-
Journal of Surgical Case Reports Jul 2023The management of hypospadias during the neonatal period should be carried out exclusively in specialized medical centers because of the potential dire complications...
The management of hypospadias during the neonatal period should be carried out exclusively in specialized medical centers because of the potential dire complications that may arise. In this report, we present a case of a 22-year-old male who underwent thirteen unsuccessful surgical procedures for his penoscrotal hypospadias in various hospitals. The purpose of this case report is to describe the surgical correction of severe corporal fibrosis and penile curvature that ensued from the multiple failed hypospadias corrections. We implanted an extra cavernosal malleable penile prosthesis and reconstructed the tunica albuginea defect with surgical meshes used in hernia repairs.
PubMed: 37525748
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad430 -
Urology Oct 2023To report the incidence of the reoperation surgeries of nearly all the Rigicon Infla10 implants performed since device introduction in 1/2019. Inflatable penile...
OBJECTIVE
To report the incidence of the reoperation surgeries of nearly all the Rigicon Infla10 implants performed since device introduction in 1/2019. Inflatable penile prosthesis has some of the highest survival from revision surgery of any medical device implanted in humans [1]. We expand on previous Rigicon Infla10 research, adding more patients and increasing follow-up duration [2].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
535 patients had Rigicon Infla10 devices implanted from 1/2019 to 8/2022. 103 surgeons from 26 centers in 15 countries participated in the study. Patient information forms were analyzed from virtually all implantations. Explantation or revision surgery for mechanical failure, infection, other medical reasons, and patient dissatisfaction were cataloged. SPSS 25.0 (IBM) was used for the statistical analysis of Kaplan Meier survival statistics.
RESULTS
Mean follow-up was 24.2months (7-43months). Mean patient age was 56years. Reoperation was necessary for 3.5% of subjects. Revision for mechanical failure occurred in 2.24% (12/535). The rate of explant for patient dissatisfaction was 0.56% (3/535). Revision for component out of place was 0.37% (2/535) with an infection rate and unsuccessful Peyronie's correction being 0.19% (1/535). Survival from requiring another corrective surgery at 1, 2, and 3years was 96.4%, 95.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. These initial survival rates compare favorably to devices currently available, which have been repeatedly enhanced to improve reliability.
CONCLUSION
In its first 2-3years of availability, The Rigicon Infla10 inflatable penile prosthesis shows freedom from revision comparable to existing enhanced devices that have been on the market for decades.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Male; Penile Prosthesis; Reoperation; Reproducibility of Results; Penile Implantation; Erectile Dysfunction; Patient Satisfaction; Retrospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure
PubMed: 37517678
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.031 -
Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2023The malleable penile implant is often considered an inferior device to the three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant. Nonetheless, the malleable prosthesis has... (Review)
Review
The malleable penile implant is often considered an inferior device to the three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant. Nonetheless, the malleable prosthesis has its unique advantages such as lower cost, easier to perform and fewer mechanical complications than inflatable prostheses. Furthermore, its role can be extended to patients with issues relating to poor manual hand dexterity, those undergoing a salvage for infection prosthesis and as an emergency surgical measure in patients presenting with acute ischaemic priapism. Over the past few decades, there have been numerous design and technological advancements to improve overall clinical efficacy, mechanical durability, axial rigidity and device concealability of malleable penile prostheses. The following article provides a narrative review of the six major contemporary malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market, namely, the Coloplast Genesis prosthesis, the Boston Scientific Tactra prosthesis, the Zephyr ZSI 100 and 100 (female-to-male) FTM devices, the Rigi10 prosthesis, the TUBE malleable prosthesis and the Shah prosthesis and evaluates the published outcomes. Appropriate patient selection and strict counselling regarding what to expect with malleable prostheses coupled with adherence to safe surgical principles are paramount to ensure excellent clinical success and patient satisfaction rates.
PubMed: 37465318
DOI: 10.1177/17562872231179008 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2023To understand differences between asymptomatic colonized and infected states of indwelling medical devices, we sought to determine penile prosthesis biofilm composition,...
