-
International Journal of Environmental... Apr 2022Delirium and psychomotor agitation are relevant clinical conditions that may develop during COVID-19 infection, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The... (Review)
Review
Delirium and psychomotor agitation are relevant clinical conditions that may develop during COVID-19 infection, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The psychopharmacological management of these conditions is receiving increasing interest in psychiatry, considering hyperkinetic delirium as one of the most common neuropsychiatries acute consequences in COVID-19 recovery patients. However, there are no actual internationally validated guidelines about this topic, due to the relatively newly introduced clinical condition; in addition, a standardized psychopharmacologic treatment of these cases is a complex goal to achieve due to the risk of both drug-drug interactions and the vulnerable conditions of those patients. The aim of this systematic review and case series is to evaluate and gather the scientific evidence on pharmacologic handling during delirium in COVID-19 patients to provide practical recommendations on the optimal management of psychotropic medication in these kinds of patients. The electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were reviewed to identify studies, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. At the end of the selection process, a total of 21 studies ( = 2063) were included. We also collected a case series of acute psychomotor agitation in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in ICU. Our results showed how the symptom-based choice of the psychotropic medication is crucial, and even most of the psychotropic drug classes showed good safety, one must not underestimate the possible drug interactions and also the possible decrease in vital functions which need to be strictly monitored especially during treatment with some kinds of molecules. We believe that the evidence-based recommendations highlighted in the present research will enhance the current knowledge and could provide better management of these patients.
Topics: Delirium; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotropic Drugs; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 35564372
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19094978 -
Australian Critical Care : Official... May 2023Person-centred nonpharmacological strategies should be used whenever possible to reduce agitation in the intensive care unit due to issues related to an overreliance on... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Person-centred nonpharmacological strategies should be used whenever possible to reduce agitation in the intensive care unit due to issues related to an overreliance on physical restraints and psychoactive drugs. However, the effect of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce agitation is unclear.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this study were to systematically review studies that evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions designed to prevent and minimise or manage patient agitation in the adult intensive care unit.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's Systematic Review of Effectiveness method and a priori PROSPERO protocol. Quantitative studies were identified from seven databases, including MEDLINE, EmCare, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. In addition, grey literature from several repositories and trial registers was searched. The primary outcome of interest was the effect on prevention, minimisation, and management of agitation. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included (n = 882). Meta-analyses of two studies demonstrated significantly lower levels of agitation (measured with the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) in the group receiving a multicomponent nonpharmacological intervention than in those receiving usual care. Individual studies showed a significant effect of nature-based sounds, music, foot reflexology, healing touch, and aromatherapy. The type of the endotracheal suction system did not affect levels of agitation. Overall, the certainty of the findings was rated very low. Harms and adverse effects were not reported in any studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Nonpharmacological interventions have the potential to reduce levels of agitation in the intensive care unit. However, inconsistencies in reporting, low quality of methodological designs, and small sample sizes impact the certainty of the results. Future trials must include larger sample sizes, use rigorous methods to improve knowledge in this field, and consider a range of other outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Psychomotor Agitation
PubMed: 35513998
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.02.005 -
Academic Emergency Medicine : Official... Dec 2022Agitation in children in acute care settings poses significant patient and staff safety concerns. While behavioral approaches are central to reducing agitation and oral... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Agitation in children in acute care settings poses significant patient and staff safety concerns. While behavioral approaches are central to reducing agitation and oral medications are preferred, parenteral medications are used when necessary to promote safety. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an ultra-short-acting parenteral medication, droperidol, for the management of acute, severe agitation in children in acute care settings.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series/reports examined the effectiveness and safety of parenteral droperidol for management of acute agitation in patients ≤21 years old in acute care settings. Effectiveness outcomes included time to sedation and need for a subsequent dose of medication. Safety outcomes were adverse effects such as QTc prolongation, hypotension, respiratory depression, and dystonic reactions.
RESULTS
A total of 431 unique articles were identified. Six articles met inclusion criteria: two in the prehospital setting, one in the emergency department, and three in the inpatient hospital setting. The articles included a prospective observational study, three retrospective observational studies, and two case reports. The largest study reported a median time to sedation of 14 min (interquartile range 10-20 min); other studies reported a time to sedation of 15 min or less. Across studies, 8%-22% of patients required a second dose of medication for ongoing agitation. The most frequent adverse effects were dystonic reactions and transient hypotension. One patient had QTc prolongation and another developed respiratory depression, but both had significant comorbidities that may have contributed. The risk of bias in included studies ranged from moderate to critical.
