-
Life Sciences Aug 2023Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a wave of pathologic neuronal dysfunction that spreads through cerebral gray matter, causing neurologic disturbance in... (Review)
Review
AIMS
Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a wave of pathologic neuronal dysfunction that spreads through cerebral gray matter, causing neurologic disturbance in migraine and promoting lesion development in acute brain injury. Pharmacologic interventions have been found to be effective in migraine with aura, but their efficacy in acutely injured brains may be limited. This necessitates the assessment of possible adjunctive treatments, such as nonpharmacologic methods. This review aims to summarize currently available nonpharmacological techniques for modulating CSDs, present their mechanisms of action, and provide insight and future directions for CSD treatment.
MAIN METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed, generating 22 articles across 3 decades. Relevant data is broken down according to method of treatment.
KEY FINDINGS
Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions can mitigate the pathological impact of CSDs via shared molecular mechanisms, including modulating K/Ca/Na/Cl ion channels and NMDA, GABA, serotonin, and CGRP ligand-based receptors and decreasing microglial activation. Preclinical evidence suggests that nonpharmacologic interventions, including neuromodulation, physical exercise, therapeutic hypothermia, and lifestyle changes can also target unique mechanisms, such as increasing adrenergic tone and myelination and modulating membrane fluidity, which may lend broader modulatory effects. Collectively, these mechanisms increase the electrical initiation threshold, increase CSD latency, slow CSD velocity, and decrease CSD amplitude and duration.
SIGNIFICANCE
Given the harmful consequences of CSDs, limitations of current pharmacological interventions to inhibit CSDs in acutely injured brains, and translational potentials of nonpharmacologic interventions to modulate CSDs, further assessment of nonpharmacologic modalities and their mechanisms to mitigate CSD-related neurologic dysfunction is warranted.
Topics: Humans; Cortical Spreading Depression; Migraine Disorders; Serotonin; Neurons; Brain Injuries
PubMed: 37302793
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121833 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2023Long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are inhaled medications used to manage chronic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) versus LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
BACKGROUND
Long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are inhaled medications used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). When two classes of medications are required, a LAMA plus an ICS (LABA+ICS) were previously recommended within a single inhaler as the first-line treatment for managing stable COPD in people in high-risk categories. However, updated international guidance recommends a LAMA plus a LABA (LAMA+LABA). This systematic review is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2017.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the benefits and harms of LAMA+LABA versus LABA+ICS for treatment of people with stable COPD.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed an electronic search of the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Search Portal, followed by handsearches. Two review authors screened the selected articles. The most recent search was run on 10 September 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included parallel or cross-over randomised controlled trials of at least one month's duration, comparing LAMA+LABA and LABA+ICS for stable COPD. We included studies conducted in an outpatient setting and irrespective of blinding.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted data and evaluated risk of bias. We resolved any discrepancies through discussion. We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios (ORs), and continuous data as mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager 5. Primary outcomes were: participants with one or more exacerbations of COPD; serious adverse events; quality of life, as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score change from baseline; and trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV). We used the GRADE framework to rate our certainty of the evidence in each meta-analysis as high, moderate, low or very low. MAIN RESULTS: This review updates the first version of the review, published in 2017, and increases the number of included studies from 11 to 19 (22,354 participants). The median number of participants per study was 700. In each study, between 54% and 91% (median 70%) of participants were males. Study participants had an average age of 64 years and percentage predicted FEV of 51.5% (medians of study means). Included studies had a generally low risk of selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting biases. All but two studies were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, which had varying levels of involvement in study design, conduct, and data analysis. Primary outcomes The odds of having an exacerbation were similar for LAMA+LABA compared with LABA+ICS (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06; I = 61%; 13 studies, 20,960 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The odds of having a serious adverse event were also similar (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; I = 20%; 18 studies, 23,183 participants; high-certainty evidence). Participants receiving LAMA+LABA had a similar improvement in quality of life, as measured by the SGRQ, to those receiving LABA+ICS (MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.36 to 0.21; I = 78%; 9 studies, 14,437 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) but showed a greater improvement in trough FEV (MD 0.07, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.08; I = 73%; 12 studies, 14,681 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes LAMA+LABA decreased the odds of pneumonia compared with LABA+ICS from 5% to 3% (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72; I = 0%; 14 studies, 21,829 participants; high-certainty evidence) but increased the odds of all-cause death from 1% to 1.4% (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.75; I = 0%; 15 studies, 21,510 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The odds of achieving a minimal clinically important difference of four or more points on the SGRQ were similar between LAMA+LABA and LABA+ICS (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.25; I = 77%; 4 studies, 13,614 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Combination LAMA+LABA therapy probably holds similar benefits to LABA+ICS for exacerbations and quality of life, as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, for people with moderate to severe COPD, but offers a larger improvement in FEV and a slightly lower risk of pneumonia. There is little to no difference between LAMA+LABA and LAMA+ICS in the odds of having a serious adverse event. Whilst all-cause death may be lower with LABA+ICS, there was a very small number of events in the analysis, translating to a low absolute risk. Findings are based on moderate- to high-certainty evidence from heterogeneous trials with an observation period of less than one year. This review should be updated again in a few years.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Female; Muscarinic Antagonists; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Quality of Life; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Pneumonia
PubMed: 37276335
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012066.pub3 -
The Clinical Respiratory Journal Oct 2023Montelukast is a highly selective and specific cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist used in the treatment of asthma. Whether montelukast as adjuvant therapy can... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Montelukast is a highly selective and specific cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist used in the treatment of asthma. Whether montelukast as adjuvant therapy can significantly and safely treat adults with cough variant asthma (CVA) remains inconclusive.
