-
BJU International Jan 2017The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based systematic review of the use of laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy in the treatment of adrenal disease as part... (Review)
Review
International Consultation on Urological Diseases and European Association of Urology International Consultation on Minimally Invasive Surgery in Urology: laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy.
The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based systematic review of the use of laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy in the treatment of adrenal disease as part of the International Consultation on Urological Diseases and European Association of Urology consultation on Minimally Invasive Surgery in Urology. A systematic literature search (January 2004 to January 2014) was conducted to identify comparative studies assessing the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive adrenal surgery. Subtopics including the role of minimally invasive surgery for pheochromocytoma, adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and large adrenal tumours were examined. Additionally, the role of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches, as well as laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) and robotic adrenalectomy were reviewed. The major findings are presented in an evidence-based fashion. Large retrospective and prospective data were analysed and a set of recommendations provided by the committee was produced. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered the first-line therapy for benign adrenal masses requiring surgical resection and for patients with pheochromocytoma. While a laparoscopic approach may be feasible for selected cases of ACC without adjacent organ involvement, an open surgical approach remains the 'gold standard'. Large adrenal tumours without preoperative or intra-operative suspicion of ACC may be safely resected via a laparoscopic approach. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy are safe. The approach should be chosen based on surgeon training and experience. LESS and robotic adrenalectomy should be considered as alternatives to laparoscopic adrenalectomy but require further study.
Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Adrenalectomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Robotic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 27431446
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13592 -
Contemporary Clinical Trials Sep 2016Adrenal tumors are quite rare in infancy and childhood with the exception of neuroblastoma. In fact, adrenocortical tumors (ACT) account for only 0.2% of all malignant... (Review)
Review
Adrenal tumors are quite rare in infancy and childhood with the exception of neuroblastoma. In fact, adrenocortical tumors (ACT) account for only 0.2% of all malignant cancers in children and adolescents. According to a multicenter registry investigation, the median interval between first endocrine symptoms and the diagnosis of ACT is 5months, and death is seen in 38% of patients, who suffer from tumor progression following the diagnosis in about 2½years. The prognosis of pediatric ACC is poor with a 5-year event-free survival of 54%. To face this dreadful scenario, a few decades ago the International Pediatric Adrenocortical Tumor Registry (IPACTR) was established. Moreover, Children's Oncology Group (COG) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) have approved several clinical trials designed to investigate new treatment options in pediatric ACT. In this systematic review, we summarize the diagnostic histopathologic criteria, bio-markers, and clinical trials of this challenging diagnosis. Eleven pediatric ACT trials were reviewed in our investigation. Two out of 11 studies were conducted in Brazil showing apparently an increased rate of germline mutation-related pediatric ACT. A heterogeneous methodology was evident with four non-randomized clinical trials, three prospective cohort studies, and four retrospective case-control studies limiting higher statistical approach. Tumor histology remains the backbone to diagnose ACT creating a common investigative platform and potentially supporting studies aiming to increase international collaborative research, which is crucial for this challenging disease.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms; Adrenocortical Carcinoma; Biomarkers, Tumor; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Research Design; Survival Rate
PubMed: 27424218
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.011 -
European Journal of Endocrinology Aug 2016To perform a systematic review of published literature on adrenal biopsy and to assess its performance in diagnosing adrenal malignancy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of published literature on adrenal biopsy and to assess its performance in diagnosing adrenal malignancy.
METHODS
Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial were searched from inception to February 2016. Reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality in duplicate.
RESULTS
We included 32 observational studies reporting on 2174 patients (39.4% women, mean age 59.8 years) undergoing 2190 adrenal mass biopsy procedures. Pathology was described in 1621/2190 adrenal lesions (689 metastases, 68 adrenocortical carcinomas, 64 other malignancies, 464 adenomas, 226 other benign, 36 pheochromocytomas, and 74 others). The pooled non-diagnostic rate (30 studies, 2013 adrenal biopsies) was 8.7% (95%CI: 6-11%). The pooled complication rate (25 studies, 1339 biopsies) was 2.5% (95%CI: 1.5-3.4%). Studies were at a moderate risk for bias. Most limitations related to patient selection, assessment of outcome, and adequacy of follow-up. Only eight studies (240 patients) could be included in the diagnostic performance analysis with a sensitivity and specificity of 87 and 100% for malignancy, 70 and 98% for adrenocortical carcinoma, and 87 and 96% for metastasis respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence based on small sample size and moderate risk of bias suggests that adrenal biopsy appears to be most useful in the diagnosis of adrenal metastasis in patients with a history of extra-adrenal malignancy. Adrenal biopsy should only be performed if the expected findings are likely to alter the management of the individual patient and after biochemical exclusion of catecholamine-producing tumors to help prevent potentially life-threatening complications.
