-
Cureus Apr 2024Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis (GN) is an immune-mediated kidney disease characterized by the inflammation of small blood... (Review)
Review
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis (GN) is an immune-mediated kidney disease characterized by the inflammation of small blood vessels in the kidney, leading to renal impairment and potentially irreversible damage. Concerns have been raised over the reports of myeloperoxidase/perinuclear (MPO/p) ANCA GN following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Our study provides a comprehensive insight into perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (p-ANCA) GN after COVID-19 vaccination. We conducted a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to "covid-19 vaccine," "glomerulonephritis," "p-ANCA," and "MPO-ANCA" up to March 5, 2024, to include cases of p-ANCA-associated GN following COVID-19 vaccination. Of the 4,102 articles, we included 29, reporting 35 patients demonstrating COVID-19 vaccine-induced p-ANCA GN, with 23 (65.7%) females and a median age of 69 years (mean ± SD = 63.22 ± 16). Twenty-six (74.28%) patients received the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer = 19, Moderna = 7). Seventeen (48.57%) patients presented with p-ANCA GN after the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with a median gap of 19 days (1-84 days). Constitutional symptoms (54.28%) and acute kidney injury (42.85%) were the most reported initial presentations, and elevated serum creatinine (mean peak serum creatinine = 4.98 ± 5.02 mg/dL), hematuria, and proteinuria were the laboratory findings. MPO/p-ANCA was positive in 31 (88.6%) patients. All patients underwent renal biopsy, and crescentic GN was the most common finding among 27 (77.14%) patients. Management of p-ANCA GN included steroids in 30 (85.71%) patients, followed by rituximab (28.57%), and plasmapheresis (22.86%). Most patients responded well to treatment, with complete remission in 29 (82.86%) and relapse in four (11.42%) patients. Two patients did not achieve remission and became dialysis dependent. ANCA-associated GN is a rare and life-threatening complication of the COVID-19 vaccine, necessitating urgent evaluation and management. COVID-19 vaccine-induced p-ANCA GN should be included in the differential diagnoses of patients presenting with kidney injury after vaccination.
PubMed: 38817489
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59390 -
Cureus Apr 2024Rhabdomyolysis, a medical condition caused by the destruction of striated muscle fibers, can have many etiologies, with the most common one being traumatic etiologies,... (Review)
Review
Rhabdomyolysis, a medical condition caused by the destruction of striated muscle fibers, can have many etiologies, with the most common one being traumatic etiologies, that is, crushing injuries, heavy exertion, and being trapped under rubbles, and so forth. Rhabdomyolysis causes many complications, including acute kidney injury and different electrolyte imbalances, which later can cause cardiac dysrhythmia and even death as a result. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the incidence of imbalances of four important electrolytes among patients diagnosed with traumatic rhabdomyolysis. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for any article related to traumatic rhabdomyolysis using keywords related to the topic of our study, excluding case studies and case series. Relevant data were extracted from the included articles, and finally, a meta-analysis was performed on them to calculate the pooled incidence of each electrolyte imbalance. Collectively, 32 articles were included in our study (through the database and citation checking). The following were the pooled incidence of each electrolyte imbalance: hyperkalemia, 31% (95%CI 22%-41%); hypokalemia, 10% (95%CI 4%-17%); hypernatremia, 3% (95%CI 0%-8%); hyponatremia, 23% (95%CI 7%-44%); hypercalcemia, 0% (95%CI 0%-1%); hypocalcemia, 57% (95%CI: 22%-88%); hyperphosphatemia, 33% (95%CI 11%-59%); hypophosphatemia, 4% (95%CI 0%-16%). According to the meta-analyses, the rate of hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, hypocalcemia, and hyperphosphatemia is higher than their counterpart in patients diagnosed with traumatic rhabdomyolysis.
PubMed: 38817473
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59333 -
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of sex on outcomes after aortic valve replacement.Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine... Jul 2024In recent years, extensive literature has been produced demonstrating inferior outcomes for women when compared with men undergoing heart valve interventions. Herein, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
In recent years, extensive literature has been produced demonstrating inferior outcomes for women when compared with men undergoing heart valve interventions. Herein, we seek to analyze the literature comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
METHODS
A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase was conducted for articles comparing differences in outcomes between adult men and women undergoing SAVR. One thousand nine hundred and ninety titles were screened, of which 75 full texts were reviewed, and a total of 19 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review.
RESULTS
Pooled estimates of mortality demonstrated that women tended to have lower rates of survival within the first 30 days post-SAVR, although mid-term and long-term mortality did not differ significantly up to 10 years postoperatively. Pooled estimates of postoperative data indicated no difference in the rates of stroke and postoperative bleeding. Rates of aortic valve reoperation and acute kidney injury favored women.
