-
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Jul 2024
Topics: Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Ophthalmic Solutions; COVID-19; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; SARS-CoV-2; Conjunctivitis
PubMed: 38905467
DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2666_23 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2024Periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty has a large incidence, and it may often require two or more stages of revision, placing an additional... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty has a large incidence, and it may often require two or more stages of revision, placing an additional burden on clinicians and patients. The purpose of this network meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of four different preventive strategies during total joint arthroplasty on the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection.
METHODS
The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD: 42,023,448,868), and the literature search databases included Web of Science, PubMed, OVID Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, OVID EMBASE, and OVID MEDLINE (R) ALL that met the requirements. The network meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies and prospective cohort studies with the outcome of periprosthetic joint infection. The gemtc R package was applied to perform the network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative results of different preventive strategies.
RESULTS
This network meta-analysis study included a total of 38 articles with 4 preventive strategies and negative controls. No improvement was observed in antibiotic-loaded bone cement compared with negative controls. Chlorhexidine showed the highest probability of delivering the best preventive effect, and povidone iodine had the second highest probability. Although vancomycin ranked after chlorhexidine and povidone iodine, it still showed a significant difference compared with negative controls. In addition, the incidence after applying chlorhexidine was significantly lower than that after applying negative controls and vancomycin. In the heterogeneity test between direct and indirect evidence, there was no apparent heterogeneity between them.
CONCLUSION
The study indicated that chlorhexidine, povidone iodine and vancomycin showed significant efficacy in preventing periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty, while antibiotic-loaded bone cement did not. Therefore, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to verify the results above.
Topics: Humans; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Network Meta-Analysis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Arthroplasty, Replacement; Vancomycin; Bone Cements; Chlorhexidine; Povidone-Iodine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38890743
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04738-4 -
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Jun 2024Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are commonly contaminated with pathogenic organisms and precede most diabetes-related amputations. Antimicrobial dressings are used in the...
INTRODUCTION
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are commonly contaminated with pathogenic organisms and precede most diabetes-related amputations. Antimicrobial dressings are used in the treatment of DFUs; however, recent guidelines do not support their use. There are no data describing the experience of antimicrobial dressing use among podiatrists in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). This study aimed to (i) determine which antimicrobial dressings podiatrists in AoNZ use for the management of diabetic foot ulcers; and (ii) determine what factors influence AoNZ podiatrists' use of antimicrobial dressing when managing DFUs.
METHODS
An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was undertaken. Participants were AoNZ registered podiatrists who managed DFUs in their practice. The survey included questions relating to personal and professional demographic characteristics and DFU management and dressing practices. Descriptive statistics were computed to address the research aims.
RESULTS
Responses from 43 AoNZ podiatrists were included. Participants reported both cadexomer iodine and silver dressings were the most common antimicrobial dressings used, with honey dressings being the least frequently used. The most influential factors in choosing antimicrobial dressings when managing DFUs were the presence of current infection, ulcer exudate and ability to prevent future infection. The least influential factors in choosing antimicrobial dressings when managing DFUs were patient preferences, cost of dressings and comfort of dressing/pain on removal.
CONCLUSIONS
AoNZ podiatrists managing DFUs primarily use antimicrobial dressings containing cadexomer iodine or silver as active ingredients, while lower-cost options, such as honey and povidone iodine are less often used. Current recommendations highlight the lack of evidence to support positive outcomes from any particular antimicrobial dressing over another and advocate that exudate control, comfort and cost be prioritised in decision-making. As cost has been an increasing burden to our healthcare funding, clinicians and organisations may consider this before purchasing and stocking expensive dressings.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; New Zealand; Cross-Sectional Studies; Bandages; Podiatry; Male; Female; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Middle Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Surveys and Questionnaires; Adult; Honey
PubMed: 38884388
DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.12032 -
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection... Jun 2024Although uncommon, infections associated with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) may be responsible for severe life-threatening complications and increase... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Insertion site and risk of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization and/or local infection: a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 study including more than 800 catheters.
