-
Journal of Neuro-oncology Jan 2022Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is characterized by often bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) that result in progressive hearing loss and compression of nearby... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is characterized by often bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) that result in progressive hearing loss and compression of nearby brainstem structures causing cranial nerve palsies. Treatment of these tumors remains challenging, as both surgical removal and expectant management can result in symptom progression. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been investigated for the management of NF2-associated VS; however, the role, promises, and pitfalls of this treatment modality remain unclear.
METHODS
Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews were searched for studies assessing SRS outcome in NF2-associated VS only. Primary endpoints included tumor control, serviceable hearing, presence of tinnitus, and cranial nerve V and VII symptoms.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies (589 patients harboring 750 tumors) were analyzed. Clinical tumor control was achieved in 88% of cases (95% CI 80-95%); salvage surgery was needed in 8% (95% CI 4-13%) of cases. Treatment resulted in a worsening of pre-treatment serviceable hearing (OR = 0.26, p < 0.01), increased facial nerve (OR = 1.62, p < 0.01) and trigeminal nerve (OR = 1.42, p = 0.07) impairment. The incidence of vestibular symptoms and hydrocephalus were not consistently reported and thus could not be assessed.
CONCLUSIONS
The treatment of NF2-associated VS continues to pose a challenge, as current SRS regimens result in impaired hearing and worse cranial nerve comorbidities, despite achieving high tumor control. It remains unclear if these findings have to be regarded as treatment complications or, rather, continued disease progression.
Topics: Hearing Loss; Humans; Neurofibromatosis 2; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35040021
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03910-8 -
Frontiers in Neuroscience 2021Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (CS) is defined as a permanent loss of synapses in the auditory nerve pathway following noise exposure. Several studies using...
Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (CS) is defined as a permanent loss of synapses in the auditory nerve pathway following noise exposure. Several studies using auditory brainstem response (ABR) have indicated the presence of CS and increased central gain in tinnitus patients with normal hearing thresholds (TNHT), but the results were inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to review the evidence of CS and its pathological changes in the central auditory system in TNHT. Published studies using ABR to study TNHT were reviewed. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were selected to search for relevant literature. Studies (489) were retrieved, and 11 were included for meta-analysis. The results supported significantly reduced wave I amplitude in TNHT, whereas the alternations in wave V amplitude were inconsistent among the studies. Consistently increased V/I ratio indicated noise-induced central gain enhancement. The results indicated the evidence of noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in tinnitus patients with normal hearing. However, inconsistent changes in wave V amplitude may be explained by that the failure of central gain that triggers the pathological neural changes in the central auditory system and/or that increased central gain may be necessary to generate tinnitus but not to maintain tinnitus.
PubMed: 34987358
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.778197 -
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2022Vestibular schwannoma is a benign tumor in the schwannoma cells of the 8th cranial nerve. It causes symptoms like tinnitus, vertigo and end up with loss of hearing so... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Vestibular schwannoma is a benign tumor in the schwannoma cells of the 8th cranial nerve. It causes symptoms like tinnitus, vertigo and end up with loss of hearing so the appropriate treatment is very important. There are many treatment techniques including conservative, surgery and radiosurgery. We aimed to systematically review and single arm meta-analysis the different treatment techniques of vestibular schwannoma.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search using thirteen databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed. All clinical trials about treatment vestibular schwannoma were included and single arm meta-analyzed. We assessed the risk of bias using ROBIN-I's tool and scale of Council Australia's Cancer Guidelines Wiki. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018089784) and has been updated on 17 April 2019.
RESULTS
A total of 35 clinical trials studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of stable hearing capability in patients receiving gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) was 64% (95% CI: 52%-74%). GKRS favored increased hearing capability 10% (95% CI: 7%-16%). Regarding tumor size, GKRS is the most protective method 53% (95% CI: 37%-69%). Complications occurred most commonly in single fractional linac stereotactic radiosurgery (SFSRT) 37% (95% CI: 12%-72%).
CONCLUSION
Our analysis suggested gamma knife radiosurgery could be the most ideal treatment for vestibular schwannoma based on stabilizing hearing capability, increasing hearing capability, decreasing tumor size and complications.
Topics: Hearing; Hearing Tests; Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34973662
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103337 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Nov 2022To review the role of the endoscope in cochlear implantation (CI). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review the role of the endoscope in cochlear implantation (CI).
