-
International Journal of Surgery Case... Mar 2024Penile fracture is a relatively uncommon condition that most commonly results from blunt trauma during sexual intercourse, forced flexion, masturbation, or rolling over....
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE
Penile fracture is a relatively uncommon condition that most commonly results from blunt trauma during sexual intercourse, forced flexion, masturbation, or rolling over. However, other causes are also possible. It is a catastrophic illness to the patient's organic and psychological health.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report a case of a 43-year-old male patient who sustained a penile fracture due to the presence of a toothbrush implant. No urethral injury was documented. The patient underwent surgical repair, and one month post-surgery, exhibited no deformity and had a normal sexual and voiding function.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION
Penile fracture is most commonly caused by blunt trauma during sexual intercourse. While it has not been documented in the literature, penile implants may increase the incidence of penile fractures. Clinical examination and urethrography confirmed the absence of urethral injury. In cases where a penile fracture is suspected, the only management is surgical exploration. This approach has resulted in the lowest rate of negative long-term sequelae and does not negatively impact the patient's psychological well-being.
CONCLUSION
Penile fracture is a rare but serious condition that can result from the presence of an unstandardized implant. It is not close to the incidence of penile fracture for unstandardized prosthesis as even the standardized implant can get fracture when counter to high velocity. To avoid functional and morphological abnormalities, surgical exploration is recommended as the primary course of treatment.
PubMed: 38394942
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109420 -
Asian Journal of Andrology Feb 2024Penile prosthesis surgery is a definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The two categories of penile prosthesis are endorsed by professional guidelines,...
Penile prosthesis surgery is a definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The two categories of penile prosthesis are endorsed by professional guidelines, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and malleable penile prosthesis (MPP). Each modality of penile prosthesis offers distinct advantages and incorporates specific design features, allowing for personalized device selection that aligns with individual needs and preferences. While the overall complication rate of penile implant surgery remains low, surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for complications in the perioperative time period. Multimodal analgesic regimens including nerve blocks and narcotic-free pathways should be administered to manage perioperative pain. Finally, the high patient satisfaction after penile prosthesis surgery underscores the success of this ED treatment option.
PubMed: 38376174
DOI: 10.4103/aja202386 -
Sexual Medicine Feb 2024The significance of geographic barriers to receiving inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) treatment is uncertain according to the existing medical literature.
BACKGROUND
The significance of geographic barriers to receiving inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) treatment is uncertain according to the existing medical literature.
AIM
To describe the travel patterns of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the United States who underwent IPP surgery.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files. Men aged ≥65 years with an ED diagnosis who underwent IPP surgery between January 2016 and December 2021 were identified from the database. Federal Information Processing Series codes from the National Bureau of Economic Research's County Distance Database were used to determine geographic distances from patients' homes to the facilities at which surgery was performed.
OUTCOMES
Evaluations included the proportions of men who traveled outside their county of residence or state for IPP treatment and the average distances in miles traveled.
RESULTS
Among 15 954 men with ED undergoing IPP treatment, 56.4% received care out of their county for IPP, at a mean distance of 125.6 miles (range, 3.8-4935.0). Although patients aged ≥80 years were less likely to travel outside their county as compared with men aged 65 to 69 years (48.1% vs 57.1%, < .001), if they traveled, they were likely to travel farther (mean, 171.8 vs 117.7 miles; < .001). South Dakota had the highest proportion of men traveling outside their county for IPP treatment (91.3%; mean, 514.2 miles), while Vermont had the highest proportion traveling outside their home state (73.7%).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
By unveiling disparities in access, this study will potentially lead to tailored interventions that enhance patient care and health outcomes.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS
Strengths include the uniqueness in (1) evaluating the proportions of patients who travel out of their county of residence or home state for IPP treatment and (2) quantifying the average distances that patients traveled. An additional strength is the large sample size due to the retrospective design and database used. The analysis did not capture all Medicare enrollees; however, it did encompass all traditional Medicare enrollees, representing approximately half of all men in the US aged ≥65 years. Limitations include not being generalizable to entire population of the US, as the study examined only Medicare enrollees. In addition, the study period includes the pandemic, which could have affected travel patterns. Furthermore, the coding and accuracy of the data are limitations of using administrative claims data for research.
CONCLUSION
Study findings showed that many men with Medicare and ED traveled from their home geographic location for IPP treatment.
PubMed: 38348105
DOI: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad073 -
Cancers Jan 2024Given that the current standard of proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer is through bilateral beams, this modality is typically avoided when it comes to treatment of...
PURPOSE
Given that the current standard of proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer is through bilateral beams, this modality is typically avoided when it comes to treatment of patients with hip prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether novel PT methods, i.e., anterior proton beams and proton arc therapy (PArc), could be feasible options to treat this patient subpopulation. We evaluate PT methods in the context of dosimetry and robustness and compare with standard of practice volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to explore any potential benefits.
