-
Clinical Drug Investigation May 2023Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as a therapeutic option for alopecia areata. The risk of potential adverse events is currently debated. In particular, several...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as a therapeutic option for alopecia areata. The risk of potential adverse events is currently debated. In particular, several safety data for JAK inhibitors are extrapolated from a single study in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib or adalimumab/etanercept as a comparator. The population of patients with alopecia areata is clinically and immunologically different from persons with rheumatoid arthritis and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are not effective in these patients. The objective of this systematic review was to analyze available data on the safety of various JAK inhibitors in patients with alopecia areata.
METHODS
The systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature review was performed by searching PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO databases with the last search on March 13, 2023.
RESULTS
In total, 36 studies were included. The frequency and odds ratio (OR) for most common adverse events versus placebo were: for baricitinib hypercholesterolemia (18.2% vs 10.5%, OR = 1.9) and headache (6.1% vs 5.1%, OR = 1.2), for brepocitinib elevated creatinine level (27.7% vs 4.3%, OR = 8.6) and acne (10.6% vs 4.3%, OR = 2.7), for ritlecitinib acne (10.4% vs 4.3%, OR = 2.6) and headache (12.5% vs 10.6%, OR = 1.2) and for deuruxolitinib headache (21.4% vs 9.1%, OR = 2.7) and acne (13.6% vs 4.5%, OR = 3.3). The respective numbers for upper respiratory infections were: baricitinib (7.3% vs 7.0%, OR = 1.0) and brepocitinib (23.4% vs 10.6%, OR = 2.6); for nasopharyngitis: ritlecitinib (12.5% vs 12.8%, OR = 1.0) and deuruxolitinib (14.6% vs 2.3%, OR = 7.3).
CONCLUSIONS
The most common side effects of JAK inhibitors in patients with alopecia areata were headache and acne. The OR for upper respiratory tract infections varied from over 7-fold increased to comparable to placebo. The risk of serious adverse events was not increased.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Alopecia Areata; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Alopecia
PubMed: 37138134
DOI: 10.1007/s40261-023-01260-z -
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology : JDD May 2023Monoclonal antibodies encompass an increasingly important treatment for a variety of dermatologic conditions including hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The high failure...
BACKGROUND
Monoclonal antibodies encompass an increasingly important treatment for a variety of dermatologic conditions including hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The high failure rate and cost of anti-tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α) agents and emergence of biologic treatments critically warrant treatment strategies that identify treatment failures early and optimize therapy. This review’s primary objective is to understand the current literature on biologic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) used in chronic inflammatory diseases and apply this knowledge to future dermatologic studies and treatment.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or high-quality retrospective analyses of RCTs investigating the outcomes of biologic TDM were identified between January 1979 and January 2020 within the PubMed/MEDLINE database using keywords: "biologic," "therapeutic drug monitoring," and "randomized controlled trial," combined with common medical conditions for which biologics are prescribed: "rheumatoid arthritis," "inflammatory bowel disease," "psoriasis," "Crohn’s," "ulcerative colitis," "vasculitis," and "hidradenitis suppurativa." The methods and findings of each study were compared.
RESULTS
Three RCTs were included all examining TDM of TNF-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Two studied TDM of infliximab, and one adalimumab. An additional high-quality retrospective analysis of an infliximab RCT captured in our search was also included. Two of the three RCTs (TAXIT and PAILOT) found proactive TDM superior to clinically based dosing and reactive TDM, respectively. The third RCT (TAILORX) found no significant difference between proactive and reactive TDM.
CONCLUSION
TDM of anti-TNF-α biologics in IBD has demonstrated success through RCTs. Knowledge gained from these studies applies to dermatologic treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(5): doi:10.36849/JDD.6671.
Topics: Humans; Infliximab; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Drug Monitoring; Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Biological Products; Necrosis
PubMed: 37133467
DOI: 10.36849/JDD.6671 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Aug 2023
Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy of biologics and oral agents in palmoplantar psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Biological Products; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Psoriasis; Administration, Oral; Treatment Outcome; Ustekinumab; Severity of Illness Index; Adalimumab; Etanercept; Dermatologic Agents
PubMed: 37121476
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.04.043 -
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Jul 2023Almost 50% of patients with skin psoriasis have concomitant nail involvement. The comparative effectiveness of the available biologics for nail psoriasis (NP) is still... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Almost 50% of patients with skin psoriasis have concomitant nail involvement. The comparative effectiveness of the available biologics for nail psoriasis (NP) is still an area of contention because of limited data on nails.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of biologics in achieving complete resolution of NP.