CONCLUSIONS
Existing data on droperidol for management of acute agitation in children suggest that droperidol is both effective and safe for acute, severe agitation in children. Data are limited by study designs that may introduce bias.
Topics: Humans; Child; Young Adult; Adult; Droperidol; Retrospective Studies; Emergency Service, Hospital; Prospective Studies; Respiratory Insufficiency; Psychomotor Agitation; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 35490341
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14515 -
Critical Care (London, England) Mar 2022Delirium is the most common cerebral dysfunction in the intensive care unit (ICU) and can be subdivided into a hypoactive, hyperactive, or mixed motor subtype based on...
BACKGROUND
Delirium is the most common cerebral dysfunction in the intensive care unit (ICU) and can be subdivided into a hypoactive, hyperactive, or mixed motor subtype based on the clinical manifestation. The aim of this review was to describe the distribution, pharmacological interventions, and outcomes of delirium motor subtypes in ICU patients.
METHODS
This systematic scoping review was performed according to the PRISMA-ScR and Cochrane guidelines. We performed a systematic search in six major databases to identify relevant studies. A meta-regression analysis was performed where pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were computed by a random effect model.
RESULTS
We included 131 studies comprising 13,902 delirious patients. There was a large between-study heterogeneity among studies, including differences in study design, setting, population, and outcome reporting. Hypoactive delirium was the most prevalent delirium motor subtype (50.3% [95% CI 46.0-54.7]), followed by mixed delirium (27.7% [95% CI 24.1-31.3]) and hyperactive delirium (22.7% [95% CI 19.0-26.5]). When comparing the delirium motor subtypes, patients with mixed delirium experienced the longest delirium duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, the highest ICU and hospital mortality, and more frequently received administration of specific agents (antipsychotics, α2-agonists, benzodiazepines, and propofol) during ICU stay. In studies with high average age for delirious patients (> 65 years), patients were more likely to experience hypoactive delirium.
CONCLUSIONS
Hypoactive delirium was the most prevalent motor subtype in critically ill patients. Mixed delirium had the worst outcomes in terms of delirium duration, length of stay, and mortality, and received more pharmacological interventions compared to other delirium motor subtypes. Few studies contributed to secondary outcomes; hence, these results should be interpreted with care. The large between-study heterogeneity suggests that a more standardized methodology in delirium research is warranted.
Topics: Aged; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Delirium; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Psychomotor Agitation
PubMed: 35241132
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03931-3 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jan 2022The incidence of hyperactive brain syndrome in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is very high. Compared with other sedative drugs, existing research shows that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The incidence of hyperactive brain syndrome in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is very high. Compared with other sedative drugs, existing research shows that dexmedetomidine can significantly reduce the incidence of hyperactive brain syndrome. This study systematically analyzed the clinical efficacy of a dexmedetomidine intravenous injection in ICU patients with hyperactive brain syndrome.
METHODS
The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to December 2020 to identify papers that studied the clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine intravenous injection in ICU patients with hyperactive brain syndrome. The basic information and evaluation indexes in the literature were screened and extracted. Revman5.3 software was used for quality assessment and meta-analysis of the included studies, and forest maps were drawn.
RESULTS
A total of 255 patients were included in 5 studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed that intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine could reduce the incidence of restless delirium in patients [odds ratio (OR) =0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07 to 0.29; (Z test) Z=5.39, P<0.00001], total delirium after medication duration [mean difference (MD) =-15.50; 95% CI: -25.70 to -5.29; Z=2.98; P=0.003], and ICU hospitalization time (MD =-1.93; 95% CI: -3.57 to -0.29; Z=2.31; P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions (bradycardia and hypotension) in patients who were given an intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (OR =2.85; 95% CI: 0.21 to 38.74; Z=0.79; P=0.43).
DISCUSSION
The incidence of restlessness delirium, the duration of total delirium after medication, and the length of ICU stay in patients treated with a dexmedetomidine intravenous injection were significantly lower than those in patients treated with haloperidol, indicating that a dexmedetomidine intravenous injection had clinical efficacy in ICU patients with hyperactive brain syndrome.
