-
American Journal of Health-system... Jun 2024Parenteral nutrition (PN) is an established therapy when oral/enteral feeding is not sufficient or is contraindicated, but nevertheless PN remains a complex, high-alert... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Parenteral nutrition (PN) is an established therapy when oral/enteral feeding is not sufficient or is contraindicated, but nevertheless PN remains a complex, high-alert medication that is susceptible to errors that may affect patient safety. Over time, considerable progress has been made to make PN practices safer. The purpose of this article is to address ongoing challenges to improve the PN use process from prescription to administration and monitoring, and to outline practical aspects fostering the safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of PN, as discussed at the International Safety and Quality of PN Summit.
SUMMARY
Opportunities to improve the PN use process in clinical practice include the promotion of inter-disciplinary communication, vigilant surveillance for complications, staff education to increase competency, and more consistent use of advanced technologies that allow automated safety checks throughout the PN process. Topics covered include considerations on PN formulations, including the value of intravenous lipid emulsions (ILEs), trends in compounding PN, the current and future role of market-authorized multi-chamber PN bags containing all 3 macronutrients (amino acids, glucose/dextrose, and ILE) in the United States and in Europe, and strategies to cope with the increasing global problem of PN product shortages.
CONCLUSION
This review outlines potential strategies to use in clinical practice to overcome ongoing challenges throughout the PN use process, and ultimately promote PN patient safety.
Topics: Humans; Parenteral Nutrition; Patient Safety; Fat Emulsions, Intravenous; United States; Internationality; Europe
PubMed: 38869257
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae079 -
American Journal of Health-system... Jun 2024This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit concerning the acute care...
PURPOSE
This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit concerning the acute care setting. Some European practices presented in this article do not conform with USP general chapter <797> requirements. Nevertheless, the purpose is to cover the challenges experienced in delivering high-quality PN within hospitals in the United States and Europe, in order to share best practices and experiences more widely.
SUMMARY
Core issues regarding the PN process within an acute care setting are largely the same everywhere: There are ongoing pressures for greater efficiency, optimization, and also concurrent commitments to make PN safer for patients. Within Europe, in recent years, the use of market-authorized multi-chamber bags (MCBs) has increased greatly, mainly for safety, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency purposes. However, in the US, hospitals with low PN volumes may face particular challenges, as automated compounding equipment is often unaffordable in this setting and the variety of available MCBs is limited. This can result in the need to operate several PN systems in parallel, adding to the complexity of the PN use process. Ongoing PN quality and safety initiatives from US institutions with various PN volumes are presented. In the future, the availability of a greater selection of MCBs in the US may increase, leading to a reduction in dependence on compounded PN, as has been seen in many European countries.
CONCLUSION
The examples presented may encourage improvements in the safety and quality of PN within the acute care setting worldwide.
Topics: Humans; Europe; Hospitals; Parenteral Nutrition; Parenteral Nutrition Solutions; Patient Safety; Pharmacy Service, Hospital; United States; Congresses as Topic
PubMed: 38869256
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae080 -
American Journal of Health-system... Jun 2024The International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit consisted of presentations, discussions, and formulation of consensus statements. The purpose...
PURPOSE
The International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit consisted of presentations, discussions, and formulation of consensus statements. The purpose here is to briefly summarize the summit and to present the consensus statements.
SUMMARY
There was a high degree of consensus, with all statements approved by all authors/summit experts. These consensus statements should be regarded not as formal guidelines but rather as best-practice guidance intended to complement national and international nutrition society evidence-based guidelines and position statements. This article also summarizes key discussion topics from the summit, encompassing up-to-date knowledge and practical guidance concerning PN safety and quality in various countries and clinical settings, focusing on adult patients. Clear geographical differences exist between practices in Europe and the United States, and different approaches to improve the safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of PN vary, particularly with regard to the delivery systems used. Discussion between experts allowed for an exchange of practical experience in optimizing PN use processes, opportunities for standardization, use of electronic systems, potential improvements in PN formulations, better management during PN component shortages, and practical guidance to address patients' needs, particularly during long-term/home PN.