AIMS
This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of montelukast as an adjuvant treatment for adults with CVA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on montelukast combined with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β2 agonists (LABAs) to treat CVA in adults, from inception to March 6, 2023, were retrieved from the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and Clinical Trials website. Review Manager (version 5.4) and Stata (version 15.0) were used to conduct the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 15 RCTs were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. It was established that montelukast as adjuvant therapy raised the total effective rate (RR = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.13, 1.27], P < 0.01) and improved the FEV1% (SMD = 0.91, 95% CI [0.40, 1.41], P < 0.01), PEF% (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI [0.38, 0.88], P < 0.01), FEV1 (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI [0.53, 1.77], P < 0.01), PEF (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI [0.42, 0.86], P < 0.01), and FEV1/FVC% (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI [0.51, 1.01], P < 0.01) and reduced the recurrence rate (RR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.15, 0.53], P < 0.01). The incidence of adverse reactions was higher in the montelukast auxiliary group compared to the control group but with no statistical difference (RR = 1.32, 95% CI [0.89, 1.96], P = 0.17).
CONCLUSION
Existing evidence indicated that the use of montelukast as an adjuvant therapy had therapeutic efficacy superior to ICS + LABA alone for the treatment of adult patients with CVA. However, further research is needed, especially a combination of high-quality long-term prospective studies and carefully designed RCTs.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cough; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Asthma; Adrenal Cortex Hormones
PubMed: 37218346
DOI: 10.1111/crj.13629 -
Advances in Experimental Medicine and... 2023Catecholamine stimulation over adrenergic receptors results in a state of hypercoagulability. Chronic stress involves the release and increase in circulation of...
Catecholamine stimulation over adrenergic receptors results in a state of hypercoagulability. Chronic stress involves the release and increase in circulation of catecholamines and other stress related hormones. Numerous observational studies in human have related stressful scenarios to several coagulation variables, but controlled stimulation with agonists or antagonists to adrenergic receptors are scarce. This systematic review is aimed at presenting an updated appraisal of the effect of adrenergic receptor modulation on variables related to human hemostasis by systematically reviewing the effect of adrenergic receptor-targeting drugs on scale variables related to hemostasis. By searching 3 databases for articles published between January 1st 2011 and February 16th, 2022 reporting effects on coagulation parameters from stimulation with α- or β-adrenergic receptor targeting drugs in humans regardless of baseline condition, excluding records different from original research and those not addressing the main aim of this systematic review. Risk of bias assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Tables describing a pro-thrombotic anti-fibrinolytic state induced after β-adrenergic receptor agonist stimulation and the opposite after α-, β-adrenergic receptor antagonist stimulation were synthesized from 4 eligible records by comparing hemostasis-related variables to their baseline. Notwithstanding this low number of records, experimental interventions included were sound and mostly unbiased, results were coherent, and outcomes were biologically plausible. In summary, this systematic review provides a critical systematic assessment and an updated elaboration, and its shortcomings highlight the need for further investigation in the field of hematology.
