-
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Based on dynamic changes of indicators during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and of clinical outcomes of suboptimal ovarian response with different protocols, this...
BACKGROUND
Based on dynamic changes of indicators during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and of clinical outcomes of suboptimal ovarian response with different protocols, this study aimed to summarize the clinical characteristics of SOR and provide clinical recommendations.
METHODS
Data of 125 patients with SOR and 125 controls who had undergone appropriate protocols for fertilization-embryo transfer were collected from a single medical center from January 2017 to January 2019. Basic clinical indexes, including age, BMI, antral-follicle count, infertility time, basic follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, LH/FSH ratio, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, androstenedione, prolactin, anti-Mullerian hormone, and thyroid stimulating hormone levels, were analyzed using T-test. Dynamic indexes during COH, including amount and days of gonadotropin, sex hormone levels, and number of large/medium/small follicles at specified time periods, were analyzed using T-test and joint diagnosis analysis with ROC curves. Indexes of laboratory and clinical indicators were analyzed using the chi-square test.
RESULTS
For the SOR group, BMI, duration time, and dosage of gonadotropin used for SOR were significantly higher. In the ultra-long/long group, ROC curve analysis showed that the LH/FSH ratio and BMI yielded cutoff values of 0.61 and 21.35 kg/m, respectively. A combined diagnosis of the two indexes showed higher sensitivity (90%) and specificity (59%). In the GnRH-ant group, ROC curve analysis showed an LH level, an LH/FSH ratio on COH day 2, and BMI yielded cutoff values of 2.47 IU/L, 0.57, and 23.95 kg/m, respectively. Combining the two indexes with BMI, both showed increased sensitivity (77%) and specificity (72% and 74%). The estradiol level and progesterone level during the late follicular stage in SOR patients were significantly lower than those in control patients for both protocol groups. At each monitoring time, delayed follicular development was observed. The live-birth rate in fresh cycles of the ultra-long/long group and the live-birth rate in cumulative cycles of the antagonist group in the SOR group were lower than those in the control group.
CONCLUSION
SOR had adverse effects on clinical outcome. We provide some threshold values of basic LH/FSH ratio, BMI, COH day 2 LH, counts of follicles, and levels of estradiol/progesterone to be taken as reference to assist the early recognition of SOR.
Topics: Female; Humans; Progesterone; Retrospective Studies; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Fertilization in Vitro; Embryo Transfer; Gonadotropins; Estradiol
PubMed: 37228708
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.938926 -
F&S Reports Jun 2023Treatment of uterine fibroids (UF) and endometriosis (EM) has relied on the surgical skills of gynecologists to improve symptoms and potentially alter the course of...
Treatment of uterine fibroids (UF) and endometriosis (EM) has relied on the surgical skills of gynecologists to improve symptoms and potentially alter the course of these debilitating diseases. Medical management of symptoms for both diseases leverages combined hormonal contraceptives used off label as a first-line treatment, with nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids to manage pain as needed. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists (peptide analogs) have been used as short-term therapy to manage severe symptoms of UF or EM, treat anemia, and reduce fibroid size before surgery. The introduction of oral GnRH receptor antagonists opened the door for the development of new treatment options for UF, EM, and other estrogen-driven diseases. Relugolix is an orally active, nonpeptide, GnRH receptor antagonist that competitively binds to GnRH receptors, preventing the release of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone (LH) into the systemic circulation. In women, the reduction in follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations prevents natural follicular development, suppressing ovarian production of estrogen, and together with reductions in LH concentrations, prevent ovulation, corpus luteum formation, and, thereby, the production of progesterone (P). By reducing circulating concentrations of estradiol (E2) and P, relugolix improves heavy menstrual bleeding and other symptoms associated with UF and moderate to severe pain associated with EM, including dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) and dyspareunia. However, as monotherapy, the use of relugolix is associated with signs and symptoms of a hypoestrogenic state, including bone mineral density loss and vasomotor symptoms. The clinical development of relugolix incorporated the addition of a 1 mg dose of E2 and a 0.5-mg dose of norethindrone acetate (NETA) to achieve systemic E2 concentrations that remain in a therapeutic range while mitigating the risk for bone mineral density loss and vasomotor symptoms, enabling the longer-term treatment and reducing the impact of symptoms on quality of life, and potentially delaying or preventing the need for surgery. Relugolix 40 mg in combination with estradiol (E2) 1 mg and NETA 0.5 mg as a single fixed-dose combination tablet (relugolix combination therapy [relugolix-CT]) approved in the United States as MYFEMBREE is the first and only once daily oral GnRH antagonist combination therapy indicated for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with UF and moderate to severe pain associated with EM. In the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK), relugolix-CT is approved as RYEQO for the management of symptoms associated with UF. In Japan, relugolix 40 mg, as monotherapy, was the first GnRH receptor antagonist approved to improve symptoms associated with UF or pain associated with EM under the brand name RELUMINA. In men, relugolix suppresses testosterone production. Relugolix 120 mg (ORGOVYX) was developed by Myovant Sciences and is approved in the United States, EU, and UK as the first and only oral androgen-deprivation therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. This review is focused on the development of relugolix and relugolix-CT in women's health indications.