METHODS
We identified studies in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus. The eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trial (RCTs) or cohort studies for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis with at least two arms of active comparator of biologic reporting at least one efficacy outcome of interest: that is the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), the modified NAPSI or the Physician's Global Assessment of Fingernail Psoriasis with a score of 0.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies comprising seven treatments met the inclusion criteria, and were included in the NMA. The NMA showed the odds of complete NP resolution were superior with ixekizumab [risk ratio (RR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-3.10] compared with the treatment of reference (adalimumab). Brodalumab (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.14-7.40), guselkumab (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.80), infliximab (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.19-4.60) and ustekinumab (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.08-1.60) demonstrated worse therapeutic effect compared with adalimumab. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks had the highest probability of being the best treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab has the highest rate of complete nail clearance and it can be considered the best-ranked therapy from the present evidence. This study is relevant to daily practice as it facilitates the decision when choosing between the wide variety of available biologics in patients for whom clearance of nail symptoms is the first concern.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Adalimumab; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Psoriasis; Biological Products; Treatment Outcome; Severity of Illness Index; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37052062
DOI: 10.1093/ced/llad136 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Sep 2023Rapidity of symptom resolution informs treatment choice in patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a systematic review and network... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Rapidity of symptom resolution informs treatment choice in patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing early symptomatic remission with approved therapies.
METHODS
Through a systematic literature review to December 31, 2022, we identified randomized trials in adult outpatients with moderate-severe UC treated with approved therapies (tumor necrosis factor α antagonists, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, janus kinase inhibitors, or ozanimod), compared with each other or placebo, reporting rates of symptomatic remission (based on partial Mayo score, with resolution of rectal bleeding and near-normalization of stool frequency) at weeks 2, 4, and/or 6. We performed random-effects network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach and estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval values.
RESULTS
On network meta-analysis, upadacitinib was more effective than all agents in achieving symptomatic remission at weeks 2 (range of RR, 2.85-6.27), 4 (range of RR, 1.78-2.37), and 6 (range of RR, 1.84-2.79). Tumor necrosis factor α antagonists and filgotinib, but not ustekinumab and vedolizumab, were more effective than ozanimod in achieving symptomatic remission at week 2, but not at weeks 4 and 6. With approximately 10% placebo-treated patients achieving symptomatic remission at 2 weeks, we estimated 68%, 22%, 23.7%, 23.9%, 22.2%, 18.4%, 15.7%, and 10.9% of upadacitinib-, filgotinib-, infliximab-, adalimumab-, golimumab-, ustekinumab-, vedolizumab-, and ozanimod-treated patients would achieve early symptomatic remission, ustekinumab and vedolizumab achieving rapid remission only in biologic-naïve patients.
DISCUSSION
In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, upadacitinib was most effective in achieving early symptomatic remission, whereas ozanimod was relatively slower acting.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Colitis, Ulcerative; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Network Meta-Analysis; Adalimumab; Ustekinumab; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36976548
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002263 -
Medicina Clinica Jun 2023Inflammatory bowel disease includes two chronic inflammatory diseases, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The burden of disease is increasing worldwide. A few... (Review)
Review
Inflammatory bowel disease includes two chronic inflammatory diseases, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The burden of disease is increasing worldwide. A few reviews evaluating the paediatric use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists have been published, although these mostly include observational studies and do not consider economic evaluations. This systematic review evaluated the available evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TNF antagonist therapy for paediatric inflammatory bowel disease. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central (up to May 2022). Nine randomized clinical trials and four economic evaluations that examined any anti-TNF drugs (e.g., infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab) against different alternatives were included. In studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-TNF drugs in Crohn's disease, most assessed the efficacy of maintenance regimen in patients who had previously responded to induction (response=28%-63%, and clinical remission=17%-83% depending on dose, drug, and follow-up). In ulcerative colitis, maintenance treatment with anti-TNF drugs reported clinical remission rates between 17% and 44%. Nine studies reported information on adverse events. No clinical trials comparing different anti-TNF drugs were found. The findings from this review suggest that maintenance treatment with anti-TNF drugs (such as infliximab and adalimumab) in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease is probably effective and safe. However, the economic evaluations reported contradictory results of the cost-effectiveness ratios. Protocol registry: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/wjmvf.
Topics: Humans; Child; Adalimumab; Infliximab; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Crohn Disease; Colitis, Ulcerative; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
PubMed: 36967304
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.02.006 -
Digestive and Liver Disease : Official... Jun 2023The therapeutic armamentarium for the management of Crohn's disease (CD) is rapidly expanding. Several biologic therapies (e.g. infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, and...
The therapeutic armamentarium for the management of Crohn's disease (CD) is rapidly expanding. Several biologic therapies (e.g. infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab) have been regulatory approved, and there is considerable practice variability in the treatment of patients with CD. This technical review systematically searched and identified the current evidence, synthesized it using meta-analytic methodology, appraised its quality, and concisely presented it, thus forming the basis for developing clinical practice recommendations on the use of biologic treatments in adult patients with CD.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Crohn Disease; Infliximab; Adalimumab; Ustekinumab; Biological Products
PubMed: 36964060
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.02.019 -
Advances in Therapy May 2023Dose escalation is one of the treatment approaches studied and suggested in advanced therapies for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Dose escalation is one of the treatment approaches studied and suggested in advanced therapies for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to identify and characterize the dosing escalation patterns of advanced therapies in CD and UC.
