-
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Mar 2020Clinicians and researchers often use feeding intolerance (FI) as main cause for insufficient enteral nutrition (EN). However, there is no uniform definition for FI. A...
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Clinicians and researchers often use feeding intolerance (FI) as main cause for insufficient enteral nutrition (EN). However, there is no uniform definition for FI. A uniform definition is essential for future studies focusing on predictors and outcomes of FI and enteral nutrition. A systematic review was performed to investigate the definitions, prevalence, predictors and outcomes of FI in critically ill children.
METHODS
The databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criteria were interventional, observational or case-control studies (>10 patients) in which a definition of FI was reported in critically ill children (0-21 years).
RESULTS
FI was defined in 31 unique studies performed in 2973 critically ill children. FI was most commonly defined as presence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and/or large gastric residual volume (GRV) (n = 21), followed by discontinuation of EN due to GI symptoms (n = 7) and inadequate delivery of EN (n = 3). Median prevalence of FI was 20.0% [IQR 7.4%-33.0%]. Large GRV, abdominal distention, diarrhoea and vomiting/emesis, were the predominantly reported GI symptoms to define FI. FI was associated with severity of illness, mortality and nosocomial infections.
CONCLUSIONS
Feeding intolerance is inconsistently defined in the current literature, but appears to be a prevalent concern in critically ill children. FI is most frequently defined by the presence of GI symptoms. A standardized definition is needed for both clinical and research purpose to determine the consequences of FI in relation to short-term and long-term outcomes. The new proposed definition for FI entails the inability to achieve enteral nutrition target intakes in combination with the presence of GI symptoms indicating GI dysfunction.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018092967. Registered on 07 June 2018.
Topics: Child; Critical Illness; Diarrhea; Enteral Nutrition; Gastric Emptying; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting
PubMed: 30962102
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.026 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Dec 2018Intestinal microbiota play an important role in the pathogenesis of surgical site infections (SSIs) and other surgery-related complications (SRCs). Probiotics and...
A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Evaluating the Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics and Synbiotics in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections and Surgery-Related Complications.
Intestinal microbiota play an important role in the pathogenesis of surgical site infections (SSIs) and other surgery-related complications (SRCs). Probiotics and synbiotics were found to lower the risk of surgical infections and other surgery-related adverse events. We systematically reviewed the approach based on the administration of probiotics and synbiotics to diminish SSIs/SRCs rates in patients undergoing various surgical treatments and to determine the mechanisms responsible for their effectiveness. A systematic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the inception of databases to June 2018 for trials in patients undergoing surgery supplemented with pre/pro/synbiotics and randomized to the intervention versus placebo/no treatment and reporting on primarily: (i) putative mechanisms of probiotic/symbiotic action, and secondarily (ii) SSIs and SRCs outcomes. Random-effect model meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of outcomes was done. Thirty-five trials comprising 3028 adult patients were included; interventions were probiotics ( = 16) and synbiotics ( = 19 trials). We found that C-reactive protein (CRP) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) were significantly decreased (SMD: -0.40, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.02], = 0.041; SMD: -0.41, 95% CI [-0.70, -0.02], = 0.006, respectively) while concentration of acetic, butyric, and propionic acids were elevated in patients supplemented with probiotics (SMD: 1.78, 95% CI [0.80, 2.76], = 0.0004; SMD: 0.67, 95% CI [0.37, -0.97], = 0.00001; SMD: 0.46, 95% CI [0.18, 0.73], = 0.001, respectively). Meta-analysis confirmed that pro- and synbiotics supplementation was associated with significant reduction in the incidence of SRCs including abdominal distention, diarrhea, pneumonia, sepsis, surgery site infection (including superficial incisional), and urinary tract infection, as well as the duration of antibiotic therapy, duration of postoperative pyrexia, time of fluid introduction, solid diet, and duration of hospital stay ( < 0.05). Probiotics and synbiotics administration counteract SSIs/SRCs via modulating gut-immune response and production of short chain fatty acids.
