-
Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2024To compare the cardiopulmonary effects of apneustic anesthesia ventilation (AAV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in anesthetized pigs and to describe a new...
OBJECTIVE
To compare the cardiopulmonary effects of apneustic anesthesia ventilation (AAV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in anesthetized pigs and to describe a new mode of ventilation for anesthetized veterinary species.
STUDY DESIGN
Randomized, crossover design without washout.
ANIMALS
Twelve healthy, female white Landrace pigs.
METHODS
Following ketamine-midazolam premedication and anesthetic induction with propofol, the trachea was intubated, and each pig was positioned in dorsal recumbency. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and sufentanil infusions. Pigs were instrumented and their lungs were sequentially ventilated with each mode, in random order, for 1 h according to predefined criteria [fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) = 0.21, 10 mL kg tidal volume (V), and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO) within 40-45 mmHg]. Cardiopulmonary data were collected at baseline, 30 and 60 min. In 8 pigs, thoracic computed tomography (CT) was performed following the 60 min time point for each mode of ventilation and images were analyzed to quantify lung aeration. The effects of ventilation mode, time, and order were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Paired -tests were used to compare lung aeration between modes. Significance was defined as < 0.05.
RESULTS
Data from 12 pigs were analyzed. A significant effect of mode was found for heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index, systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary vascular resistance, oxygen delivery index (DOI), oxygen extraction ratio (OER), V, arterial oxygen tension, arterial hemoglobin saturation, PaCO, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension, alveolar dead space (V/V), venous admixture ( ), mean airway pressure, and dynamic compliance index (CI). Order effects were also observed for some cardiovascular and respiratory variables. For the eight pigs that underwent thoracic CT, AAV resulted in significantly larger proportions of normally and hyperaerated lung while CMV resulted in larger proportions of hypoaerated and atelectatic lung.
CONCLUSIONS
In dorsally recumbent anesthetized pigs, ventilated with FiO = 0.21, both modes of ventilation supported adequate oxygenation while AAV resulted in higher CI, and lower V/V and , compared with CMV. AAV was also associated with lower MAP, CI, and DOI and higher OER compared with CMV. Further investigation of AAV in anesthetized animals is warranted.
PubMed: 38855412
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1378617 -
Cureus May 2024Introduction Propofol is a phenol agent with sedative and anesthetic properties that has been in use for decades, but with controversy in critically ill pediatric...
Introduction Propofol is a phenol agent with sedative and anesthetic properties that has been in use for decades, but with controversy in critically ill pediatric patients, given the concern for developing propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS). Our aim was to assess the risk of propofol infusions in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at doses and durations greater than the described safety data and its associated covariables. Methods Retrospective cohort analysis of 173 patients receiving propofol in the PICU. Patients were categorized as receiving greater or less than 48-hour infusions. Demographic data and daily clinical variables were recorded for up to seven days post-infusion initiation or until infusion was stopped. Results In this descriptive analysis, patients' demographics were similar, but admission diagnosis was not. Both groups received high mean doses of propofol (>67 mcg/kg/min), with no cases of PRIS observed. The illness severity scores and the need for vasoactive infusion support varied between the cohorts, with higher illness scores and a higher percentage of subjects requiring vasoactive agents in the >48-hour cohort. Finally, there were no major differences in lactate levels or biochemical characteristics between the two groups. Conclusions This study provides pilot data in relation to the feasibility of propofol infusion in critically ill pediatric patients and underscores the need for a larger multicenter study to draw clinical recommendations.
PubMed: 38854299
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59948 -
Cureus May 2024We present a case of rocuronium-induced hypertensive crises that occurred twice in a patient with paraganglioma. An 86-year-old woman was first scheduled for laminectomy...