Microbe-metabolite interaction networks, antibiotic resistance, and in vitro reconstitution of the penile prosthesis biofilm support a paradigm shift from infection to colonization.
To understand differences between asymptomatic colonized and infected states of indwelling medical devices, we sought to determine penile prosthesis biofilm composition, microbe-metabolite interaction networks, and association with clinical factors. Patients scheduled for penile prosthesis removal/revision were included. Samples from swabbed devices and controls underwent next-generation sequencing, metabolomics, and culture-based assessments. Biofilm formation from device isolates was reconstituted in a continuous-flow stir tank bioreactor. 93% of 27 analyzed devices harbored demonstrable biofilm. Seven genera including Faecalibaculum and Jeotgalicoccus were more abundant in infected than uninfected device biofilms (p < 0.001). Smokers and those with diabetes mellitus or cardiac disease had lower total normalized microbial counts than those without the conditions (p < 0.001). We identified microbe-metabolite interaction networks enriched in devices explanted for infection and pain. Biofilm formation was recapitulated on medical device materials including silicone, PTFE, polyurethane, and titanium in vitro to facilitate further mechanistic studies. Nearly all penile prosthesis devices harbor biofilms. Staphylococcus and Escherichia, the most common causative organisms of prosthesis infection, had similar abundance irrespective of infection status. A series of other uncommon genera and metabolites were differentially abundant, suggesting a complex microbe-metabolite pattern-rather than a single organism-is responsible for the transition from asymptomatic to infected or painful states.
Topics: Humans; Penile Prosthesis; Biofilms; Staphylococcus; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Silicones; Prosthesis-Related Infections
PubMed: 37460611
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38750-1 -
Medicine Jun 2023Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in middle-aged and elderly men, affecting more than 100 million males worldwide. Most ED cases can be attributed to organic and/or...
An atypical erectile dysfunction patient with infertility treated with penile prosthesis implantation and testicular epididymal sperm aspiration (TESA)-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): A case report.
RATIONALE
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in middle-aged and elderly men, affecting more than 100 million males worldwide. Most ED cases can be attributed to organic and/or psychological factors. Here we report an atypical ED case with no clear manifestation fitting the diagnosis for recognized types of ED.
PATIENT CONCERNS
The 35-year-old male is unable to have normal erection since puberty, and unable to complete intercourse with his wife. He had no history of trauma, surgery or psychiatric/psychological disease. The patient has a normal male karyotype. There is no significant finding in physical examination, nocturnal penile tumescence test, and ultrasound measurement of penis vascular functions. The serum levels of major hormones are all in normal ranges.
DIAGNOSES
Atypical ED, psychogenic ED not excluded; infertility.
INTERVENTIONS
Oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors Tadalafil (20 mg, BIW) or Sildenafil (50 mg, BIW) had no effect in this patient. Penile prosthesis implantation helped the patient to acquire normal sexual life, but did solve the ejaculation failure and infertility. Motile sperms were obtained by testicular epididymal sperm aspiration under the guidance of ultrasound, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed with occytes retrieved from his wife.
OUTCOMES
The patient sexual life was significantly improved after penile prosthesis implantation; the patient wife is currently in the first trimester of pregnancy as the result of in vitro fertilization.
CONCLUSIONS
The no response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5) treatment may suggest an impediment of PDE5-related pharmacological pathways or the presence of defect/injury in the neural system. This special case raises a question if some patients with persistent ED may have similar manifestations and can be treated with the same procedures.
Topics: Aged; Middle Aged; Pregnancy; Female; Male; Humans; Adult; Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Implantation; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Sperm Retrieval; Semen; Infertility
PubMed: 37352063
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034023 -
Translational Andrology and Urology May 2023In 2017, a prospective multicenter, multinational, investigational pilot study was conducted examining outcomes using a novel surgical technique, the Mini-Jupette sling,...
