-
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... May 2024Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational... (Review)
Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and uncontrolled trials reporting on the use of checkpoint blockers in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease.
BACKGROUND
Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICBs.
METHODS
We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths.
RESULTS
A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7 %) followed by skin cancer (15.7 %). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61 % (95 % CI 54 % to 68 %); that of flares was 36 % (95 % CI 30 % to 43 %), and that of de novo irAEs was 23 % (95 % CI 16 % to 30 %). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39 %), inflammatory bowel disease (37 %), and rheumatoid arthritis (36 %). 32 % of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included corticosteroids in 72 % of the cases. The irAEs mortality rate was 0.07 %. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer response to ICBs between patients with and without autoimmune disease.
CONCLUSIONS
Although more patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease had irAEs, these were mild and managed with corticosteroids in most cases, with no impact on cancer response. These results suggest that ICBs can be used in these patients, but careful monitoring is required, as over a third of the patients will experience a flare of their autoimmune disease and/or require hospitalization. These findings provide a crucial foundation for oncologists to refine their monitoring and management strategies, ensuring that the benefits of ICB therapy are maximized while minimizing its risks.
PubMed: 38834015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114148 -
JAMA Network Open Jun 2024Published research suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are neither commonly collected nor reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for solid tumors....
IMPORTANCE
Published research suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are neither commonly collected nor reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for solid tumors. Little is known about these practices in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the prevalence of PROs as prespecified end points in RCTs of hematological malignant neoplasms, and to assess reporting of PROs in associated trial publications.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
All issues of 8 journals known for publishing high-impact RCTs (NEJM, Lancet, Lancet Hematology, Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, JAMA, and JAMA Oncology) between January 1, 2018, and December 13, 2022, were searched for primary publications of therapeutic phase 3 trials for adults with hematological malignant neoplasms. Studies that evaluated pretransplant conditioning regimens, graft-vs-host disease treatment, or radiotherapy as experimental treatment were excluded. Data regarding trial characteristics and PROs were extracted from manuscripts and trial protocols. Univariable analyses assessed associations between trial characteristics and PRO collection or reporting.
FINDINGS
Ninety RCTs were eligible for analysis. PROs were an end point in 66 (73%) trials: in 1 trial (1%) as a primary end point, in 50 (56%) as a secondary end point, and in 15 (17%) as an exploratory end point. PRO data were reported in 26 of 66 primary publications (39%): outcomes were unchanged in 18 and improved in 8, with none reporting worse PROs with experimental treatment. Trials sponsored by for-profit entities were more likely to include PROs as an end point (49 of 55 [89%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]; P < .001) but were not significantly more likely to report PRO data (20 of 49 [41%] vs 6 of 17 [35%]; P = .69). Compared with trials involving lymphoma (18 of 29 [62%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (18 of 28 [64%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (27 of 30 [90%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (3 of 3 [100%]) were more likely to include PROs as an end point (P = .03). Similarly, compared with trials involving lymphoma (3 of 18 [17%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (5 of 18 [28%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (16 of 27 [59%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (2 of 3 [67%]) were more likely to report PROs in the primary publication (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review, almost 3 of every 4 therapeutic RCTs for blood cancers collected PRO data; however, only 1 RCT included PROs as a primary end point. Moreover, most did not report resulting PRO data in the primary publication and when reported, PROs were either better or unchanged, raising concern for publication bias. This analysis suggests a critical gap in dissemination of data on the lived experiences of patients enrolled in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.
Topics: Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Hematologic Neoplasms; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38829615
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14425 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jul 2024The AHA/ASA guidelines for primary stroke prevention are almost a decade old. The current recommendation regarding folic acid supplementation is based on only 8 clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
The AHA/ASA guidelines for primary stroke prevention are almost a decade old. The current recommendation regarding folic acid supplementation is based on only 8 clinical trials, and an additional 13 folate trials have been published since then. This meta-analysis aims to fill in critical evidence gaps by comprehensively evaluating 21 published trials with particular attention given to identifying the true influences through stratification.