We present a case of rocuronium-induced hypertensive crises that occurred twice in a patient with paraganglioma. An 86-year-old woman was first scheduled for laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five minutes after intravenous induction of anesthesia using fentanyl, propofol, rocuronium, and remifentanil, the patient's blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) suddenly increased with no stimuli. Surgery was postponed because the patient was suspected of having pheochromocytoma. After that, paraganglioma was diagnosed, and surgery for removal of the paraganglioma was scheduled after the commencement of alpha-blocker therapy. The patient's hemodynamic parameters remained stable when anesthesia was induced with an infusion of remimazolam. Subsequently, immediately after rocuronium was administered as an intravenous bolus, the patient's arterial BP and HR increased, and plasma concentrations of noradrenaline and rocuronium had markedly increased. Ten minutes after the administration of rocuronium, the patient's BP and HR gradually and fully recovered without any intervention. The plasma concentrations of both noradrenaline and rocuronium also concurrently decreased. We conclude that simultaneous increases in BP, HR, and plasma concentration of noradrenaline revealed a direct correlation with rocuronium.
PubMed: 38854215
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59868 -
BMC Veterinary Research Jun 2024When inhalant anesthetic equipment is not available or during upper airway surgery, intravenous infusion of one or more drugs are commonly used to induce and/or maintain... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
When inhalant anesthetic equipment is not available or during upper airway surgery, intravenous infusion of one or more drugs are commonly used to induce and/or maintain general anesthesia. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) does not require endotracheal intubation, which may be more difficult to achieve in rabbits. A range of different injectable drug combinations have been used as continuous infusion rate in animals. Recently, a combination of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) has been used for TIVA in both human patients and animals. The purpose of this prospective, blinded, randomized, crossover study was to evaluate anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of ketofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in combination with constant rate infusion (CRI) of midazolam, fentanyl or dexmedetomidine in eight New Zealand White rabbits. Following IV induction with ketofol and endotracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with ketofol infusion in combination with CRIs of midazolam (loading dose [LD]: 0.3 mg/kg; CRI: 0.3 mg/kg/hr; KPM), fentanyl (LD: 6 µg/kg; CRI: 6 µg/kg/hr; KPF) or dexmedetomidine (LD: 3 µg/kg; CRI: 3 µg/kg/hr; KPD). Rabbits in the control treatment (KPS) were administered the same volume of saline for LD and CRI. Ketofol infusion rate (initially 0.6 mg kg minute [0.3 mg kg minute of each drug]) was adjusted to suppress the pedal withdrawal reflex. Ketofol dose and physiologic variables were recorded every 5 min.
RESULTS
Ketofol induction doses were 14.9 ± 1.8 (KPM), 15.0 ± 1.9 (KPF), 15.5 ± 2.4 (KPD) and 14.7 ± 3.4 (KPS) mg kg and did not differ among treatments (p > 0.05). Ketofol infusion rate decreased significantly in rabbits in treatments KPM and KPD as compared with saline. Ketofol maintenance dose in rabbits in treatments KPM (1.0 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) and KPD (1.0 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) was significantly lower as compared to KPS (1.3 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) treatment (p < 0.05). Ketofol maintenance dose did not differ significantly between treatments KPF (1.1 ± 0.3 mg/kg/min) and KPS (1.3 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min). Cardiovascular variables remained at clinically acceptable values but ketofol infusion in combination with fentanyl CRI was associated with severe respiratory depression.
CONCLUSIONS
At the studied doses, CRIs of midazolam and dexmedetomidine, but not fentanyl, produced ketofol-sparing effect in rabbits. Mechanical ventilation should be considered during ketofol anesthesia, particularly when fentanyl CRI is used.
Topics: Animals; Rabbits; Fentanyl; Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Ketamine; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Propofol; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Cross-Over Studies; Male; Female; Heart Rate; Prospective Studies; Blood Pressure; Anesthetics, Combined; Infusions, Intravenous; Hypnotics and Sedatives
PubMed: 38851722
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-04112-w -
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma,... Jun 2024
Topics: Humans; Ketamine; Etomidate; Propofol; Emergency Medical Services; Conscious Sedation; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Analgesia; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Analgesics
PubMed: 38849908
DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01218-w -
BMC Neurology Jun 2024Dexmedetomidine (Dex), midazolam, and propofol are three distinct sedatives characterized by varying pharmacological properties. Previous literature has indicated the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Dexmedetomidine (Dex), midazolam, and propofol are three distinct sedatives characterized by varying pharmacological properties. Previous literature has indicated the positive impact of each of these sedatives on ICU patients. However, there is a scarcity of clinical evidence comparing the efficacy of Dex, midazolam, and propofol in reducing mortality among people with epilepsy (PWE). This study aimed to assess the impact of Dex, midazolam, and propofol on the survival of PWE.