PubMed: 37223761
DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2022.11.010 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Oct 2023Crinecerfont, a corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, has been shown to reduce elevated adrenal androgens and precursors in adults with congenital...
CONTEXT
Crinecerfont, a corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, has been shown to reduce elevated adrenal androgens and precursors in adults with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD), a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by cortisol deficiency and androgen excess due to elevated adrenocorticotropin.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of crinecerfont in adolescents with 21OHD CAH.
METHODS
This was an open-label, phase 2 study (NCT04045145) at 4 centers in the United States. Participants were males and females, 14 to 17 years of age, with classic 21OHD CAH. Crinecerfont was administered orally (50 mg twice daily) for 14 consecutive days with morning and evening meals. The main outcomes were change from baseline to day 14 in circulating concentrations of ACTH, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), androstenedione, and testosterone.
RESULTS
8 participants (3 males, 5 females) were enrolled; median age was 15 years and 88% were Caucasian/White. After 14 days of crinecerfont, median percent reductions from baseline to day 14 were as follows: ACTH, -57%; 17OHP, -69%; and androstenedione, -58%. In female participants, 60% (3/5) had ≥50% reduction from baseline in testosterone.
CONCLUSION
Adolescents with classic 21OHD CAH had substantial reductions in adrenal androgens and androgen precursors after 14 days of oral crinecerfont administration. These results are consistent with a study of crinecerfont in adults with classic 21OHD CAH.
Topics: Male; Adult; Humans; Female; Adolescent; Androgens; Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital; Androstenedione; 17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone; Testosterone; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone
PubMed: 37216921
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad270 -
JCI Insight Jun 2023Progesterone (P4) is essential for embryo implantation, but the extent to which the pro-gestational effects of P4 depend on the maternal immune compartment is unknown....
Progesterone (P4) is essential for embryo implantation, but the extent to which the pro-gestational effects of P4 depend on the maternal immune compartment is unknown. Here, we investigate whether regulatory T cells (Treg cells) act to mediate luteal phase P4 effects on uterine receptivity in mice. P4 antagonist RU486 administered to mice on days 0.5 and 2.5 postcoitum to model luteal phase P4 deficiency caused fewer CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cells and impaired Treg functional competence, along with dysfunctional uterine vascular remodeling and perturbed placental development in midgestation. These effects were linked with fetal loss and fetal growth restriction, accompanied by a Th1/CD8-skewed T cell profile. Adoptive transfer at implantation of Treg cells - but not conventional T cells - alleviated fetal loss and fetal growth restriction by mitigating adverse effects of reduced P4 signaling on uterine blood vessel remodeling and placental structure and by restoring maternal T cell imbalance. These findings demonstrate an essential role for Treg cells in mediating P4 effects at implantation and indicate that Treg cells are a sensitive and critical effector mechanism through which P4 drives uterine receptivity to support robust placental development and fetal growth.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Animals; Mice; Progesterone; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Placenta; Fetal Growth Retardation; Embryo Implantation; Fetal Development
PubMed: 37191999
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.162995 -
Cells Apr 2023The enteric nervous system (ENS) is an intrinsic network of neuronal ganglia in the intestinal tube with about 100 million neurons located in the myenteric plexus and...