METHODS
PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched from inception to April 4, 2023. This study included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of folic acid with stroke as one of the reporting endpoints. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the association between folic acid supplementation and the risk of stroke in a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Results from the 21 pooled RCTs totaling 115,559 participants showed that folic acid supplementation significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 10% (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.98). Subgroup analyses showed that folic acid efficacy was greater in areas without fortified grain or with partially-fortified grain (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.93; RR = 1.04 in areas with grain fortification, P-interaction = 0.003). In this group, folic acid supplementation was most efficacious in those without a history of stroke or myocardial infarction (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86; RR = 0.94 for participants with a history of stroke or myocardial infarction, P-interaction = 0.008). The efficacy of folic acid remained consistent regardless of baseline folate levels, folic acid dosage, baseline vitamin B12 levels, vitamin B12 dosage, homocysteine reduction, intervention duration, and whether folic acid was taken alone or in combination (all P-interaction>0.05). All 21 trials were free of attrition bias and reporting bias, and there was no significant publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
This is by far the largest meta-analysis of RCTs regarding folic acid supplementation and stroke, demonstrating the overall benefit of folic acid for stroke prevention. Grain fortification and history of stroke or myocardial infarction may be the most important influences on the efficacy of folic acid for stroke prevention.
Topics: Folic Acid; Humans; Stroke; Dietary Supplements; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38824900
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.034 -
Targeted Oncology Jun 2024Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain the frontline standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer....
BACKGROUND
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain the frontline standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. An updated toxicity profile of EGFR-TKIs proves valuable in guiding clinical decision making.
OBJECTIVE
This study comprehensively assessed the risk of EGFR-TKI-related adverse events (AEs) involving different systems/organs.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy with placebo or chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The odds ratio (OR) of all-grade and high-grade adverse events (AEs) including dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, hepatic, and respiratory events was pooled for a meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses based on the control arm (placebo or chemotherapy) and individual EGFR-TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) were conducted.
RESULTS
Thirty-four randomized controlled trials comprising 15,887 patients were included. The pooled OR showed EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade dermatologic AEs including paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, and skin fissures, gastrointestinal AEs including abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, mouth ulceration, and stomatitis, hepatic AEs including elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, and respiratory AEs including epistaxis, interstitial lung disease and rhinorrhea. Furthermore, a significantly increased risk of high-grade rash (OR 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.11, 12.00), diarrhea (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.44, 3.05), elevated alanine aminotransferase (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.71, 9.03), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.05, 9.92) and interstitial lung disease (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.38, 4.01) was observed in patients receiving EGFR-TKIs. When stratified by individual EGFR-TKIs, gefitinib showed a significant association with all-grade and high-grade hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease.
CONCLUSIONS
Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors were associated with a significantly increased risk of various types of AEs. Clinicians should be vigilant about the risks of these EGFR-TKI-related AEs, particularly for severe hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease, to facilitate early detection and proper management.
PubMed: 38824269
DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01073-w -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Jul 2024There is a need to improve the outcomes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), especially in recurrent...
A systematic review of antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Charting the course of future therapies.
INTRODUCTION
There is a need to improve the outcomes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), especially in recurrent unresectable and metastatic (R/M) setting. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and bispecific antibodies (BsAb) may deliver promising results.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature review to identify ADC and BsAb clinical trials, involving patients with HNSCC and NPC, from database creation to December 2023. We reported trial characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (trAEs).
RESULTS
23 trials (65 % phase I) were found, involving 540 R/M patients (355 [20trials] HNSCC and 185 [5trials] NPC). There were 13 ADC (n = 343) and 10 BsAb (n = 197) trials. 96 % patients were refractory to standard of care treatments. ORR ranged from 0 to 100 %, with the highest ORR for GEN1042 plus chemoimmunotherapy. ORRs for monotherapies were 47 % for ADC, and 0-37 % for BsAb. MRG003 reached in HNSCC 43 % and NPC 47 %. BL-B01D1 54 % in NPC. Longest median OS was seen with MRG003 and KN046. Grade ≥ 3 trAEs were 28-60 % in ADC trials, and 3-33 % BsAb. Grade ≥ 3 myelosuppressive trAEs were typically seen in 8 ADC trials, while 4 BsAb showed infusion-related reactions (IRR). Four treatment-related deaths were reported (1 pneumonitis), all ADC trials.
