-
Clinical and Experimental Immunology Jul 2021Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) haploinsufficiency (CHAI) and lipopolysaccharide-responsive beige-like anchor (LRBA) deficiency (LATAIE) are newly identified... (Review)
Review
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) haploinsufficiency (CHAI) and lipopolysaccharide-responsive beige-like anchor (LRBA) deficiency (LATAIE) are newly identified inborn errors of immunity with shared molecular pathomechanisms and clinical manifestations. In this review, we aimed to provide differential comparisons regarding demographic, clinical, immunological and molecular characteristics between these two similar conditions. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases and included studies were systematically evaluated. Overall, 434 (222 CHAI and 212 LATAIE) patients were found in 101 eligible studies. The CHAI patients were mainly reported from North America and western Europe, while LATAIE patients were predominantly from Asian countries. In CHAI, positive familial history (P < 0·001) and in LATAIE, consanguineous parents (P < 0·001) were more common. In CHAI patients the rates of granulomas (P < 0·001), malignancies (P = 0·001), atopy (P = 0·001), cutaneous disorders (P < 0·001) and neurological (P = 0·002) disorders were higher, while LATAIE patients were more commonly complicated with life-threatening infections (P = 0·002), pneumonia (P = 0·006), ear, nose and throat disorders (P < 0·001), organomegaly (P = 0·023), autoimmune enteropathy (P = 0·038) and growth failure (P < 0·001). Normal lymphocyte subsets and immunoglobulins except low serum levels of CD9 B cells (14·0 versus 38·4%, P < 0·001), natural killer (NK) cells (21 versus 41·1%, P < 0·001), immunoglobulin (Ig)G (46·9 versus 41·1%, P = 0·291) and IgA (54·5 versus 44·7%, P = 0·076) were found in the majority of CHAI and LATAIE patients, respectively. The most frequent biological immunosuppressive agents prescribed for CHAI and LATAIE patients were rituximab and abatacept, respectively. Further investigations into the best conditioning and treatment regimens pre- and post-transplantation are required to improve the survival rate of transplanted CHAI and LATAIE patients.
Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; CTLA-4 Antigen; Haploinsufficiency; Humans; Immunoglobulins; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lymphocytes
PubMed: 33788257
DOI: 10.1111/cei.13600 -
Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal Mar 2021Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are prescribed in adult and paediatric rheumatology. Due to age-dependent...
Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors in paediatric rheumatology - what we know and what we do not know from randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are prescribed in adult and paediatric rheumatology. Due to age-dependent changes, disease course, and pharmacokinetic processes paediatric patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (PiRD) differ from adult rheumatology patients.
METHODS
A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in PiRD treated with bDMARDs/JAK inhibitors was conducted on Medline, clinicaltrials.gov , clinicaltrialsregister.eu and conference abstracts as of July 2020. RCTs were included if (i) patients were aged ≤20 years, (ii) patients had a predefined rheumatic diagnosis and (iii) RCT reported predefined outcomes. Selected studies were excluded in case of (i) observational or single arm study or (ii) sample size ≤5 patients. Study characteristics were extracted.
RESULTS
Out of 608 screened references, 65 references were selected, reporting 35 unique RCTs. All 35 RCTs reported efficacy while 34/3 provided safety outcomes and 16/35 provided pharmacokinetic data. The most common investigated treatments were TNF inhibitors (60%), IL-1 inhibitors (17%) and IL-6 inhibitors (9%). No RCTs with published results were identified for baricitinib, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, guselkumab, risankizumab, rituximab, sarilumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, or upadacitinib. In patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 25/35 RCTs were conducted. The remaining 10 RCTs were performed in non-JIA patients including plaque psoriasis, Kawasaki Disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and non-infectious uveitis. In JIA-RCTs, the control arm was mainly placebo and the concomitant treatments were either methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or corticosteroids. Non-JIA patients mostly received NSAID. There are ongoing trials investigating abatacept, adalimumab, baricitinib, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tofacitinib and tildrakizumab.
CONCLUSION
Despite the FDA Modernization Act and support of major paediatric rheumatology networks, such as the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) and the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO), which resulted in drug approval for PiRD indications, there are limited RCTs in PiRD patients. As therapy response is influenced by age-dependent changes, pharmacokinetic processes and disease course it is important to consider developmental changes in bDMARDs/JAK inhibitor use in PiRD patients. As such it is critical to collaborate and conduct international RCTs to appropriately investigate and characterize efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of bDMARDs/JAK inhibitors in paediatric rheumatology.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Child; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 33766063
DOI: 10.1186/s12969-021-00514-4 -
Joint Bone Spine Jul 2021To explore current evidence on the management of poor prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate whether this evidence is taken into account by...