METHODS
MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as other sources, were searched by two independent reviewers. Studies including patients undergoing either exclusively endoscopic or endoscopically assisted CI were eligible for inclusion. Endoscopic CI approaches and postoperative complications were the primary outcomes. Secondary endpoints included the degree of round window (RW) microscopic visualisation according to St Thomas' Hospital classification and type of cochleostomy for electrode insertion in the scala tympani (ST).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria comprising 191 endoscopic or endoscopically assisted CI cases. The endoscope was used for better visualisation of the RW across all included studies, facilitated the insertion of the electrode in the ST and spared a mastoidectomy in a number of cases. No facial nerve palsy was reported in any of the studies. The most common complication was external auditory canal/tympanic membrane tear followed by chorda tympani injury.
CONCLUSION
The microscopic CI approach is still the gold standard. The endoscope facilitates the recognition of the RW area and leads to successful and safe implantation, particularly in difficult anatomical scenarios, ear malformations and advanced otosclerosis. Endoscopically assisted CI procedures offer the opportunity to avoid a posterior tympanotomy and reduce the risk of facial nerve injury. To date, the lack of long-term data does not permit the widespread adoption of completely endoscopic CI procedures without a mastoidectomy.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Endoscopes; Humans; Round Window, Ear; Scala Tympani
PubMed: 34971491
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13909 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2022A meta-analysis of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) primarily treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or microsurgery (MS) was performed, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Primary Treatment of Small to Medium (<3 cm) Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Hearing Preservation and Tumor Control Rates for Microsurgery versus Radiosurgery.
BACKGROUND
A meta-analysis of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) primarily treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or microsurgery (MS) was performed, and hearing preservation outcome (HPO), tumor control (TC), and facial nerve dysfunction (FND) were analyzed.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted (Medline and Scopus database) for the period January 2010-June 2020 with appropriate MeSH. English language articles for small to medium sporadic VS (<3 cm) using SRS or MS as primary treatment modality, with minimum follow-up of 3 years, were included. Studies had to report an acceptable standardized hearing metric.
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria: 10 MS; 23 radiosurgery, and 1 comparative study included in both. HPO, at approximately 65 months follow-up, were comparable between MS group (10 studies; 809 patients) and SRS group (23 studies; 1234 patients) (56% vs. 59%; P = 0.1527). TC, at approximately 70 months follow-up, was significantly better in the MS group (9 studies; 1635 patients) versus the SRS group (19 studies; 2260 patients) (98% vs. 92%; P < 0.0001). FND, at approximately 12 months follow-up, was significantly higher in the MS group (8 studies; 1101 patients) versus the SRS group (17 studies; 2285 patients) (10% vs. 2%; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
MS and SRS are comparable primary treatments for small (<3 cm) sporadic VS with respect to HPO at 5-year follow-up in patients with serviceable hearing at presentation; approximately 50% of patients for both modalities likely lose serviceable hearing by that time point. High TC rates (>90%) were seen with both modalities; MS 98% versus SRS 92%. The posttreatment FND was significantly less with the SRS group (2%) versus the MS group (10%).
Topics: Follow-Up Studies; Hearing; Humans; Microsurgery; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34838768
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.083 -
Brain Sciences Oct 2021Several electrical stimulation patterns of the auditory nerve have been described for tinnitus relief, but there is no consensus on the most effective stimulation... (Review)
Review
Several electrical stimulation patterns of the auditory nerve have been described for tinnitus relief, but there is no consensus on the most effective stimulation pattern. Therefore, we aim to systematically review the literature on the effect of intra- and extracochlear electrical stimulation patterns as a treatment option for patients with tinnitus. Only studies on intra- and extracochlear electrical stimulation for patients with tinnitus were included if the stimulation used did not concern standardized CI stimulation patterns to primarily rehabilitate hearing loss as intervention. A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 10 studies (89 patients) on intracochlear electrical stimulation and 25 studies on extracochlear electrical stimulation (1109 patients). There was a high to medium risk of bias in 22 studies, especially due to lack of a non-exposed group and poor selection of the exposed group. All included studies showed subjective tinnitus improvement during or after electrical stimulation, using different stimulation patterns. Due to methodological limitations and low reporting quality of the included studies, the potential of intra- and extracochlear stimulation has not been fully explored. To draw conclusions on which stimulation patterns should be optimized for tinnitus relief, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in tinnitus suppression is needed.