CONCLUSION
Despite the inferior outcomes for women post-SAVR that have been reported in recent years, the results of this meta-analysis demonstrate comparable results between the sexes with comparable mid- to long-term mortality in data pooled from the literature. Although mortality favored men in the short term, rates of aortic valve reoperation and acute kidney injury favored women. Future investigation into this field should focus on identifying discrepancies in diagnosis and initial surgical management in order to address any potential factors contributing to discrepant short-term outcomes.
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
http://links.lww.com/JCM/A651.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Aortic Valve; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome; Risk Factors; Postoperative Complications; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; Reoperation; Aged; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Health Status Disparities; Middle Aged
PubMed: 38809253
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001635 -
PeerJ 2024The optimal range of protein dosage and effect of high-dose protein on critically ill patients remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare higher and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The optimal range of protein dosage and effect of high-dose protein on critically ill patients remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare higher and lower doses of protein supplementation for nutritional support in critically ill patients.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials that compared higher (≥1.2 g/kg per day) lower (<1.2 g/kg per day) doses of protein supplementation among critically ill adult patients. This search spanned from the inception of relevant databases to November 20, 2023. Our primary endpoint of interest was overall mortality, while secondary endpoints included length of stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of acute kidney injury.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies including 2,965 critically ill patients were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled analyses showed no significant difference in overall mortality (RR 1.03, 95%CI [0.92-1.15], = 0.65, I = 0%), length of intensive care unit stay (MD 0.19, 95%CI [-0.67 to 1.04], = 0.66, I = 25%), length of hospital stay (MD 0.73, 95%CI [-1.59 to 3.04], = 0.54, I = 27%), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -0.14, 95%CI [-0.83 to 0.54], = 0.68, I = 8%), and incidence of acute kidney injury (RR 1.11, 95%CI [0.87-1.41], = 0.38, I = 0%) between critically ill patients receiving higher or lower doses of protein supplementation.
CONCLUSIONS
For critically ill patients, the protein supplementation dose had no significant effect on clinical outcomes, including overall mortality, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of acute kidney injury.
Topics: Humans; Critical Illness; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Length of Stay; Respiration, Artificial; Acute Kidney Injury; Intensive Care Units; Dietary Proteins; Dietary Supplements; Nutritional Support; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
PubMed: 38799065
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17433 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Development... Apr 2024Acute kidney injury is a common complication following cardiac surgery (CSA-AKI). Serum creatinine levels require a minimum of 24-48 h to indicate renal injury.... (Review)
Review
Acute kidney injury is a common complication following cardiac surgery (CSA-AKI). Serum creatinine levels require a minimum of 24-48 h to indicate renal injury. Nevertheless, early diagnosis remains critical for improving patient outcomes. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the PubMed and CENTRAL databases was performed to assess the role of Klotho as a predictive biomarker for CSA-AKI (end-of-search date: 17 February 2024). An evidence quality assessment of the four included studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Among the 234 patients studied, 119 (50.8%) developed CSA-AKI postoperatively. Serum Klotho levels above 120 U/L immediately postoperatively correlated with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.806 and 90% sensitivity. Additionally, a postoperative serum creatinine to Klotho ratio above 0.695 showed 94.7% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity, with an AUC of 92.4%, maintaining its prognostic validity for up to three days. Urinary Klotho immunoreactivity was better maintained in samples obtained via direct catheterization rather than indwelling catheter collection bags. Storage at -80 °C was necessary for delayed testing. Optimal timing for both serum and urine Klotho measurements was from the end of cardiopulmonary bypass to the time of the first ICU lab tests. In conclusion, Klotho could be a promising biomarker for the early diagnosis of CSA-AKI. Standardization of measurement protocols and larger studies are needed to validate these findings.
PubMed: 38786957
DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11050135 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024(1) Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most frequent complications in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) may be a... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most frequent complications in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) may be a risk factor for UTIs and graft rejection. We aimed to evaluate available evidence regarding the benefit of screening and treatment of ASB within the first year after KT. (2) Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library CENTRAL and Embase. Inclusion criteria were manuscripts in English addressing the management of ASB after KT. The PICO questions concerned Patients (adults receiving a KT), Intervention (screening, diagnosis and treatment of ASB), Control (screening and no antibiotic treatment) and Outcome (UTIs, sepsis, kidney failure and death). (3) Evidence synthesis: The systematic review identified 151 studies, and 16 full-text articles were evaluated. Seven were excluded because they did not evaluate the effect of treatment of ASB. There was no evidence for a higher incidence of lower UTIs, acute pyelonephritis, graft loss, or mortality in patients not treated with antibiotics for ASB. Analysis of comparative non-randomized and observational studies did not provide supplementary evidence to guide clinical recommendations. We believe this lack of evidence is due to confounding risk factors that are not being considered in the stratification of study patients.