METHODS
Two PT and one VMAT treatment plans were retrospectively created for 10 patients who participated in a clinical trial with a weekly repeat CT (rCT) imaging component. All plans were robustly optimized and featured: (1) combination anterior oblique and lateral proton beams (AoL), (2) PArc, and (3) VMAT. All patients had hydrogel spacers in place, which enabled safe application of anterior proton beams. The planned dose was 70 Gy (RBE) to the entire prostate gland and 50 Gy (RBE) to the proximal seminal vesicles in 28 fractions. Along with plan dose-volume metrics, robustness to setup and interfractional variations were evaluated using the weekly rCT images. The linear energy transfer (LET)-weighted dose was evaluated for PArc plans to ensure urethra sparing given the typical high-LET region at the end of range.
RESULTS
Both PT methods were dosimetrically feasible and provided reduction of some key OAR metrics compared to VMAT except for penile bulb, while providing equally good target coverage. Significant differences in median rectum V35 (22-25%), penile bulb Dmean (5 Gy), rectum V61 (2%), right femoral head Dmean (5 Gy), and bladder V39 (4%) were found between PT and VMAT. All plans were equally robust to variations. LET-weighted dose in urethra was equivalent to the physical dose for PArc plans and hence no added urethral toxicity was expected.
CONCLUSIONS
PT for treatment of prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis is feasible and equivalent or potentially superior to VMAT in quality in some cases. The choice of radiotherapy regimen can be personalized based on patient characteristics to achieve the best treatment outcome.
PubMed: 38254818
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020330 -
Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2024There is a rising prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related urinary symptoms along with erectile dysfunction in the aging male population. Therefore,...
BACKGROUND
There is a rising prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related urinary symptoms along with erectile dysfunction in the aging male population. Therefore, assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is advised before penile prosthesis surgery with some men requiring preoperative transurethral surgical management to reduce the risk of post-procedure complications. However, less is known about the natural history of men with uncomplicated LUTS who do not require surgical management for BPH before penile prosthesis.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to assess the natural history of BPH-related uncomplicated LUTS in men following penile prosthesis surgery.
DESIGN
Single institution retrospective review.
METHODS
Following institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of all adult males with a preoperative diagnosis of LUTS undergoing penile prosthesis surgery at our institution from January 2017 to November 2022. The primary outcome was progression to transurethral surgery.
RESULTS
From 2017 to 2022, 211 patients with preexisting LUTS underwent penile prosthesis surgery and met all criteria for inclusion including no history of transurethral surgery. The median (interquartile range, IQR) AUA symptom score (AUA-SS) was 12 (12). Post-void residual was below 200 cc in 96.2% of patients preoperatively and 99.1% of patients after surgery. At a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 9 (23) months after surgery, 5.7% (12/211) of patients had progressed to bladder outlet surgery and 35.5% of patients endorsed LUTS bother with a median (IQR) AUA-SS of 14.5 (11.8).
CONCLUSION
The majority of patients with uncomplicated LUTS did not require bladder outlet surgery following penile prosthesis implantation and could be managed with conservative or pharmacologic measures alone. Prostate gland size was significantly larger in patients who progressed to bladder outlet surgery. While the results are overall reassuring, further study is needed to identify specific factors associated with pursuing bladder outlet surgery in this small subset of patients.
PubMed: 38223525
DOI: 10.1177/17562872241226579 -
Urology Case Reports Jan 2024Testicular cancers represent about 5 % of all urological tumors. Most patients who undergo radical orchiectomy (RO) decide to place a testicular prosthesis, for a...
Testicular cancers represent about 5 % of all urological tumors. Most patients who undergo radical orchiectomy (RO) decide to place a testicular prosthesis, for a cosmetic result and to accept the testicular loss. Among all late complications, a spontaneous prosthesis rupture is a rare event contrary to penile prosthesis. The present study reported the case of a 53-year-old Italian man has presented to our department principally for a suspicious rupture of testicular implant, placed twenty years before after a RO. Despite the findings at scrotal ultrasonography, at final histology, the mass was identified as spontaneously broken intra-scrotal epidermoid cyst.
PubMed: 38222483
DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102639 -
Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2024Penile shortening, frequently resulting from end-stage Peyronie's disease (PD), has a negative impact on patients' sexual activity and overall quality of life,... (Review)
Review
Risk and benefits of penile length preservation techniques during penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review by the young academic urologists sexual and reproductive health working group.
BACKGROUND
Penile shortening, frequently resulting from end-stage Peyronie's disease (PD), has a negative impact on patients' sexual activity and overall quality of life, especially when accompanied by Erectile dysfunction (ED). Various surgical techniques have been described to manage concomitant ED and penile shortening through penile prosthesis (PP) implantation.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and risks of different penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation.