CONCLUSION
The consensus statements are the collective opinion of the panel members and form best-practice guidance. The authors intend that this guidance may help to improve the safety and quality of PN in a variety of settings by bridging the gap between published guideline recommendations and common practical issues.
Topics: Humans; Parenteral Nutrition; Consensus; Patient Safety; Practice Guidelines as Topic
PubMed: 38869255
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae078 -
American Journal of Health-system... Jun 2024
Topics: Humans; Parenteral Nutrition; Patient Safety
PubMed: 38869254
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae076 -
The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology... Jun 2024Acetaminophen (APAP) is an alternative to indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The side effect profile of non-steroidal...
OBJECTIVE
Acetaminophen (APAP) is an alternative to indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The side effect profile of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) presents enteral feeding safety concerns; however, the safety of enteral feeding on APAP is largely unknown. Optimal feeding strategies during pharmacological PDA treatment are unknown, leading to practice variation. This study aims to assess the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes in neonates treated with APAP for PDA closure while receiving enteral feedings.
METHODS
Single-center retrospective cohort study of 59 extremely low birth weight (ELBW), premature neonates who received APAP for PDA treatment divided into Low Volume (LV; ≤ 20 mL/kg/day) and High Volume (HV; > 20 mL/kg/day) enteral feeding groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of any suspected or confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Timing of nutrition milestones, parenteral nutrition (PN) days, and adverse outcomes (feeding intolerance, liver dysfunction, death prior to discharge) were evaluated.
RESULTS
The incidence of suspected or confirmed NEC was 19.5% in the LV group and 13.3% in the HV group (p = 0.593). The HV group reached full feeds 6 days sooner (18 vs 24 days, p = 0.024) and had fewer PN days (17 vs 23.5 days, p = 0.044) with no difference in adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Provision of > 20 mL/kg/day of enteral feeds during APAP treatment of PDA decreased time to full feeds and PN days compared to trophic feedings (≤ 20 mL/kg/day) with no difference in adverse GI outcomes. Continuing enteral feeding during APAP PDA treatment appears safe while improving achievement of nutritional milestones.
PubMed: 38863856
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.278 -
Pediatrics and Neonatology Jun 2024Candidiasis is a critical infection that is associated with very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g). This study investigated the characteristics and clinical presentation...
BACKGROUND
Candidiasis is a critical infection that is associated with very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g). This study investigated the characteristics and clinical presentation of candidiasis in Korean VLBW infants according to the onset of candidemia.
METHODS
All VLBW infants with candidemia, defined as blood culture-positive candidiasis and registered in a multicenter database with data from 70 neonatal units of the Korean Neonatal Network between 2013 and 2017, were included in this study. Early-onset candidemia (EOC; ≤10 days) and late-onset candidemia (LOC; >10 days) were analyzed. The demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, and outcomes of candidemia were also determined.
RESULTS
The overall incidence of candidemia was 2% (209/10,397) and 4% (173/3934) in VLBW and extremely very low birth weight (ELBW; <1000 g) infants, respectively. In ELBW infants, gestational age was significantly younger at EOC than at LOC (P = 0.015). Cesarean section, respiratory distress syndrome, severe bronchopulmonary disease, pulmonary hemorrhage, prior-bacteremia, neonatal seizures, and periventricular leukomalacia were significantly more common in the LOC group than in the EOC group (P < 0.05). The duration of invasive ventilation, total parenteral nutrition, and hospital stay were significantly longer in the LOC group than in the EOC group (P < 0.05). Most infections were caused by Candida spp. (91.8%). The mortality rate of ELBW infants with candidemia was 41%, which was higher than that of those without candidemia (29%) (P < 0.001). Mortality due to infection was also higher in infants with candidemia (55%) than in those without candidemia (15%) (P < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences between the EOC and LOC groups.
CONCLUSIONS
LOC was more common than EOC in VLBW infants. Considering the risk factors of LOC, active weaning from invasive ventilators and aggressive enteral feeding are required to decrease LOC. Furthermore, preventing candidemia is necessary to reduce mortality in VLBW infants.