BACKGROUND
In 2017, a prospective multicenter, multinational, investigational pilot study was conducted examining outcomes using a novel surgical technique, the Mini-Jupette sling, for the management of erectile dysfunction (ED) patients with climacturia and/or minimal stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate procedures. Climacturia has been reported in up to 64% of patients following radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to report the 5-year outcomes from this original cohort to assess long-term safety and effectivity of the mini-jupette sling in the treatment of ED and concomitant mild SUI and/or climacturia.
METHODS
This is a single-arm, multicenter, retrospective, observational study. We identified patients who were enrolled in the previous multicenter study with post-RP ED and climacturia and/or mild SUI- 2 PADS PER DAY (PPD) and underwent inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion with simultaneous placement of a mini-jupette sling. Data were collected including current PPD, subjective improvement in climacturia/SUI, complications, need for revision of IPP or additional urinary incontinence surgery, and date of most recent follow-up. SPSS was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Of the original 38 patients, 5 have since died and 10 were lost to follow-up with 23/38 (61%) patients available for evaluation of long-term outcomes. The average follow-up time was 59 months (SD =8.8) with a mean age of 69 years (SD =6.8). Most patients (n=21, 91%) had subjective improvement of SUI and climacturia. One patient with persistent bothersome incontinence underwent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement in 2018 with no complications, while the other is still considering a repeat procedure due to minor but persistent SUI. The mean PPD decreased from 1.4 preoperatively to 0.4 at a mean of 5 years of follow-up. Most patients reported satisfaction in their urinary symptoms with 91% and 73% reporting improvement in SUI and climacturia respectively, compared to 86% and 93% respectively in the original series. One (4.3%) patient had an IPP revision for pump malfunction. There were no device infections reported.
CONCLUSIONS
The mini-jupette sling appears to be a safe and effective procedure with durable improvements in SUI and climacturia at 5 years of follow-up.
PubMed: 37305641
DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-661 -
Translational Andrology and Urology May 2023Penile prosthesis surgery (PPS) is a commonly used treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), either as first-line therapy or in cases refractory to other treatment...
BACKGROUND
Penile prosthesis surgery (PPS) is a commonly used treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), either as first-line therapy or in cases refractory to other treatment options. In patients with a urologic malignancy such as prostate cancer, surgical interventions like radical prostatectomy (RP) as well as non-surgical treatments such as radiation therapy can all induce ED. PPS as a treatment for ED has high satisfaction rates in the general population. Our aim was to compare sexual satisfaction in patients with prosthesis implantation for ED following RP versus ED following radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review from our institutional database was conducted to identify patients who underwent PPS at our institution from 2011 to 2021. Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire data at least 6 months from implant operative date available was required for inclusion. Eligible patients were placed in one of two groups depending on etiology of ED-following RP or prostate cancer radiation therapy. To prevent crossover confounding; patients with history of pelvic radiation were excluded from the RP group and patients with history of RP were excluded from the radiation group. Data were obtained from 51 patients in the RP group and 32 patients in the radiation therapy group. Mean EDITS scores and additional survey questions were compared between the radiation and RP groups.
RESULTS
There was a significant difference in mean survey responses for 8 of the 11 questions in the EDITS questionnaire between the RP group and the radiation group. Additional survey questions administered also found RP patients reported significantly higher rate of satisfaction with size of penis post-operatively versus the radiation group.
CONCLUSIONS
These preliminary findings, while requiring large-scale follow-up, suggest that there is greater sexual satisfaction and penile prosthesis device satisfaction in patients undergoing IPP placement following RP versus radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Use of validated questionnaires should continue to be utilized in quantifying device and sexual satisfaction following PPS.
PubMed: 37305636
DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-600 -
Translational Andrology and Urology May 2023The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the gold standard for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, highly complex patients such as those with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the gold standard for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, highly complex patients such as those with bulbar urethral compromise, bladder pathology, and lower urinary complications pose a particular challenge for the surgeon. In this article, we will address critical risk factors and synthesize existent data across relevant disease states to support surgeons in successful management of SUI in high-risk patients.