Topics: Catecholamines; Receptors, Adrenergic; Adrenergic Agents; Hemostasis; Humans; Stress, Physiological; Blood Coagulation
PubMed: 37093421
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-26163-3_3 -
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal =... Mar 2023Objective Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative and analgesic properties but without respiratory depression effect and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Objective Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative and analgesic properties but without respiratory depression effect and has been widely used in perioperative anesthesia. Here we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on maintaining perioperative hemodynamic stability in elderly patients.Methods PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) on the application of dexmedetomidine in maintaining perioperative hemodynamic stability in elderly patients from their inception to September, 2021. The standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were employed to analyze the data. The random-effect model was used for the potential clinical inconsistency.Results A total of 12 RCTs with 833 elderly patients (dexmedetomidine group, 546 patients; control group, 287 patients) were included. There was no significant increase in perioperative heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the dexmedetomidine group before and during the operation. In addition, the variations of hemodynamic indexes including HR, MAP, SBP (systolic blood pressure), and DBP were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the control group (HR: SMD = -0.87, 95% : -1.13 to -0.62; MAP: SMD = -1.12, 95% : -1.60 to -0.63; SBP: SMD = -1.27, 95% : -2.26 to -0.27; DBP: SMD = -0.96, 95% : -1.33 to -0.59). Subgroup analysis found that with the prolongation of 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine infusion, the patient's heart rate declined in a time-dependent way.Conclusion Dexmedetomidine provides more stable hemodynamics during perioperative period in elderly patients. However, further well-conducted trials are required to assess the effective and safer doses of dexmedetomidine in elderly patients.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Dexmedetomidine; Hemodynamics; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Blood Pressure; Heart Rate
PubMed: 37066726
DOI: 10.24920/004088 -
Journal of Cardiac Failure Jul 2023Traditional approaches to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) management often lead to delayed initiation and titration of therapies in patients with heart... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Traditional approaches to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) management often lead to delayed initiation and titration of therapies in patients with heart failure. This study sought to characterize alternative models of care involving nonphysician provider-led GDMT interventions and their associations with therapy use and clinical outcomes.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing nonphysician provider-led GDMT initiation and/or uptitration interventions vs usual physician care (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022334661). We queried PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform for peer-reviewed studies from database inception to July 31, 2022. In the meta-analysis, we used RCT data only and leveraged random-effects models to estimate pooled outcomes. Primary outcomes were GDMT initiation and titration to target dosages by therapeutic class. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations.
RESULTS
We reviewed 33 studies, of which 17 (52%) were randomized controlled trials with median follow-ups of 6 months; 14 (82%) trials evaluated nurse interventions, and the remainder assessed pharmacists' interventions. The primary analysis pooled data from 16 RCTs, which enrolled 5268 patients. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) and beta-blocker initiation were 2.09 (95% CI 1.05-4.16; I = 68%) and 1.91 (95% CI1.35-2.70; I = 37%), respectively. Outcomes were similar for uptitration of RASI (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.24-3.20; I = 77%) and beta-blocker (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.29-3.83; I = 66%). No association was found with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist initiation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.47-2.19). There were lower rates of mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-1.04; I = 12%) and hospitalization due to HF (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.01; I = 25%) across intervention arms, but these differences were small and not statistically significant. Prediction intervals were wide due to moderate-to-high heterogeneity across trial populations and interventions. Subgroup analyses by provider type did not show significant effect modification.
CONCLUSIONS
Pharmacist- and nurse-led interventions for GDMT initiation and/or uptitration improved guideline concordance. Further research evaluating newer therapies and titration strategies integrated with pharmacist- and/or nurse-based care may be valuable.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Pharmacists; Nurse's Role; Antihypertensive Agents; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
PubMed: 37004867
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.03.012 -
International Journal of Surgery... May 2023Oral medications, onabotulinumtoxinA injections, and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) are recommended by the American Urological Association/Society of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effectiveness and safety of oral medications, onabotulinumtoxinA (three doses) and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation as non or minimally invasive treatment for the management of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Oral medications, onabotulinumtoxinA injections, and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) are recommended by the American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction guidelines as non or minimally invasive treatments for patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) without treatment hierarchy.
OBJECTIVE
The objective was to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of oral medications, three doses of onabotulinumtoxinA, and TTNS on improving urodynamic outcomes in patient-reported outcomes and safety outcomes in patients with NDO.
METHODS
The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Medicine, and clinicaltrials.gov, from their inception to October 2022 and included randomized controlled studies on the drug, onabotulinumtoxinA, and TTNS for the treatment of patients with NDO. Outcomes included urodynamic parameters, voiding diary, quality of life changes, adverse event rate and postvoid residual.
RESULTS
A total of 26 articles and 2938 patients were included in the statistics. Regarding effectiveness, all interventions except TTNS and α-blockers were statistically different for the placebo group. The urodynamic outcome and patient-reported outcome suggested that onabotulinumtoxinA injection (urodynamic outcome: onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U, the mean surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): 87.4; patient-reported outcome: onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U, mean SUCRA: 89.8) was the most effective treatment, and the safety outcome suggested that TTNS (SUCRA: 83.3) was the safest. Cluster analysis found that antimuscarinics and β3-adrenoceptor-agonists possessed good effectiveness and safety.