Topics: Adrenal Gland Diseases; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Adrenal Glands; Biopsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis
PubMed: 27257146
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-16-0297 -
European Urology Focus Apr 2018
Erratum re: "Surgical Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Impact of Laparoscopic Approach, Lymphadenectomy, and Surgical Volume on Outcomes-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Current Literature" [Eur Urol Focus, 2015; 1 (3) 241-250].
PubMed: 28753758
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.04.001 -
Endocrine Practice : Official Journal... Jun 2016Adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) may be due to congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to homozygous CYP21A2 mutations, or perhaps from heterozygous carrier status. It is...
OBJECTIVE
Adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) may be due to congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to homozygous CYP21A2 mutations, or perhaps from heterozygous carrier status. It is unclear if genetic or biochemical testing of CYP21A2 status in AI is justified, despite its potential for avoiding adrenal crises in those referred for adrenalectomy.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE for articles published up to October 19, 2015 containing all terms associated with adrenal tumors and CAH. Meta-analyses were used to estimate the CAH or carrier prevalence in AI and assess clinical factors that may guide testing.
RESULTS
Thirty-six publications were included. Of AI patients biochemically screened for CAH, 58/990 (5.9%) were diagnosed with CAH. Genetic screening of all AIs revealed only 2/252 (0.8%) with clear CAH. The carrier prevalence was 10.2% (36/352). The rate of 0.8% (8/1,000) genetically confirmed CAH is higher than the 1/15,000 affected by classic CAH or 1/1,000 by nonclassic CAH in the Caucasian population. The rate of heterozygous CYP21A2 mutation frequency is similar to those in reported in population studies. Levels of both basal and stimulated 17-hydroxyprogesterone positively correlated with AI diameter. Although bilateral incidentalomata were frequent in CAH, their presence did not predict CYP21A2 status.
CONCLUSION
The presence of an AI does not increase the probability of detection of CAH or CYP21A2 carrier status to the extent routine genetic testing is justified. Screening with 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels appears to lack specificity in the setting of an AI. CYP21A2 mutation analysis is probably the only reliable method for CAH diagnosis in AIs.
ABBREVIATIONS
ACC = adrenocortical carcinoma ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone AI = adrenal incidentaloma CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia NCAH = nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia 17OHP = 17-hydroxyprogesterone SV = simple virilizing.
PubMed: 26919651
DOI: 10.4158/EP151085.RA -
European Urology Focus Feb 2016Controversy exists regarding the choice for surgical approach and the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) treatment. ACC surgery is... (Review)
Review
Surgical Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Impact of Laparoscopic Approach, Lymphadenectomy, and Surgical Volume on Outcomes-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Current Literature.
CONTEXT
Controversy exists regarding the choice for surgical approach and the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) treatment. ACC surgery is increasingly advocated to be performed in specialist referral centres.
OBJECTIVE
To review systematically the evidence of oncologic outcomes for ACC surgery by open adrenalectomy (OA) or laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), and for concomitant LND. The influence of surgical volume is also analysed.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review of Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed in June 2015 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Twenty-six publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis. Meta-analyses were performed when appropriate.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Included studies reported on oncologic outcomes after surgical treatment of ACC (11 studies), compared different surgical approaches (7 studies), evaluated the role of LND (3 studies), and analysed the effect of surgical volume on outcome (5 studies). From the available studies and the meta-analysis, no differences were found in the rate of positive surgical margins, disease-free survival, and overall survival between OA and LA in localised disease. In patients with histologically proven positive lymph nodes, a shorter time to recurrence was seen when no proper LND was performed. A trend for better recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival after LND was found. In high-volume centres, more aggressive and open surgery was performed. In low-volume centres, higher local recurrence and distant metastases rates, and a shorter time to recurrence were seen. Our findings are limited due to the low level of evidence of selected studies, patient and disease heterogeneity, and heterogeneous surgeon populations.