Topics: Brain; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Intensive Care Units; Psychomotor Agitation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35144421
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-3762 -
Journal of Child and Adolescent... Feb 2022Schizophrenia at a young age deserves investigation because of the greater severity and burden of illness on individuals and health care than its adult onset. For this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Schizophrenia at a young age deserves investigation because of the greater severity and burden of illness on individuals and health care than its adult onset. For this study, we included both childhood-onset schizophrenia and early-onset schizophrenia. We used the common term "childhood and adolescent-onset schizophrenia (CAOS)" for either type. This systematic review provides an overview of the clinical use, efficacy, and safety of clozapine treatment in managing CAOS. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open-label studies (OLSs), review articles, meta-analytic and observational studies. Our literature search resulted in 1242 search results. After the title, abstract, and full article review, 18 studies qualified (double-blind RCTs = 4; OLS = 4; observational studies = 7; case reports = 3). Clozapine use in CAOS was generally well tolerated and not associated with any fatalities. Clozapine use in the short term (6 weeks) and long term (2-9 years) was superior in efficacy than other antipsychotics in CAOS management. Improvement in overall symptoms was maintained during long-term follow-up over the years in OLSs. Clozapine appeared to have a favorable clinical response and shorter hospital stays. Sedation and hypersalivation were commonly reported (90%), constipation was next in frequency (13%-50%). Neutropenia was seen in 6%-15% of cases and agranulocytosis (<0.1%). Although weight gain was common (up to 64%), followed by metabolic changes (8%-22%), treatment-onset diabetes was less frequent (<6%). Akathisia, tachycardia, and blood pressure changes were less commonly seen. Limited studies indicate that clozapine is a safe and efficacious option for CAOS management. We need large-scale and well-designed long-term RCTs for the use of clozapine in the management of CAOS.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain
PubMed: 35099269
DOI: 10.1089/cap.2021.0092 -
Revista de Neurologia Feb 2022Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. This symptomatology can appear or be exacerbated with changes in routine...
INTRODUCTION
Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. This symptomatology can appear or be exacerbated with changes in routine and in the patient's usual environment. The lockdown situation during the COVID-19 pandemic has meant a drastic and unexpected change in the daily life of the general population, with a particular impact on the most physically and mentally vulnerable groups, including patients with cognitive impairment.
AIM
To know the impact of lockdown measures imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic on neuropsychiatric symptomatology in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Exploratory systematic review, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, of Pubmed and Psycinfo databases papers published from January 2020 to April 2021 which related confinement due to COVID-19 with the presentation or worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with mild cognitive impairment mild or dementia.
RESULTS
Worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms was observed in patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment, especially agitation/aggression, anxiety, depression and apathy. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were more common in patients with dementia than in those with mild cognitive impairment, although their typology varied depending on the severity of dementia.
CONCLUSIONS
During lockdown a worsening in the psychobehavioral area has been observed in people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Therefore, considerations arise on the need of promoting social contact in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia, avoiding situations of isolation and low stimulation.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aggression; Anxiety; Apathy; Argentina; COVID-19; Cognitive Dysfunction; Dementia; Depression; Europe; Humans; Mental Disorders; Mood Disorders; Neuropsychological Tests; Pandemics; Psychomotor Agitation; Quarantine; Retrospective Studies; SARS-CoV-2; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Social Isolation; United States
PubMed: 35084733
DOI: 10.33588/rn.7403.2021356 -
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2021We aim to systematically review evidence for a relationship between antipsychotic-induced akathisia and suicidal behaviour, in order to guide further clinical decision... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
We aim to systematically review evidence for a relationship between antipsychotic-induced akathisia and suicidal behaviour, in order to guide further clinical decision making in this area.
METHODS
Several electronic databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane and PsychINFO) were systemically searched for articles published up to February 2021, using search terms related to akathisia, antipsychotics and suicidal behaviour. Two reviewers independently evaluated all the relevant studies using predetermined criteria and assessed the risk of bias for each included study. The systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA methodology and reporting.
RESULTS
Following de-duplication, screening and application of exclusion criteria, four eligible studies were identified. All of the available studies were in English and included adult patients. Nevertheless, there was significant variability regarding methodology and overall quality was deemed low due to small sample sizes. There was insufficient data to perform statistical analyses of the results. Of the four studies, two found a weak correlation between antipsychotic-related akathisia and suicidal behaviour, a finding that was not supported by the remaining two studies.