AIM
Although uncommon, infections associated with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) may be responsible for severe life-threatening complications and increase healthcare costs. Few data are available on the relationship between PIVC insertion site and risk of infectious complications.
METHODS
We performed a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 database, a randomized 2 × 2 factorial study comparing two skin disinfection procedures (2% chlorhexidine-alcohol or 5% povidone iodine-alcohol) and two types of medical devices (innovative or standard) in 989 adults patients requiring PIVC insertion before admission to a medical ward. Insertion sites were grouped into five areas: hand, wrist, forearm, cubital fossa and upper arm. We evaluated the risk of risk of PIVC colonization (i.e., tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism in a concentration of at least 1000 Colony Forming Units per mL) and/or local infection (i.e., organisms growing from purulent discharge at PIVC insertion site with no evidence of associated bloodstream infection), and the risk of positive PIVC tip culture (i.e., PIVC-tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism regardless of its amount) using multivariate Cox models.
RESULTS
Eight hundred twenty three PIVCs with known insertion site and sent to the laboratory for quantitative culture were included. After adjustment for confounding factors, PIVC insertion at the cubital fossa or wrist was associated with increased risk of PIVC colonization and/or local infection (HR [95% CI], 1.64 [0.92-2.93] and 2.11 [1.08-4.13]) and of positive PIVC tip culture (HR [95% CI], 1.49 [1.02-2.18] and 1.59 [0.98-2.59]).
CONCLUSION
PIVC insertion at the wrist or cubital fossa should be avoided whenever possible to reduce the risk of catheter colonization and/or local infection and of positive PIVC tip culture.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Catheterization, Peripheral; Catheter-Related Infections; Middle Aged; Aged; Chlorhexidine; Adult; Disinfection; Povidone-Iodine; Risk Factors; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Equipment Contamination; Wrist
PubMed: 38840171
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01414-4 -
Journal of International Society of... 2024To determine whether rinsing with preprocedural mouthrinses against coronavirus disease before acid etching affects resin-based sealant microleakage.
AIM
To determine whether rinsing with preprocedural mouthrinses against coronavirus disease before acid etching affects resin-based sealant microleakage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A presented experimental study was performed on 15 extracted permanent third molars. Samples were randomly allocated into five groups: Group 1-distilled water (control); Group 2-1% hydrogen peroxide; Group 3-1.5% hydrogen peroxide; Group 4-0.5% povidone-iodine; and Group 5-1% povidone-iodine. After the teeth were immersed in the assigned mouth rinses for 60 s, they were sealed with Concise™ white sealant. Subsequently, the teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles, immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 h, and sectioned with two parallel cuts in the buccolingual direction. Sixty surfaces (12 surfaces in each group) were examined for microleakage under a 40× light microscope and scored as described by Zyskind . Welch's one-way analysis of variance test and the Games-Howell test were used to analyze the results at a significance level of < 0.05 for all tests.
RESULTS
The intergroup comparisons indicated that the 0.5% povidone-iodine group and the 1% povidone-iodine group had significantly higher microleakage compared with the control group. The 1% and 1.5% hydrogen peroxide groups demonstrated no significant difference in mean microleakage scores compared with the control group. There was no significant difference between the povidone groups and the hydrogen peroxide groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Preprocedural rinsing with 0.5% and 1% povidone-iodine before acid etching caused higher microleakage of resin-based sealant, while hydrogen peroxide rinsing gave comparable microleakage compared with the control group.
PubMed: 38827349
DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_188_23 -
Heliyon May 2024It is important to accurately determine the blood ethanol concentration (BEC) to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients in the emergency department (ED)...
BACKGROUND
It is important to accurately determine the blood ethanol concentration (BEC) to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients in the emergency department (ED) and protect their legal rights. This study aimed to determine whether sterilization of venipuncture site with ethanol, which is frequently used in practice in the ED would affect BEC.