PubMed: 30558358
DOI: 10.3390/jcm7120556 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Feb 2019Many studies have explored the hypothesis that epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) accumulation adversely affects cardiac remodeling. We assessed, through a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Many studies have explored the hypothesis that epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) accumulation adversely affects cardiac remodeling. We assessed, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, whether EAT is linked to left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) structure and function, irrespective of global or abdominal visceral adiposity. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies evaluating the association of EAT volume quantified by computed tomography with cardiac morphology and function. We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models to summarize the adjusted-effect of 10 ml variation of EAT on LA size, LV mass, LV diastolic and systolic functions parameters, and presence of diastolic dysfunction. We quantified heterogeneity using I statistic. We included 19 studies. Quantitative analysis by cardiac parameters, including LA dimension (n = 2,719), LV mass (n = 2,519), diastolic function (n = 3,741), and systolic function (n = 2,037) showed that EAT was associated with LA dilation (pooled B-coefficient: 0.12 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.17; I: 97%), LV hypertrophy (pooled B-coefficient: 1.21 g; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.79; I: 77%), diastolic dysfunction (odds ratio: 1.35; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.57; I: 0%), higher E/E' ratio (pooled B-coefficient: 0.28 cm/s; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.49; I: 67%), lower E' velocity (pooled B-coefficient: -0.16 cm/s; 95% CI -0.22 to -0.09; I: 43%), and E/A ratio (pooled B-coefficient: -0.01; 95% CI -0.02 to -0.001; I: 70%), independently of body mass index. There was no association between EAT and LV systolic function. In conclusion, EAT volume measured by computed tomography was independently associated with LA dilation, LV hypertrophy, and diastolic dysfunction.
Topics: Adipose Tissue; Blood Flow Velocity; Diastole; Dilatation, Pathologic; Heart Atria; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Pericardium; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 30477802
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.020 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Aug 2018Fibrotic stricture is a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD) affecting approximately half of all patients. No specific anti-fibrotic therapies are available;...
BACKGROUND
Fibrotic stricture is a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD) affecting approximately half of all patients. No specific anti-fibrotic therapies are available; however, several therapies are currently under evaluation. Drug development for the indication of stricturing CD is hampered by a lack of standardised definitions, diagnostic modalities, clinical trial eligibility criteria, endpoints and treatment targets in stricturing CD.
AIM
To standardise definitions, diagnosis and treatment targets for anti-fibrotic stricture therapies in Chron's disease.
METHODS
An interdisciplinary expert panel consisting of 15 gastroenterologists and radiologists was assembled. Using modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology, 109 candidate items derived from systematic review and expert opinion focusing on small intestinal strictures were anonymously rated as inappropriate, uncertain or appropriate. Survey results were discussed as a group before a second and third round of voting.
RESULTS
Fibrotic strictures are defined by the combination of luminal narrowing, wall thickening and pre-stenotic dilation. Definitions of anastomotic (at site of prior intestinal resection with anastomosis) and naïve small bowel strictures were similar; however, there was uncertainty regarding wall thickness in anastomotic strictures. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the optimal technique to define fibrotic strictures and assess response to therapy. Symptomatic strictures are defined by abdominal distension, cramping, dietary restrictions, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and post-prandial abdominal pain. Need for intervention (endoscopic balloon dilation or surgery) within 24-48 weeks is considered the appropriate endpoint in pharmacological trials.
CONCLUSIONS
Consensus criteria for diagnosis and response to therapy in stricturing Crohn's disease should inform both clinical practice and trial design.
Topics: Catheterization; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colon; Consensus; Constriction, Pathologic; Crohn Disease; Dilatation; Endoscopy; Expert Testimony; Fibrosis; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Intestine, Small; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reference Standards
PubMed: 29920726
DOI: 10.1111/apt.14853 -
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 2017This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of chewing gum in intestinal function recovery after colorectal cancer surgery. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of chewing gum in intestinal function recovery after colorectal cancer surgery.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until April 2017. Summary risk ratios or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were used for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS
17 RCTs with a total number of 1845 patients were included. Gum chewing following colorectal cancer surgery significantly reduced the time to first passage of flatus (WMD -0.55; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.16; = 0.006), first bowel movement (WMD -0.60; 95% CI -0.87 to -0.33; < 0.0001), start feeding (WMD -1.32; 95% CI -2.18 to -0.46; = 0.003), and the length of postoperative hospital stay (WMD -0.88; 95% CI -1.59 to -0.17; = 0.01), but no obvious differences were found in postoperative nausea, vomiting, abdominal distention, pneumonia, and mortality, which were consistent with the findings of intention to treat analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Chewing gum could accelerate the recovery of intestinal function after colorectal cancer surgery. However, it confers no advantage in postoperative clinical complications. Further large-scale and high-quality RCTs should be conducted to confirm these results.