OBJECTIVES
To explore current evidence on the management of poor prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate whether this evidence is taken into account by clinicians when deciding on treatment in daily clinical practice.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to analyse the effects of currently available biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) on the classically accepted poor prognostic factors of RA. All randomized controlled trials reporting subgroup analyses about effects on prognostic factors were identified and synthesized. In a second phase, a two-round Delphi survey was carried out to contrast the SLR results with the grade of agreement of a large group of rheumatologists about the effectiveness of each drug class on each prognostic factor.
RESULTS
According to the Delphi results, the only prognostic factor that significantly influenced the selection of treatment was the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD), being the preferred treatment in this scenario abatacept or rituximab. The rest of the poor prognostic factors (including high disease activity at baseline, disability as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire index, seropositivity, elevated acute-phase reactants, and evidence of erosions based on plain radiography or ultrasonography) did not seem to significantly influence rheumatologists when choosing a treatment. The results of the SLR results did not show solid evidence regarding the use of any specific therapy in the management of patients with specific poor factors, except in the case of RA-ILD, although the data in the literature in this regard are not free of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The only prognostic factor that seems to significantly influence the selection of treatment is the presence of RA-ILD.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Prescriptions; Prognosis; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 33689842
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105172 -
BioDrugs : Clinical Immunotherapeutics,... Mar 2021Our objective was to update the understanding of the development of paradoxical immune-mediated glomerular disorders (IGDs) in patients with rheumatic diseases treated...
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to update the understanding of the development of paradoxical immune-mediated glomerular disorders (IGDs) in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with biologics and targeted synthetic drugs (ts-drugs).
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed by searching PubMed for articles published between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2020 reporting on the development of IGD in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who were receiving biologics or ts-drugs. IGDs were classified on the basis of clinical, laboratory and histopathological data as (1) glomerulonephritis associated with systemic vasculitis (GNSV), (2) isolated autoimmune renal disorder (IARD) or (3) glomerulonephritis in SLE and in lupus-like syndrome (GNLS). The World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) system for standardized case causality assessment was applied to evaluate the causal relationship between IGD and specific drugs. The classification was based on a six-category scale, where the "certain" and "probable" categories were deemed clinically relevant relationships.
RESULTS
The literature search retrieved 875 articles. Of these, 16 articles reported IGD data, for a total of 25 cases. According to the WHO-UMC assessment, the strength of the causal relationship between IGDs and investigated drugs was higher for anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents (a clinically relevant relationship was found in four of six cases), abatacept (one of two cases), tocilizumab (two cases), ustekinumab (one case) and tofacitinib (one case) than for rituximab (nine cases), belimumab (three cases) or secukinumab (one case), which showed a weak causal relationship with these paradoxical events. No cases associated with apremilast or baricitinib were found. The retrieved cases were classified as 11 GNLS, seven IARD and seven GNSV.
CONCLUSIONS
Biologics and ts-drugs can cause IGDs. These events are rare, and the causative effect of a specific drug is hard to establish. When a patient is suspected of having an IGD, the drug should be discontinued, and treatment for the new-onset renal disorder should be promptly started.
Topics: Abatacept; Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Humans; Synthetic Drugs
PubMed: 33595833
DOI: 10.1007/s40259-021-00467-w -
European Review For Medical and... Jan 2021We aimed to systematically review biological agents' efficacy and safety in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to systematically review biological agents' efficacy and safety in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search of 7 electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Elsevier ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Springer Link, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on the efficacy of biological agents on patients with TAK was conducted. Only studies published in English and with a sample size >5 patients with TAK were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed its methodological quality. Random effects meta-analyses of various effect measures were performed.