PubMed: 38862350
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.01.006 -
Iranian Journal of Microbiology Apr 2024Early diagnosis of candidemia is of vital importance in reducing mortality and morbidity. The main objective of the study was to determine the TTP (Time to Positivity)...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Early diagnosis of candidemia is of vital importance in reducing mortality and morbidity. The main objective of the study was to determine the TTP (Time to Positivity) of different species of causing bloodstream infection and to see whether TTP can help differentiate which is frequently fluconazole resistant from Fluconazole sensitive .
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TTP (Time to positivity) and AAT (Appropriate Antifungal therapy) were noted for Blood cultures becoming positive for . Presence of Risk factors for candidemia like prolonged ICU stay, neutropenia, Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN), use of steroids , broad spectrum antibiotics, use of Central Venous Catheter, Foleys catheter were also analyzed.
RESULTS
The most frequent isolates were , and The median TTP for all isolates in our study was 34 hours. The diagnostic sensitivity of TTP for detecting and in patients with candidemia was 88% and 85% respectively. TTP showed that there was no difference in survival between TTP <24 hrs. and > 24hrs. Initiation of antifungal therapy <24 hours and > 24hrs after onset of candidemia had no association with survival.
CONCLUSION
Longer TTP maybe predictive of while shorter TTP may be predictive of In our study we found that fluconazole resistant causing blood stream infection is quite unlikely if the TTP of the isolate is <48hrs.
PubMed: 38854986
DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v16i2.15361 -
Iranian Journal of Microbiology Apr 2024Candidemia is the most common serious fungal infection in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU). It series fourth among bloodstream infectious agents. In...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Candidemia is the most common serious fungal infection in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU). It series fourth among bloodstream infectious agents. In this study, candidemia risk analysis was examined in COVID 19 and non-COVID 19 patients during the pandemic period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
COVID 19 and non-COVID 19 cases who were followed up with candidemia in the ICU of our hospital were retrospectively screened. Demographic data, intubation, central venous catheter (CVC), medications, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) status were evaluated in terms of risk between the two groups. Isolated and susceptibilty were evaluated.
RESULTS
When age, gender, medication, intubation, TPN and CVC were evaluated, no difference was seen in terms of risk. Differences were detected in terms of comorbidities. While the most frequently identified species was the most frequently detected species in the COVID19 patient group was
CONCLUSION
There was no difference in candidemia incidence and risk factors between the two groups. Since candidemias were evaluated in terms of comorbidities, it was determined that Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and chronic obstructive pulmoner disease (COPD) were more common in patients with COVID 19 and less common in coronary artery disease (CAD) and malignancy.
PubMed: 38854981
DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v16i2.15357 -
Medicine Jun 2024Ileal perforation caused by the insertion of a drainage tube is a rare complication. Hence, the utilization of surgical drains in abdominal surgery remains... (Review)
Review
RATIONALE
Ileal perforation caused by the insertion of a drainage tube is a rare complication. Hence, the utilization of surgical drains in abdominal surgery remains controversial. At present, there is a trend to reduce the utilization of drains in abdominal surgery, although certain situations may necessitate their application.
PATIENT CONCERNS
A 25-year-old Chinese woman presented with a history of right lower abdominal pain persisting for 10 days. Imaging examinations, including abdominal computed tomography and ultrasound, identified low-density lesions measuring 10 × 8 × 8cm3 in the right lower abdomen, which are consistent with perforated appendicitis complicated by a peri-appendiceal abscess. A laparoscopic appendectomy was carried out. On the 5th postoperative day, the drainage fluid changed to a grass-green color (80mL). Imaging with retrograde contrast through the drainage tube revealed that the 26 Fr silicon rubber drainage tube tip was positioned 50cm away from the ileocecal junction within the ileum. Both the ileal and ileocecal regions appeared well-developed.
INTERVENTION AND OUTCOMES
Oral intake was suspended, and the patient received antacids, somatostatin, antibiotics, and total parenteral nutrition. On the 19th postoperative day, a follow-up imaging procedure using retrograde contrast through the drainage tube indicated that the tube tip was sealed. The treatment concluded on day 33 postoperatively, and the patient was discharged.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Ileal perforation due to an abdominal drainage tube following laparoscopic appendectomy constitutes a rare but serious complication. However, due to the adhesion and inflammatory changes around the abscess, laparoscopic dissection becomes a challenging and risky process, and the surgical skills and experiences are particularly important. Removing the abdominal drainage tube promptly based on the characteristics of the drainage fluid is recommended. The findings provide valuable insights for surgeons navigating similar challenges.