PubMed: 29312450
DOI: 10.1155/2017/3087904 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2017When human milk is not available for feeding preterm infants, protein hydrolysate rather than standard cow's milk formulas (with intact proteins) are often used because... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
When human milk is not available for feeding preterm infants, protein hydrolysate rather than standard cow's milk formulas (with intact proteins) are often used because they are perceived as being tolerated better and less likely to lead to complications. However, protein hydrolysate formulas are more expensive than standard formulas, and concern exists that their use in practice is not supported by high-quality evidence.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of feeding preterm infants with hydrolysed formula (versus standard cow's milk formulas) on the risk of feed intolerance, necrotising enterocolitis, and other morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
SEARCH METHODS
We used the standard Cochrane Neonatal search strategy including electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 4), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (to April 2017), as well as conference proceedings and previous reviews.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared feeding preterm infants with protein hydrolysate versus standard (non-hydrolysed) cow's milk formula.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data independently. We analysed treatment effects as described in the individual trials and reported risk ratios and risk differences for dichotomous data, and mean differences for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used a fixed-effect model in meta-analyses and explored potential causes of heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses. We assessed quality of evidence at the outcome level using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 11 trials for inclusion in the review. All trials were small (total participants 665) and had various methodological limitations including uncertainty about methods to ensure allocation concealment and blinding. Most participants were clinically stable preterm infants of gestational age less than about 34 weeks or birth weight less than about 1750 g. Fewer participants were extremely preterm, extremely low birth weight, or growth-restricted. Most trials found no effects on feed intolerance assessed variously as mean prefeed gastric residual volume, incidence of abdominal distention or other concerning gastrointestinal signs, or time taken to achieve full enteral feeds (meta-analysis was limited because studies used different measures). Meta-analysis found no effect on the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (typical risk ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.34; risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.04; 5 trials, 385 infants) (low quality evidence; downgraded for imprecision and design weaknesses).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The identified trials provide only low quality evidence about the effects of feeding preterm infants with protein hydrolysate versus standard formula. The existing data did not support conclusions that feeding with protein hydrolysate affects the risk of feed intolerance or necrotising enterocolitis. Further large, pragmatic trials are needed to provide more reliable and precise estimates of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Topics: Animals; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Food Intolerance; Humans; Infant Formula; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Milk; Protein Hydrolysates; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28968486
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012412.pub2 -
Current Gastroenterology Reports Jun 2017This study aimed to systematically review small bowel obstruction (SBO), focusing on recent changes in diagnosis/therapy. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This study aimed to systematically review small bowel obstruction (SBO), focusing on recent changes in diagnosis/therapy.
RECENT FINDINGS
SBO incidence is about 350,000/annum in the USA. Etiologies include adhesions (65%), hernias (10%), neoplasms (5%), Crohn's disease (5%), and other (15%). Bowel dilatation occurs proximal to obstruction primarily from swallowed air and secondarily from intraluminal fluid accumulation. Dilatation increases mural tension, decreases mucosal perfusion, causes bacterial proliferation, and decreases mural tensile strength that increases bowel perforation risks. Classical clinical tetrad is abdominal pain, nausea and emesis, abdominal distention, and constipation-to-obstipation. Physical exam may reveal restlessness, acute illness, and signs of dehydration and sepsis, including tachycardia, pyrexia, dry mucous membranes, hypotension/orthostasis, abdominal distention, and hypoactive bowel sounds. Severe direct tenderness, involuntary guarding, abdominal rigidity, and rebound tenderness suggest advanced SBO, as do marked leukocytosis, neutrophilia, bandemia, and lactic acidosis. Differential diagnosis includes postoperative ileus, narcotic bowel, colonic pseudo-obstruction, mesenteric ischemia, and large bowel obstruction. Medical resuscitation includes intravenous hydration, correcting electrolyte abnormalities, intravenous antibiotics, nil per os, and nasoenteral suction. Abdominal CT with oral and intravenous gastrografin contrast is highly sensitive and specific in detecting/characterizing SBO. SBO usually resolves with medical therapy but requires surgery, preferentially by laparoscopy, for unremitting total obstruction, bowel perforation, severe ischemia, or clinical deterioration with medical therapy. Overall mortality is 10% but increases to 30% with bowel necrosis/perforation. Key point in SBO is early diagnosis, emphasizing abdominal CT; aggressive medical therapy including rehydration, antibiotics, and nil per os; and surgery for failed medical therapy.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Diagnosis, Differential; Dilatation, Pathologic; Humans; Ileus; Intestinal Obstruction; Intestine, Small; Laparoscopy; Nausea; Physical Examination; Postoperative Complications; Vomiting
PubMed: 28439845
DOI: 10.1007/s11894-017-0566-9 -
Nutricion Hospitalaria Feb 2017Although guidelines emphasize that the provision of enteral nutrition (EN) should be as close as the patient's needs, prospective studies question this strategy. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Underfeeding versus full enteral feeding in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
INTRODUCTION
Although guidelines emphasize that the provision of enteral nutrition (EN) should be as close as the patient's needs, prospective studies question this strategy.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effect of two EN strategies (underfeeding versus full-feeding) on ICU and overall mortality (hospital mortality or 60-day mortality) and length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), infectious complications, and gastrointestional tolerability in ICU patients.