PubMed: 34827395
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111394 -
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica :... Dec 2021
-
Neuro-oncology Practice Dec 2021Differences in long-term outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems for vestibular... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Differences in long-term outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems for vestibular schwannoma (VS) management remain unclear. To investigate differences in safety and efficacy between modalities, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies over the past decade.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for studies with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between January 2010 and April 2020, cohort size ≥30, and mean/median follow-up ≥5 years. Odds ratios (OR) compared rates of tumor control, hearing preservation, and cranial nerve toxicities before and after SRS.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies were included (29 GK, 10 LINAC) with 6516 total patients. Tumor control rates were 93% (95% CI 91-94%) and 94% (95% CI 91-97%) for GK and LINAC, respectively. Both GK (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.13) and LINAC (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.76) reduced odds of serviceable hearing. Neither GK (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.22) nor LINAC (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64-2.00) impacted facial nerve function. GK decreased odds of trigeminal nerve (TN) impairment (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) while LINAC did not impact TN function (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.61). Lastly, LINAC offered decreased odds of tinnitus (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.87) not observed with GK (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.01).
CONCLUSIONS
VS tumor control and hearing preservation rates are comparable between GK and LINAC SRS. GK may better preserve TN function, while LINAC decreases tinnitus rates. Future studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of GK and LINAC SRS more directly.
PubMed: 34777833
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab052 -
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Feb 2022Cochlear implantation can be used when a patient's hearing cannot satisfactorily be improved after optimised hearing aid fitting. However, in patients with a cochlear...
BACKGROUND
Cochlear implantation can be used when a patient's hearing cannot satisfactorily be improved after optimised hearing aid fitting. However, in patients with a cochlear nerve or brain disorder affecting hearing, the benefits of cochlear implants are not so straightforward.
METHODS
This paper describes a 58-year-old patient suffering from multiple sclerosis and profound sensorineural hearing loss, rehabilitated with a cochlear implant. Literature concerning cochlear implantation in demyelinating conditions was systematically reviewed using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases.
RESULTS
The patient's cochlear implantation was successful, with speech discrimination scores remaining above 90 per cent for eight years post-operatively. No previous cases of cochlear implantation with multiple sclerosis related hearing loss have been reported, despite the high incidence of hearing loss in multiple sclerosis patients.
CONCLUSION
This paper demonstrates that multiple sclerosis lesions should not be an exclusion criterion in an otherwise suitable candidate for cochlear implantation.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34649636
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215121002917 -
The Journal of International Advanced... Sep 2021Vestibular schwannomas (VS) frequently lead to ipsilateral sensorineural hearing loss (HL) as part of its natural history or as a result of treatment. Cochlear...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) frequently lead to ipsilateral sensorineural hearing loss (HL) as part of its natural history or as a result of treatment. Cochlear implantation represents a well-documented treatment of profound HL that cannot be treated adequately with a conventional hearing aid, thus being offered to selected VS patients. A functional cochlea and cochlear nerve are prerequisites for sound perception with a cochlear implant (CI). The potential impact of radiotherapy on these structures is thus an important issue for subsequent CI hearing outcomes. The objective of this article is to present a case and to review the existing literature on the outcomes of cochlear implantation in irradiated VS patients systematically.
METHODS
A systematic literature review using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted. Medline was searched systematically. Papers reporting ipsilateral CI outcomes after radiotherapy of VS were included. Additionally, results of CI after stereotactic radiotherapy in a 54-year-old male with neurofibromatosis type 2 are presented.
RESULTS
A total of 14 papers (33 patients) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Moderate preoperative HL was found in 11 patients. Six had moderate to severe HL, whereas 16 had severe HL or total deafness. Postoperative hearing outcomes varied from poor in 27% of patients to excellent in 19%, with remaining cases lying in between (mean follow-up of 19 months). Most patients achieved improvement in hearing and quality of life.
CONCLUSION
Despite variation in the degree of hearing outcome, CI after radiotherapy of VS appears to be effective in the majority of cases, as more than 70% of patients have good or excellent outcomes within 1-2 years post-implantation. Subjective benefits are considerable, even in cases with relatively poor objective outcome.
Topics: Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuroma, Acoustic; Quality of Life; Speech Perception; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34617898
DOI: 10.5152/iao.2021.21008