The enteric nervous system (ENS) is an intrinsic network of neuronal ganglia in the intestinal tube with about 100 million neurons located in the myenteric plexus and submucosal plexus. These neurons being affected in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, before pathological changes in the central nervous system (CNS) become detectable is currently a subject of discussion. Understanding how to protect these neurons is, therefore, particularly important. Since it has already been shown that the neurosteroid progesterone mediates neuroprotective effects in the CNS and PNS, it is now equally important to see whether progesterone has similar effects in the ENS. For this purpose, the RT-qPCR analyses of laser microdissected ENS neurons were performed, showing for the first time the expression of the different progesterone receptors (PR-A/B; mPRa, mPRb, PGRMC1) in rats at different developmental stages. This was also confirmed in ENS ganglia using immunofluorescence techniques and confocal laser scanning microscopy. To analyze the potential neuroprotective effects of progesterone in the ENS, we stressed dissociated ENS cells with rotenone to induce damage typical of Parkinson's disease. The potential neuroprotective effects of progesterone were then analyzed in this system. Treatment of cultured ENS neurons with progesterone reduced cell death by 45%, underscoring the tremendous neuroprotective potential of progesterone in the ENS. The additional administration of the PGRMC1 antagonist AG205 abolished the observed effect, indicating the crucial role of PGRMC1 with regard to the neuroprotective effect of progesterone.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Progesterone; Parkinson Disease; Neuroprotective Agents; Enteric Nervous System; Intestines
PubMed: 37190115
DOI: 10.3390/cells12081206 -
Gynecological Endocrinology : the... Dec 2023To determine the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders (25-35 follicles with a diameter of ≥12 mm on day of...
Incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger in "freeze-all" approach.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders (25-35 follicles with a diameter of ≥12 mm on day of triggering) who received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to trigger final follicular maturation.
METHODS
We used individual data from women who participated in four different clinical trials and were high responders to ovarian stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol in this retrospective combined analysis. All women were evaluated for signs and symptoms of OHSS using identical criteria based on Golan's system (1989).
RESULTS
High responders ( = 77) were of different ethnicities. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between women with or without signs and symptoms of OHSS. Mean ± standard deviation baseline data were: age, 32.3 ± 3.5 years; anti-Müllerian hormone, 42.4 ± 20.7 pmol/L; antral follicle count, 21.5 ± 9.2. Before triggering, duration of stimulation was 9.5 ± 1.6 days and the mean number of follicles with a diameter of ≥12 mm and ≥17 mm was 26.5 ± 4.4 and 8.8 ± 4.7, respectively. Mean serum estradiol (17,159 pmol/l) and progesterone (5.1 nmol/l) levels were high at 36 h after triggering. Overall, 17/77 high responders (22%) developed signs and symptoms of mild OHSS which lasted 6-21 days. The most frequently prescribed medication was cabergoline to prevent worsening of OHSS. No severe OHSS occurred and no OHSS cases were reported as serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
High responders receiving GnRH agonist for triggering should be informed that they may experience signs and symptoms of mild OHSS.
Topics: Female; Humans; Adult; Pregnancy; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Incidence; Retrospective Studies; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Ovulation Induction; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Fertilization in Vitro; Pregnancy Rate
PubMed: 37156263
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2023.2205952 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2023Only a small number of studies have reported the use of progesterone vaginal gel in combination with dydrogesterone as part of the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo...