RESULTS
According to the title and abstract, 961 studies were identified and screened. Subsequently, 31 studies from 29 observational studies and 2 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), which included a total of 517 patients with TAK that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were selected. Observational studies showed a high risk of bias. Pooled remission rates of biological agents were 66% (95% CI: 58%-73%; I2=59%), and the remission rates of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and tocilizumab (TCZ) were similar: 65% (95% CI: 56%-73%; I2=49%) and 70% (95% CI: 55%-86%; I2=69%), respectively. Pooled relapse rates were 23% (95% CI: 15%-31%; I2=66%). The relapse rate was 28% (95% CI: 16%-40%; I2=68%) for anti-TNF agents and 17% (95% CI: 7%-26%; I2=49%) for TCZ. The remission rate of TCZ was slightly higher (p>0.05), but the relapse rate was statistically significantly lower than that of anti-TNF agents (p=0.017). Furthermore, biological agents significantly decreased the doses of glucocorticoid (GC) and levels of acute phase inflammation markers (ESR, CRP) while the proportion of patients with new angiographic lesions or progression of previously noted lesions were 11% (95% CI: 4%-18%; I2=59%). RCTs with a small sample size showed abatacept was ineffective, and TCZ was underpowered to detect a difference in time to relapse compared to placebo. The most common adverse event of biological agents was infection (6%, 95%CI: 2%-10%). No deaths were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the beneficial effects of biological agents are encouraging in enhancing disease remission, reducing the levels of acute phase inflammation markers and decreasing the treatment doses of GC in patients with TAK, there is still a risk of relapse. More refined studies with larger cohorts are necessary before drawing a definitive opinion.
Topics: Biological Factors; Humans; Takayasu Arteritis
PubMed: 33506914
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202101_24391 -
Pharmacological Research Nov 2020Whether the use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) would influence the risk of new-onset diabetes remains uncertain. Therefore, we performed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Whether the use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) would influence the risk of new-onset diabetes remains uncertain. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between the use of bDMARDs and the incidence of diabetes in patients with systemic inflammatory conditions. Pubmed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published from January 2000 to March 2020. Studies conducted in systemic inflammatory conditions with reports of the incidence of diabetes in subjects treated with bDMARDs were included. With 22 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies included, the overall result indicated that compared with non-bDMARD treatment, the use of bDMARDs was significantly associated with decreased incidence of diabetes in patients with systemic inflammatory conditions (RR = 0.56, 95 % CI, 0.43 to 0.74, P < 0.001, I = 69 %), especially in patients with in rheumatoid arthritis (RR = 0.54, 95 % CI, 0.38 to 0.76, P = 0.0005, I = 26). Reduced risk of new-onset diabetes was observed in studies with follow-up more than 1 year (RR = 0.73, 95 % CI, 0.54 to 0.99, P = 0.04, I = 88). New-onset diabetes was less frequent in patients with TNF-α inhibitor treatment (RR = 0.54, 95 % CI, 0.48 to 0.60, P < 0.001, I = 42 %) and abatacept treatment (RR = 0.44, 95 % CI, 0.34 to 0.58, P < 0.001, I = 3 %), which might be associated with the inhibition of TNF-α mediated inflammatory responses and dysregulated T cell activation and immune responses respectively. Further investigations are required to validate the glucose metabolism protective effect of bDMARDs and clarify the underlying mechanisms of the crosstalk between bDMARDs and diabetes.
Topics: Abatacept; Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Incidence; Inflammation Mediators; Lymphocyte Activation; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; T-Lymphocytes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 33007415
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105216 -
BMC Rheumatology 2020Dose loading of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in auto-immune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) is performed to achieve steady state drug...
The pharmacological and clinical aspects behind dose loading of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in auto-immune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs): rationale and systematic narrative review of clinical evidence.
BACKGROUND
Dose loading of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in auto-immune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) is performed to achieve steady state drug concentrations earlier after treatment start compared to dosing regimens without loading. Although loading inherently results in increased costs, treatment targets in terms of reduced disease activity may be achieved at an earlier state. It is an interesting topic that, surprisingly, has not received much attention in literature.
METHODS
In this review, we aimed at providing a theoretical description of the pharmacodynamic / -kinetic rationale for dose loading of bDMARDs in AIRDs and to systematically review the clinical evidence on the effectiveness of dose loading on disease activity in AIRDs.
RESULTS
Only a small number of studies ( = 5) has been published comparing the effectiveness of dose loading versus a regimen without dose loading of bDMARDs in AIRDs, addressing abatacept ( = 2), certolizumab pegol ( = 1), and secukinumab (n = 2). These studies provide insufficient evidence on superiority of dose loading in terms of disease activity compared to a dosing regimen without loading, while safety issues might be comparable.