CONCLUSIONS
After adequate clinical staging for localised disease, LA is as effective and oncologically safe as OA, as long as oncologic principles are respected. LA should be performed by surgeons with extensive experience in laparoscopic adrenal surgery in high-volume centres. Patients with locally advanced disease and metastatic disease, for debulking purposes, should be operated on extensively with open surgery with adequate margins and concomitant LND to optimise staging, which may contribute to survival in locally advanced disease.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Laparoscopic surgery for localised adrenocortical carcinoma is safe and effective when performed by expert surgeons in high-volume centres. Patients with more extensive tumours should be operated with open surgery; lymph node dissection is mainly applied to determine the stage of the disease.
PubMed: 28723392
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2015.12.001 -
Clinical Nuclear Medicine Aug 2016Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is an uncommon primary neoplasm of the adrenal cortex with dismal prognosis. It often presents with symptoms and signs of adrenal cortical... (Review)
Review
Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is an uncommon primary neoplasm of the adrenal cortex with dismal prognosis. It often presents with symptoms and signs of adrenal cortical hormone hypersecretion and abdominal mass effect or is incidentally detected as an adrenal mass on imaging performed for other indications. Endocrine evaluation, comprehensive staging, and meticulous resection are crucial to ensure the best possible outcome. Despite extensive initial surgical resection, local and distant metastases are not uncommon with disappointing 5-year survival, although progress is being made at high-volume centers. Accurate restaging of recurrent disease is important to guide further management. Mitotane, external beam radiation and chemotherapy, and newer anticancer systemic treatments are used as adjunctives for inoperable disease and distant metastases. Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are first-line imaging modalities for evaluation of ACC to characterize adrenal masses and to determine tumor resectability. Emerging literature supports F-FDG PET/CT use to determine the malignant potential of adrenal masses. In patients with a diagnosis of ACC, FDG PET/CT is sensitive for detecting metastatic disease, and its tumor accumulation has been correlated to pathology, Weiss scores, and prognosis. Metomidate, labeled with C for PET or with I for SPECT/CT, allows characterization of an adrenal mass as being of adrenocortical origin with high specificity. Taking advantage of its adrenocortical avidity, metomidate has been labeled with I for radionuclide therapy in a subset of ACC. In this review, we describe how nuclear medicine imaging, and specifically PET, can assist surgical management of ACC.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms; Adrenocortical Carcinoma; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Molecular Imaging; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography
PubMed: 26825212
DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001112 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Apr 2016This study was designed to determine the role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the surgical management of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This study was designed to determine the role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the surgical management of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC).
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed on January 2, 2015 using PubMed. Article selection proceeded according to PRISMA criteria. Studies comparing open adrenalectomy (OA) to LA for ACC and including at least 10 cases per each surgical approach were included. Odds ratio (OR) was used for all binary variables, and weight mean difference (WMD) was used for the continuous parameters. Pooled estimates were calculated with the fixed-effect model, if no significant heterogeneity was identified; alternatively, the random-effect model was used when significant heterogeneity was detected. Main demographics, surgical outcomes, and oncological outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS
Nine studies published between 2010 and 2014 were deemed eligible and included in the analysis, all of them being retrospective case-control studies. Overall, they included 240 LA and 557 OA cases. Tumors treated with laparoscopy were significantly smaller in size (WMD -3.41 cm; confidence interval [CI] -4.91, -1.91; p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of them (80.8 %) more at a localized (I-II) stage compared with open surgery (67.7 %) (odds ratio [OR] 2.8; CI 1.8, 4.2; p < 0.001). Hospitalization time was in favor of laparoscopy, with a WMD of -2.5 days (CI -3.3, -1.7; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall recurrence rate between LA and OA (relative risk [RR] 1.09; CI 0.83, 1.43; p = 0.53), whereas development of peritoneal carcinomatosis was higher for LA (RR 2.39; CI 1.41, 4.04; p = 0.001). No difference could be found for time to recurrence (WMD -8.2 months; CI -18.2, 1.7; p = 0.11), as well as for cancer specific mortality (OR 0.68; CI 0.44, 1.05; p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS
OA should still be considered the standard surgical management of ACC. LA can offer a shorter hospital stay and possibly a faster recovery. Therefore, this minimally invasive approach can certainly play a role in this setting, but it should be only offered in carefully selected cases to avoid jeopardizing the oncological outcome.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms; Adrenalectomy; Adrenocortical Carcinoma; Humans; Laparoscopy; Prognosis
PubMed: 26480850
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4900-x -
JSLS : Journal of the Society of... 2015Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is a rare disease that is difficult to treat. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is performed, even for large adrenocortical carcinomas.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is a rare disease that is difficult to treat. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is performed, even for large adrenocortical carcinomas. However, the oncological effectiveness of LA remains unclear. This review presents the current knowledge of the feasibility and oncological effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for ACC, with an analysis of data for outcomes and other parameters.