CONCLUSION
ADC and BsAb antibodies show promise in R/M HNSCC and NPC. Results are premature by small sample sizes and lack of control arm. ADC mainly caused myelosuppression and a pneumonitis case, and BsAb IRR. Further research is warranted in this setting.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Bispecific; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Immunoconjugates; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
PubMed: 38820656
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102772 -
World Journal of Stem Cells May 2024Gliomas pose a significant challenge to effective treatment despite advancements in chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Glioma stem cells (GSCs), a subset within tumors,...
BACKGROUND
Gliomas pose a significant challenge to effective treatment despite advancements in chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Glioma stem cells (GSCs), a subset within tumors, contribute to resistance, tumor heterogeneity, and plasticity. Recent studies reveal GSCs' role in therapeutic resistance, driven by DNA repair mechanisms and dynamic transitions between cellular states. Resistance mechanisms can involve different cellular pathways, most of which have been recently reported in the literature. Despite progress, targeted therapeutic approaches lack consensus due to GSCs' high plasticity.
AIM
To analyze targeted therapies against GSC-mediated resistance to radio- and chemotherapy in gliomas, focusing on underlying mechanisms.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted across major medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) up to September 30, 2023. The search strategy utilized relevant Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords related to including "glioma stem cells", "radiotherapy", "chemotherapy", "resistance", and "targeted therapies". Studies included in this review were publications focusing on targeted therapies against the molecular mechanism of GSC-mediated resistance to radiotherapy resistance (RTR).
RESULTS
In a comprehensive review of 66 studies on stem cell therapies for SCI, 452 papers were initially identified, with 203 chosen for full-text analysis. Among them, 201 were deemed eligible after excluding 168 for various reasons. The temporal breakdown of studies illustrates this trend: 2005-2010 (33.3%), 2011-2015 (36.4%), and 2016-2022 (30.3%). Key GSC models, particularly U87 (33.3%), U251 (15.2%), and T98G (15.2%), emerge as significant in research, reflecting their representativeness of glioma characteristics. Pathway analysis indicates a focus on phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (27.3%) and Notch (12.1%) pathways, suggesting their crucial roles in resistance development. Targeted molecules with mTOR (18.2%), CHK1/2 (15.2%), and ATP binding cassette G2 (12.1%) as frequent targets underscore their importance in overcoming GSC-mediated resistance. Various therapeutic agents, notably RNA inhibitor/short hairpin RNA (27.3%), inhibitors ( LY294002, NVP-BEZ235) (24.2%), and monoclonal antibodies ( cetuximab) (9.1%), demonstrate versatility in targeted therapies. among 20 studies (60.6%), the most common effect on the chemotherapy resistance response is a reduction in temozolomide resistance (51.5%), followed by reductions in carmustine resistance (9.1%) and doxorubicin resistance (3.0%), while resistance to RTR is reduced in 42.4% of studies.
CONCLUSION
GSCs play a complex role in mediating radioresistance and chemoresistance, emphasizing the necessity for precision therapies that consider the heterogeneity within the GSC population and the dynamic tumor microenvironment to enhance outcomes for glioblastoma patients.
PubMed: 38817336
DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v16.i5.604 -
Modern Rheumatology May 2024To update evidence on the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and provide information to the taskforce for the 2024 update of the Japan...
OBJECTIVES
To update evidence on the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and provide information to the taskforce for the 2024 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS
We searched various databases for randomised controlled trials on RA published until June 2022, with no language restriction. For each of the 15 clinical questions, 2 independent reviewers screened the articles, evaluated the core outcomes, and performed meta-analyses.
RESULTS
Subcutaneous injection of methotrexate (MTX) showed similar efficacy to oral MTX in MTX-naïve RA patients. Ozoralizumab combined with MTX improved drug efficacy compared to the placebo in RA patients with inadequate response (IR) to csDMARD. Rituximab with and without concomitant csDMARDs showed similar efficacy to other bDMARDs in bDMARD-IR RA patients. Combined Janus kinase inhibitors and MTX achieved similar clinical responses and equal safety during a 4-year period compared to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in MTX-IR RA patients. Biosimilars showed efficacy equivalent to that of the original bDMARDs in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR RA patients.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review provides latest evidence for the 2024 update of the JCR CPG for RA management.
PubMed: 38814660
DOI: 10.1093/mr/roae049 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024Lung cancer is the foremost cause of cancer-related death globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85-90% of cases. Targeted therapy is the most...
Progression-free survival estimation of docetaxel-based second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis from 18 randomized control trials.