CONCLUSIONS
Although dose loading is commonly adopted for several bDMARDs in AIRDs, scientific evidence on its effectiveness and safety is surprisingly scarce and does not suggest superiority compared to a regimen without dose loading. More research in this field, also with regard to the pharmaco-economic consequences of dose loading, is urgently needed.
PubMed: 32743343
DOI: 10.1186/s41927-020-00130-x -
Rheumatology International Dec 2020The effects of dose reduction or spacing of all types of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis has not been consistently assessed in systematic reviews. We aimed to assess... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effects of dose reduction or spacing of all types of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis has not been consistently assessed in systematic reviews. We aimed to assess the effects of biologics reduction compared with dose maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low disease activity or remission. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to a previously registered protocol (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017069080); and searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and trial registers up to July, 2020. Two researchers selected, extracted and assessed the risk of bias of controlled trials that randomized patients to reduction/spacing or dose maintenance of biologics. Low disease activity, disability and other clinically important outcomes were summarized in random effect meta-analyses. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We included ten studies (n = 1331 patients), which assessed reduction or spacing of abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or tocilizumab. Risk of bias was high in over half of trials, mainly due to lack of blinding. No statistically significant difference was found in low disease activity (RR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.78-1.04; I = 60%, very low certainty), and other outcomes. Subgroup analysis of blinded studies led to homogeneous results, which remained heterogeneous in open-label studies. Reduction or spacing biologics did not affect disease activity and other important outcome. Changes in the doses regimen should consider patient preferences, considering the low certainty of evidence.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32710197
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04651-z -
Clinical Nephrology Sep 2020The efficacy of abatacept has been demonstrated mainly in case reports, case series, and observational studies with small sample size. With current evidence, it is...
Efficacy of abatacept treatment for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease: A systematic review of case reports, case series, and observational studies .
INTRODUCTION
The efficacy of abatacept has been demonstrated mainly in case reports, case series, and observational studies with small sample size. With current evidence, it is premature to conclude that abatacept is an effective treatment for nephrotic syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library until December 2019 for studies including patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) or minimal change disease (MCD) treated with abatacept. Proteinuria recovery and remission were outcomes of interest. Presence of urinary CD80 level of B7-1 staining on kidney biopsies was also reported.
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies (n = 32) were included in the systematic review. 60% of patients were male. The median age was 27.5 years (range 5.2 - 72 years). Approximately 90.6% had FSGS, while 9.4% had MCD. With median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 6.38), only 15 patients (46.9%) showed response in proteinuria reduction, and 12 patients (43.8%) achieved remission with abatacept. Serious adverse events were reported in 12.5%. Additionally, we observed that patients with positive B7-1 staining on kidney biopsies had higher odds of achieving remission with abatacept (likelihood ratio 18.25; p < 0.001). We found no significant correlation between elevated CD80 levels and remissions.
CONCLUSION
The efficacy of abatacept therapy for FSGS or MCD was only 43.8%. Serious adverse effects are common. However, our study suggested that abatacept should be considered only in patients with positive B7-1 staining on kidney biopsy because these patients tend to respond to treatment.
Topics: Abatacept; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; B7-1 Antigen; Biopsy; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Nephrosis, Lipoid; Young Adult
PubMed: 32589135
DOI: 10.5414/CN110134 -
Reumatologia Clinica Jun 2020To review the available evidence on the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments in associated diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD).
OBJECTIVE
To review the available evidence on the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments in associated diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD).
METHODS
Systematic review of studies evaluating the impact of pharmacological treatment in patients with RA and ILD. A bibliographic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane, a selection of articles and the methodological quality assessment (FLC 3.0 OSTEBA) and grading of the level of evidence (SING) of the selected articles were performed.
RESULTS
1,720 references were identified in primary search and 7 in manual or indirect. Forty-three articles were included: 7 systematic reviews, 2 randomized clinical trials, 5 cohort studies, 8 case-control studies and 21 case series. Methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) do not increase incidence, complications or mortality due to ILD. Although the results are not uniform, anti-TNF have often had worse outcomes in incidence, progression and mortality due to ILD than MTX, LEF, abatacept (ABA) and rituximab (RTX). The evidence found is scarce for JAK kinase and antifibrotic inhibitors, and controversial for IL-6 inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence that MTX or LEF worsens the prognosis of patients with AR-EPID. RTX and ABA seem to have better results than other biologicals, such as anti-TNF, often achieving stabilization and, in some cases, the improvement of ILD in patients with RA.
PubMed: 32571732
DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2020.04.015