METHODS
Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between January 2011 and October 2021 and limited to non-interventional studies in English language. Congress and bibliographic searches were also conducted. Articles were screened by two independent researchers. Dose escalation patterns were described and summarized considering the regional regulatory label recommendation (in North America [NA] or outside of North America [ONA]).
RESULTS
Among 3190 CD and 2116 UC articles identified in the Ovid searches, 100 CD and 54 UC studies were included in the SLR, with more studies conducted ONA. Most studies reported an initial maintenance dose pattern aligned with the lower starting dose per local regulatory label; however, several ONA studies (n = 13 out of 14) reported ustekinumab every 8 weeks as starting maintenance pattern in CD. In ONA studies, the median within-guideline escalation rates in CD and UC were 43% in ustekinumab (CD only), 33% and 32% for vedolizumab; 29% and 39% for adalimumab; and 14% and 10% for infliximab. Evidence regarding dose escalation patterns for tofacitinib, certolizumab pegol, and golimumab was limited. Some dose escalation patterns outside of label recommendations were observed including ustekinumab every 8 weeks to every 4 weeks and vedolizumab every 8 weeks to every 6 weeks.
CONCLUSION
Dose escalation strategies are widely documented in the literature. The reported dose escalation patterns and escalation rates vary by region and by CD and UC. Most escalation patterns reported were aligned with regulatory recommendations while some reported more diverse or aggressive dose escalation.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42021289251.
Topics: Humans; Crohn Disease; Colitis, Ulcerative; Ustekinumab; Adalimumab; Infliximab
PubMed: 36930430
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02457-6 -
JAMA Dermatology May 2023Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis) approved to treat several inflammatory diseases are sometimes used off label to treat severe forms of acne that are...
IMPORTANCE
Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis) approved to treat several inflammatory diseases are sometimes used off label to treat severe forms of acne that are refractory to conventional therapies. However, use of TNFis can also be followed by acne occurrence, suggesting an association between TNFis and acne. Most of the literature on the topic comprises case reports and series that have not been reviewed in a systematic manner.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes of patients receiving TNFis to treat acne and patients who develop acne following treatment of other conditions with TNFis.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A systematic literature review was performed and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception through October 17, 2022. Included studies reported on patients of any sex or age who received TNFis whose treatment was followed by resolution or occurrence of acne. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined criteria and extracted data from each study, which were quantitatively combined.
FINDINGS
A total of 53 studies reporting on 64 patients who received TNFis for the treatment of acne (n = 47) or who experienced acne after treatment with TNFis for a different condition (n = 17) (mean age, 28.7 years; range, 12-64 years; 6 female individuals [8.8%]) were included. The TNFis used included adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept. Among the 47 patients treated for acne with TNFis, most had previously received antibiotics (31 [66.0%]) or isotretinoin (32 [68.1%]). Most (44 [93.6%]) experienced partial improvement (25 [53.2%]) or clearance (19 [40.4%]) with very few adverse effects reported (3 [6.4%]). Acne manifested as part of an inflammatory syndrome for 30 patients (63.8%). Among the 17 patients treated TNFis for a different condition followed by the occurrence of acne, only 1 patient (5.9%) reported having a history of acne. Therapy with TNFis was either discontinued (8 [47.1%]) or altered (6 [35.3%]) in most patients due to acne occurrence, typically with improvement in symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The results of this systematic review suggest that TNFis can be effective in treating refractory acne but can also be associated with the occurrence of acne in certain instances. Further studies elucidating the role that TNF plays in treating and inducing acne could yield insight into off-label TNFi use and acne pathogenesis, potentially guiding clinical care of patients with acne treated or induced by TNFis.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Acne Vulgaris; Adalimumab; Etanercept; Immunologic Factors; Infliximab; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Male; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Middle Aged
PubMed: 36930143
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0269 -
International Journal of Molecular... Mar 2023The aims of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify the effects of approved biological and targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aims of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify the effects of approved biological and targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) on synovial membrane of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, and to determine the existence of histological/molecular biomarkers of response to therapy. A search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (PROSPERO:CRD42022304986) to retrieve data on longitudinal change of biomarkers in paired synovial biopsies and in vitro studies. A meta-analysis was conducted by adopting the standardized mean difference (SMD) as a measure of the effect. Twenty-two studies were included (19 longitudinal, 3 in vitro). In longitudinal studies, TNF inhibitors were the most used drugs, while, for in vitro studies, JAK inhibitors or adalimumab/secukinumab were assessed. The main technique used was immunohistochemistry (longitudinal studies). The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in both CD3+ lymphocytes (SMD -0.85 [95% CI -1.23; -0.47]) and CD68+ macrophages (sublining, sl) (SMD -0.74 [-1.16; -0.32]) in synovial biopsies from patients treated for 4-12 weeks with bDMARDs. Reduction in CD3+ mostly correlated with clinical response. Despite heterogeneity among the biomarkers evaluated, the reduction in CD3+/CD68+sl cells during the first 3 months of treatment with TNF inhibitors represents the most consistent variation reported in the literature.
Topics: Humans; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Antirheumatic Agents; Adalimumab; Biomarkers
PubMed: 36902437
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24055006