CONCLUSION
OnabotulinumtoxinA injection is probably the most effective way to treat patients with NDO, with increasing effectiveness but decreasing safety as the dose rises. The effectiveness of α-blockers and TTNS was not statistically different from the placebo group. Antimuscarinics and β3-adrenoceptor-agonists have good effectiveness and safety.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Female; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Quality of Life; Network Meta-Analysis; Muscarinic Antagonists; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic; Urinary Bladder, Overactive; Treatment Outcome; Receptors, Adrenergic; Tibial Nerve
PubMed: 36974676
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000338 -
Chronic Respiratory Disease 2023The rationale for additional treatment with short-acting bronchodilators combined with long-acting bronchodilators for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy and safety of additional treatment with short-acting muscarinic antagonist combined with long-acting beta-2 agonist in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The rationale for additional treatment with short-acting bronchodilators combined with long-acting bronchodilators for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not adequately studied.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) therapy combined with a long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA) in patients with stable COPD. Pulmonary function, dyspnea, health-related quality of life, exercise tolerance, physical activity, exacerbations of COPD, and adverse events during regular use were set as outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
We included five controlled trials including two sets of publicly available online data without article publications for the meta-analysis. Additional use of SAMA plus LABA showed a significant improvement in the peak response in FEV (mean difference (MD) 98.70 mL, < .00001), transitional dyspnea index score (MD .85, = .02), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (MD -2.00, = .008) compared to LABA treatment. There was no significant difference in the risk of exacerbation of COPD ( = .20) and only a slight trend of increased severe adverse events (OR: 2.16, = .08) and cardiovascular events (OR: 2.38, = .06).
CONCLUSION
Additional treatment with SAMA combined with LABA could be a feasible choice due to its efficacy and safety.
Topics: Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Quality of Life; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Administration, Inhalation; Dyspnea
PubMed: 36967224
DOI: 10.1177/14799731231166008 -
Minerva Cardiology and Angiology Dec 2023Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a rare and complex genetic disorder associated with increased aortic growth and aortic disease. The effectiveness of cardiovascular medical...
INTRODUCTION
Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a rare and complex genetic disorder associated with increased aortic growth and aortic disease. The effectiveness of cardiovascular medical therapies aiming to slow down aortic growth has been tested in several trials, particularly beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers, however showing conflicting results.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We conducted a systematic review on PubMed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Biomed Central databases between January and February 2022. We selected relevant articles focusing on patients with MFS treated with beta-blockers, angiotensin receptors blockers, or both, and reporting data on the effect of the drugs on 1) slowing down aortic dilatation; 2) the reduction of aortic complication (aortic dissection, mortality, aortic surgery); and with a 3) follow-up length of at least two years. A total of 16 studies were selected.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Beta-blockers remain the mainstay of therapy as they have proven to slow aortic enlargement. Angiotensin receptor blockers are a useful alternative and with proven benefit as an add-on therapy to limit aortic growth. Neither beta-blockers, nor angiotensin receptor blockers have shown meaningful results on clinical aortic endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS
The current evidence of pharmacological treatment for MFS patients is conflicting due to the lack of large, randomized clinical trials with adequate follow-up studies and homogeneous age grouping. Beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are the only available treatments to reduce aortic growth. A recently published patient-level meta-analysis confirmed that angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers have a similar effect on reducing the rate of increase of the aortic root Z score, used singularly or as add-on therapy. Considering the current evidence on new features related with MFS (such as mitral annular disjunction - MAD) bearing a potential additional increased arrhythmic risk, it is of paramount importance to establish the role of beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in clinical endpoints of this population as well.
Topics: Humans; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Aorta; Aortic Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Marfan Syndrome
PubMed: 36939732
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06184-7 -
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms May 2023The aim of this study was to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of mirabegron and vibegron in patients with overactive bladder. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of mirabegron and vibegron in patients with overactive bladder.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed on Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify studies from the date of database inception to January 1, 2022. All randomized controlled trials comparing mirabegron or vibegron with tolterodine, imidafenacin, or placebo were eligible. One reviewer extracted data, and a second reviewer checked. Included trials were assessed for similarity, and networks were developed using Stata 16.0 software. Mean differences for continuous variables and odds ratios for dichotomous variables together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to rank treatments and compare the differences, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 11 randomized controlled trials and 10 806 patients were included. For each outcome, results for all licensed treatment doses were included. Both vibegron and mirabegron were more efficacious than placebo at reducing the frequency of micturition, incontinence, urgency, urgency incontinence, and nocturia. Vibegron was more efficacious than mirabegron in reducing mean voided volume/micturition (95% CI [5.15, 14.98]). Safety outcomes for vibegron and mirabegron were similar to those in the placebo group, except for mirabegron, which had a higher risk of nasopharyngitis and cardiovascular adverse events than placebo.
CONCLUSIONS
Both drugs seem to be comparable and well tolerated, particularly as direct comparisons are not available. However, vibegron may be more effective than mirabegron in reducing mean voided volume.
Topics: Humans; Urinary Bladder, Overactive; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Double-Blind Method; Acetanilides; Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36863312
DOI: 10.1111/luts.12475