DATABASE
A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching the PubMed and Medline databases for all relevant articles in English, published between January 1992 and August 2014 on LA for adrenocortical carcinoma.
DISCUSSION
The search resulted in retrieval of 29 studies, of which 10 addressed the outcome of LA versus open adrenalectomy (OA) and included 844 patients eligible for this review. Among these, 206 patients had undergone LA approaches, and 638 patients had undergone OA. Among the 10 studies that compared the outcomes obtained with LA and OA for ACC, 5 noted no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the oncological outcomes of recurrence and disease-free survival, whereas the remaining 5 reported inferior outcomes in the LA group. Using a paired t test for statistical analysis, except for tumor size, we found no significant difference in local recurrence, peritoneal carcinomatosis, positive resection margin, and time to recurrence between the LA and OA groups. The overall mean tumor size in patients undergoing LA and OA was 7.1 and 11.2 cm, respectively (P = .0003), and the mean overall recurrence was 61.5 and 57.9%, respectively. The outcome of LA is believed to depend to a large extent on the size and stage of the lesion (I and II being favorable) and the surgical expertise in the center where the patient undergoes the operation. However, the present review shows no difference in the outcome between the 2 approaches across all stages. A poor outcome is likely to result from inadequate surgery, irrespective of whether the approach is open or laparoscopic.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms; Adrenalectomy; Adrenocortical Carcinoma; Humans; Laparoscopy
PubMed: 26175553
DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00036 -
Pediatric Radiology Oct 2014Ablation techniques are widely used for solid malignant tumors in adults. There is no large series assessing the effectiveness of local ablative therapies in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ablation techniques are widely used for solid malignant tumors in adults. There is no large series assessing the effectiveness of local ablative therapies in the treatment of malignant or aggressive benign lesions in children.
OBJECTIVE
To review the existing evidence on the techniques and results of ablation for pediatric solid malignant or aggressive benign tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched MEDLINE for papers published between 1995 and 2012 that reported outcomes of radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation, interstitial laser therapy, irreversible electroporation and percutaneous ethanol injection for patients younger than 18 years old. Data collection included factors related to the patient, tumor biology, ablation technique and cancer-specific endpoints. Additional series of predominantly adults including data on patients younger than 18 years old were also identified.
RESULTS
We identified 28 patients treated by ablation in 29 regions: 5 patients undergoing ablation for liver lesions, 9 patients for lung metastases, 11 patients for bone and/or soft tissue and 4 patients for kidney or pancreas. The ablation was performed to treat primary tumors, local recurrences and metastases. The histology of the tumors was osteosarcoma in 6 patients, Wilms tumor in 3, rhabdomyosarcoma in 3, hepatoblastoma in 3, desmoid tumor in 3, adrenocortical carcinoma in 2 and a single case each of leiomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, paraganglioma, solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, sacrococcygeal teratoma, hepatic adenoma, juxtaglomerular cell tumor and plantar fibromatosis. Eighteen of the patients (64%) experienced a complication, but only 6 (21%) of these needed treatment other than supportive care.
CONCLUSIONS
Although ablative techniques are feasible and promising treatments for certain pediatric tumors, large multicenter prospective trials will be needed to establish efficacy.
Topics: Ablation Techniques; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prevalence
PubMed: 24821394
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3001-5