PubMed: 38786170
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050442 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Jul 2024Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show a reduction in acute kidney injury, renal impairment and acute renal failure after initiation of a sodium glucose... (Review)
Review
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show a reduction in acute kidney injury, renal impairment and acute renal failure after initiation of a sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. Observational literature on the association is conflicting, but important to understand for populations with a higher risk of medication-related adverse renal events. We aimed to systematically review the literature to summarize the association between sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and acute kidney injury, renal impairment and acute renal failure in three at-risk groups: older people aged >65 years, people with heart failure and people with reduced renal function. A systematic search of Embase (1974 until 23 February 2024) and PubMed (1946 until 23 February 2024) was performed. RCTs were included if they reported numbers of acute kidney injury or acute renal failure in people using sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared to other diabetic therapies. Studies needed to report results by level of renal function, heart failure status or age. Of 922 results, eight studies were included. The absolute risk of acute kidney injury or acute renal failure was higher in people >65 years compared to those <65 years, higher in people with heart failure (vs without) and higher in people with reduced kidney function (vs preserved kidney function), but insufficient evidence to determine if the relative effect of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on this risk was similar for each group. At-risk cohorts are associated with a higher incidence of acute kidney problems in users of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Acute Kidney Injury; Age Factors; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 38784979
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16088 -
Critical Care Science 2024To provide insights into the potential benefits of goal-directed therapy guided by FloTrac in reducing postoperative complications and improving outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To provide insights into the potential benefits of goal-directed therapy guided by FloTrac in reducing postoperative complications and improving outcomes.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate goal-directed therapy guided by FloTrac in major surgery, comparing goal-directed therapy with usual care or invasive monitoring in cardiac and noncardiac surgery subgroups. The quality of the articles and evidence were evaluated with a risk of bias tool and GRADE.
RESULTS
We included 29 randomized controlled trials with 3,468 patients. Goal-directed therapy significantly reduced the duration of hospital stay (mean difference -1.43 days; 95%CI 2.07 to -0.79; I2 81%), intensive care unit stay (mean difference -0.77 days; 95%CI -1.18 to -0.36; I2 93%), and mechanical ventilation (mean difference -2.48 hours, 95%CI -4.10 to -0.86, I2 63%). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury or hypotension, but goal-directed therapy significantly reduced the risk of heart failure or pulmonary edema (RR 0.46; 95%CI 0.23 - 0.92; I2 0%).
CONCLUSION
Goal-directed therapy guided by the FloTrac sensor improved clinical outcomes and shortened the length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit in patients undergoing major surgery. Further research can validate these results using specific protocols and better understand the potential benefits of FloTrac beyond these outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Length of Stay; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Intensive Care Units; Respiration, Artificial; Early Goal-Directed Therapy; Monitoring, Physiologic
PubMed: 38775544
DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240196-en -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2024Acute heart failure (AHF) is new onset of, or a sudden worsening of, chronic heart failure characterised by congestion in about 95% of cases or end-organ hypoperfusion... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute heart failure (AHF) is new onset of, or a sudden worsening of, chronic heart failure characterised by congestion in about 95% of cases or end-organ hypoperfusion in 5% of cases. Treatment often requires urgent escalation of diuretic therapy, mainly through hospitalisation. This Cochrane review evaluated the efficacy of intravenous loop diuretics strategies in treating AHF in individuals with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification III or IV and fluid overload.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of intravenous continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for the initial treatment of acute heart failure in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We identified trials through systematic searches of bibliographic databases and in clinical trials registers including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CPCI-S on the Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry platform (ICTRP), and the European Union Trials register. We conducted reference checking and citation searching, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. The latest search was performed on 29 February 2024.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with AHF, NYHA classification III or IV, regardless of aetiology or ejection fraction, where trials compared intravenous continuous infusion of loop diuretics with intermittent bolus injection in AHF. We excluded trials with chronic stable heart failure, cardiogenic shock, renal artery stenosis, or end-stage renal disease. Additionally, we excluded studies combining loop diuretics with hypertonic saline, inotropes, vasoactive medications, or renal replacement therapy and trials where diuretic dosing was protocol-driven to achieve a target urine output, due to confounding factors.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened papers for inclusion and reviewed full-texts. Outcomes included weight loss, all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, readmission following discharge, and occurrence of acute kidney injury. We performed risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis where data permitted and assessed certainty of the evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