Topics: Humans; Female; Adult; Appendectomy; Drainage; Laparoscopy; Appendicitis; Ileum; Intestinal Perforation; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38847709
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038405 -
Medecine Tropicale Et Sante... Mar 2024Caustic ingestion in children is a public health problem; it is mainly due to domestic accidents due to improper packaging and storage of caustic products. It is a...
[Results of emergency management of esophageal lesions related to caustic ingestion in children in the emergency department of the General Reference Hospital of Niamey (Niger)].
INTRODUCTION
Caustic ingestion in children is a public health problem; it is mainly due to domestic accidents due to improper packaging and storage of caustic products. It is a medical and surgical emergency whose management is multidisciplinary. The lesions caused by the accidental ingestion of caustics can affect the functional and vital prognosis in 10% of cases.
METHODOLOGY
A retrospective, descriptive study from January 2020 to December 2022 (2 years), carried out in the emergency department of the General Reference Hospital of Niamey (Niger). The study included patients less than 15 years old admitted for ingesting a caustic product.
RESULTS
Our study included 17 patients. The average age was 5 years, with age extremes of 2 to 11 years. We noted a male predominance with a sex ratio (M/F) of 2.4. Ingestion of caustic products was accidental in all cases. The caustic product was caustic soda in 59%. The average quantity of product ingested was 5 ml (2 ml to 20 ml). The average consultation time was 3 days (3 hours to 15 days). Clinically, dysphagia was the most functional sign, represented by 13 cases, or 76%. Regarding general signs, 3 patients (18%) were admitted with fever; blood pressure was normal in 15 patients (88%); and 2 patients (18%) were admitted in a state of shock. The respiratory rate was normal in 14 patients (82%). Four patients (24%) were admitted in a state of deterioration in the general condition associated with severe malnutrition and dehydration. On physical examination, 2 patients (12%) presented with abdominal defense at the epigastric level. Examination of the ENT sphere revealed benign buccopharyngeal ulcerations in 2 patients (12%). Esogastroduodenal fibroscopy was performed in 4 patients (24%). The caustic lesions observed in the esophagus were: Zargar stage I at 25%, stage Ila at 50%, and stage Illb at 25%. In the stomach, the lesions were Zargar stage I in 75% of cases and stage III in 25% of cases. An injected thoracic-abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) was performed in 3 patients (18%). It revealed a lack of enhancement of the esophageal wall compatible with esophageal necrosis in one patient. An esophagogastroduodenal transit was performed in 8 patients (47%) admitted more than 72 hours after ingestion of the caustic. They showed esophageal stenoses longer than 3 cm in 3 patients, multiple esophageal stenoses in 2 patients, a single esophageal stenosis in 2 patients, and a single antropyloric stenosis in 1 patient. Therapeutically, all patients benefited from antiemetics to avoid vomiting and proton pump inhibitors. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis with third-generation cephalosporin was administered to 12 patients (71%). Corticosteroid therapy based on IV prednisolone at a dose of 1 g/1.73 m per day was used to limit or prevent stenoses in 9 patients (53%). Parenteral nutrition was administered to 7 patients (41%). Endoscopic dilations were performed in 2 patients (12%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 7 patients (41%): 3 patients underwent transitional feeding gastrostomies; in 3 others, esophagoplasties by colon transplant were performed, and 1 patient was treated by stripping of the esophagus associated with total gastrectomy. The postoperative course was marked by a leak of esocolic anastomosis in one patient for whom conservative treatment was performed with good progress. The average length of hospital stay was 5 days (1-32 days).
CONCLUSION
Accidental caustic ingestions can have serious consequences. Preventing these accidents relies on raising public awareness of the dangers associated with improper storage of these products.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Child; Child, Preschool; Caustics; Retrospective Studies; Burns, Chemical; Emergency Service, Hospital; Esophagus; Esophageal Diseases
PubMed: 38846116
DOI: 10.48327/mtsi.v4i1.2024.399