METHODS
The data were retrospectively retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (version 2.0). PWE were categorized into Dex, midazolam, and propofol groups based on the intravenously administered sedatives. PWE without standard drug therapy were included in the control group. Comparative analyses were performed on the data among the groups.
RESULTS
The Dex group exhibited a significantly lower proportion of in-hospital deaths and a markedly higher in-hospital survival time compared to the midazolam and propofol groups (p < 0.01) after propensity score matching. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a significant improvement in survival rates for the Dex group compared to the control group (p = 0.025). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant differences in survival rates among the Dex, midazolam, and propofol groups (F = 1.949, p = 0.143). The nomogram indicated that compared to midazolam and propofol groups, Dex was more effective in improving the survival rate of PWE.
CONCLUSION
Dex might improve the survival rate of PWE in the ICU compared to no standard drug intervention. However, Dex did not exhibit superiority in improving survival rates compared to midazolam and propofol.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Propofol; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Retrospective Studies; Intensive Care Units; Epilepsy; Adult; Aged; Databases, Factual; Hospital Mortality
PubMed: 38849716
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03693-1 -
Medicine Jun 2024In this study, we analyzed whether scalp nerve block with ropivacaine can improve the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
In this study, we analyzed whether scalp nerve block with ropivacaine can improve the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection.
METHODS
We included 150 patients who were undergoing craniotomy in our hospital and categorized them into 2 groups - observation group (patients received an additional regional scalp nerve block anesthesia) and control group (patients underwent intravenous general anesthesia for surgery), using the random number table method approach (75 patients in each group). The main indicator of the study was the Karnofsky Performance Scale scores of patients at 3 days postoperatively, and the secondary indicator was the anesthesia satisfaction scores of patients after awakening from anesthesia. The application value of different anesthesia modes was studied and compared in the 2 groups.
RESULTS
Patients in the observation group showed better anesthesia effects than those in the control group, with significantly higher Karnofsky Performance Scale scores at 3 days postoperatively (75.02 vs 66.43, P < .05) and anesthesia satisfaction scores. Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the observation group had lower pain degrees at different times after the surgery, markedly lower dose of propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia, and lower incidence of adverse reactions and postoperative complications. In addition, the satisfaction score of the patients and their families for the treatment was higher and the results of all the indicators were better in the observation group than in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < .05).
CONCLUSION
Scalp nerve block with ropivacaine significantly improves the quality of short-term postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for meningioma resection. This is presumably related to the improvements in intraoperative hemodynamics, relief from postoperative pain, and reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Block; Meningioma; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Scalp; Ropivacaine; Anesthetics, Local; Pain, Postoperative; Adult; Meningeal Neoplasms; Craniotomy; Patient Satisfaction; Aged; Karnofsky Performance Status
PubMed: 38847715
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038324 -
Medicine Jun 2024The goal of this study was to evaluate the dose-response relationship between dexmedetomidine and propofol in sedating patients and to determine the optimal dosage of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
The goal of this study was to evaluate the dose-response relationship between dexmedetomidine and propofol in sedating patients and to determine the optimal dosage of dexmedetomidine during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
METHODS
One hundred fifty patients were divided into 5 groups, each receiving a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 µg/kg) or saline, with propofol for sedation. The median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol was calculated using the modified Dixon up-and-down approach. Adverse effects, vital signs, procedure, and recovery times were recorded.
RESULTS
The EC50 of propofol in groups NS, D0.4, D0.6, D0.8, and D1.0 were 3.02, 2.44, 1.97, 1.85, and 1.83 µg/mL, respectively. Heart rate in the dexmedetomidine groups decreased more than the NS group (P < .001). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the NS group experienced a decline compared to groups D0.8 and D1.0 when the plasma concentration and effect-site concentration reached equilibrium. Additionally, the respiratory rate was found to be lower in groups NS, D0.4, D0.6, and D0.8 (P < .05). Recovery time in groups D0.8 and D1.0 was longer than the NS group (P < .05). Bruggemann comfort scales score was higher in group D1.0 (P < .05). No significant difference was found in the incidences of hypotension and bradycardia, and the dose of ephedrine and atropine. Respiratory depression was significantly reduced in groups D0.8 and D1.0 compared to the NS group.