The review included seven RCTs, spanning 32 hospitals in seven countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. Data collection ranged from eight months to six years. Following exclusion of participants in subgroups with confounding treatments and different clinical settings, 681 participants were eligible for review. These additional study characteristics, coupled with our strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, improve the applicability of the body of the evidence as they reflect real-world clinical practice. Meta-analysis was feasible for net weight loss, all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, readmission, and acute kidney injury. Literature review and narrative analysis explored daily fluid balance; cardiovascular mortality; B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) change; N-terminal-proBNP change; and adverse incidents such as ototoxicity, hypotension, and electrolyte imbalances. Risk of bias assessment revealed two studies with low overall risk, four with some concerns, and one with high risk. All sensitivity analyses excluded trials at high risk of bias. Only narrative analysis was conducted for 'daily fluid balance' due to diverse data presentation methods across two studies (169 participants, the evidence was very uncertain about the effect). Results of narrative analysis varied. For instance, one study reported higher daily fluid balance within the first 24 hours in the continuous infusion group compared to the bolus injection group, whereas there was no difference in fluid balance beyond this time point. Continuous intravenous infusion of loop diuretics may result in mean net weight loss of 0.86 kg more than bolus injection of loop diuretics, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference (MD) 0.86 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 1.28; 5 trials, 497 participants; P < 0.001, I = 21%; very low-certainty evidence). Importantly, sensitivity analysis excluding trials with high risk of bias showed there was insufficient evidence for a difference in bodyweight loss between groups (MD 0.70 kg, 95% CI -0.06 to 1.46; 3 trials, 378 participants; P = 0.07, I = 0%). There may be little to no difference in all-cause mortality between continuous infusion and bolus injection (risk ratio (RR) 1.53, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.90; 5 trials, 530 participants; P = 0.19, I = 4%; low-certainty evidence). Despite sensitivity analysis, the direction of the evidence remained unchanged. No trials measured cardiovascular mortality. There may be little to no difference in the length of hospital stay between continuous infusion and bolus injection of loop diuretics, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -1.10 days, 95% CI -4.84 to 2.64; 4 trials, 211 participants; P = 0.57, I = 88%; very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis improved heterogeneity; however, the direction of the evidence remained unchanged. There may be little to no difference in the readmission to hospital between continuous infusion and bolus injection of loop diuretics (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.16; 3 trials, 400 participants; P = 0.31, I = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis continued to show insufficient evidence for a difference in the readmission to hospital between groups. There may be little to no difference in the occurrence of acute kidney injury as an adverse event between continuous infusion and bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.49; 3 trials, 491 participants; P = 0.92, I = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis continued to show that continuous infusion may make little to no difference on the occurrence of acute kidney injury as an adverse events compared to the bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Analysis of available data comparing two delivery methods of diuretics in acute heart failure found that the current data are insufficient to show superiority of one strategy intervention over the other. Our findings were based on trials meeting stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure validity. Despite previous reviews suggesting advantages of continuous infusion over bolus injections, our review found insufficient evidence to support or refute this. However, our review, which excluded trials with clinical confounders and RCTs with high risk of bias, offers the most robust conclusion to date.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Humans; Acute Disease; Bias; Cause of Death; Heart Failure; Infusions, Intravenous; Injections, Intravenous; Length of Stay; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors
PubMed: 38775253
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014811.pub2 -
The American Journal of the Medical... May 2024Differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury (AKI) presents a challenge. Here, we assessed the performance of the fractional excretion of urea...
BACKGROUND
Differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury (AKI) presents a challenge. Here, we assessed the performance of the fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea) and compared it to the fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) in distinguishing intrinsic from prerenal AKI.
METHODS
A thorough search was conducted in several databases until January 16, 2024. We included studies evaluating FEUrea, with or without FENa, for differentiating AKI etiologies in adults. We assessed the methodological quality using the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tools. We performed a meta-analysis using the bivariate random effects model, with subgroup analyses to explore the impact of diuretic therapy on FEUrea, and direct statistical comparisons between FEUrea and FENa involving the subgroups with and without diuretics.
RESULTS
We included 11 studies with 1108 hospitalized patients. Among eight studies (915 patients) evaluating FEUrea >35% for distinguishing intrinsic from prerenal AKI, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 66% (95% CI, 49%-79%) and 75% (95% CI, 60%-85%), respectively. In a subset of six studies (302 patients) comparing FEUrea at 35% to FENa at 1% in patients not receiving diuretics, there were no significant differences in sensitivity (77% versus 89%, P = 0.410) or specificity (80% versus 79%, P = 0.956). In four studies, 244 patients on diuretics, FEUrea demonstrated lower sensitivity (52% versus 92%, P < 0.001) but higher specificity (82% versus 44%, P < 0.001) compared to FENa for the diagnosis of intrinsic AKI.
CONCLUSIONS
FEUrea has limited utility in differentiating intrinsic from prerenal AKI. FEUrea does not provide a superior alternative to FENa, even in patients receiving diuretics.
PubMed: 38768779
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.04.021