BACKGROUND
Lung cancer is the foremost cause of cancer-related death globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85-90% of cases. Targeted therapy is the most essential therapeutic option for NSCLC, other common treatments include radiation therapy, surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.
OBJECTIVE
Our study objective was to estimate whether progression-free survival (PFS) is an outcome of NSCLC extracted from 18 randomized control trials (RCTs) with docetaxel as experimental group and antineoplastic agent, kinase inhibitor, and monoclonal antibodies as a control group.
METHODS
We selected relevant studies published between 2011 and 2022 using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library. Advanced NSCLC, chemotherapy, RCT, docetaxel, and second-line treatment were the terms included in the search. A total of 9738 patients were evaluated from the 18 identified studies. We used the meta package of R Studio to perform the meta-analysis. Graphical funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias visually.
RESULTS
Patients who underwent docetaxel-based therapy had a considerably longer PFS than those who got antineoplastic agents, kinase inhibitors, or monoclonal antibodies-based treatment. Patients in the standard treatment arm had a slightly longer PFS than those in the experimental therapy arm in the overall meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Docetaxel outperformed monoclonal antibodies, antineoplastic agents, and kinase inhibitors in the second-line therapy of advanced NSCLC since PFS was extensively utilized.
PubMed: 38807763
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1298786 -
Vaccines Apr 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the immunogenicity and safety of an additional heterologous (viral vector) versus homologous (mRNA) COVID-19... (Review)
Review
A Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Safety of an Additional Heterologous versus Homologous COVID-19 Vaccination among Non-Seroconverted Immunocompromised Patients after a Two-Dose Primary Series of mRNA Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the immunogenicity and safety of an additional heterologous (viral vector) versus homologous (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine dose among non-seroconverted immunocompromised patients after a two-dose primary series of mRNA vaccine. We searched studies published up to 21 June 2023 in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The meta-analysis was conducted to compare the seropositivity rates based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG (anti-S IgG) and SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell immune response rates, assessed by interferon-γ release assay at 4 weeks, and the incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) within 28 days between the two vaccine regimens. In four included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there were no statistically significant differences in the seropositive rate of anti-S IgG (risk ratio [RR]: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.48-1.29) and the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 interferon-γ (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.96-1.48) between heterologous and homologous regimens. The heterologous regimen exhibited a significantly lower incidence of injection pain (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.45-0.69), but a higher incidence of headache (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.02-2.02) compared with the homologous regimen. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported within 28 days following vaccination. An additional heterologous or homologous COVID-19 vaccine dose was well tolerated and demonstrated a comparable vaccine immunogenicity among non-seroconverted immunocompromised patients who were initially vaccinated with a two-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. This finding supports the recommendations of an extended primary series of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised persons.
PubMed: 38793719
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12050468 -
Cancers May 2024This study aimed to systematically review case reports documenting rare adverse events in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following the administration of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to systematically review case reports documenting rare adverse events in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted to identify case reports detailing previously unreported adverse drug reactions to ICIs in patients with SCLC. The scope of the literature reviewed was restricted to case studies on SCLC published up to 31 December 2023.
RESULTS
We analyzed twenty-four studies on ICI use for patients with SCLC. There were six reports on atezolizumab, four on durvalumab, and three on adverse events from monotherapy with nivolumab. Reports involving combination treatments were the most frequent, with a total of six, predominantly involving using nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab. Additionally, there was one report each on using pembrolizumab, nofazinilimab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, and toripalimab. We collected detailed information on the clinical course, including patient and disease characteristics, symptoms, treatment for each adverse event, and recovery status. Among the patients included in the case reports, 21 out of 24 (87.5%) had extensive-stage SCLC when initiating ICI therapy, with only 1 patient diagnosed with limited-stage SCLC. Respiratory system adverse events were most common, with seven cases, followed by neurological, endocrinological, and gastroenterological events. Three case reports documented adverse events across multiple systems in a single patient. In most cases, patients showed symptom improvement; however, four studies reported cases where patients either expired without symptom improvement or experienced sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS
Efforts to develop reliable biomarkers for predicting irAEs continue, with ongoing research to enhance predictive precision. Immunotherapy presents diverse and unpredictable adverse events, underscoring the need for advanced diagnostic tools and a multidisciplinary approach to improve patient management.
PubMed: 38791974
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101896