METHODS
Venous blood samples were collected by two consecutive techniques from 94 individuals who were admitted to the ED, had an indication for BEC measurement, and volunteered to participate in the study. The reference technique involved applying 3 cc of 10 % povidone-iodine solution to a gauze pad, cleaning the right arm antecubital region, and performing phlebotomy. The index technique used 3 cc of alcohol-based antiseptic (89 % ethanol) on another gauze for cleaning the left arm antecubital region. Both techniques allowed the antiseptic to air-dry for 30 s before phlebotomy. Two blood sample tubes per patient were sent to the laboratory, and BEC were measured using the alcohol dehydrogenase enzymatic method.
RESULTS
94 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 37.8 years (±15.7), with 77 % (n = 72) of them were male. The median BEC levels measured by both the reference and index techniques were 2 mg/dL (IQR: 0.97-16.25) and 2 mg/dL (IQR: 0.90-15.22), respectively, with no significant statistical difference (p = 0.536). 72 (77 %) of the patients had a BEC level below the legal driving limit of 20 mg/dL. Bland-Altman analysis, performed on these patients, revealed a small negative bias, -0.116 mg/dL with a standard deviation of 1.13 mg/dL. The upper and lower limit of the agreement was 2.092 and -2.323 respectively.
CONCLUSION
In patients with a BEC level of less than 20 mg/dL, using ethanol-containing antiseptics before blood sampling does not lead to erroneously elevated BEC levels.
PubMed: 38813189
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31517 -
International Journal of Retina and... May 2024The use of povidone-iodine for ocular surface asepsis is widespread for intravitreal injections. They became frequent procedures, leading to serial exposure of patients'...
BACKGROUND
The use of povidone-iodine for ocular surface asepsis is widespread for intravitreal injections. They became frequent procedures, leading to serial exposure of patients' eyes to iodinated solutions. In this study, we investigate the changes in the ocular surface in patients submitted to repeated use of povidine for intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF asepsis, analyzing Ocular Surface Disease Index, non-invasive break up time, blinking quality, lipid layer, meniscus height and osmolarity.
METHODS
This case-control study included 34 individuals (68 eyes), 14 males, 20 females aged 48 to 94. Inclusion criteria were individuals who received application of 2% povidone-iodine eyedrops for intravitreal injections treatment with the non-treated contralateral eye used as control. Ocular surface examinations were performed at a single occasion. A pre-intravitreal injection asepsis protocol with povidone-iodine was applied. All statistical analysis was performed using the STATA® 18.0 Software and a p-value = 0.05 was considered as the statistical significance value in all tests.
RESULTS
The median number of IVIs in treated eyes was 12 (range 6-20). The results in treated eyes compared with untreated eyes were respectively : median OSDI 16 (IQR 6-39) and 12.5 (IQR 8-39) (p = 0.380); mean NIBUT 10.30 (SD ± 2.62) and 10.78 (SD ± 2.92) ( s, p = 0.476); median blinking quality 100 (IQR 100) and 100 (IQR 100 ) (%, p = 0.188); median lipid layer 87 (IQR 77-90) and 86 (IQR 74-100) (nm, p = 0.451); median meniscus height 0.22 (IQR 0.19-0,31) and 0.24 (IQR 0.20-0.27) (mm, p = 0.862), median Meibomian gland atrophy 33 (IQR 24-45) and 31.5 (IQR 25-39) (%, p = 0.524); and mean osmolarity 306.6 (SD ± 21.13) and 313.8 (SD ± 29) (mOsm, p = 0.297). There was no statistically significant relationship between the repetitive use of 2% iodinated solution and signs or symptoms compatible with dry eye syndrome in this group of patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that 2% povidone iodine is a safe and efficacious agent for ocular surface antisepsis during intravitreal injections, not leading to substantial ocular surface modifications. This conclusion supports the continued use of povidone iodine in routine ophthalmic procedures without increased risk of inducing dry eye syndrome.
PubMed: 38812063
DOI: 10.1186/s40942-024-00557-1 -
Dentistry Journal May 2024In severe stages of periodontitis, conventional periodontal therapy and maintenance care are usually insufficient due to the viral and bacterial etiology; thus, a...
A Low-Cost Protocol Using the Adjunctive Action of Povidone-Iodine Irrigations and Sodium Hypochlorite Rinsing Solution in Step 2 of Periodontal Therapy for Patients with Stage III-IV Periodontitis: A Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.