METHODS
A comprehensive review of current literature was performed utilizing the search term "artificial urinary sphincter" in conjunction with any of the following additional terms: "radiation", "urethral stricture", "posterior urethral stenosis", "vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis", "bladder neck contracture", "pelvic fracture urethral injury", "penile revascularization", "inflatable penile prosthesis", and "erosion". Guidance is provided based upon expert opinion where existing literature was sparse or nonexistent.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS
Several known patient risk factors are associated with AUS failure and can ultimately lead to device explantation. Each risk factor requires careful consideration and investigation, or intervention as appropriate, prior to device placement. Optimization of urethral health, confirmation of anatomic and functional stability of the lower urinary tract, and thorough patient counseling are a necessity for these high-risk patients. Several surgical strategies to decrease device complications can be considered: optimization of testosterone, avoidance of 3.5 cm AUS cuff, transcorporal AUS cuff placement, relocation of AUS cuff site, use of lower pressure-regulating balloon, penile revascularization, and intermittent nocturnal deactivation.
CONCLUSIONS
A number of patient risk factors are associated with AUS failure and can ultimately lead to device explantation. We present an algorithm for management of high-risk patients. Optimization of urethral health, confirmation of anatomic and functional stability of the lower urinary tract, and thorough patient counseling are a necessity for these high-risk patients.
PubMed: 37305622
DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-727 -
Brain Sciences May 2023Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the inability to get and maintain an adequate penile erection for satisfactory sexual intercourse. Due to its negative impacts on men's life... (Review)
Review
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the inability to get and maintain an adequate penile erection for satisfactory sexual intercourse. Due to its negative impacts on men's life quality and increase during aging (40% of men between 40 and 70 years), ED has always attracted researchers of different disciplines, from urology, andrology and neuropharmacology to regenerative medicine, and vascular and prosthesis implant surgery. Locally and/or centrally acting drugs are used to treat ED, e.g., phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (first in the list) given orally, and phentolamine, prostaglandin E1 and papaverine injected intracavernously. Preclinical data also show that dopamine D receptor agonists, oxytocin and α-MSH analogues may have a role in ED treatment. However, since pro-erectile drugs are given on demand and are not always efficacious, new strategies are being tested for long lasting cures of ED. These include regenerative therapies, e.g., stem cells, plasma-enriched platelets and extracorporeal shock wave treatments to cure damaged erectile tissues. Although fascinating, these therapies are laborious, expensive and not easily reproducible. This leaves old vacuum erection devices and penile prostheses as the only way to get an artificial erection and sexual intercourse with intractable ED, with penile prosthesis used only by accurately selected patients.
PubMed: 37239274
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13050802 -
Arab Journal of Urology 2023Penile prosthesis insertion is a well-established therapeutic option in refractory ischemic priapism but there is a lack of standardization regarding the timing of...
OBJECTIVES
Penile prosthesis insertion is a well-established therapeutic option in refractory ischemic priapism but there is a lack of standardization regarding the timing of surgery, the type of prosthesis (malleable or inflatable), as well as the possible complications. In this study, we retrospectively compared early versus delayed penile prosthesis insertion in patients with refractory ischemic priapism.
METHODS
42 male patients who presented with refractory ischemic priapism during the period between January 2019 and January 2022 were included in this study. All patients had malleable penile prosthesis insertion by four highly experienced consultants. Patients were divided into two groups based on the time of the prosthesis insertion. 23 patients had immediate insertion of the prosthesis within the first week of the onset of priapism while the remaining 19 patients had delayed prosthesis insertion three months or later after the onset of priapism. The outcome as well as the intra- and the postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS
Postoperative complications such as prosthesis erosion and infection were higher among the early insertion group while the delayed insertion group had higher incidence of intraoperative complications such as corporal perforation and urethral injury. The insertion of the prosthesis was much more difficult among the delayed insertion group due to fibrosis which made dilatation of the corpora very difficult. The length and the width of the penile implant were significantly higher among the early insertion group as compared to the delayed insertion group.
CONCLUSIONS
Early penile prosthesis insertion for refractory ischemic priapism is a safe and effective treatment option as delayed prosthesis insertion is more difficult and challenging due to corporal fibrosis and is associated with higher complication.
PubMed: 37234682
DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2135290