting within 24 h postoperatively, serious adverse events, any adverse event and drug class-specific side-effects. We included 585 trials (97,516 participants, 83% women) testing 44 single drugs and 51 drug combinations. The studies' overall risk of bias was assessed as low in only 27% of the studies. In 282 trials, 29 out of 36 drug combinations and 10 out of 28 single drugs lowered the risk of vomiting at least 20% compared with placebo. In the ranking of treatments, combinations of drugs were generally more effective than single drugs. Single neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists were as effective as other drug combinations. Out of the 10 effective single drugs, certainty of evidence was high for aprepitant, with risk ratio (95%CI) 0.26 (0.18-0.38); ramosetron, 0.44 (0.32-0.59); granisetron, 0.45 (0.38-0.54); dexamethasone, 0.51 (0.44-0.57); and ondansetron, 0.55 (0.51-0.60). It was moderate for fosaprepitant, 0.06 (0.02-0.21) and droperidol, 0.61 (0.54-0.69). Granisetron and amisulpride are likely to have little or no increase in any adverse event compared with placebo, while dimenhydrinate and scopolamine may increase the number of patients with any adverse event compared with placebo. So far, there is no convincing evidence that other single drugs effect the incidence of serious, or any, adverse events when compared with placebo. Among drug class specific side-effects, evidence for single drugs is mostly not convincing. There is convincing evidence regarding the prophylactic effect of at least seven single drugs for postoperative vomiting such that future studies investigating these drugs will probably not change the estimated beneficial effect. However, there is still considerable lack of evidence regarding safety aspects that does warrant investigation.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, General; Antiemetics; Female; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33170514
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15295