BACKGROUND
Only a small number of studies have reported the use of progesterone vaginal gel in combination with dydrogesterone as part of the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from infertile patients who underwent fresh embryo transfer via the antagonist protocol (2785 cycles) between February and July 2019 and between February and July 2021 at the Peking University Third Hospital Reproductive Medicine Centre. According to the luteal support received, the cycle groups were divided into the progesterone vaginal gel group (single medication or VP group; 1170 cycles) and the progesterone vaginal gel plus dydrogesterone group (combination medication or DYD + VP group; 1615 cycles). After propensity score matching, the clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, early miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
In total, 1057 pairs of cycles were successfully matched via propensity scores. The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in the combination medication group were significantly higher than those in the single medication group (P < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were noted in the early miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates between the two groups (both P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Combined luteal support after the antagonist protocol is preferred for patients undergoing fresh cycle embryo transfer.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pregnancy Outcome; Progesterone; Retrospective Studies; Dydrogesterone; Abortion, Spontaneous; Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies; Embryo Transfer; Pregnancy Rate; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Fertilization in Vitro
PubMed: 37142960
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05570-0 -
Cureus Apr 2023Endometriosis, defined as the development of endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity, is a common gynecological disorder. The prevalence of pelvic endometriosis... (Review)
Review
Endometriosis, defined as the development of endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity, is a common gynecological disorder. The prevalence of pelvic endometriosis approaches 6%-10% in the general female population, and in women with pain, infertility, or both, the frequency is 35%-50%. The gold standard recommended process for diagnosing endometriosis is laparoscopy, an invasive surgical procedure, with or without histologic verification. The currently available nonsurgical treatments include oral contraceptives (estrogen-progestogen preparations), progestogen preparations (containing progesterone derivatives), androgenic hormones (danazol), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists. Two GnRH types have been discovered in mammals, GnRH I and GnRH II. In particular, GnRH I is released by the hypothalamus; however, it can be present in various tissues and organs of the body, including neural tissue, where it exerts neuroendocrine, autocrine, and paracrine actions in the peripheral and central nervous system (CNS). Interestingly, another GnRH isoform, GnRH III, has been identified, which has 60% similarity with GnRH I from which it varies by four amino acids. This peptide has been shown to have a significant role in reproduction, specifically in gametogenesis and steroidogenesis. Further research is needed to identify innovative treatment options for endometriosis, such as the therapeutic exogenous administration of GnRH II or antagonists of the GnRH I receptor. In this review, we examined the role of GnRH in endometriosis, outlining the specific actions of GnRH and GnRH receptors (GnRHRs). The innovative use of GnRH analogs and antagonists in the treatment of endometriosis is also discussed.
PubMed: 37122983
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38136 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Apr 2023Preliminary data have shown that it is possible to attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in fresh cycles without the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone...
Ovarian Stimulation with FSH Alone versus FSH plus a GnRH Antagonist for Elective Freezing in an Oocyte Donor/Recipient Programme: A Protocol for a Pilot Multicenter Observational Study.
Preliminary data have shown that it is possible to attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in fresh cycles without the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or any other medication to prevent the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during ovarian stimulation. To date, there is no information on this topic in the context of a prospective controlled trial. However, as prevention of the LH surge is an established procedure in fresh cycles, the question is whether such a study can be performed in frozen cycles. We aim to perform a pilot study in order to compare the efficacy of a protocol using FSH alone with that of a protocol using follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) plus a GnRH antagonist for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in cycles of elective freezing in the context of a donor/recipient program. This is a seven-center, two-arm prospective pilot cohort study conducted at the respective Assisted Reproductive Units in Greece. The hypothesis to be tested is that an ovarian stimulation protocol that includes FSH alone without any LH surge prevention regimens is not inferior to a protocol including FSH plus a GnRH antagonist in terms of the clinical outcome in a donor/recipient model. The results of the present study are expected to show whether the addition of the GnRH antagonist is necessary in terms of the frequency of LH secretory peaks and progesterone elevations >1 ng/mL during the administration of the GnRH antagonist according to the adopted frequency of blood sampling in all Units.
PubMed: 37048828
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072743 -
International Journal of Molecular... Apr 2023Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the deadliest among women worldwide. Estrogen signaling is closely associated with hormone-dependent breast cancer (estrogen... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the deadliest among women worldwide. Estrogen signaling is closely associated with hormone-dependent breast cancer (estrogen and progesterone receptor positive), which accounts for two-thirds of tumors. Hormone therapy using antiestrogens is the gold standard, but resistance to these treatments invariably occurs through various biological mechanisms, such as changes in estrogen receptor activity, mutations in the ESR1 gene, aberrant activation of the PI3K pathway or cell cycle dysregulations. All these factors have led to the development of new therapies, such as selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), or combination therapies with cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 or PI3K inhibitors. Therefore, understanding the estrogen pathway is essential for the treatment and new drug development of hormone-dependent cancers. This mini-review summarizes current literature on the signalization, mechanisms of action and clinical implications of estrogen receptors in breast cancer.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estrogen Antagonists; Estrogens; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Receptors, Estrogen; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 37047814
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076834