CONCLUSION
A single dose of 0.6 to 0.8 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine should be recommended in combination with propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy. And the EC50 of propofol is 1.97 to 1.85 µg/mL.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Propofol; Male; Female; Double-Blind Method; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Adult; Middle Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heart Rate
PubMed: 38847682
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038421 -
Neurologia I Neurochirurgia Polska 2024Maintaining optimal systemic circulatory parameters is essential to ensure adequate cerebral perfusion (CPP) during neurosurgery, especially when autoregulation is... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
INTRODUCTION
Maintaining optimal systemic circulatory parameters is essential to ensure adequate cerebral perfusion (CPP) during neurosurgery, especially when autoregulation is impaired.
AIM OF STUDY
To compare two types of total intravenous anaesthesia i.e. target controlled infusion (TCI) and manually controlled infusion (MCI) with propofol and remifentanil in terms of their control of cardiovascular parameters during neurosurgical resection of intracranial pathology.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Patients with supratentorial intracranial pathology were selected for the study. Patients in ASA grades III and IV and those with diseases of the circulatory system were excluded. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups according to the method of general anaesthesia used i.e. TCI or MCI. During the neurosurgery, the values of mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), bispectral index (BIS) and central venous pressure were monitored and recorded at the designated 14 relevant (i.e. critical from the anaesthetist's and neurosurgeon's points of view) measurement points.
RESULTS
Fifty patients (25 TCI and 25 MCI) were enrolled in the study. The groups did not differ with respect to sex, age and BMI, operation time or volume of removed lesions. TCI-anaesthetised patients had better MAP stability at the respective time points.
CONCLUSIONS
Due to the greater stability of MAP, which has a direct effect on CPP, TCI appears to be the method of choice in anaesthesia for intracranial surgery.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Pilot Projects; Propofol; Middle Aged; Adult; Neurosurgical Procedures; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Remifentanil; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Piperidines; Heart Rate; Infusions, Intravenous; Elective Surgical Procedures; Aged; Anesthesia, General
PubMed: 38845558
DOI: 10.5603/pjnns.99294 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Jun 2024Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening intestinal illness mostly affecting preterm infants, which commonly requires surgery. Anesthetic care for these...
STUDY OBJECTIVE
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening intestinal illness mostly affecting preterm infants, which commonly requires surgery. Anesthetic care for these patients is challenging, due to their prematurity and critical illness with hemodynamic instability. Currently, there are no guidelines for anesthetic care for these vulnerable patients. Therefore, this study aimed to describe current anesthesia practices across Europe for infants undergoing surgery for NEC.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional survey study.
PARTICIPANTS
Anesthesiologists working in centers where surgery for NEC is performed across Europe.
MEASUREMENTS
A 46-item questionnaire assessing protocols for anesthesia practice, preoperative care, intraoperative care, postoperative care, and the respondent's opinion on the adequacy of anesthetic care for patients with NEC in their center.
MAIN RESULTS
Out of the 173 responding anesthesiologists from 31 countries, approximately a third had a written standard protocol for anesthetic care in infants. Three quarters of the respondents screened all patients with NEC preoperatively, and a third structurally performed preoperative multidisciplinary consultation. For induction of general anesthesia, most respondents opted for intravenous anesthesia (n = 73, 43%) or a combination of intravenous and inhalation anesthesia (n = 57, 33%). For intravenous induction, they mostly used propofol (n = 58, 44%), followed by midazolam (n = 43, 33%) and esketamine (n = 42, 32%). For maintenance of anesthesia, inhalation anesthetic agents were more commonly used (solely: n = 71, 41%; in combination: n = 37, 22%), almost exclusively with sevoflurane. Postoperative analgesics mainly included paracetamol and/or morphine. Sixty percent of the respondents (n = 104) considered their anesthetic care for patients with NEC adequate. Suggestions for further improvement mainly revolved around monitoring, protocols, and collaboration.
CONCLUSIONS
Anesthesia practice for infants undergoing surgery for NEC was highly variable. Most respondents considered the provided anesthetic care for patients with NEC adequate, but also recognized opportunities for further improvement, especially with regards to monitoring, protocols, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
PubMed: 38843649
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111508