CONCLUSION
The search yielded very few studies for inclusion. On the basis of the existing evidence, akathisia cannot be reliably linked to the presence of suicidal behaviour in patients treated with antipsychotic medication. However, proactive screening for emerging suicidal behaviour in this vulnerable patient group is advisable. Our findings highlight the pressing need for further research in this area.
PubMed: 34887662
DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S337785 -
The American Journal of Emergency... Jan 2022Safe and effective tranquilization of the acutely agitated patient is challenging, and head-to-head comparisons of medications are limited. We aimed to identify the most... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Safe and effective tranquilization of the acutely agitated patient is challenging, and head-to-head comparisons of medications are limited. We aimed to identify the most optimal agent(s) for rapid tranquilization of the severely agitated patient in the emergency department (ED).
METHODS
The protocol for systematic review was registered (PROSPERO; CRD42020212534). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Database/CENTRAL from inception to June 2, 2021. We limited studies to randomized controlled trials that enrolled adult ED patients with severe agitation and compared drugs for rapid tranquilization. Predetermined outcomes were: 1) Adequate sedation within 30 min (effectiveness), 2) Immediate, serious adverse event - cardiac arrest, ventricular tachydysrhythmia, endotracheal intubation, laryngospasm, hypoxemia, hypotension (safety), and 3) Time to adequate sedation (effect onset). We extracted data according to PRISMA-NMA and appraised trials using Cochrane RoB 2 tool. We performed Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method with random-effects model and vague prior distribution to calculate odds ratios with 95% credible intervals for dichotomous outcomes and frequentist NMA to calculate mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for continuous outcomes. We assessed confidence in results using CINeMA. We used surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves to rank agent(s) for each outcome.
RESULTS
Eleven studies provided data for effectiveness (1142 patients) and safety (1147 patients). Data was insufficient for effect onset. The NMA found that ketamine (SUCRA = 93.0%) is most likely to have superior effectiveness; droperidol-midazolam (SUCRA = 78.8%) is most likely to be safest. There are concerns with study quality and imprecision. Quality of the point estimates varied for effectiveness but mostly rated "very low" for safety.
CONCLUSIONS
Available evidence suggests that ketamine and droperidol have intermediate effectiveness for rapid tranquilization of the severely agitated patient in the ED. There is insufficient evidence to definitively determine which agent(s) may be safest or fastest-acting. Further, direct-comparison study of ketamine and droperidol is recommended.
Topics: Adult; Droperidol; Emergence Delirium; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Ketamine; Network Meta-Analysis; Psychomotor Agitation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34823192
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.011 -
PloS One 2021Antipsychotic agents are the basis for the pharmacological management of acute and chronic schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, mood disorders with psychotic feature, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Antipsychotic agents are the basis for the pharmacological management of acute and chronic schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, mood disorders with psychotic feature, and other psychotic disorders. Antipsychotic medication use is frequently associated with unfavorable adverse effects such as extrapyramidal side effects (EPSEs). Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to determine the magnitude of antipsychotic-induced EPSEs.
METHOD
A literature search was conducted using legitimate databases, indexing services, and directories including PubMed/MEDLINE (Ovid®), EMBASE (Ovid®), google scholar and WorldCat to retrieve studies. Following screening and eligibility, the relevant data were extracted from the included studies using an Excel sheet and exported to STATA 15.0 software for analyses. The Random effects pooling model was used to analyze outcome measures at a 95% confidence interval. Besides, publication bias analysis was conducted. The protocol has been registered on PROSPERO with ID: CRD42020175168.
RESULT
In total, 15 original articles were included for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of antipsychotic-induced EPSEs among patient taking antipsychotic medications was 37% (95% CI: 18-55%, before sensitivity) and 31% (95% CI: 19-44%, after sensitivity). The prevalence of antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia was 20% (95% CI: 11-28%), 11% (95% CI: 6-17%), and 7% (95% CI: 4-9%), respectively. To confirm a small-study effect, Egger's regression test accompanied by funnel plot asymmetry demonstrated that there was a sort of publication bias in studies reporting akathisia and tardive dyskinesia.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of antipsychotic-induced EPSEs was considerably high. One in five and more than one in ten patients experienced parkinsonism and akathisia, respectively. Appropriate prevention and early management of these effects can enhance the net benefits of antipsychotics.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Geography; Humans; Movement Disorders; Observational Studies as Topic; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Publication Bias; Tardive Dyskinesia
PubMed: 34506552
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257129