In severe stages of periodontitis, conventional periodontal therapy and maintenance care are usually insufficient due to the viral and bacterial etiology; thus, a mechanical approach alone may not be sufficient to eliminate a substantial portion of subgingival pathogens, especially in deep periodontal sites. : This single-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy of a low-cost protocol using povidone-iodine and sodium hypochlorite formulations as adjuncts to non-surgical therapy for patients with stage IV periodontitis when compared with chlorhexidine, the most commonly employed substance to date for antimicrobial regimens in periodontal therapy. : Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups: control (subgingival instrumentation, chlorhexidine-assisted) and test (antiviral medication, subgingival instrumentation with povidone-iodine, sodium hypochlorite rinsing solution, and antibiotics). Clinical measurements and microbiological analyses were performed at baseline and after three months. : After three months, notable differences were found in the bacterial detection scores for (a significant reduction in detection frequency was observed in the test compared to the control ( = 0.021)), and there were significant reductions in detection in the test group for and , showing undetectable levels ( < 0.0001 for both). In the test group, the pocket probing depth median value was reduced significantly ( = 0.0005); similarly, bleeding on probing showed a marked decrease ( < 0.0001). However, changes in clinical attachment loss and full-mouth plaque score were not statistically significant. : Using the proposed protocol, substantial improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters were obtained when compared with the current antimicrobial recommendations.
PubMed: 38786542
DOI: 10.3390/dj12050144 -
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and... May 2024Intravitreal injections are a common ophthalmologic procedure. While infections following these injections are rare, they can lead to endophthalmitis, with potentially...
BACKGROUND
Intravitreal injections are a common ophthalmologic procedure. While infections following these injections are rare, they can lead to endophthalmitis, with potentially serious consequences. Various methods have been proposed to prevent endophthalmitis, including the use of antisepsis and antibiotics in patient preparation.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the antiseptic efficacy of aqueous chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PI) when used alone and in combination with lidocaine gel (LG) in vitro.
METHODS
Two independent experimental trials were conducted. The first trial determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of CHX and PI against six bacterial strains. The second trial evaluated the bactericidal efficacy of the antiseptic agents (CHX 0.1% and PI 5%) and their combination with LG against the same bacterial strains.
RESULTS
CHX was more effective than PI in reducing the number of colonies forming units (cfus) of the tested bacteria. The order in which the antiseptic and LG were administered affected their effectiveness, with CHX administered before LG resulting in greater reduction of bacterial growth.
CONCLUSIONS
CHX 0.1% is more effective than PI 5% as an antiseptic agent. Application of CHX and PI prior to the use of lidocaine gel results in a more effective reduction of microorganisms.
PubMed: 38782819
DOI: 10.1186/s12348-024-00404-2 -
JAR Life 2024Ageing of the global population has led to an increase in the demand for the treatment of wounds, especially considering the challenges of managing wounds in the...
INTRODUCTION
Ageing of the global population has led to an increase in the demand for the treatment of wounds, especially considering the challenges of managing wounds in the elderly. Therefore, more effective treatment strategies need to be explored. In this article, we aimed to compare medical-grade honey (MGH) products with other wound care products and to provide guidelines on using MGH in wounds commonly found in the elderly.
METHODS
Based on literature research and expert opinion, an overview of commonly used wound care products and their wound healing characteristics is provided. In addition, literature-based classification of wounds in the elderly and the recommendations for treatments are provided.
RESULTS
Frequently used wound care products include povidone-iodine, enzymatic products, absorbing dressings, larvae, silver dressings, and MGH dressings. Supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses, MGH dressings were identified as the most potent and all-round wound care product compared to the others. Next, we provided basic guidelines for managing the most common wounds in the elderly, both acute and chronic, and specified how and which MGH products can be used in these wounds.
CONCLUSION
MGH is a widely applicable, safe, easy-to-use, and cost-effective product to manage wounds in the elderly. In case of doubt, refer to a trained wound care specialist who can support the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds.
PubMed: 38774269
DOI: 10.14283/jarlife.2024.7