DESIGN
A systematic review of the available literature on the use of penile length preservation maneuvers in conjunction with PP implantation was conducted.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS
For this systematic review, three databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) and clinical trial.gov were queried for relevant publications from 1 January 1990 to 1 September 2022. The review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
The qualitative analysis included 15 relevant articles involving 1186 adult patients who underwent penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation. Penile lengthening of 1-7 cm was reported. Overall, postoperative complications were described in up to 21.7% of cases. Only five studies reported functional outcomes, showing a significant improvement in postoperative period based on the administered questionnaire (e.g. IIEF - International Index of Erectile Function, EDITS - Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction).
CONCLUSION
Penile length preservation procedures appear to offer a viable option for managing acquired penile shortening, particularly in cases of PD. However, they are associated with a significant risk of complications. Proper patient selection, thorough discussion of risks and benefits, and referral to high-volume centers are mandatory to achieve optimal outcomes and minimizing complications.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO database registration CRD42022360758.
PubMed: 38205393
DOI: 10.1177/17562872231215177 -
Translational Andrology and Urology Dec 2023Penile prosthesis surgery is considered a safe and effective treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction. Implantation in the medically complex patient can be a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Penile prosthesis surgery is considered a safe and effective treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction. Implantation in the medically complex patient can be a challenge. The benefits of treatment must outweigh the possible risks or complications. A description of possible problems and how to cope with them is given in this narrative review.
METHODS
Literature search was performed in January 2023 using different search prompts in PubMed. These articles, excluding non-English and non-full text articles, were listed by the two authors and afterwards, the most relevant ones were included.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS
This article is divided into five important topics. We evaluated different comorbidities such as spinal cord injury, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, in which preoperative work-up and counseling is of significant importance. A detailed description of these comorbidities and how to handle these can be found in each section. In addition to the preoperative aspect in organ transplant patients, problems during surgery can arise, e.g., with the reservoir placement. Similarly, in patients with previous pelvic surgery, an ectopic reservoir placement can prevent possible complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative diagnostics are crucial and prosthetic surgery should be done by an experienced high-volume surgeon with a diverse range of surgical techniques at his disposal.
PubMed: 38196703
DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-71 -
Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical... 2024Genitourinary manifestations are rare in patients with Crohn's disease, and a small percentage of patients will experience enterocutaneous fistulas. Infection is one of...
Genitourinary manifestations are rare in patients with Crohn's disease, and a small percentage of patients will experience enterocutaneous fistulas. Infection is one of the most common complications associated with inflatable penile prosthesis placement, which can be associated with fistula formation. In this report, we present a patient with Crohn's disease who developed an inflatable penile prosthesis infection secondary to an undiagnosed enterocutaneous fistula.
PubMed: 38174017
DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2281214 -
The American Journal of Case Reports Jan 2024BACKGROUND Traditionally, penile implant infections have been treated by removal followed by immediate or delayed replacement. The use of antibiotics in conservative...
BACKGROUND Traditionally, penile implant infections have been treated by removal followed by immediate or delayed replacement. The use of antibiotics in conservative therapy has recently attracted attention. CASE REPORT We report our experience with 4 cases of infected penile implants managed conservatively. Case 1 was a 41-year-old with sickle cell anemia who presented with low-grade fever and purulent discharge that started 1 month postoperatively and lasted for 3 weeks. He had left graft after fibrotic tissue excision with 14-mm collection in the left corpus cavernosum. He was managed with IV pipracillin/tazobactam and vancomycin for 13 days. Follow-up after 23 weeks showed complete wound healing. Case 2 was a 62-year-old with diabetes who had purulent discharge that started 41 days postoperatively and lasted for 1 week. He received 5 days of IV vancomycin and gentamycin. Follow-up after 4 weeks showed marked improvement of the wound. Case 3 was a 61-year-old with diabetes and ischemic heart disease. He presented 30 days postoperatively with fever, purulent discharge for 5 days. He received a total of 10 days of IV vancomycin and gentamycin. Follow-up 3 weeks after discharge showed complete wound healing. Case 4 was a 61-year-old with diabetes and ischemic heart disease. He presented 1 month postoperatively with fever and pus discharge for 1 week. He completed 10 days of IV vancomycin and gentamycin. Follow-up after 1 week showed marked wound healing. CONCLUSIONS Choosing patients with early superficial infected penile prosthesis for conservative management should be tailored to selected patients who does not have leukocytosis, signs of sepsis, high-grade fever, or an exposed device.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Vancomycin; Penile Prosthesis; Conservative Treatment; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Gentamicins; Diabetes Mellitus; Myocardial Ischemia
PubMed: 38167227
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.941806