METHODS
Random effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT). Our search covered MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and CENTRAL databases until May 2015. Underfeeding was assigned into to two different groups according to the level of energy intake achieved (moderate feeding 46-72% and trophic feeding 16-25%) for subgroup analysis.
RESULTS
Five RCTs were included among the 904 studies retrieved (n=2432 patients). No difference was found in overall mortality when all five studies were combined. In the subgroup analysis, moderate feeding (three studies) showed lower mortality compared with full-feeding (RR 0.82;95%CI,0.68-0.98;I2 0% p=0.59 for heterogeneity). No differences were found for ICU mortality, ICU and hospital LOS, duration of MV, and infectious complications. Underfeeding showed lower occurrence of GI signs and symptoms except for aspiration and abdominal distention.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis found no differences in ICU and overall mortality, ICU and hospital LOS, duration of MV, and infectious complications between underfeeding and full-feeding. The subgroup analysis showed lower overall mortality among patients receiving moderate underfeeding. This result should be cautiously interpreted due to the limitations of the small number of studies analyzed and their methodology.
Topics: Critical Illness; Enteral Nutrition; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Length of Stay; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Insufficiency
PubMed: 28244768
DOI: 10.20960/nh.443 -
Current Medical Research and Opinion Jul 2017The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a challenge because its cause remains unknown. Previous clinical trials to examine the efficacy of probiotic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a challenge because its cause remains unknown. Previous clinical trials to examine the efficacy of probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 (B. infantis) in patients with IBS have shown inconsistent findings. This study aimed to assess the combined effect of B. infantis on reducing the symptom severity of IBS based on the published data.
METHODS
A meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effect models to estimate the combined effect of B. infantis on primary outcomes, which included abdominal pain, bloating/distention, and bowel habit satisfaction. A systematic review was performed based on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases to identify the randomized controlled trials comparing probiotic B. infantis with placebo in treating IBS symptoms, published up until 31 December 2016. The standardized mean difference (SMD) method was used to combine data since scales to measure the efficacy of probiotics were different among studies.
RESULTS
A total of five studies were identified as suitable for inclusion, including three studies with single probiotic B. infantis and two studies with composite probiotics containing B. infantis. Treatment with single probiotic B. infantis didn't impact on abdominal pain, bloating/distention, or bowel habit satisfaction among IBS patients. However, patients who received composite probiotics containing B. infantis had significantly reduced abdominal pain (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03-0.41) and bloating/distention (SMD, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.04-0.56). After combining the data from six studies, the improvement of bloating/distention among IBS patients remained significant (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.35).
CONCLUSION
Composite probiotics containing B. infantis might be an effective therapeutic option for IBS patients, which could significantly alleviate the symptoms of IBS without significant adverse effects. However, the efficacy of single probiotic B. infantis on IBS has not been confirmed yet, which needs to be further validated by more large-sized randomized clinical trials.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis; Female; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Male; Probiotics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28166427
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1292230 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2017Previous randomised trials and meta-analyses have shown that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a useful method for providing respiratory support after... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Previous randomised trials and meta-analyses have shown that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a useful method for providing respiratory support after extubation. However, this treatment sometimes 'fails' in infants, and they may require endotracheal re-intubation with its attendant risks and expense. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) can augment NCPAP by delivering ventilator breaths via nasal prongs. Older children and adults with chronic respiratory failure benefit from NIPPV, and the technique has been applied to neonates. However, serious side effects including gastric perforation have been reported with older methods of providing NIPPV.
OBJECTIVES
Primary objective To compare effects of management with NIPPV versus NCPAP on the need for additional ventilatory support in preterm infants whose endotracheal tube was removed after a period of intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Secondary objectives To compare rates of gastric distension, gastrointestinal perforation, necrotising enterocolitis and chronic lung disease; duration of hospitalisation; and rates of apnoea, air leak and mortality for NIPPV and NCPAP.
SEARCH METHODS
We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 9), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 28 September 2015), Embase (1980 to 28 September 2015) and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982 to 28 September 2015). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings and reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing use of NIPPV versus NCPAP in extubated preterm infants. NIPPV included non-invasive support delivered by a mechanical ventilator or a bilevel device in a synchronised or non-synchronised way. Participants included ventilated preterm infants who were ready to be extubated to non-invasive respiratory support. Interventions compared were NIPPV, delivered by short nasal prongs or nasopharyngeal tube, and NCPAP, delivered by the same methods.Types of outcomes measures included failure of therapy (respiratory failure, rates of endotracheal re-intubation); gastrointestinal complications (i.e. abdominal distension requiring cessation of feeds, gastrointestinal perforation or necrotising enterocolitis); pulmonary air leak; chronic lung disease (oxygen requirement at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age) and mortality.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently extracted data regarding clinical outcomes including extubation failure; endotracheal re-intubation; rates of apnoea, gastrointestinal perforation, feeding intolerance, necrotising enterocolitis, chronic lung disease and air leak; and duration of hospital stay. We analysed trials using risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) or an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the quality of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
Through the search, we identified 10 trials enrolling a total of 1431 infants and comparing extubation of infants to NIPPV or NCPAP. Three trials had methodological limitations and possible selection bias.Five trials used the synchronised form of NIPPV, four used the non-synchronised form and one used both methods. Eight studies used NIPPV delivered by a ventilator, one used a bilevel device and one used both methods. When all studies were included, meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant reduction in the risk of meeting extubation failure criteria (typical RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.80; typical RD -0.13, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.08; NNTB 8, 95% CI 6 to 13; 10 trials, 1431 infants) and needing re-intubation (typical RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.88; typical RD -0.10, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.05; NNTB 10, 95% CI 7 to 20; 10 trials, 1431 infants). We graded evidence for these outcomes as moderate, as all trial interventions were unblinded. Although methods of synchronisation varied (Graseby capsule or pneumotachograph/flow-trigger), the five trials that synchronised NIPPV showed a statistically significant benefit for infants extubated to NIPPV in terms of prevention of extubation failure up to one week after extubation.Unsynchronised NIPPV also reduced extubation failure. NIPPV provided via a ventilator is more beneficial than that provided by bilevel devices in reducing extubation failure during the first week. When comparing interventions, investigators found no significant reduction in rates of chronic lung disease (typical RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.10; typical RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.03) or death, and no difference in the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis. Air leaks were reduced in infants randomised to NIPPV (typical RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.82; typical RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01; NNTB 33, 95% CI 20 to 100). We graded evidence quality as moderate (unblinded studies) or low (imprecision) for secondary outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Implications for practice NIPPV reduces the incidence of extubation failure and the need for re-intubation within 48 hours to one week more effectively than NCPAP; however, it has no effect on chronic lung disease nor on mortality. Synchronisation may be important in delivering effective NIPPV. The device used to deliver NIPPV may be important; however, data are insufficient to support strong conclusions. NIPPV does not appear to be associated with increased gastrointestinal side effects. Implications for research Large trials should establish the impact of synchronisation of NIPPV on safety and efficacy of the technique and should compare the efficacy of bilevel devices versus a ventilator for providing NIPPV.
Topics: Dilatation, Pathologic; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation; Intubation, Intratracheal; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Insufficiency; Retreatment; Stomach; Ventilator Weaning
PubMed: 28146296
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3